![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Friday, March 20, 1998 Published at 12:27 GMT Talking Point Mobile phones: More a menace than a must? Your reaction <% ballot="66050" ' Check nothing is broken broken = 0 if ballot = "" then broken = 1 end if set vt = Server.Createobject("mps.Vote") openresult = vt.Open("Vote", "sa", "") ' Created object? if IsObject(vt) = TRUE then ' Opened db? if openresult = True AND broken = 0 then ballotresult = vt.SetBallotName(ballot) ' read the vote votetotal=(vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "yes")+vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "no")) if votetotal <> 0 then ' there are votes in the database numberyes = vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "yes") numberno = vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "no") percentyes = Int((numberyes/votetotal)*100) percentno = 100 - percentyes ' fix graph so funny graph heights dont appear 'if percentyes = 0 then ' percentyes = 1 'end if 'if percentno = 0 then ' percentno = 1 'end if else ' summut went wrong frig it numberyes = 0 numberno = 0 percentyes = 50 percentno = 50 end if end if end if %> Votes so far:
Mobile phones are extremely useful as a tool for business. I think, however, that there is a limited justification for private use. This is where the mobile phone augments our bodies and makes us into cyborgs / and the mobile itself becomes a fashion aid. Sometimes I have seem women in supermarkets making mobiles calls to their husbands to say that they couldn't find what he wanted for his supper but would he like that instead? That's sad, necessary? You decide!
I believe that the mobile phone is a must. My opinion is that the Government should intervene in the pricing of the exorbitant prices charged by the manufacturers for hand-free kit accessories. It should also introduce legislation for all cars using mobile phones to have such installations. Once
this is passed, any police patrol spotting a driver using his phone off the hook, will be subjected to substantial fines and endorsements on his licence.
I myself have a mobile 'phone but when in restaurants or public places, I'm
always sure to turn it off. I absolutely hate it when people don't consider
others when using their 'phones. As for drivers who use theirs whilst
driving,
well in my opinion, it is the ultimate lack of consideration. As a cyclist I
live in fear on the roads especially when I see a driver with a mobile 'phone
wedged between shoulder and ear.
Surely all this hoo-haa is because the technology is relativly new, all new
lifestyle changing
technologies in the past have given rise to eexactly this sort of debate, in
10
or 20 years cellphones
will have "faded into the background" along with cars, television/radio,
aeroplanes, synthetic fabrics etc.
General Aviation pilots have a saying "Aviate, Navigate, Communicate". Automobile drivers should follow suit. Drive first!
Mobile phones should be "revamped" so that they wouldn't be "as dangerous". In the case of their usage inside vehicles by drivers, no-hands attachments should be made compulsory; failing that, usage by drivers should be banned altogether.
A mobile phone is becoming less and less of a luxury and if car kits were
cheaper I bet many more people would use them. Nobody likes to feel out of
control.
They are a part of society and we'll never be rid of them now!
Unfortunately, in Italy almost everybody (students, plumbers, clerks, lawyers, etc.) has a mobile and uses it everywhere, at work as well as at the gym! There is no place where you cannot hear the ring of a mobile or see a person driving holding the phone in one hand. Most of the time it gets on your nerves just like when I was at the opera and a telephone rang. You can imagine the choral "BOO!" that echoed in the theatre!
Users of mobile phones should be educated so that they are not used in a way
which distracts from their driving.
Hands-free phones should be no worse than having a conversation with a
passenger in the same car.
Mobiles should not be used in cars. I agree with what others have said that car driving is not taken as a serious enough responsibility. As for them causing a disturbance on trains etc this only really occurs because people insist on shouting down them. There is no need to talk louder
than in a normal conversation, so it need not be a problem.
I could not survive without a mobile phone. I have used one now for 10 years. I travel a lot and working in countries with different time zones. People not knowing where you are may call at all hours of the day. You are not restricted to being in any one place to receive a call. I do however agree that mobile phones should not be used whilst in a motor vehicle - even with a hands free kit. All your concentration goes into the call and not on your driving. As for making and receiving calls in restaurants etc the most polite thing to do is answer the call, decide if it is important and if it is politely excuse yourself from the table and have your conversation in the foyer or lobby. If it is not important it can wait. Tell the caller you will return their call at your earliest convenience.
Driving, in virtually any country, requires that the driver pay attention and concentrate on the road and other drivers. Watch the next erratic driver you see. Chances are there is a mobile phone firmly mashed against one ear. Divided concentration can be fatal. These people don't even have the consideration to move to the slow lane but, blissfully unaware of their surroundings continue their "urgent" conversations. Need to use that mobile??? Pull over and talk and get back on the road when the conversation is completed.
