Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Talking Point
Front Page 
UK Politics 
Talking Point 
In Depth 

Friday, 3 November, 2000, 10:24 GMT
BSE: Have we learnt our lesson?

The long-awaited report into the BSE crisis has criticised the then Tory Government's handling of the affair. But it adds that there was no deliberate attempt to mislead the public.

Lord Phillips' 16-volume report follows a 27m inquiry lasting two-and-a-half years. It says the way the public was informed about the risk of the disease was "flawed".

The Conservatives have apologised to the victims of vCJD, the human form of BSE. A national fund will now be set up to help the families of victims.

Are you convinced we've learnt our lesson from this tragic incident? Do you trust politicians and civil servants with issues of public health? Could this sort of crisis happen again?

This debate is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below.

Your reaction

Although the Government was appallingly irresponsible in its denial of the hazards of BSE, I feel that the most ignorant group involved were and are the consumers themselves. It was selfishness and abject greed that caused people to demand their chunk of meat, when they could always have chosen another product from the many available, or better still, not eaten meat at all.
Tom Read, UK

I think the best future safeguard of public health is education. If ordinary people know enough about biology, chemistry and physics, then they are able to make intelligent decisions based not on the lies of Government. ministers and politicians but on their own personal understanding. What this BSE debacle has shown is that official edicts on what is safe or not safe are totally meaningless and that as always the end result will be an early meeting with the grim reaper for tens of thousands of dumb suckers (the people).
Gerry, UK

Let's have a little less hard-nosed investigative journalism and greater encouragement of honesty and decency

Patrick Melling, UK
The truth can be difficult and expensive - to establish in a post-autocratic society, but it's well worth it. At least for 27m pounds the painstaking BSE enquiry has given us a good insight into the mindset of those who followed the Thatcherite doctrine either by choice or by coercion. But then, if all we do is criticise and knock politicians and the Civil Service instead of valuing their heavy responsibilities, then I suppose we should expect to be led by people slippery enough to climb such a greasy pole. Let's have a little less hard-nosed investigative journalism and greater encouragement of honesty and decency.
Patrick Melling, UK

I think it is highly likely that nvCJD will become to the UK what AIDS is to the African Subcontinent.
Phil Hampton, UK

Having read the reports I am sadly of the opinion that the British government is burying its head in the sand and failing to acknowledge its full culpability. There is a long way to go before the freedom of information act is seen to be being complied with fully. I think British subjects now and in the future should continue to hold the government's feet to the fire and continue to demand the highest levels of personal culpability from individual MPs.
D. Cutting, U.S.A.

Having read some of the comments like "We are paying high taxes to support the already rich farmers" and "Getting second class food" I feel it does go to show how far removed some consumers are from real life. There are very few rich farmers especially in the beef producing areas. The taxes help to keep British farmers in business. If we can spend millions on a Greenwich fiasco we can at least afford to keep on of Britains most important industries on its feet. I have seen the controls imposed on British beef and I know the same controls do not exist elsewhere in the world. The French government has admitted that some BSE infected meat entered the food chain, where is the blanket ban on French beef?
Michael Smith , UK

We know politicians are inclined to be economical with the truth. However, science is the quest for truth. So scientists are supposed to concerned with truth aren't they? Pity then that so many scientists let themselves into the "don't rock the boat camp" thereby allowing the truth to go unheard for years in the case of BSE and other issues.
Robin Pearce, UK

Why weren't the feed merchants sued?

Name Here
In France the supermarket Carrefour is about to sue the supplier of the defective meat. Why weren't the feed merchants who originally supplied defective feed to the farmers in the UK sued?
Sylvia, England

I can't help but think that this whole issue is still not understood by scientists at all. After years of research and no doubt significant amounts of money spent they still only "think" there is a link ! You can't blame the government for reacting the way they did based on such weak science. Even today, the evidence of a major problem is not borne out given the extremely low number of vCJD victims who could, for all we know, simply be the unfortunate victims of another new disease, something that is nothing new. I still don't understand why such paranoia was never aimed at the lamb industry which has been dealing with scrapie for a long time. According to the "scientists" this is one and the same as BSE in cattle but for some reason doesn't seem to be considered a threat. At the end of it all, one has to wonder if it isn't simply the media hype that has made BSE what it is today, and nothing more!
Al H, Germany

