US President George W Bush and his Democratic challenger John Kerry have clashed over homeland security, jobs, taxes and healthcare in the third and final of their televised debates.
 |
ASK THE EXPERT
American journalist Greg Katz answered your questions in an interactive forum
|
Analysts say the debate's importance had grown after strong performances by Mr Kerry in the first two debates were followed by rising support for him in opinion polls.
Who do you think won the debate? Have you changed your mind about the candidates as a result of the debate? How do you think the candidates performed? What would you like to have heard? Send us your views.
This debate is now closed. Thank you for your comments.
Your comments:
The debates were simply snapshots of each candidate taken at a point in time. To properly evaluate each candidate it's necessary to consider their performance over a long period of time. Given Kerry's record in the Senate and his actions against the US regarding Vietnam it's clear his character is questionable and he's not one to be trusted with the office of the President. George Bush, while not an eloquent public speaker, is certainly the only one I consider resolute enough to properly continue the war against the terrorists. If we lose the war against the terrorists, all the other concerns facing the US will become moot points.
Richard, North Carolina, USA
These debates are meaningless personality and oratory contests. One either agrees with the stated policies of a candidate or not. These should be published in a clear format and let's dispense with the talking-head editorials from partisan "journalists".
George Milton, Baltimore USA
While Kerry's points require one to listen carefully and think, Bush's answers tend to all sound the same. Kerry is framed as flip-flopping on the war; I recently saw the actual Senate speech he gave. He made it clear his vote was only to allow Bush to use the threat of war to give weight to his negotiations in the U.N. Alas, we were taken to a foolish war. Therefore, regardless of the debates; I will be voting for a change of leadership.
Robert Brown, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Kerry clearly won the debates, but the truth is that he nor Bush said or did anything unexpected. Debates have been full of empty promises for a long time now. Neither candidate will do what they say they will. Neither will balance the budget. Neither will stick to the plans that they outline in the debates. I would have liked to have seen Pres. Bush answer the last question in the second debate honestly. I think this would have boosted him more than anything else. Instead, he maintains his consistency in being stubborn and unapologetic. That was a mistake and he'll pay for it in the polls!
Will, Memphis, TN, USA
|
Bush is more personal and compassionate than Kerry, who always seems elitist.
|
Of course Kerry is a better and more articulate speaker than Bush. Bush's public speaking is usually horrible. But I don't think Americans will be swayed by a candidate's English. Bush is more personal and compassionate than Kerry, who always seems elitist. I have supported Bush for a while and although I admire President Bush's character, I hope Americans vote for him because of his determined leadership that has made America safer and stronger.
Tim, Bethesda, MD, USA
The most important thing for a US president is to look and sound presidential. That's why I'm voting for John Kerry. I'm sure that is what the rest of the world would want me to do.
Tyler D, Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania
These days the question is not who you vote in through the front door it's who comes in through the unelected back door. Make your decision based on the backers not the front men and get some real democracy, UK voters should be aware of the same thing in the coming elections.
Dave, Scotland
I am comfortable with President Bush. I am not convinced that Senator Kerry would do any better if not as well as President Bush. I am happy with the way the president handles the Executive Branch. Difference between Kerry and Bush, is that Kerry likes to plan and Bush likes to execute. Let's get on with it.
Jesse Mata, Pacific Grove, California
As usual, a lot of rhetoric and missed opportunities for all. And, once again we are faced with voting against Bush, not for Kerry.
Cathy Gatling, Linden, Virginia
|
I watched the debate and thought both were very lack lustre.
|
I watched the debate and thought both were very lack lustre. The substance was dictated and unsurprising very akin to British politics. Boring lets leave it to the American electorate to decide.
Carole, UK
To Mr. Kenneth Hung in NYC: Perhaps if you opened your mind and acknowledged that there are competing, valid points of view, you wouldn't be so appalled. What's appalling is that people in NYC consider themselves to be the "centre of the ideological universe". This arrogance is exactly what gives liberals a bad name.
Andrea, NY, USA
I really think that John Kerry should be president USA because he looks and sounds very willing to give the Americans a better future. Thank you.
Jane Roberts , England
I thought that President Bush was the clear winner. Kerry's long and boring answers were full of air, with no substance. Bush spoke in earnest, and his positions were clear.
Jim, Miami, Fla. USA
Given the divided opinion on this board there evidently was no 'clear winner'. People will pick out the strong points from the candidate they supported before the debates began. Kerry for president, as he clearly demonstrated the intelligence, integrity and compassion to run and re-build America.......
Karen, Plymouth, England
|
The debate winner does not necessarily make a good president.
|
I vote based on the substance of debate rather than who apparently wins a debate. The debate winner does not necessarily make a good president.
Kevin, USA
Pretty low key debate but Kerry came out clearly on top. He was composed and articulate.
Mato Shimabale, Lusaka, Zambia
Kerry was clearly more composed and articulate with his responses. GWB's response that people who lost their jobs should get money to go to junior college to develop their skills has got to be the dumbest reply I have ever heard. What if that person had a PhD? Also, had 9/11 not occurred, there is no way Bush could of sold the war in Iraq. His has done a nice job on blinding the USA from truth. Not anymore!
A Jimenez, Chicago, Illinois
The debates are a not really serious thing. The two political parties do not allow other candidates and control the content. This isn't how democracy is supposed to be.
