|You are in: Talking Point: African Debates|
Monday, 13 March, 2000, 15:42 GMT
Are South Africa's media racist?
The Human Rights Commission in South Africa has accused two newspapers of being racist.
Does the Commission have a point? Are the media in South Africa still operating in the remains of an apartheid culture? Or is the accusation of racism a convenient way of trying to stifle legitimate critical reporting?
People seem to be leaving that beautiful land in droves, whether their departure is due to black on black crime, coloured on coloured, Indian on Indian, white on white or white on everything else. Basically many entities within the media culture of SA needs to leave in droves. Time for a change, let's have some compassionate deep spirited journalists, not a bunch of angry upstarts who cannot understand change.
Charmain Falode, United Kingdom
Surely rather than having a go at each other (Willem) people should be looking at the wider picture. The commentators have their own views and they are entitled to them, to accuse them of knowing little of the subject is hardly helping the argument.
It is really sad to see so many people view their ideas about how South Africa is/should and was run, when they have never been there!!
I lived there for the most part of my life during both the apartheid era and the non-apartheid era,
having being brought up very liberal with the idea and continuing belief that every one deserves to be
treated as an individual and to be given the respect they deserve no matter what colour they are. That is how most South Africans feel, but it is the ongoing interference
from small minded so-called intelligent people who wont give South Africa the chance to change.
I do think that the ruling ANC party is sometimes over sensitive, but at the same time the South African media must exercise caution and tact because it is only human nature that criticism shall not be taken lightly.
For countries like South Africa, or the USA who have such a hard task of trying to abolish racism and discrimination need to realise that racism is a two-way process! On a trip to the USA I was shocked by some media within the black communities that said 'all whites are evil', or 'white man is the devil'! If it was vice versa it would be considered racist, why doesn't the media in all countries acknowledge this? Maybe this is why racism still continues to be a problem even today!
I found it very interesting reading the 'expert' opinions of everyone that has never even set foot in South Africa. It is clear that very few of the commentators even know what the specific allegations regarding racism in the media are. I suggest that you read the newspaper articles that are so-called 'racist' before forming your ridiculous opinions.
While there are a limited number of black/white radical newspapers, I found the majority of journalists to be very PC (politically correct). Maybe that is the problem...
"How soon we forgot" the way it was. The carnage. The brutality. The deep hated intolerance. The total exclusion. The dehumanization. Shall I continue? South Africa was never a so-called first-world, for your information. The people of South Africa have tasted freedom and are a very educated electorate. Let them decide their fate. For those that enjoyed the oppressive government and fled because of ANC, please shut-up, you are not fit to advise.
It is difficult for a nation that institutionalised Apartheid to change and demonstrate racial equality. This process will take years, even decades. It is unreasonable to expect South Africa's 37.4 million people to just forget the likes of F. W. De-Clerk
Racism shall never be eliminated. It is a war of fear and man must try to reduce it because everywhere we look it is there especially in the west or rich white neighbourhoods world wide. Blacks should stop complaining while giving mediocre service to their people, some of it is just inferiority complex. I have never met a black who does not feel inferior because of his colour consciously or unconsciously.
I have not yet come across an African government which does not demand a slavish press. And quite frankly, I would consider almost all of the South African press to be extremely slavish. African governments have always gone out of their way to eliminate any form of criticism. They do not cherish the idea that criticism (whether justified or not) is the basis of democracy.
James Mcintosh, South Africa
I'm white and I finally think I'm beginning to understand how the Jews felt in Germany before the war.
There is an " International white media conspiracy" and "subliminal" racism against blacks in the (white controlled) media. The press is owned by the "rich whites who have never been near a township".
The commission against (white) racism is so racist it's scary.
Why can't these very brothers and sisters accept us in their midst come what may! LOOK let's say the truth that the maltreatment the other Africans face in South Africa is worse than what they come across in any other country! The shame is that that xenophobic attitude in most cases is from the fellow black South African brothers! Why?! Why?!
Russian, Italian and Japanese immigrants or residents are not stigmatised on account of the Russian, Italian or Japanese Mafia but West African immigrants especially Nigerians and Senegalese are almost universally portrayed by the white-owned papers as criminals one and all; no mention is ever made of the thousands of law abiding, hard working Nigerian professionals and business people who are contributing to South Africa's economic progress.