The simple fact of the matter is that cows should eat grass not themselves

Paul Clements, UK
The simple fact of the matter is that cows should eat grass not themselves and chickens should eat grain, not their own excrement and if that means that the cost of meat is higher, so be it. Most of us would probably live longer, healthier lives if we ate less meat in the Western world and more fruit and vegetables. I suspect, partly the farmers and mostly the supermarkets who no doubt put pressure on suppliers to keep prices low.
Paul Clements, UK

Reading the comments it does not seem to me as if there was any lesson even being acknowledged as such. The question is not whether the French or other European countries made a worse mistake than the English government did. Too many people are missing the point here. Fact is that consumers weren't informed about possible dangers. Instead they were made believe that national products were safe and that eating British beef is a matter of national pride. And why did this work?
Caroline, Germany

I always thought that cows ate grass or at least grass/vegetable derived processed food, but it seems not, so there's a lesson for you! It just goes to show how much these poor beef farmers cared about their cattle, doesn't it? Feeding their cows something without a label on it! I wouldn't do that to a rabid dog, let alone an animal for human consumption. And it's no good protesting that they had no choice in order to stay in business; if you can't do the job properly at the right price then the business just isn't viable. Millions of ship builders, steel workers, coal miners and people in other traditional industries have had to learn that lesson the hard way. So why shouldn't the farmers? Oh, I forgot, they're not urban working class and tend to vote Tory! Another lesson there then.
Steve, UK

Is the government's current involvement in searching for a cure sufficient?

Winnie Morris, UK
The compensation for affected victims has been rightly set aside now but the next question is: Is the government's current involvement in searching for a cure sufficient? If the government does not have the expertise and man-power to search for a new drug to combat vCJD before it becomes an epidemic, they should look into measures such as subsidies or tax incentives to aid R&D in pharmaceutical companies. If there's cure or major progress towards a cure for various forms of cancer and AIDS, surely with modern science and technology, it's just a matter of time and effort before a cure can be found for vCJD.
Winnie Morris, UK

BSE is a typical symptom of global capitalism

Peter Cameron, UK
BSE is a typical symptom of global capitalism. We'll see more and more instances of profits put before safety, and companies' wishes put before state laws and democracy, unless people wake up and act. Capitalism doesn't lead to more choices. Ultimately, it leads to huge private multinational monopolies absorbing anyone in their path. The farmers were fighting a losing battle against the monolithic supermarkets and their shareholders, although I don't condone them turning herbivores into cannibals, which is appalling.
Peter Cameron, UK

The 'trust us we know what's safe for you' attitude to GM food, demonstrates that no lesson has been learnt.
Ran Fuchs, UK

I worked on a farm where 4 cows developed BSE. I feel some of the blame should be directed to the animal feed industry who, in a effort to cut costs and increase profits, used rendered meat and bone meal in cattle food. Farmers brought these products in good faith to supplement the cattle's diet during the period when grass does not contain a lot of nutrients, i.e. winter .
James, UK

According to the report, MAFF deliberately prevented their own scientists from publishing results in open scientific literature. The free flow of information is one of the cornerstones of science. If you prevent this you undermine one of science's greatest strengths. Keep politics out of science.
Mark, UK

Politicians are arts graduates. God only knows what they think BSE is. They lack the basic ability to understand causal relationships or statistics. They confuse "lack of evidence" with "evidence of lack". Any new piece of scientific information is invariably ambiguous and there will be genuinely held beliefs on both sides. If you have a degree in history or languages, a minister lacks the ability to work out which viewpoint is most credible.
Domini Connor, UK

In England we pay higher taxes and food prices to support already rich farmers and in return we get second-class food

John Ley, England
In England we pay higher taxes and food prices to support already rich farmers and in return we get second-class food. The lesson of BSE is surely that we should abolish subsides to farmers and demand world-class food at world-class prices. British farming is a failing industry - it should be allowed to fail - let's have free and fair competition in farming!
John Ley, England

I remember people saying that BSE could infect humans long before any ban came in - and the state contradicting them. There is no reason for them to say they did not know and they should be punished.
Jamie, UK