Mr. Gerry Kalisik, Hilo USA
I have stayed up till 3.30am to watch the debate. Kerry was the most thoughtful of the two and he needed no wiring under his jacket to articulate his ideas. I cannot comprehend how the Americans voted for Bush in the first place!
Abdellah, London
|
Kerry was by far the more articulate
|
As a neutral I sat with interest to watch the presidential debate and one thing was as clear as crystal. Kerry was by far the more articulate and addressed the issues presented to him with honesty and intelligence. I think to address the American middle class and tell them things are going to need to change to better the whole country takes courage. Bush was as usual trying to grab the Rah factor. An inflections ending to his messages in a vain hope for cheers is positively redundant. I think the American intelligentsia will not be bought on these factors, they want positive leadership, and not boys club observations
John, London England
Bush! All the way! 4 More for sure. You Kerry Liberals must look at his accomplishments: getting the USA through 9/11, stock market crash, recession--all inherited when he took office. Has kept you safe in your own home and now the hard work is paying off in dividends! The economy is recovering, the country is safer, the terrorists are running or dead. Bush is an experienced businessman with an MBA and history majors, Kerry is a lawyer...people say he spoke well at the debates...no kidding, he's a Lawyer...who do you think can better handle the country's books? I will take the MBA over the Lawyer any day.
Well what happened to a debate on Education in the USA? Being a teacher and also married to a teacher I cannot believe that Kerry did not pick up on the fact that overall Bush has failed with his "no child left behind". I still buy soap for my class as well as almost all supplies. Still, I do think Kerry won the debate.
Ian, Orlando, USA
Kerry has failed to convince the electorate that he is a capable leader. On complex issues, he responds with catchy sound bites instead of solid actions. Other issues he dodges all together, and then blames Bush, as usual. Kerry does not possess the moral clarity, intelligence, or integrity to be president.
Drew, San Fernando, Trinidad
Judging a winner of these debates is a bit like having to choose whether coffee is better than tea. Clearly the debate is simply a podium for Bush to trot out his personal attacks on Kerry's record and for Kerry to demonstrate that he has the qualities to be the next president. The debates are largely stage managed affairs in which the most important aspect for the candidates is not to fluff their lines.
Martin Charles, Cronton, UK
Kerry wins again. Bush was not as horribly inept as he was in the first debate, but he still did not have a firm grasp of the facts. He seems out of touch with what the average Americans really needs and wants. Also his views about gun control and inability to separate church and state are down right scary.
Rebecca Satterberg, Los Gatos United States
Although the president did better than in his two earlier attempts, he failed to erase the previous images of complete lack of true leadership. Kerry, although certainly the better of the two in all three performances, doesn't look visionary enough to pull the USA back up from the abyss Bush has flung us into. But getting W's gang out of power will do much good.
Philip Munger, Palmer, AK United States
John Kerry was flawless in his preparation and in delivering a coherent message. Again, George Bush demonstrated why his public exposure is limited to pre-scripted venues that avoid challenging his desperate and often fragile grip on comprehensibility. And it's not "oh I'm so smart!" but I'm just astonished that we could have such an imbecile for a President.
Glenn Ingraham, Murrieta, CA
I thought Kerry came out the winner. It was sad that some people in the media later said that Kerry had too many facts in the debate. When will America learn that an intelligent debate is a GOOD thing, and that after so much rhetoric from Bush which has actually misled the country, Kerry using facts to make his case is a good, good thing? It seems amazing that right after Kerry gives an answer about an issue Bush responds any which way he wants to, saying that Kerry did not explain himself - or, another favourite, distorts what Kerry just said (let's call it a radical interpretation of the text) and no one seems to call Bush on that ever. I'm rooting for the guy with integrity and it's not W.
Mahima Kaul, Montreal, Quebec
I wonder how this third debate will resonate. People forget quickly, so this third debate matters most. Bush was calm, at first it looked unnatural but later he bloomed with this approach. Kerry is talking about too many details, people cannot remember them. The most positive candidate always wins the election; I think Bush is more positive.
J.K., Jsselstein, The Netherlands
Bush was being real while Kerry was trying to appeal. Kerry will say and do whatever he thinks will get him votes while Bush stands firm on his beliefs and principles. Bush won this debate.
Evan, Pittsburgh, PA USA
George Bush won in 2000 because he was the more likeable of the two candidates. After 3 3/4 years of brazen foreign policy, needless war and tax cuts for the ultra wealthy Americans understands that "Compassionate conservatism" is merely a catchphrase. George Bush needed to do more in these debates than look personable and recite overly focus-grouped words like "hard-work " and "faith". Unfortunately for him it's true, you can't teach an old dog new tricks.
B Bachrach, Florida, USA
|
I still can't trust Kerry to really do anything he promises
|
I expected Kerry to easily win this debate, he was after all on home turf this being the "domestic issue debate". I was very surprised to find that President Bush was clearly the stronger debater this time around. Kerry couldn't give clear cut answers to anything and reminded me of the Republican charges of trying to always be on both sides of an issue. Pres. Bush was clear and sincere. I still can't trust Kerry to really do anything he promises. Why didn't he do anything during his 20 years in the senate? All talk and no action. Sorry Kerry I'm going with the other guy.