Mobile phones, like driving, are a responsibility. If you can't do both -
admit
to it and pull over. Here some providers have 'voice-activated dialing' as a
solution to the problem.
I'm English, but living in Sweden. The percentage of the population who own
mobile telephones here is among the highest in the world. There is no stigma
attached nor any status symbol with using them - they are simply part of life
and this is the way it will be in the UK I'm sure. If Scandinavia is leading
the way, "hands-free" telephones for cars are becoming more the norm here so
let's hope the UK follows, with or without legislative encouragement.
Don't these issues polarise opinion? There are cheap handsfree kits now for
portables which make using them in car no more dangerous that talking to a
passenger or switching on the radio.
Passengers in a car should be able to use a phone
without causing accidents, why deny them the convenience,
and the possible safety features of having a mobile?
Mobile phones are now a way of life. As the technology develops, the need to
hand-hold them will go and they can become safer. As for the intrusiveness,
they will become little different to ordinary conversation as earpieces
develop
and the temptation to shout is removed. As with all innovations, there are a
vociferous few who will oppose and an eager media willing to make a newsworthy
issue of it! Come on, own up!
We seemed to manage very well before mobile phones came along. Probably we planned our days and activities better, so as not to need this umbilical cord to our peers and superiors.
The only difference
with other passengers/diners
talking is that third parties only hear one side of the conversation as
compared to "normal" conversations.
Maybe that is the problem: one's
curiosity isn't fully satisfied.
Mobile phones are here to stay and so we must adapt our lifestyles accordingly as we have done with all new innovations.
Like any new toy, a mobile is exciting for a while. I've had mine for a few
weeks now and any number of people have called me a poser.
However, it is very convenient, and already I would be lost without it.
I don't understand why people have a problem with mobile phones on trains. How is it any worse than people talking to each other on a train? It's about half the noise (as the other conversationalist is not present). I think people get upset because they can only hear one side of the conversation. Personally, I find children on trains far more disturbing (no, I wouldn't ban them - probably). In restaurants, it depends on the restaurant. Again, though, I cannot think of a logical objection. It's just someone talking, after all, and lots of people do that in restaurants.
Who honestly drives with both hands on the wheel at all times? Whos not
taken their eye off the road for a few moments to twiddle the radio? Whos
not held a conversation with a passenger in their car? If my car breaks down
or I've forgotten my airplane tickers or I can help out at an accident or my
wife goes into labor then I'll be glad I have my phone with me in the car.
Driving while on phone may jeopardise road safety,but a cell phone is very
useful when you have to call for an ambulance because of an alcoholic driver
One trip with a seriously ill toddler with telephone support from the hospital
convinced me that all parents should have access to mobile comms.
Irresponsible use is covered by driving without due care and attention
legislation.
The laws are already there to stop drivers using mobile phones on the move. But motorists should be aware of them; they're obviously not. More education is needed, not more laws.
The problem is that most people aren't coordinated enough to do more than
one thing at a time. The shouldn't even be allowed to drive let alone drive
with a cell phone.
I can't see anything wrong with mobile phones when they are used properly. But yes, it is extremely annoying having someone in a restaurant or train shouting down one. With regards to driving I think he only practical way to deal with the situation is to come down very hard on anyone that has an accident when using a mobile phone. I think that any preemptive legislation (however desirable) would be unworkable.
I don't understand how people can complain about others using phones in trains, public places etc. These people are just talking - or is that next on the list of things to ban? Hand held phones in cars however should be banned however, and hands free kits made compulsory. It is simply not safe to try and hold a phone and drive.
In Malaysia (where I come from), I have witnessed car accidents due to people
talking on their mobile phone while driving. As a result, using phones while
driving is banned in Malaysia and Singapore. However, motorists are still
allowed to use their phones - provided a hands-free car kit is installed.
Maybe
the UK government could do something similar.
A mobile phone is necessary for business, particularly when you spend a lot of time out of the office or have a job which involves the use of hot desks. However, it should be illegal to use a phone in a car without a hands free adapter. Surely it is not beyond the technology to prevent phones from working when in a car without being plugged into a hands free adapter.
The use of hand helds in cars is dangerous and should be banned - no question.
A technical solution already exists with most makes of phone (and airtime
providers) offering car instalaltion kits which allow 'hands free' operation.
