This is the second page of your comments on the US presidential election.
Return to the first page to add to the debate.
The following comments reflect the balance of opinion we have received so far:
 |
I thought Kerry debated with style and grace
|
I thought Kerry debated with style and grace, while the President attempted a more plain spoken method to convey his reasons and beliefs for his foreign policies. As the incumbent, the President was placed in the position of defending his difficult decisions during a time of global war, and explaining the sweeping changes he sees as leading to a final solution to America's threat from terrorism. As the challenger, Kerry was the classic "snake-oil" salesman, and Monday Morning Quarterback wrapped into one! All Kerry said was, "George does everything bad, bad, bad!", and "My plan is to do everything the President is doing now, just faster, stronger, better, cheaper, and with a lemon fresh sent!" Please. The real John Kerry was exposed by the moderator's question, "Senator Kerry, how would you diplomatically handle the North Korea nuclear situation? Multilaterally (as the President is doing) or Bilaterally?" John Kerry gave his true answer: "Both!" He decided not to make a decision. I'm sticking with Bush.
Joseph, Kentucky, USA
As I suspected the comments here show the debate did nothing to change anyone's mind. Kerry supporters claim victory as do Bush fans. As a solid conservative I was disappointed Bush missed opportunities to articulate his past accomplishments and a vision for the future. His constant charge that Kerry is a flip flopper is growing stale. On the other hand Kerry was the classic Democrat, making grand promises without any mention of how he intends to achieve his goals. Seriously, does he really believe he is going to march up to North Korea and demand they disarm with any success? Anyway, overall this debate lacked any substance and provided no new information. Hope the next ones are better.
K Walker, Los Angeles, USA
John Kerry had a strong performance, setting out a clear program for both an end to the war in Iraq, and how to deal with terrorism as well as a strong grasp of the issues around North Korea, Iran and the tragedy in Darfur. George Bush on the other hand offered nothing of substance and was reduced to whining about Kerry's supposed message of "the wrong war at the wrong time and in the wrong place." br />Rev. David Kashangaki, USA/Kenya
I was impressed with John Kerry's clear and confident manner. He acted like a leader. It was painful to watch our current Commander-in-Chief become irritated on defensive about subjects he should be most confident and knowledgeable about.
Dalena, Oregon, USA
Last night's presidential debate highlighted the ignorance of the two American candidates about world politics and history. To mention a few: I couldn't help laugh when George W. Bush said UA instead of EU when he was talking about European alliances. Kerry on his part said that weapons of mass destruction cross the border into Iraq to blow up people. What a laughing stock it was for two American presidential hopefuls to expose their American self-centred attitudes!
Omar Mohamed, Mogadishu, Somalia
Sen. Kerry was clear and concise in every answer he gave - decisive in his delivery. The President was searching for answers and cluttered his responses by rambling and being consistent in his use of "ahhh...ummm". Sen. Kerry clearly put Pres. Bush on the defensive and forced him to answer for what he has done the past four years. Kerry easily won but I would have liked him to address the "flip-flop" issue as a question of leadership. He touched on it briefly but needs to say that a leader is always taking in new information to make decisions with. I don't trust anyone that makes a snap judgement then will not change his/her mind despite new information. Pres. Bush just changes his spin.
J Cullinane, Redwood City, CA - USA
I will vote for Kerry who thinks before he acts. Bush rushes in and thinks he's playing offensive football. He's playing with our young people's lives and I will gladly vote for John Kerry! It's time for a change. Kerry had a calm command of the debate while Bush's blood pressure skyrocketed. We don't need an angry president; we need a smart president who will restore our allies' faith in America. God Bless our troops and God Bless John Kerry and especially, God Bless America.
Judy Swezy, Independence MO 64052-USA
The comparison between Kerry and Bush in this first debate couldn't have been more striking. While Kerry clearly has a command of the issues and is able to articulate what he will do if elected, I felt I was finally seeing the "C-student Bush" that the administration has been carefully and deliberately hiding from us. When Bush is forced to think on his feet, even to the limited extent required here, it is a true contrast from the guy we usually see who reads to groups of hand-picked and sworn supporters from scripts written (and researched) by others. Last night Bush clearly had trouble recalling critical facts, pronouncing relevant names and places, and even putting together sentences. Kerry particularly resonated with me when he described how, during the Cuban missile crisis in 1962, French President Charles de Gaulle accepted the word of the president of the US without needing to see proof. When Kerry said that the current US leadership is no longer seen as meriting this sort of trust in the world, I recalled watching Colin Powell making the case to the UN for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Kristen Kroll, Saint Louis, MO USA
Kerry changed my mind in the debate. I was ambivalent about both candidates before, now I have confidence in Mr. Kerry.