S Kym, Los Angeles, Ca
Kerry is almost always calm and disarming. Bush almost always sends agitation, nervousness, aggression and desperation. It feels like I'm suffocating to watch Bush while watching Kerry makes me feel like I'm on a peaceful island vacation. I guess my feelings of nervousness and oppression weren't at all helped by watching Bush beat the podium repeatedly when he wanted to make a point. So for a third time, Kerry won. Too bad there weren't any Independent candidates allowed on the floor.
Viet Tran, Houston, TX, USA
The media say it was a dead heat. I tried hard to find substance in Bush, but only found wind and the same old evading of issues and finger-pointing. This is my seventh election. This is the seventh time I am voting against rather than voting for. I am voting against Bush.
Marton, Munich, Germany
Bush finally did what he was supposed to do in these debates...he turned the tides in his direction. He showed his command of and his firm resolve on key issues.
Brandon, Portland, Oregon, USA
As an American watching the debates from the UK, I was disappointed by the choreographed, soft questions asked. Nonetheless, they provided still another display of how well-prepared Kerry is to articulate a clearer and more just vision, and lead the US toward that vision. Meanwhile, the incumbent continued his disingenuous aversion to answering questions regarding health care, women's rights, minority issues and job losses. Kerry won.
Margarete Parrish, Gloucester, UK
This was clearly Bush's best debate, but I don't think that he quite matched John Kerry in this debate. If John Kerry didn't win this debate tonight, he will when the ads begin to show Bush's inconsistent positions on Osama bin Laden and Canadian drugs.
Ben Main, Neenah, WI, USA
It is obvious John Kerry won the debate again. This win makes it 3-0. President Bush has been very effective on the campaign trail. Unfortunately, he has been unable to export the campaign trail effectiveness where it matters the most - at the debates. We still have 19 days left to election day but the momentum appears to have shifted to John Kerry. Some reasons for this shift are that: that Kerry appears more Presidential, is more eloquent, and is crisp in his answers. It appears the tide may have turned already.
Mwaura Mwembu, Corona, Calfiornia, USA
|
Kerry only spoke to the cameras, but Bush spoke with his heart
|
Bush won hands down without a doubt. Kerry only spoke to the cameras, but Bush spoke with his heart to the American people. Kerry is a shady politician who is indecisive, Bush is an American who makes the right decisions for all of America. With tonight's debate, I am more convinced that our President will be re-elected.
Sean Su, New York, USA
Kerry answered the questions strongly and factually and Bush used campaign slogans and did not answer direct questions. His numbers do not add up, especially on Healthcare and Social Security.
Kathy Laugel, Williamsburg, Va. USA
Kerry won. He expresses himself better and is smarter. However, I am afraid to say that many of his international policies are not different from Bush. Therefore, I would rather see Bush win and clean up his messes rather than Kerry take them on and get blamed for them. PLUS we have to make way for Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden who have a slam dunk shot at election after next if Bush gets re-elected.
Glen, Chicago
Kerry is a better debater than Bush, but that doesn't mean he is the better candidate. Bush is strong leader with clear views of what needs to be accomplished. It is easy for Kerry to point at difficulties in the previous Bush term. The American people should realise that it was a difficult period with major events (Sep 11). Kerry tells the people what they want to hear, that's why seems a bit floppy from time to time. On the other hand, Bush cuts straight to the point. Kerry is a strong candidate and will probably be a good president but Bush is the better candidate and at this time of uncertainty the USA needs a strong leader.
Mos, Cape Town, South Africa
Bush tried to portray Kerry as a tax-and-spend liberal, but I think Kerry did a good job of creating a new moniker: the spend-and-spend conservative. Kerry may be a flip-flop, but even if that is true, I'd rather vote for the flip-flop than the guy who has been wrong on almost every single issue.
Leo Kim, New York City, USA
Abraham Lincoln said that "a house divided against itself cannot stand." Given the sense of unity we felt after 9/11, it is shocking that we are now so bitterly divided. We've seen what Bush can do, and it is frightening. The debates removed any remaining doubts that it's time to give Kerry a chance.
Maureen, Chicago, USA
Kerry didn't answer one single question directly. He used his time to address other issues or to go back to get in one last jab about the previous topic. "I'll answer that in a minute but first let me go back to..." was how he began nearly every turn.
Greg, Independence, Missouri USA
Senator Kerry won the debate by at least 60 against 40 If you are an outsider, you would think that Mr Kerry is the President and Mr Bush the contender
Hendrik Grijspeerdt, Nashville TN USA
George Bush won. If there was any doubt in my mind before, it was erased not only by Bush's strong performance, but by Kerry's weak responses and inability to address several key issues. He has NO plan for anything, other that to say "I have a plan". I found Kerry's comments about Cheney's daughter to be disgusting. To bring the private life of an opponent's daughter into a presidential debate says all about his character one needs to know.
Arnold Bush, Gig Harbor, WA USA
Bush clearly won because he forced Kerry to either admit the weakness of his positions or lie about it. Like Kerry claiming he passed 56 bills in the senate. That can and already has been checked. Bush nailed him.
Steve Foote, Memphis USA
Kerry clearly won this debate. As a working woman, Kerry is clearly the president for me. And he offers preventative solutions. He talks intelligently about policy when it comes to helping the military. Bush had four years to do the things he talked about. I think he had a bad policy on Iraq, bad poor leadership in regard to 9/11, and he has done nothing about social security and health care. He didn't even fund his "leave no children behind." Everyone knows after school programs had to be cut as a result. It is time for a smart president.
