| You are in: Talking Point | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, 4 July, 2000, 10:43 GMT 11:43 UK
Genome: Will it deliver?
![]() Researchers in the US, the UK, and several other countries, have published the first draft of all the genetic material that makes us human. The Human Genome Project could eventually help scientists prevent a host of genetic diseases.
Disclaimer: The BBC will put up as many of your comments as possible but we cannot guarantee that all e-mails will be published. The BBC reserves the right to edit comments that are published.But UK geneticist Professor Steve Jones says that while it could help tremendously in the early diagnosis of diseases like inherited cancer, there is a big step between diagnosis and treatment. Professor Jones says it is worth remembering that the anatomy of the heart was worked out in 1543, but the first heart transplant was not performed until 1967. Are scientists too quick to promise us miracle cures? Can they deliver what they say or is Monday's announcement all hype? Do you think it will be decades before we start reaping the benefits of this latest breakthrough?
Click here to see our multimedia programme: Decoding Humanity: Who will really benefit?
I think that the human genome map is a great advance in medical science, but it is not without its risks.
What really worries me, however, is the other uses this technology could be put to. If people could choose the characteristics of their children, for instance, the world could end up with "designer people" perfect in every way and a lower class of citizens who are outcasts because of their genes. This would be a great step backwards for a society trying to achieve equality.
Matt Prescott, UK
Efforts spent on the Human Genome Project only shows that man is decided to unravel the mystery underlying life. With the mapping of the human genome, this can give us hope that one day...inborn errors of metabolism will be minimized if not prevented. But as they say don't expect too much yet. We only have the information but there is no concrete process on how to utilize such codes. Eventually man will soon maximize its use. Let's cross our fingers that this discovery will help more people in curing and preventing diseases. Think of the generations to come.
I would like to bet that whilst men may be a cinch,1000-1 says they won't figure out women.
Paul Tyce, UK
Millions of people die every year from preventable or curable diseases because the rich have no interest in helping them. This research already looks set to deliver most of its benefits to the overprivileged, but perhaps in future we can engineer some genuine compassion into our makeup.
Margaret, USA
Once again our generation has managed to create an awful lot of hype over something that although an important breakthrough in science and medicine, is still in its very early stages and probably won't be of much benefit to the general public for some time.
Most of us probably won't see these cures to genetic illnesses in our lifetime.
Louis Kabbani, UK
Universities and other charities are always quick to promise benefits as they desperately need the funding that such publicity brings. The reality is that any new drugs arising from these discoveries are a good fifteen to twenty years off at the moment.
We may not see the benefits, but our children might. A cure or treatment for cancer might be a fitting apology to future generations, considering the state of the environment that we'll be leaving them.
As a journalist in a developing country, I hope the benefits of the Genome research are shared and not used as a means of further enslavement of the poor. Like the Internet, the benefits of this research should be available to all. A major challenge for serious journalists is how to cut through the hype and try to marry their communication skills to that of the scientists so that the public may get accurate and not necessarily sensational information.
Dave, Canada Let us not be hasty in promoting so much hope and anticipation among people about what the genome project can deliver because so far the project is useful to identify the gene that is pertinent to a particular genetic disease. To treat that disease is a different proposition in the sense that that particular gene remedial drug has to be invented.
Dave Adams, USA I cannot think of the progression made on the field of genetics as a bad thing simply because it is would not be'nature's way'. The welfare state is all but natural and we all consider that as a good thing. I expect a lot of good from the new discoveries, but there is one fear: won't insight in the human code widen the gap between rich and poor? If skills and traits can be simply bought, won't the poorer people in the world lose chances? It is a strange world indeed where beauty and intelligence are only for the rich, and I can't help but fear that is the world we are heading towards.
Never before in our history of science have we met such a great discovery with such fear. There could be endless cures for many genetic defects and illnesses. Are we now at a point where we believe that we no longer can trust our medical community to use this for the benefit of humankind?