It's not the phones that are the menace it's irresponsible users. I live near Ross-on-Wye and a few years age Marie Wilks was murdered on the motorway when her car broke down and she had to walk to a phone. If she had had a mobile she would be alive today.
Can't the Scientists ever give us a straight answer? Are they dangerous or not? When will we know for sure?
Much more effort should be put into looking at the long term radiation effects for mobile users. It should be illegal to use a hand held mobile in a car. In Asia they have a cradle plus a microphone cum speaker "wire" system which works perfectly well, is cheap and allows both hands to remain on the wheel.
I think mobile phones are a very useful means of communication in today's world. They represent security, availability, boost efficiency and help promote better relationships as a result. Their use in cars can lead to accidents but there are a number of other equally distracting situations likely to prevail upon the car driver if he allows it. Overall I wouldn't be without mine.
One need only look at the results of a Canadian study which showed that mobile phone use while driving is comparable to driving while intoxicated, to
conclude that driving and using a mobile phone is not a good idea. However, we have in mobile phones another product whose use, like tobacco, is driven by advertising and not by reason.
People can smoke, eat and drink while driving - why penalise those responsible ones who want to talk while driving?
As a driving instructor I must consider the use of hand held mobiles while
driving to be unsafe. However, I do think that smoking is much worse, but no
one seems to make a fuss about that.
The public needs to be educated to the dangers associated with
the innapropriate use of mobile phones - hopefully making it as unnaceptable
as drink driving.
Hands-Free mobile phones are no more dangerous than listening to the radio /
conversing with a passenger. Safer, in all probability, than smoking and
driving. The benefits to business of mobile phones is enormous, and therefore the cost to business of banning should not be underestimated.
Driving while on the phone should be banned; even "hands-free" phones should
not be allowed. Apart from that, mobile phones are useful.
What about the dangers of other in-car gadgets: how many accidents have been caused by people trying to fiddle with their multi-changer RDS new radio systems (not to mention the air-con..).
I wonder if Stuart Slade, USA, would have the same view, if he was involved in an accident in a remote area - I doubt it.
Mobile phones are great, but the problem is with the people (myself included), who use them. People cause crashes, not the phones we talk on, or cars we drive.
Surely it is already illegal to drive without due care and attention.
Don't blame the mobile phone for peoples failures.
I have seen drivers reading newspapers on Londons roads.
It's not the mobile phones themselves that are the problem but the people who use them. Mobiles can be life-savers and undoubtedly play an important role in the lifestyles of many people.
Mobile phones are essential for those people who don't lead a cosy life at
home
with a land line from BT, they are vital for vulnerable people at night in
difficulties and a host of other applications such as fax, data etc. etc.
Where
are these Luddites?Get a life!
The predominant function of mobile phone
is a status symbol and a 'trendy' fashion
accessory. However, few other accessories
can raise your blood pressure to the
extent of the perpetual ringing of the wretched
things in public - especially on trains.
They should be immediately banned!
I think that the moblie phones discussed in this issue and the dangers of their usage, are perfectly good explanations for the ban of their use in cars.
As a university student, my mobile phone is a necessity. The halls of
residence I live in has two pay phones for 112 students. Also any incoming
calls are not guaranteed to reach me, even if a message is taken. My mobile
phone is for peace of mind more than anything else, for me and my parents.
I live in horror of the day when I'm inevitably going to be handed one by my
boss or my wife. Of course we'll all own one soon and we'll all wonder how we
ever lived without it. The fact is that we did (I still, for the moment, do)
and we enjoyed those periods reading on the train or walking through the
streets of New York when we knew that no one could bother us with a phone
call.
Mobile phones are simple evolution. When the telephone was first invented
everyone thought that was a nuisance as well. I do not like them being used
where they may disturb others, but in public I see no problem whatsoever.
There is no need to waste time for a
call when you can be reached anywhere.
It allows security, and use in
emergencies when other communications
possibilities are not available.
I use a mobile, but switch it off when in my car. This stops me from having to answer it when on the move. I use the Vodaphone Recall messaging service to get messages when I'm driving. It makes sense...
Like everything else, there is a right and wrong time to use them. Anyone who loses control of the car through using a mobile is a potential killer, but all modern mobiles can have an answerphone to take a message whilst the owner is otherwise engaged.
As an expatriate now living in Raleigh, North Carolina, I am nervous when my
wife and 17 year-old daughter are driving alone in their cars. Too many times
in this area have unaccompanyed women been assaulted while stranded
on the roads. The availability of mobile phones adds to my peace-of-mind.