Suzanne Lagasa, San Francisco, United States
I think it was a victory for Kerry, he used the President's record to highlight the fact that the labels he has attempted to foist on Kerry would be more accurately applied to his own administration. The arguments were strong and combative but the President failed to deliver more than the worn out rhetoric of the past four years. Over these three debates it has become clear as to why he has given the fewest press conferences of any president, and speaks mainly through more articulate academics.
Luke Hamm, Keene, NH, USA
The traditional line that Republicans have had is fiscal responsibility. The government's budget is the most important issue that I consider when voting. However, the last two Republican presidents have created enormous deficits that the Democrats have had to pay off. How can Bush claim that we should not elect a "tax and spend" Democrat when he piled up a 30 billion dollar debt and sent a $300 gift rebate check to everyone? If Bush is correct when he says the deficit is required to fund the war and stimulate the economy then he should have been more careful and not wasted so much of it in Iraq. The clear choice for me is Kerry.
Eric H., Seattle, WA, USA
This is one election that I will go into the voting booth, hold my nose and pick one. I am voting for John Kerry because he addressed all issues put before him at every debate. Bush evaded and waffled as usual.
Harold Stratz, Gulfport, MS U.S.A
People keep saying Kerry has got a bad history due to his past record in the senate and Vietnam. Has EVERYONE forgotten that Bush went AWOL during his time in the National Guard?
Sergio, Bristol UK
Bush answered a question about affirmative action by citing No Child Left Behind, a question about taxes by citing No Child Left Behind, and a question about minimum-wage by citing No Child Left Behind... I got the feeling his wire wasn't working.
Vanna LaRoche, Town & Country, MO, USA
I heard the other day on a an unnamed BBC radio channel, US voters saying that they would vote for Bush as he is the more committed follower of God!! How brainwashed are these people when a person's alleged faith determines their votes?!! I ask this question to all those who support Bush: Would God support a war based upon untruths and personal vendettas?
sb, UK
|
The incumbent cannot run on his own record and can only attack his competition.
|
Kerry won the debate on the issues presented. Bush may have strengthened his base, especially that of the Christian conservative through talk of his faith. By attacking Kerry so aggressively it seems quite ironic that Bush now seems to be running on a platform of "anyone but Kerry"! Bush is not making a case for why he should be re-elected, he is instead focussing on why people should not vote for Kerry. I think it speaks volumes about the president's record that the incumbent cannot run on his own record and can only attack his competition.
Robert, Wheaton, MD, USA
I hope that John Kerry has done enough to persuade the voters a 'regime change' is right and right now. Mr Bush has served his four years, we, the world, need a political will with a strong grasp of foreign policy and the determination to make global policies work. Global is local these days and the last four years demonstrates just how connected we all are.
don oddy, London UK
What were you guys watching? All I saw was 2 millionaires agreeing about more than they disagreed on. A government of the people? Just which people do either of these men represent?
Paul, Glasgow, Scotland
The debate merely exposed John Kerry's incessant inability to highlight the obvious flaws decorating the Bush regime's foreign policy and interior economic management. Alas, once more, the Democrats have failed to produce a candidate willing to openly reject Republicanism, and openly criticise President Bush, a rather suspect embodiment of it.
D. Hutcheon, Glasgow, Scotland
I agree with many contributors that Bush is clear in his beliefs... the trouble is that they are the wrong beliefs for the future of the world. Kerry's stand on seeking allies, the need for stem cell research, the need for an American health system that reaches out to the whole population... all these things make him the clear choice of everyone outside anti-foreign and redneck West and South in the USA.
Terry Jones, Gravesend, Kent
How is Kerry going to win the war against terror by pulling out of Iraq and letting a fledging nation die under the oppression of terrorists? Kerry has totally lost the plot. It takes tough and unpalatable action to win this war and if a presidential candidate can't use his troops to do what they have been trained for (i.e. to kill the enemy so the innocent survive) then he has no right or reason to be president. If Kerry wins and pulls out, America loses.
Rick, UK
Both candidates are inadequate. It shows the downfall off allowing the richest in society control society rather than having people of intelligence and integrity.
Alex, UK
|
I would ask the US electorate to think carefully before voting for Kerry
|
I watched all three debates and would score the first to Kerry, the second a draw and the third to Bush. I cannot comment of US domestic issues, but on foreign policy I would ask the US electorate to think carefully before voting for Kerry, his behaviour after his brief service in Vietnam suggests that he does not see loyalty to his nation as an important virtue.
Gordon McStraun, UK
This was Kerry's best debate, although I have enjoyed them all. He speaks clearly and this time defended his position when attacked by Mr. Bush's low-blow pathetic name-calling and repetitive cliché one-liners. I've never seen Bush stutter, mumble and whine so much. He would not answer the questions directly or sometimes at all. He looked tired this round. If Bush wins, there's something really wrong with America...
Christine Edwards, Paris, France (but from Atlanta, GA, USA)
For me, Kerry was the clear winner of the final debate. He consistently reached out to and displayed a passion for issues of importance to women, people of colour, and the shrinking middle class. He projected a can-do spirit about reducing the deficit, expanding healthcare, and raising the standard of living. President Bush, on the other hand, seemed to have trouble getting his rhetorical footing, and hung on to education and grants for support again and again, whether the topic was the economy, job loss, or immigration.