Mike Camus, UK
As a parent of a child suffering from muscular dystrophy, I have received the news with hope and trepidation. Hope that future may bring an end to this disability and disease. Trepidation that human greed and lack of ethical direction may prevent many sufferers from benefiting from this momentous discovery in human history
It sounds as though some very tall claims are being made on behalf of discovering the size, shape and dimensions of a particular double helix that occurs in nature. I do not buy any of this but maybe my grandchildren will see some benefits.
This will be like the space programme. First the hype, then ten years of comedians making jokes about non-stick frying pans, and then the actual benefits, so widespread that everyone will forget where they started.
This is a great medical advance so long as it is kept out of the greedy hands of multinational biotech companies who are only out to make a profit. So long as it is kept as a global resource available to all, then it is truly a breakthrough. One hopes that the petty nationalism of the United States towards countries it doesn't like (Cuba, for example) will not get in the way of the widespread dissemination of this data.
I know scientists might feel the need to hype discoveries in order to keep interest and funding going, but one must temper enthusiasm with realism. Each Solution inevitably brings with it another problem down the line, so we mustn't grow complacent. Derek O'Brien, Northern Ireland This idea of custom made medicine sounds good to me. I'm all for this
Proceed slowly, please. It took engineers about
50 years to develop the automobile, (a relatively simple mechanical device
compared to the human body) that was safe and reliable. They made many mistakes.
What sort of surprises are we in for when scientists start serious experimentation
with human genetic information?
Given that 85% of the code has been evaluated, and that humans are supposed to share 95% of their genetic material with chimpanzees, how do we know which part of the genome, so far elucidated, relates to humans and which to monkeys? Does this mean that, instead of a cure for asthma, you could end up curing 'Red Bottom' syndrome (a worthwhile achievement in itself)!
Scott-Lee Nichol, UK
I have no doubt that this would benefit mankind by wiping out diseases and extending life expectancy to 95, however there are some seriously dangerous consequences about the new breakthrough! The government must ensure that this discovery cannot fall into the wrong hands!
To all the people who mutter about meddling with nature, fine. Let's close down all the hospitals then, because they're meddling with nature. Let's close down all the shops, businesses, industries, whatever. Let's have no gas, electricity, filtrated water supply. All this is meddling with nature. Man has "meddled with nature" since he learned to make fire. Get over it, please! Antony, UK We will see the benefits sometime between 5 and 20 years from now. Research takes time.
I agree with the professor's comments. There has been a huge surge of interest amongst the general public in terms of the genome project and what it can deliver but most of it is hype and a smoke-and-mirrors act.
John B, UK
Let us hope this is used for the benefit of humanity. Just think, no more haemophilia or other genetic and inheritable defects. These could become extinct just like smallpox and every child born would at least start out without a physical disadvantage in life. Also, we could clone tissue thus making transplants and skin grafts routine without the need to rob corpses for organs. I salute the scientists who have completed this task despite the moralising Luddites.
Judith, England
A lot of things need to happen before the genome can "deliver". Firstly, some tough legislation needs to be introduced to protect people from unscrupulous insurance companies and employers, who will use the genetic tests to cherry-pick customers and workers. It doesn't take much foresight to see that such knowledge is open to serious misuse unless the Governments act responsibly and act soon. Already, employers are allowed to analyse their workers' body chemistry for signs of illegal drug use. How long before they are analysing DNA too?
This is just a step closer by man in direct control of evolution. The scenario seen in many science fiction films where humanoids roam the earth cannot be too far behind unless, like nuclear armaments, controls on use and development can be effectively implemented.
Mikko Toivonen, Finland
If they patent or copyright their research, then we would need to ask their permission to have children, or else we would be "making illegal copies" of our genes.
This important development has been presented as a fundamental step in our understanding, not a "miracle cure", by scientists working in the field. Perhaps, the first impact will be the realisation that the usefulness of commercial health insurance is severely limited. For us to progress as a society, it will be increasingly important for us to face the requirement to look after the well being of each other.
|
Internet links The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Other Talking Points:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to other Talking Point stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|