You ask the question, "BSE: Have we learnt our lesson"? After hearing that the Food Standards Agency have in the last few days lifted the ban on offal from calves entering the food chain, the answer must be no. Again we see the culture of secrecy and vested interest that the Philips report highlighted, to the fore. This Labour Government like the last Tory one have lost credibility on this issue. As for the FSA they should be ashamed of themselves as no-one will now believe they put the interests of the public first!
Mac, Scotland

The lesson to be learnt is that Mankind has only just scratched the surface of science

Chris, England
Having read all the comments above, I still don't think we are any nearer knowing what caused BSE to develop in British Cattle. If we don't know what really started it, how can we blame anyone for covering it up. I think the lesson to be learnt is that Mankind has only just scratched the surface of science, and we can't expect our leaders and scientists to be superhuman and know everything.
Chris, England

It misses to mark to say it was simple greed, which produced BSE. It was all but inevitable in a free-trade environment which drives out anyone who doesn't use the most efficient means of production. It's a viscous cycle, and only the abolition of this free-trade madness, combined with sensible national laws, can bring it to an end.
Tom, USA

Perhaps the government of the day decided the responsible decision would be to avoid hysteria and panic. As other correspondents have already pointed out, 90 odd deaths in 15 years is hardly an epidemic. Britain acknowledged its mistakes well before other nations, such as France did.
Ed Bayley, USA (English)

No, they haven't learned their lesson. They are doing it all over again with GM Crop testing

Elizabeth Coldwell, UK
No, they haven't learned their lesson for it is the Government and not "we". They are doing it all over again with GM Crop testing.
Elizabeth Coldwell, UK

I am amazed that this report has cost 27m. I if I found out I had CJD, I would want the state to grant me the right to die with my dignity and humanity, and would rather see millions of pounds spent on saving other people from my fate.
Graham, UK

Ministers and paid government academics ought to be held responsible for they have given a death sentence to countless children and adults

Steve Kidson, South Australia
Maggie Thatcher and the Conservative government were instrumental in a cover-up. They placed profit before safety. This was a criminal act and ministers and paid government academics ought to be held responsible for they have given a death sentence to countless children and adults. I am sure this is just the tip of the iceberg. I was in the Uk at the time and I worry about my daughter's health as beef extract is known to have been in baby food and ice cream. This will be an epidemic of suffering for thousands. People need to be accountable for the propaganda many officials knowingly presented to the British public.
Steve Kidson, South Australia

Sadly I reckon these disasters will happen time after time. I did not and do not place a lot of trust in politicians or civil servants, I place even less trust in big business. The lessons that need to be learned may be difficult to communicate to some who are usually or often classified by themselves and others as "experts". This title could, or may infer that they already know a great deal more than your average Joe, whom it may be said often as "common sense". If a similar set of events leading to disaster occurred only at blue collar level, then all concerned would be dealt with most severely, I think the people who keep saying that they get paid highly because they carry big responsibilities all to often fail to be responsible.
Robert, UK

But hasn't anyone noticed that 27,000,000 of the money we all pay as taxpayers has been used to produce this report, whereby nothing will come of it other than a few embarrassed ex ministers and civil servants who will get nothing more than a media bloodied nose, and then carry on regardless, as they tend to do. That's 27m to tell us that "Yes, they got it wrong". And only allowed to be said years after the fact, whereby the original opinions of the "experts" of the time are now seen as nonsense. With will and interest, most details in this "report" could have been achieved with common sense and the ability to read.
Derek Northcote, Scotland. UK

The media have blown this out of all proportion and created a scare story to sell papers and make money

G Harris, UK
74 people have died of vCJD, over something like 10 years, you have far better chances of winning the lottery jackpot than dying of vCJD. It also needs to be stressed that a link between vCJD and BSE is unproven, but the media portrays it as gospel truth. The media have blown this out of all proportion and created a scare story to sell papers and make money. Having said that the old Tory government and civil service should have erred on the side of caution. Now the beef industry, food technology industry (through loss of public image) and probably vCJD sufferers and their families are paying the price of short term greed. It seems to me that the civil service needs to be more open, i.e. scientific advice given should be made publicly available as should the reasons why specific important decisions were made.
G Harris, UK