Allison de Fren, Los Angeles, CA USA
An absolute home run for Bush tonight! I must admit Kerry's dominance in the first debate, but tonight Kerry looked like the whipped liberal that he is. Bush displayed Kerry's 20 year record of doing nothing.
Chris, Ann Arbor, MI
As usual George could produce little but a barrage of smirks and embarrassed laughter. When explaining his crusade against terror, he gives off this arrogant smirk that says, 'Don't you all get it? It's so simple!' It is Bush's inability to see any shades of grey that really frightens me.
Eric Jensen, Chicago, USA In my opinion, both men did a good job. President Bush spoke about his faith and Senator Kerry talked about facts. The issue now is do American people need a president stick to his faith or the one who touches facts that we all share?
John C. Maswana, Kyoto, Japan
Kerry won the debate. My attitude towards the election has changed through watching the debates. Before watching the debates I was planning to vote against Bush by voting for Kerry. Now I am voting for Kerry.
Joanne G Gray, Albuquerque, NM, USA
George Bush won this debate by virtue of his strength of commitment and honesty. To hear Senator Kerry repeat the word 'integrity' was laughable, especially when one considers his career in politics. It was wonderful to see President Bush rediscover the purpose and vision that made him the victor four years ago.
Daniel Goldsmith, Cork, Ireland
John Kerry comes off more like the President I would like to have. George Bush is a good old boy that I might want to have a beer with but I don't want him to be in charge of the nuclear button. Each debate shows this more.
Judy Helder, Moraga, USA
The third debate was won by Mr. Bush. Mr. Bush actually gave a little (at least) indication of a plan while Kerry continued to repeat 'he had a plan', 'my way will work', but never gave any indication of how he will do it. He obviously studied JFK s speeches and is trying to use someone else ideas and peg them to himself.
Gail Goodfellow, Vancouver, Canada
Kerry won the debates but Bush will win the election. Kerry wins on intellect, Bush wins on feeling. International issues are debated, local ones will determine the vote. As the world's hegemony I wonder if the average voter realizes his and her responsibility to the international community.
Steve Belgraver, Koog a/d Zaan, The Netherlands
Bush definitely won. Kerry talked about being more fiscally responsible, yet at the same is advocating centralising more things to the state, whilst claiming able to such without raising taxes. Impossible!
Matthew J Jones, Sheffield, UK
Kerry would be such a great leader for the USA. I was more a Republican fan but now I am convinced that Bush will lead his country in pure isolation. The Americans must realise that the outside view of their country has become very negative in the last few years. For the US's sake and the world's sake, we cannot have Bush for another 4 years.
Fred Klaassens, Brussels, Belgium
I was very impressed by the performance of John Kerry yesterday evening. He did his best to reach all Americans around important issues. Bush has divided America. Kerry will unite America.
Thierry Donneau, Corvallis, OR USA
Bush won the debate on personality, character, clarity, and exposing Kerry's weak record of achievement and changing positions. Kerry cannot hide is conflicting views on Iraq, his weak Senate record, and his bloated domestic policy agenda. Say what you will, but Bush has a tangible record on the key issues in this race and Kerry has 20 years of flawed positions. On foreign policy, Bush has proven to be steadfast even in the face of controversy whereas Kerry has flip-flopped his way through the entire campaign only to come up with a coherent position in the closing weeks. On the domestic side, Bush clearly stated his position on individual choice, limited government, and the importance of education in raising the standard of living and creating jobs rather than siding with government handouts, oppressive regulation, and a tax code that promotes class warfare and a redistribution of wealth. Bush is also not ashamed to take a position on moral issues that Kerry dances around. Kerry's plan sounds good on the surface - no matter what the problem, the government will take care of you. Kerry's agenda is intrusive, unrealistic, and unsustainable.
Greg Kencitzski, Jacksonville, FL
One of the more amusing things to me about this series of debates is how President Bush changed his personality with each one while Senator Kerry remained consistent. It's the exact reverse of the 2000 election where Gore displayed a different personality in each debate. The personalities Bush revealed during the debates are at times at odds with his public persona. Is the Bush as portrayed by his campaign the real Bush? Or was it one of the ones we saw at the debates? If so, which one? Kerry, on the other hand, displayed a consistently presidential demeanour during the debates which is starkly at odds with the way the Bush campaign has portrayed him. Now if only he could speak as concisely as he did during the debates the rest of the time.
JS, Paderborn, Germany
Bush accused Kerry of being out of mainstream America and of being far out on the "left bank." If this is true, then all of New York City must be somewhere out in Mars. It is appalling to me that what passes as mainstream in New York is considered loopy in much of the rest of this country. Why do I feel like we in New York are among the last supporters left of good old-fashioned secular American values?
Kenneth Hung, New York, NY USA
Bush had three different faces in the debates. But, Kerry was consistent in all the debates. Now, who is flip flopping?
Kanaha, Irving, TX, USA
I felt Bush won this debate, which when all three are looked at, makes it a draw. Kerry is very good at telling people what they want to hear, but I'd like to know how raising minimum wage and raising taxes on small business will create jobs? These things may resonate with those who fight the class war, but they simply will not work in practice.