Kal Applbaum, Milwaukee Wisc.
Bush won, Kerry did not give a clear answer to any question
Anonymous
There are still, I believe, certain issues on foreign policy that John Kerry will need to work on and clarify, not necessarily for the audiences but for himself. Last night's mistake, in my opinion, was that he suddenly tossed Israel in as related to Iraq. His implication was that if they solved the problem in Iraq then all other contentious issues in the Middle East (such as Israel/Palestine) will also be solved. At a more deeper level, this implied the US support of Israel. Firstly, he shouldn't have stated that bluntly, because obviously siding with either Israel or Palestine will not solve the problem. There has got to be consensus there. In this respect, American foreign policy will have to go back to Clinton's 1995 triumph at Camp David with Itzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat shaking hands. There is no room for siding. Secondly, there is no logical flow that solving the Iraq issue, will make it easier to solve the Israeli issue. I believe it is the other way around, and I am not alone in this belief. It is there where the entire Arab discontent can be traced back to. Also, he risked losing some votes from American citizens of Arab origin.
Alina Palimaru, Philadelphia, USA
I am sick of pretending I am Canadian when overseas(because the world hates us right now!). Kerry can give us back some pride.
Beth Buckland, Chicago, IL USA
I have been a Republican all my life and sincerely wanted to see George W. Bush re-elected as President. However, after watching the debate last night, I feel that Kerry presented a real case as to why he should be the next President. Bush just didn't seem to acknowledge the war as it is or that we are still looking for OBL 3 years later. While, I am still a conservative, I need to know that we have leadership around the world too.
Sarah A, Houston, Texas, USA
From an unbiased stand point, I would have to say Kerry was more poised and articulate than Bush. Bush was on the defensive the whole debate. If his administration was above reproach there would be no need for him to be defensive. I also think Kerry wasn't very persuasive in his defence of his position on Iraq. His reasoning wasn't very persuasive. "I was for the war, just not rushing in." I didn't buy it. The vote, as far as I know, was to go to war. I am an independent voter. I don't commit my vote (even though it may not count) to one ideology. In 2000 I voted for Nader because I feel there are more serious problems here in America that should be dealt with before we go nation building. In conclusion, Kerry was more appealing over all than Bush. So I feel Kerry won the debate.
Michael, Iowa City, IA USA
I listened to the "debate" on the radio and was disappointed by both candidates. To call the Bush-Kerry exchange a debate is ridiculous and insulting; what I mostly heard was "you did so!--no I didn't!"; "I have a better plan!--no you don't!" repeated over and over again. The 90 minutes would have been far better spent by giving each candidate 15-20 minutes to state his position about the foreign policy issues confronting the United States with a 5-10 minute opportunity for rebuttal. To demonstrate how superficial the whole "show" was is the fact that neither candidate even mentioned the tragic, continuing Israeli/Palestinian conflict--which has resulted in so much death and misery on both sides, which has given birth to and continues to feed the Islamist terrorist movement, and which the United States could and should have taken care of years ago by enforcing a just and equitable settlement on the parties. It is discouraging to think that some voters will base their decision on such superficial presidential "debates".
Michael J. Berezowsky, Troy, Michigan USA
|
The debate went well despite the fact that the rule book limited any "real" debate.
|
The debate went well despite the fact that the rule book limited any "real" debate. However, right out of the gate Kerry started his attack and you could see Bush get visibly flustered and break a few of his own rules. You could tell that Kerry is a better speaker than Bush. My main argument is the fact that Bush clearly lies about facts and every chance he had tried to put his parties spin on Kerry. Kerry is inconsistent, which he is not and anyone that has looked at his record can see that. Unfortunately, times have changed and being elected President of the United States is no longer based on your record or your performance but on how well you and your party can spin the issues. The American people have become sheep following and believing what other people tell us. If anyone with a truly open honest mind sat down and watched really watched the debate they know who won. I just hope there are still enough of them out there to affect this coming election.
Tony, Houston, Texas
Kerry was very articulate and clear. Bush showed his frustration and sometimes, he seemed he didn't need all the time allotted to him to make his position. Bush assumed that his repeated assertions - however far removed from reality - will convey his point. But he didn't.
Mouli Narayanan, Portland, Oregon, USA
Kerry occasionally lost focus slightly & rambled, however always got back to the point quickly (possibly a function of the debate's time structure). Bush appeared to be consistently off-balance & relying more on a "one-trick pony" than on a thinking analysis of the points raised. He also attempted (probably unconsciously) to change questions to be about the points he wanted to make. Advantage? Kerry.