What surprises me about the CJD crisis is that anyone is surprised any more. Greed caused the situation, along with a tradition of Whitehall secrecy that shows no signs of being tackled, despite the promises. Whether the actions of those concerned was complacency or criminal neglect doesn't bother me so much as their amazing capacity for self-justification. How on Earth do such people sleep at nights? And what of the people who started it all - the farmers? The only pressure that compelled them to turn livestock into cannibals was the pressure of greed - and now they whine as public trust in their industry (for industry it is) reaches an all-time low. Let's face it - this country has degenerated into a virtual banana republic, where there is no bottom line so long as you have enough money to grease ministerial palms.
John Luby, Scotland

Learned a lesson?? Of course not. The same situation could easily happen again. The public has already been warned of the possibility, albeit small, of the development of brain tumours due to mobile phone usage, especially in children. Has this been taken on board by government? Of course not. Look how much money they got from selling off telecommunications licences. There was some vague suggestion that parents should perhaps limit mobile phone use by their children, and that was it. Responsibility over. It will take several individuals to die from brain cancer before anymore is said on the subject. Those vocal in this area are ignored and now the story has been forgotten by the majority of the public. Only when there has actually been a disaster do those in power say that there was a crisis.
NM, Scotland

Everyone seems out to blame the politicians, but surely the farmers are the guys who poisoned us in the first place

Alex White, UK
Everyone seems out to blame the politicians, but surely the farmers are the guys who poisoned us in the first place. What we have seen is that we quite simply cannot trust the farming community, and that the government of the time has let us all down. It seems that, again, greed has come before safety. We can even see it on our railways. A series of fatal blunders by government and the farming community, and still no-one is being held accountable. In a private company the manager is in the end responsible for all his/her staff, apply the same to MAFF and the Department of Health, or even the previous government. We cannot let this happen again (especially on the Continent).
Alex White, UK

Two missing pieces of the puzzle:
1. Feeding animal remains to animals is an ancient and thoroughly 'organic' farming practice. Throughout history table scraps have been fed to animals and cattle have happily nibbled, for salt and proteins, at anything that died in their field. Why did this problem not arise thousands of years ago?
2. If large scale animal recycling is the problem then why did BSE break out here and not in the US where such practices have been going on longer and on a wider scale?
Can any of the 'experts' on this group answer these questions?
Essada, UK

S. McDonagh says "thank goodness for the EU who put their people first". Has she not heard just how many cases of BSE are now appearing in France? Belgium and Holland also have the problem, and probably the rest of the EU too. The only difference between them and us is that we acknowledged the problem many years ago and started to clean up our act instead of hiding everything under the carpet like other EU countries!
J. Bennett, U.K.

We need to be more educated consumers

Iain, UK
It was as a result of the BSE problems that I started to really look at how we mass produce our food in the UK (and the West). I now rarely eat meat both for health and cruelty reasons. If we demand increasingly cheap meat and other produce, we are, I fear, doomed to see more and more problems such as this starting to appear as farmers strive to cut costs to make a living. We need to be more educated consumers.
Iain, UK

No one mentions the human growth hormone victims who died of CJD. Could the spontaneous emergence now talked about in cows be the consequence of illegal administration of bovine growth hormone to speed development? Has this possibility been investigated?
Sue Mathews, UK

I just can't believe the BSE crisis was allowed to become a crisis at all. How can we ever trust this country again?
Ali, UK

I feel that much of the current crisis is because public safety has taken a back seat to the profits of farmers and the food industry. Even today, many governments are in a state of denial - Switzerland, France, Germany, etc. Perhaps an expensive compensation package will teach the British government if not other governments that dishonesty is actually more expensive in the long run. I was living in the UK in the late 80s and heard all the reassurances (now found out to be lies) that BSE didn't affect dairy cows (wrong), that it was ok to eat beef as long as it was well done (wrong), that BSE couldn't affect a human (wrong), etc. What I want to know is why beefbone meal is still allowed to contaminate the soil and possibly fruits and vegetables.
Jerry Smith, United States

When vCJD has eventually vanished as a disease, I think the environmental damage caused by the collapse of UK farming will still be apparent