Chris, Dallas, TX, USA
Bush gave very firm answers, while Kerry appeared to be trying too hard to appeal to both his party base and remaining undecided voters. Kerry did not bridge his answers to solid positions as well as Bush did. Bush looked more rested, seemed to be enjoying himself, was more clear and concise than the previous two debates, so much so that he often finished before his allotted time was up. Kerry, as usual, used every possible second, often repeating himself just to complete the time he was given. His verbosity bothered me for some reason. Kerry is without question a polished debater, but I think he gave America little reason to dump a sitting war time president. Too little, too late! Advantage, Bush!
Jeff T. (Thieret), Pittsburgh, PA
|
Bush seems to think if he says "liberal" enough the country will flock to his side
|
Bush fumbles around, avoids questions, and repeats the same mantras again and again. Bush seems to think if he says "liberal" enough the country will flock to his side. John Kerry at least answered the questions he was asked and could finish a sentence coherently. Kerry won.
Eva, Tucson, AZ, USA
The reality is that every poll places John Kerry as the winner of all three debates. Of course, these are popular votes. The Bush people claim to have won debates, but they are dependent on conservative Supreme Court judges to decide for us.
Pete, North Carolina USA
Its like being on a "weight loss plan" and your only choices are Burger King OR McDonalds!! At the end of the day Kerry will get my vote not because he earned it but because Bush lost it.
Sanjay Prabhu, Detroit, USA
Bush won the debate hands down. He offered new vocabulary and tactics while Kerry used the same "rhetoric" as the last two debates. Bush took the opportunity to display his wit, and that helped him stay on top of the debate.
Chad, St. Louis, United States
Mr. Kerry does well at memorizing stats and talking points. Mr. Bush simply tells it like it is. The President recovered from his loss at the first debate, just in time to net some swing voters. He will win the election and remain making decisions long after Chirac and Schroeder exit their offices.
Michael Chittum, San Francisco, USA
I though Kerry's willingness to answer the questions presented to him straightforwardly and precisely gave him a clear edge over George Bush, who dodged and did not answer the questions presented to him.
Will Hanson, Minnetonka, Minnesota
In spite of all the media attention, the dirty secret is that while these debates are important, what actually happens in them is less so. At this point in the campaign, this third debate served only to confirm the choice that most "undecided" voters, who would more properly be called 'undeclared," have already made. Kerry will be elected.
Tom Ruth, United States
Kerry won but it wasn't a debate. The moderator failed to get questions answered by both candidates. American farce
E. Thomas, Spokane,WA USA
John Kerry won this debate, just as he won the other two debates. He will make a far more intelligent, compassionate, and strong leader than Bush. These debates just reinforced my conviction that Bush has got to go. John Kerry is right: "America can do better". (and we must)
Lori Durante, Brookville Pennsylvania USA
It is not abundantly clear by now that, in terms of American standards of "statesmenship," that Kerry is the obvious choice? Bush openly admitted on stage that his wife, Laura, had a better command of English than himself... which leads to the clear questioning of whether he is fit to command forces if he hardly has a command of his own native language. Not that politics should be reduced solely to language, but we are talking about the most important post in the world here.
Oliver Belcher, Lexington, KY United States
Bush did great. I hope it's his last live appearance on national television.
Tim Welsh, Muldraugh, USA
If you divided the American tax payers into two groups, the top 50 percent by income and the bottom 50 percent by income, the bottom 50 percent pay less than 100 dollars per person per year on average. The top 50 percent pay about 8000 dollars per person on average. Mr Kerry how do you give a tax cut to people who don't pay taxes? Mr Kerry why would you not give a tax cut to "the rich" who pay on average 300,000 dollars per year? This is just one example of Kerry's blarney. He is a politician through and through. I'm quite confident he will be defeated. I thank God for that.
John Nehring, Tucson, Arizona, USA
In response to John Nehring, Tucson, Arizona, USA: It is precisely the kind of misconception you demonstrate that could win the election for Bush. Clearly, the United States is not divided 50-50 in terms of tax brackets. Kerry wants to increase taxes for the wealthiest 1%, not the wealthiest 50%. Most of the wealthiest 50% are not wealthy at all, and would receive tax breaks under Kerry's plan. I urge you all to look at the facts before drawing conclusions about either candidate.
Jeremiah Cohen, Nashville, TN, USA
I found John Kerry to be more calm, composed and clear tonight. He offered some ideas of the policies he would pursue, while George W Bush continued a smear campaign against Mr Kerry. Mr Kerry had a presidential aura about him that made him the clear choice for President.
Marcus, San Francisco, CA
I think that Bush won the debate on sheer merit of the heart. It was clear that while Kerry was perhaps a bit more eloquent in his debate style, Bush clearly had a plan, but with the means to get there, unlike Kerry.
Drew Konzelman, USA
I fell asleep with the TV on and woke to hear Bush and Kerry in the early hours of the morning. I don't know who won but I had nightmares by the time I'd dropped off again.
Steve, Cambridge, UK
As an independent, I will vote for John Kerry for the next President of these United States of America. Bush is unworthy of the office and honour as he has pushed a radical religious right agenda which is dangerously dividing our land. Please note, I supported the invasion of Iraq. Bush is pushing a world view within these States that if you do not follow him then you are the enemy.
Tony Casiano, Fort Wayne, Indiana
I watched the debate with group of friends. The candidates were repeating themselves. One interesting thing point - So a 45 year old guy with 4 kids loses his job. Bush's advice to him is - go to community college. What a joke. Kerry obviously was more impressive.