Ndubisi Obiorah, Nigeria
Changing the stove dose not make the food tasty.
It seems strange that a black only organisation can complain about racism in the press, I wonder what they would have to say about a white only organisation?
The present generation is now more tolerant and less racist than the older conservatives. Therefore it will take a long time before white South Africans begin to accept black people after what they were initially taught by apartheid. You still experience racism in Zimbabwe 20 years after independence.
Denver Mahara, Zimbabwean (UK)
Why should blacks everywhere continue to think that the white man will change his/her attitude towards our skin? It is up to us to assert our rightful place in spite of history. It is a matter for insightful and purposeful leadership, one that will stop to be intimidated.
Warwick Anderson, Sweden
One suspects that the media in South Africa
is less biased in their reporting than in the
heyday of apartheid. The business press is especially
objective in covering economic news on the
continent of Africa. The best way to counter racist press is to start one's
own media. African countries need more private media outlets. Government-controlled media is anachronistic in today's world.
Considering that most of the ANC high command are also members of the SA Communist Party it is no surprise that they would try to suppress freedom of the press when it speaks out against the crime and government corruption rife within the country.
The South African press is possibly the most democratic in Africa. It is also an important source of African news that is often not available in other African countries because of intimidation of the press. The vast majority of South Africans are "non-white" and surely will not support "racist" media. Let the market decide. It would appear that the Human Rights Commission is merely pandering to populist sentiment in targeting the "liberal" media that is highlighting the shortcomings of the administration. It just so happens that this administration is largely "non-white". In the South African context, probably in the whole African context, criticism of government = criticism of "non-whites".
If the South African
government doesn't like
what its press writes,
the best response is
to demonstrate that
it can improve life for
all South Africans.
Alan A., UK (Ex SA)
It is a dream for anyone to think that just because
the government changed hands that the hearts of the
white people changed with it. You cannot miss the constant
theme to trivialise everything to do with African people.
Mind you, the BBC is just as racist.
The one universal of Southern African politics - when politicians cry patriotism and especially racism, what they really mean is "how dare the press expose our mismanagement and gutting of a country? How dare these people expect transparency and good government? Because we are black, this gives us every right to screw our countrymen out of their future." Africa deserves better than this kind of thinking, but it won't get it with a muzzled, politically correct and blind press to guard against the depravities of the rulers.
Apartheid was rooted in all government and white owned institutions including the media. Unfortunately the change of government has not reversed it. My belief is that it takes a long time to change people's attitude. On the other hand the government should not try to avoid criticism by hiding behind apartheid's legacy. Many African countries ruin democracy by stopping the media to do its work. The media should be there, free to report, no matter what the government feels about it. Let the people themselves judge it.
It is impossible for members of the news media
to not form their own opinions. And, some of those
opinions are going to be a diverse as those of others.
That is one reason why it seems impossible to expect
the media to match up to the expectations of anybody.
I found most newspapers which I read to be fairly impartial.
Margaret Carre, Belgium
If you close people out of education, jobs and freedom of opinion, not to talk about voting rights, based on what colour or tribe this happens to be then the racism is not acceptable. Freedom of discussion is by no means racism or a threat to human rights. Democracy starts by the freedom of expression and this freedom may contain elements that not everybody like.
Mikko Toivonen, Finland
The race card is a great excuse for all your problems.
Jim Kirk, USA
I think South Africa still continues apartheid in general. I have
talked to some sales men from South Africa while I was working in
Botswana. I can not forget their impoliteness still now.
Apartheid has still existed in their society where their media is
Japanese student, UK
Some South African media is racist but The Mail And Guardian? That's ridiculous? Aside from employing more black journalists, training black journalists, its history involved fighting the apartheid system whilst much media supported it or tried to be 'impartial'. However, it's no government stooge and has also exposed much of the corruption, racism and electorally difficult issues in the current government. And for those actions, it has been deemed to be racist. Madness.
Rich Johnston, England
It takes a long time for racism and prejudice to die.
South Africans have not got the press they deserve.
Mark Harrison, Canada
|E-mail this story to a friend|
Links to more African Debates stories
To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> | To BBC World Service>>
© MMIII | News Sources | Privacy