John Curran, UK
I wonder how many of your 'farmers are murderers' correspondents realise that animal feed looks very much like Go-Cat - small, dry, pellets that arrive in bags or bulk. Until the rules changed in the 90s, the only thing one knew about the feed was its protein/carbohydrate/ash mix. Personally, I feel about as culpable for BSE as I would if I'd fed my cats dried cat food and they'd developed feline BSE. We didn't spend the 80's going round fields sweeping up dead sheep and chopping them up for cow food, as some of your writers seem to believe. As for 'losing their Range Rovers and second homes' - well, you must know some much richer farmers than I do. Usually it means farms can only be sold for development which means housing - with no fields, no hedgerows, no wildlife, no birds, no streams and more roads. When vCJD has eventually vanished as a disease, I think the environmental damage caused by the collapse of UK farming will still be apparent.
John Curran, UK

One major issue that needs to be addressed is why scientists who worked for MAFF are still working under the official secrecy act and have been threatened with legal action by the department if they reveal scientific results that could be embarrassing or critical of government policy. Scientific work undertaken by MAFF especially those concerning BSE should be published openly for all members of the scientific community and the public at large to understand and not be subject to censorship. Likewise relevant scientific discussion that occurs in all committees that make decisions on the safety of food, drugs and animal husbandry should be made open to the public.
Mark, UK

Why are beef farmers being compensated instead of prosecuted?

Khan, UK
Why aren't the farmers, who caused this crisis being made liable alongside the lying politicians who sought to protect famers' interests at any cost? Why are beef farmers being compensated instead of prosecuted?
Khan, UK

Researchers suggest that more people die of eating beef and other meat than from cigarette smoking. It's about time we taxed foods that are bad for us and subsidised those that are good. How else are we to stop kids eating more sweets than fruit? How else can we get the poorest families to eat a plant-centric diet, which is what many authorities suggest? It's time we saw meat (and dairy) as add-ons to our diet and not as being central to it. But of course, governments act too little, too late, and we saw that in the BSE crisis.
T. Thargson, UK

It's the same the world over:
Big business lies
Government lies
Bureaucrats lie
It's all about money and human life is a minor factor in the equation.
Don Johnson, Canada

Time after time we hear the politicians "rubbish" scientists. How on earth can they know better?
Carmel Reynolds, UK

Responsible scientists such as Professor Richard Lacey have warned throughout that the BSE precautions were probably inadequate and ineffectively applied. Ministers must have known that "no evidence of risk" is not the same as "evidence of no risk", and should err on the side of safety, not on that of business. We now know that subclinically infected animals are infective (obviously) but we still allow young animals, some of which are certainly subclinically infected, on the food market.
Tom Heyes, UK

What goes around comes around? What a pity farmers are having to sell their Land Rovers and 2nd homes in the current climate. Talk all you like about government, the greed and "world owes us a living" attitude of farmers started all of this.
A. Vegan, UK

How many other countries would feed their own people infected meat?

S. McDonagh, Canada
One's heart goes out to the victims and their families who have shown great dignity and tolerance. What is very disturbing is that it was obvious that at the time that nobody knew, and still don't know, how dangerous CJD was and is.
Yet government ministers still insisted beef was OK therefor putting an industry ahead of its own people's safety. How despicable and callous. Thank God for the EU who put people first. How many other countries would feed their own people infected meat?
S. McDonagh, Canada

Will GM issues be the same as CJD? What has happened about the idea of making a transfusion blood substitute with animals?
Vanya Orr, Britain

There was a time when most people believed that we could trust the farmers with our food

M Baldwin, UK
Apologies (only when they had no choice at that) are not good enough. There should be prosecutions for criminal negligence at the very least. When Ministers gamble with the lives of an entire population to protect the profits of an industry they should be held to account, as it is, they only have to say sorry and they are off the hook.
Interestingly there has not been any apology (to my knowledge anyway) from the beef industry and the farmers. There was a time when most people believed that we could trust the farmers with our food. They knew the land, they understood the animals.
Why is it then, that so many town dwellers like myself had an instinctive feeling that feeding brains and other offal to cows was messing with nature and a 'recipe for disaster'. Why couldn't the farmers see this?
M Baldwin, UK