Yes, they're a must. Until recently. my wife was involved in care work which
often meant driving during the night on lonely country roads. Her mobile phone made all the difference to my peace of mind. She doesn't use it on the move, nor in circumstances where it's ikely to annoy others.
I agree with Mr Luby, luxury is to be without a phone. Why do we need to be
contactable all the time? Being disconnected for a while is healthy, it also
stops those who are after you from taking your availability for granted. As
an
exercise in marketing a false need, mobile phones have been a complete success.
The problem with the Mobile Phone use in car menace is not the Mobile itself, it is with the lax attitudes to the responsibilities of driving in this
country. It's not ok to be only a bit distracted, or to consume only a couple
of pints. Driving puts you in charge of a moving vehicle with the power to
maim, kill and otherwise harm others. Can you imagine Pilots, commercial or
private, saying it's ok to have your judgment impaired or distracted just a
little? Why do we allow it on the roads?
The proliferation of these phones have saved many lives by ensuring an even
quicker response by the emergency services. However, I totally agree with Paul
Rushworth of London, that the menace is not the phone itself but the lax
attitude of the car drivers.
Mobile phones bring benefits when used properly and with courtesy. I have been
stuk on a broken down train and seen mobile phones passed around the carriage
so that fellow travellers could ring home and advise of the delays. What is
annoying, is when a phone user seems to think that that entire carriage should
hear his conversation as well as the person on the other end of the phone.
Fortunately this type of person is rare on the trains which I generally catch.
Mobile telephones and driving do not mix. Handling an automobile in dense
traffic at any speed needs the driver's full attention. Trying to use a mobile
phone under these conditions endangers the lives of the driver and the
people around them. It should be illegal to install or use a mobile phone
in any vehicle other than emergency services or police cars. A $5,000 fine
for using such equipment while the car is moving sounds about right.
I believe they are a must in the business world, and also, for ordinary people
especially women travelling alone should they have a breakdown
in their car, or if faced with a sudden dilemma. Providing of course they use
them when the car is stationary - or have a hands-free mobile.
Anyone involved in an accident whilst making or receiving a telephone call on their handheld mobile should at the very least be tried for driving without due care and attention or greater offence depending on the result of the accident.
In some countries, such as Singapore, where mobiles are installed in cars, they are hands free telephone sets. Anyone caught with the handset to their ear are fined accordingly. This seems to be a good compromise.
In my business, I simply couldn't do without my mobile phone... mind you,
there
is an appropriate time and place to use one.
To many, including myself, mobile phones are becomming a must - what can be annoying is those who use them without consideration for others. This can include driving dangerously, using them in restaurants and places where peace and quiet is required! Ringing tones can be turned down, or vibrating
batteries can be used, and when in a car a handsfree kit should be used, as
well as keeping the call short.
If all mobile phones were disconnected, nobody would lose out. Business-wise, it becomes a problem when competitors
have them and you don't.
If we can reduce the risk of such a thing happening then we should. It's like wearing seatbelts in cars. Not everyone is going to have an accident
and those that are don't know when, but there is a risk so you wear a seat
belt to reduce the chance of being killed.
When other people complain about someone speaking into a mobile say on a
train, or in another public place, what exactly is the difference between them
speaking into a phone, or speaking to another person? Is it just a bit
frustrating for the eavesdropper because they can't hear both sides of the
conversation?
Mobile phones are a part of continually improved facilities for communication.
Mobile phones are a curse to those who own them and a curse to those who don't.
If you have one, you become its slave. All notion of privacy disappears as you are expected to have it on at all times where ever you are. It's expensive and no matter how much you try to restrict your use of it to keep down call charges, it just doesn't work. If you don't have one, you spend all your time cursing bad mobile etiquette which leads users to talk in loud, obnoxious voices in very public places. Now, scientists tell us mobiles could be putting our health at risk! Dustbin look out!!
Negative attitudes towards mobile phones are simply motivated by jealousy. Mobiles, were once the toys of the rich. Even though now they are far more accessible, the stigma has remained and users are continuously being berated for one thing or another. I use my mobile as an essential part of my work and I spend a large part of my work in my car. I am neither a danger to society nor to myself and I will continue to use a mobile in and out of the car.
People who walk along the street talking into phones are either drug dealers / criminals / incredibly important or absolute posers. I suggest the latter.
Cell phones are hazardous along with women putting on makeup while driving. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||