Bill Nichols, Shalimar, FL, US
Kerry failed to deliver the knock-out punch everyone expected him to deliver with ease while Bush failed to deliver the gaff-full performance everyone expected. Kerry needed to knock-out Bush with his vision. Instead he told us to go to JFK.com for details. By failing to fail with gaffs, Bush actually won.
David, Boca Raton, Florida - USA
I think Kerry was strong, to the point and more articulate. Bush merely kept on repeating the same thing over and over again... And his choice of words very, very poor
Tapen Sinha, Cincinnati, USA
It's pretty clear that Kerry trounced Bush in the debate. Halfway through Bush seemed impatient to leave the podium. Kerry made his point much clearer although his constant theme of getting help from our allies won't play well in Middle America. Bush sounded monarchical, as if because he said something, this obviated any response or conversation. Kerry missed one golden opportunity that the democrats have not picked up on amazingly enough. Jon Stewart of the Daily Show elaborated this point in an interview with R Ralph Reed. Sure Bush is steadfast and resolute, but he's frequently wrong. It's not a mixed message to change and adapt your policies to events; it's leadership!
Gabriel Elias, Alexandria, VA
The debate itself was exactly what I expected. Bush remained firm and Kerry in true politician form eloquently said what people wanted to hear. Personally, I find Bush far more credible and a stronger leader than Kerry. I know where I stand with Bush. With Kerry, I can't help feeling that he'll be too soft in tough times to be an effective Commander in Chief.
Valerie, An American living in London
Kerry was clear and spot-on. Bush was on the defensive and struggled to make his positions credible.
Jack Neefus, College Park, Maryland, US
Kerry clearly won the debate. He showed that he has a vision for our country and the strong character to lead us. I was very impressed!
Frances Kenna, Terra Alta, WV
It was John Kerry's debate to lose and he didn't. He stood well on all of the questions. Answered everything he was asked, unlike Bush who evaded most of the questions, just as he does in office. One interesting aside was the fact that the figures the President kept trying to pound out about the number of Iraqi's trained to fight is incorrect, only half of what he said and the American press jumped on that immediately .Kerry clearly is the better choice.
Mary Chichetto, Brewster, Ma.
Bush did quite well in memorizing his 3-4 lines. But when asked questions about things he wasn't prepared for, he stumbled back into his "freedom and democracy" rhetoric. All that hard work watching TV must have really tired the president out.
Rachel, St. Paul, USA
It was a clear win for Kerry. Bush looked annoyed and uncomfortable trying to sell his "mixed messages" theme because Kerry responded firmly and convincingly to the charge each time. Of the two, Kerry appeared smarter, more serious and more presidential.
Kenneth Weeks, Rockville, MD, USA
The Presidential debate last night was amazing. I can't believe how out-of-place President Bush seemed given how consistent and strong his performance in previous debates has been. He's always sounded like a broken record, but last night there was an extra skip that made him look absolutely foolish. Kerry made it obvious he's always been consistent on Iraq and it is President Bush who has wavered on his promises and, more importantly, his performance.
Jason Kragner, Houston, Texas USA
As a British Citizen currently living in the US I watched the debate live yesterday evening. I was impressed with John Kerry's focus on a need for a global alliance regarding Iraq. The US president is not just a domestic leader but must be a global leader. Bush has little credibility on a Global scale and this is a problem that is recognized by Kerry.
Kerry Bonner, Gilbertsville USA
It scares me that so many people back Bush, remember that 9/11 happened on his watch, he didn't protect America then and he still isn't. How anyone can say he won the debate with his stuttering, tactless, rambling is a joke , and very scary, wake up America... quit thinking with your bank accounts, you have much more to lose if he is elected.
Jack, PC, USA
Kerry's approach was measured and lucid. Could we say the same about Bush? You sensed that had they not been in a televised debate, Bush would have reverted to less temperate measures to combat Kerry's arguments. The man's a dangerous fool.
Colin Jackson, York, UK
Kerry seemed clearly the more competent and capable man to lead the American people, but neither candidate provided any clear material in their statements to put themselves into a position of undeniable superiority over their opponent.
Joseph Schaedler, Minneapolis, USA
I was more impressed by Kerry than Bush. Kerry spoke more forcefully, used facts better, and seemed more confident. Bush kept repeating the same sad attack on Kerry's being wishy washy. Kerry's arguments demanded a better response
William Punch, Webster, WI, USA
Kerry gave us hope for a new start in Iraq, so we can finish what we started. Kerry has specific plans: Bush had shallow promises.
Peter , Michigan, USA
Well finally John Kerry has shown us that he can and will make a powerful leader for this country. I voted for Bush in the last election as I did not think Gore had a handle on reality, Boy was I wrong on that one, it would appear that Bush is the one who does not have a handle on reality, I will not be making the same mistake in November.