Qaiser Bakhtiari, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Neither of them won. They are both out of material and keep using the same cliché one liners and catch phrases on each other: Kerry the flip flopper vs. Bush the war monger.
John, San Antonio, Tx, USA
Both men did a good job of appealing to their bases, though Bush seemed a bit nervous and highly strung. Kerry did a better job of appealing to swing voters, in my opinion.
Genie Babb, Anchorage, AK
I don't think that either candidate won this debate. Kerry did have strong performances in the first two, but seemed to stall and falter here. Not that Mr Bush did any better; as usual, his poor public speaking skills manifested by way of his being unable to clearly define any of his plans, resorting to much of the same old muck throwing of a campaign advert.
Blake Murphy, Pittsburgh, PA
Bush won on substance, Kerry won on style. So even though technically Bush won, polls will show it a tie.
Justin Hughes, Tacoma, USA
This was a close debate, and nothing new was revealed. The President, especially, seems to be ignoring his first term when describing what he's going to do for America if re-elected.
Paul Gore, Oakland, OR USA
I definitely do not agree that Senator Kerry faired better in the second debate. President Bush was far superior again tonight and actually had substance to his answers. Kerry says he has a plan, but you never hear the substance. He's simply a politician.
Kathy Kiepert, Menomonee Falls, WI
I can't believe that Bush started talking about education when asked about the minimum wage. This country needs an increase in the minimum wage so badly and he brushed it aside.
Richard Kelly, Cleveland
Mr. Kerry clearly appeared stronger in this debate than he did in the second, answering several of Mr. Bush's charges directly which I think played well with the American people. I think he clearly has integrity, a real plan for America and a the ability to unite this country to have that vision realized.
Maura Manning, MD, Prospect, Ohio, USA
Again, John Kerry was, without question, the more intelligent and intelligible, the better prepared, the candidate that showed strength, consistency and understanding of American and world issues. Bush is a child pretending to be president in comparison.
Regan Gill, Berkeley, CA USA
Bush did a great job. While he may not be as smooth a speaker as Kerry, he had a direct answer to every question and was able to articulate how he envisions government to be an enabler vs. primary provider. Kerry spoke of plans but gave few details and mostly criticized Bush.
Andrea, NY, USA
John Kerry has left no doubt that he has the strength and character we need in a commander in chief. He has shown the American people his command of the facts, steady demeanour, and well reasoned arguments. He offered hope and optimism, and showed that he will fight for middle class families.
Richard Bennett, Vancover, WA US
Kerry clearly won. I have friends in Arizona who tell me that at least 1000 illegal Mexicans cross over their ranch every week. Bush has done nothing about this, neither has he plugged the holes at our ports regarding container ships or completed security programs at the Canadian border. With the entire Middle East and the Europeans against us, we have no alternative but to strengthen our defences. Kerry knows how to get this done.
David W. Croft, Tampa, FL, USA
The third debate featured the most lucid of Bush's performances, but it was too little, too late. He still came across as whiny, short-tempered and childish in the face of John Kerry's devastating factual calm. If they had been playing baseball, the Kerry/Edwards team would credited with sweeping the series.
Adrienne Collier, Irvington NJ USA
Kerry has once again shown that he has the poise, the temperament and a mastery of the issues that far surpasses our miserable President Bush. I fear that if Bush is re-elected, our nation is doomed, and I, along with many of my countrymen, will be leaving it.
Margaret, Dallas, Texas USA
As a moderate Republican I was particularly impressed by Kerry's strong emphasis of fiscal responsibility and commitment to balance the budget. Before the last debate I saw Kerry as rather weak, but he seemed to demonstrate real resolve and common sense. He certainly surprised me; he came across as more Republican than Bush at times.
Alexander Zorach, Cleveland, OH
Kerry was the winner. Kerry is so presidential and with much hope he will win the election. If our votes count, he will win.
Yvonne Herr, Bandon, Or. USA
Kerry in a landslide. Bush was horrible in the first debate and has carefully worked his way up to not very good.
John Malecki, New York City, USA
|
The more President Bush debates, the better he gets
|
The more President Bush debates, the better he gets. Kerry on the other hand was consistent. Kerry demonstrated substance and a grasp of the issues. The President demonstrated his Texan charm. Kerry won the day.
KWS, US
Kerry, hands down, had a more complete command of the facts, as was demonstrated in the 2 prior debates. I Have not changed my mind about my vote. Bush stood in the shadow of Kerry's articulation, intelligence and honesty in discussion of the issues.
Jacqueline Smee, Mimbres, New Mexico, USA
John Kerry won the debate, hands down. I will still cast my vote for John Kerry. I think that George Bush was defensive and repetitive and unclear. John Kerry was focused, articulate and convincing in his arguments and proposals. What I missed was John Kerry clearly refuting the distortions of his record in the Senate by Bush, and a discussion of stem cell research and gas prices. I think Kerry has a very strong chance to legitimately win the election.
Dian Betjime, Los Angeles, California, USA
Mr. George W Bush won the debate without any trouble. I am sure he'll lead America well!
Sanjaya Silva, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Kerry by a mile. The wonder continues to be how Mr. Bush can lie with a straight face and still be respected. At least in the US...