Thank God for a media that pursues these kind of issues. Without it we would be totally at the mercy of Ministers and their bureaucrats. The CJD scandal, like the arms to Iraq affair and now the genetically modified foods fiasco show the contempt that governments of both persuasions hold the people of this country. Giving compensation is right and holding those responsible (and punishing them) is necessary.
At least William Hague has apologised. Now let us see Tony Blair take the concerns about GM foods to heart. Maybe the BBC would like to lead the way in publicising (and continuing to publicise) the similarities in government attitudes to both CJD and GM.
Paul Locke, England

Doubtless those most guilty will get off scot free, pension intact

John S. Elrick, UK
One thing's for sure, whatever lesson is learned, the guilty will not be punished or held to account for their misdeeds. The Conservative party should follow up their apology with a substantial contribution to the trust fund for CJD victims. In addition, any Civil servant implicated in these misdeeds needs to be dealt with in the appropriate way. Doubtless those most guilty will get off scot free, pension intact. Also, Gummer and Clarke should have any revenue from memoirs sequestered and placed at the disposal of CJD victims. Some hope.
John S. Elrick, UK

It's strange that we should be so concerned with the fate of people dying as a result of eating BSE infected material whilst doing so little, over decades, to prevent the premature death of hundreds of thousands every year from the diseases caused directly by smoking and by drinking alcohol.
I have overwhelming sympathy for the CJD victims and their families but cannot reach any understanding of the government policy that values the money raised from taxing the drugs consumed by addicted citizens (smoking and drinking) above the health of those citizens and their children: that is the real scandal of the last 40 years.
John Brownlee, England

It's interesting to see who lines up with who. The Conservative government lined up with the farming/food lobby in a desperate struggle to salvage the industry, after it had already made, what turned out to be foolish, money saving concessions on food production. And who steps in to defend the interests of the consumer (i.e. the British citizen), not the farmers, not the government; but the supposedly despicable European Union.
It's illustrative of the fact that those bodies who would like to prevent the European Union having more say in British life are actually only interested in maintaining control of their vested interests and not looking after the wellbeing of the people that actually live in this country.
Iain Macintosh, UK

Australia now has lower stocks of blood for transfusion

Tom, Australia
The way BSE was dealt with is a national disgrace and has on-going consequences for the world. Australia now has lower stocks of blood for transfusion. Anyone who has spent more than six months in Britain since 1980 is barred from donating blood. I do not wish to deflect blame from the then Conservative government, but where were the opposition and what were they doing?
Tom, Australia

Whilst always reluctant to allow politicians off the hook, it seems to me that a sense of proportion is needed here. According to recent figures, new CJD has accounted for eighty-five deaths since 1985. Although tragic for those personally involved, it can hardly be called an epidemic.
I suspect that there are other diseases regarded as very rare in the UK that account for more deaths per year. Yet, based upon these very few deaths we have decimated an industry and reduced farming to its present, parlous state. Perhaps the politicians were right, for once?
Tony Hague, England

When an audit is carried out it will find a glaring situation of cannibalism which is tolerated by both the British establishment and the EEC alike

Terry de Winne, Northern Ireland
With the current furore over the recycling of animal proteins for animal feeds, when an audit is carried out it will find a glaring situation of cannibalism which is tolerated by both the British establishment and the EEC alike.
The used oil from restaurants and fast food outlets, as well as from meat cooking plants, is collected and heat treated. At least, this is the theory - it is not always done. It is then added to animal feeds as a high protein additives. BSE is a protein. Therefore, if any of the meat that has been cooked in the oil is contaminated by BSE, it is then re-introduced into the human food chain for a second time.
Terry de Winne, Northern Ireland

Now we know so called respected and trusted politicians can and will lie to cover up the truth, how can we truly trust claims on issues such as MMR vaccination links to autism when one sees so many parents who know how their individual children have been affected. How we can we ever believe the official responses are based on fact and not deceit - from any politician.
Rob Covell, UK

It is the political masters that have the full responsibility and not Civil Servants