Robin Patt-Corner, Bethesda, USA
Kerry clearly had the advantage with very good and well framed arguments. Bush sounded like a drama artist with fake and varied emotions.
Vasanth Kumar, Kalamazoo, Michigan
Tonight's debate underscored the difference in approach between Kerry and Bush. Kerry works with the intellect, Bush from ideology -- with a litany of changing rationales to justify his agenda. I'm amazed this country takes him seriously.
Dan Compton, Portland, OR USA
Kerry definitely won. Bush seems to think that education is the panacea for unemployment.
Jodi Martinez, Cozad, Nebraska
It's three-wins-in-a-row for John Kerry. This debate confirms that Kerry is the best candidate for commander-in-chief and president. Kerry's clear answers show that he can think through complex issues.
Helen, San Francisco, CA, USA
Kerry is the smart one. I know quality when I see it. This man has the width & breath of experience and knowledge with integrity, measured thought, and a real zest for life that will bring us together to achieve our potential.
Anstett, Albuquerque, New Mexico USA
I think John Kerry again was commanding and presidential, while Bush constantly stumbled taking 30 minutes to settle down. The clear issue is this. Most Americans feel uncomfortable and believe the country needs change. The President has run on staying resolute and says he never made a mistake. Deep down in our souls, we know we need a change.
John Fout, New York, NY
Kerry was clear, substantive, and thoughtful. Bush was shifty, shallow, and juvenile.
Lloyd Goldwasser, El Cerrito, CA USA
The debate was another win for Kerry. Kerry showed mastery debating skills over George Bush on almost all domestic issues brought up in the debate: especially outsourcing.
Jeff Maddox, Parkersburg, WV, USA
I think this debate didn't have a clear winner but I do think it clearly shows the true differences between the two candidates. Those who already know who they are going to vote for were unswayed but the great thing about the debate is that there are clear differences and those who have been undecided should be able to decide on who they are going to vote for after these debates. I think Mr Bush didn't answer some of the questions clearly, he was vague once again about the Supreme Court Justice and the Roe vs. Wade issue. He clearly wants a judge who will decide issues like Mr Bush would but he will not admit that. Instead he just beats around bush and I think Mr Kerry got right to the issues, clearly and to the point without being vague.
Kevin Gaspari, Seattle, USA
I fear that the debate does not matter much - that Kerry's low profile this past summer and the media's misrepresentation of his opinions on the war in Iraq (that he is wishy-washy, and not understandably changing his views with the consideration of new information)will result in a loss for the Democratic Party. Politics is as much acting as it is "public service," and George W. Bush has the stronger on screen persona, period.
Carey Clifford, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Debates are immaterial. Kerry won the first. The second was a draw. The third has been won by Bush. And so what? Most American voters have already made their minds a long time ago. Bush will win a second term.
Mirek Kondracki, American in Poland
How can anyone say that Bush won this debate? All he did was improve on his disastrous performance of the first one. This debate showed that Bush has no grasp of the issues and also explains why he gave so few press conferences while in the White House.
D. Del Pino, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Bush won. While Kerry's presence and presentation at the final debate was presidential, he furthered his long-standing reputation as a tax-and-spend liberal. He cannot possibly pay for his grandiose "plans" without raising taxes on the middle class. He talks a good game but his 20-year senate record speaks for itself.
Shelley, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Kerry clearly won this debate by offering his plan and his clarity on the issues. Labels and smear tactics are old, useless tactics and I believe they worked against Bush.
J. T. Murray, Alexandria, VA, USA
This was a clear victory for George Bush, no spinning here!
P. Bessong, Charlottesville, USA
I believe George Bush won the debate. As a college student I feel George Bush did an excellent job in using John Kerry's 20 years in the senate to prove that his promises won't be kept. If he didn't perform in the senate, so what makes us believe that he will perform as president.
Matthew, San Diego, CA, USA
Both candidates failed to address the issue of illegal immigration. They were placating to us as usual. As a young and informed voter, I have little faith either candidate will effectively lead the country.
Tomas Sidenfaden, Los Angeles, CA, USA
John Kerry clearly won the debate with well composed, thoughtful answers to the moderator's questions. Bush, on the other hand, recycled old cliches. That is, when he was making any sense at all.
Judy Tate, New York, USA
The first gulf war passed the "global test", yet this was not enough for Mr Kerry to support action. Bush should have hammered this home in the first two debates. Kerry acknowledges that nuclear proliferation is currently the gravest threat to the United States, but I am not convinced he has the strength to act in the face of another attack.
Mike, McKinney, TX, USA
Dignity and eloquence vs. "heh heh heh" and slapping the podium continuously. John Kerry won. Oh, and 3 other things in John Kerry's favor: integrity, integrity, integrity.
Elaine Cole, Oregon, USA
Clearly a win for Kerry. He talks sense while Bush just harps... People want change and Kerry will deliver it for us...
Reza, San Diego, USA
I admit that I would have voted for a poodle had I thought that it stood a chance against "GWB". These debates have demonstrated that Kerry has the vision and intellect to lead this country in a positive and less divisive direction.
Erica Christie, Santa Barbara, California, USA
Kerry creamed Bush. Laura better schedule the movers in case its a snowy January!
Alexander Loriot, Staten Island, NY, USA
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~32~RS~)
One-Minute World News
News services
E-mail this to a friend
Printable version