Andrew Baker, England
Can we not deduce from the reports findings, or at least the outline that is known at this stage, that the Civil Servants have been allotted culpability and blame without there having been a recognition of:
1. That there was a culture engendered by the then Tory administration of a Civil Service that was cowered by its political masters.
2. The Civil Service was not allowed to be independent due to political nominees and postings at very high levels.
3.The Civil Service with tight budgetary controls was not encouraged to take a long term view, or allot a wider analysis.
4. Civil Servants within the 'Ministry of Ag and Fish' would have known the then government's loyalties to the farming industry and would have cowered to the expected conclusions that would have been expected of them.
All the points above were the responsibility of the then Tory administration. It is the political masters that have the full responsibility and not Civil Servants.
Andrew Baker, England

I somehow doubt any lesson was learned of the BSE case. Not in UK, not anywhere else. This is because the driving force behind the whole thing was pure greed; nothing else.
The civil servants can never be trusted fully as in all countries they are more likely to listen to the large companies or bigger players than to small enterprises, not to mention individuals. It means that if a large corporation invents a way to boost income and it requires civil servant based approval, they are likely to get it. Especially because the large companies can always buy scientists and lawyers to present their case favourably and unfortunately those are listened to again rather than independent or individual scientists. Complete governments make often themselves guilty for this behaviour.
The only way to combat this is to have a legislation that allows only absolutely known foodstuffs, traditional and natural feeding methods and materials.
Mikko Toivonen, Finland

Regulatory standards are (if they exist in a suitable form) applied to an entire industry regardless of size of a particular supplier or market segment. This means that the producer a single e.g. meat pie must conform to the same standards as the manufacturer of cattle feed for the entire UK herd. I believe that standards should not be relaxed for small suppliers, but should be strengthened by an order of magnitude for suppliers who can affect the health of an entire nation.

I doubt we have learnt any lessons. The same old story of people being led down the garden path being told all is safe. Still, at least we are not like the hypocritical French whose cattle is infected far worse than ours are.

How dare they have gambled with our security, peace of mind and futures in such a reckless manner

Meral Nugent, UK
The government of the day put profit and the livelihood of the farming industry before the health and safety of the nation. I have a young daughter aged three and am desperately worried about the future. I ate beef, particularly beef burgers all those years ago, naively believing in the Government's insistence.
Maybe I should have been more circumspect but I wasn't. Now I live with the fear, not for myself only, but for my child as well. How dare they have gambled with our security, peace of mind and futures in such a reckless manner.
As to the response that they acted with the knowledge they had available at the time, then how come the Irish Republic took every step to prevent a health catastrophe by culling herds with BSE and making sure it stayed out of the food chain. As to the two Irish people already diagnosed with CJD, they lived in the UK at the time of the BSE fiasco. I will never believe anything a government minister or scientist says about health matters, especially if they have a vested interest.
Meral Nugent, UK

The time has come for a complete clearout, if not the disbanding of the most disingenuous government department... MAFF. These are the same people who faced with indisputable evidence regarding the farce of the animal quarantine laws, conned the EU and the government into introducing the watered down Passports for Pets, and hailed it as a great step forward.
They even managed to get the useless but highly lucrative tests for parasites attached to the new entry requirements. The only parasites are the vested interests and incompetent corrupt officials in MAFF. Surely the government can see how the MAFF has mislead them in this and the BSE scandal? No doubt they will be as unwilling as their Tory predecessors to admit they were wrong and the guilty will be rewarded with honourable retirements, golden handshakes or promotions.
Dave Walsh, USA

Making people responsible, and willing to take the consequences of their actions, is as proper as compensation for the sick and bereaved

Christopher Briggs, Norway
It seems ever more likely that the safety of the people, that ought properly to be the first concern of government, has been secondary to financial expediency. Worse still certain ministers have by their own admission gambled with our health and wellbeing.
If you talk about risks in everything, and all adults have to take them, this is fine if you are speaking about your own life; where you take risks with other people's lives - and worse still a whole nation - then you must be made responsible if your gamble goes wrong.
So far only a few are dead of this horrendous CJD variant. If this "adult risk" as someone put it ultimately leads to more, and it can be proven likely that negligence and delay on the part of those who took it are responsible, then prosecutions and jail sentences should follow.
Nothing will bring back the dead, or help those with CJD or those who ultimately develop the disease; yet making people responsible, and willing to take the consequences of their actions, is I feel as meet and proper as is compensation for the sick and bereaved.
Christopher Briggs, Norway

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console






Links to other Talking Point stories