JDM, Miami, Florida
John Kerry, hands down! He was superior in every respect: he was commanding, presidential, and demonstrated a far superior understanding of complex issues. He remained calm and collected throughout. Bush's debating skills were far inferior; in addition, his fumbling, hesitancy, confused responses and obfuscation of facts merely showed everyone that issues requiring presidential judgement were just way over his head.
Sam Massari, Boca Raton, FL, USA
Kerry was sure, confident and had poise. Bush seemed tired and confused. After this I'm going to vote for Kerry in November.
Darren, Los Angeles, CA, USA
I think that last night America was finally reminded what a real president should sound like: informed, thoughtful, and articulate. Not desperately clinging to tired rhetoric! As a young person, I hope my generation values the need for a true American statesman. I believe Kerry is the clear choice and the winner of last night's debate.
Christopher Maikish, age 25, NY, USA
For the first time in weeks, I am hopeful about the outcome of our next presidential election! Between the discouraging poll figures, the proliferation of attack ads, and the lack of effort by many in the media to hold politicians accountable for their distorted or baseless claims..... it looked like President Bush was assured of another four years in the White House. But tonight, as the two candidates stood side-by-side fielding the difficult questions posed to them, it was obvious-beyond the reach of any spin doctors-that Kerry deserves to be our next president. He had an impressive command of the facts and a clear understanding of complex issues. Senator Kerry was articulate, pragmatic, forceful, sincere and dignified... I could go on and on, but I think one word says it best: presidential!
D Ellen , St. Louis, MO USA
I think that if Ralph Nader had been allowed into this "old boy's club" monologue there could have been two clear runners-up instead of a seeming tie.
Mark, Vienna, Austria
In this first debate Kerry's supposed "wavering" on Iraq became something else: an intelligent perceptiveness. Bush's "steadfast resolve" transmogrified into something worse: short-sighted fundamentalism. America wants intelligent resolve to combat terrorism; whereas Bush has only shown resolve, John Kerry has thankfully displayed both acumen AND determination.
Chad, Denver, CO
It was a score draw. They both landed a few punches, but neither one of them demolished the other.
Pete, Birmingham, UK
I stayed awake to watch the debate and was left hoping that Kerry wins. Bush showed he has nothing left to give. I can't remember international opinion ever being so low of one of our greatest allies. I hope Kerry wins, for all of us.
Mike, Preston, England
Kerry won; he was excellent! He reduced Bush to a cowering and stammering little broken record.
Nicholas A. Champlin, Alameda, CA (USA)
My impression is that being a little more articulate doesn't hide the fact that Kerry is more willing to give in facing blackmailing from North Korea, and less likely to act decisively in the war against terror. Bush knows the art of when to compromise and Kerry is merely compromising the principle of freedom for political gains.
Ben Qiu, Santa Clara, California, USA
Kerry beat Bush on every level. Presentation, issues, coherence, overall performance. He looked very presidential. I felt sorry for the Babbling Bush who tried so hard to memorize his lines, which he kept repeating.
Eric, Los Angeles CA
John Kerry is head and shoulders above George Bush in stature, substance, and intellect. Bush seemed nervous and did not seem to have his facts at his finger-tips. Kerry's effective punch line was that the war in Iraq had been a diversion that had no links with the September 11 attacks and was a colossal error of judgement. Kerry came out of the exercise smelling of roses!
Pancha Chandra, Brussels, Belgium
|
We were getting our first serious look at the next President of the United States in John Kerry
|
I think we were getting our first serious look at the next President of the United States in John Kerry. The debate was centred on Foreign Policy and Terrorism. An area where Bush claims to have the upper hand. Instead he was on the defensive trying to keep up with Kerry's charges on Bush's record. The Domestic and Economic debates will be quite a spectacle I imagine. Bush has nothing to base his position on in that regards.
Gabriel, California
Bush does not realize that repeating the same "my opponent is changing his views" statement does not answer any questions. Kerry had credibility on his table, Bush as usual had lies, more lies and more damn lies.
Bheeshm Chaudhary, Tucson, Arizona
May John Kerry's superior performance in tonight's debate translate into victory in November. Or else, I fear for the future of the United States.
Brian Schaefer, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Mr. Kerry is a better candidate than Mr. Bush. He is mature, straight talking and moreover the world is usually quieter and safer place whenever the Democrats are ruling. Looks like Republicans always want to stir the world around whenever they are in power.
Mike Maonde, Lusaka, Zambia
Bush just can't admit when he has made a mistake, but his war against Iraq will breed terrorism, not stop it. Kerry was right to say that finding Bin Laden was a job bush botched.
Don Shank, Bellingham, USA
|
Bush is the front runner when it comes to security
|
The debates proved that both candidates are marginal at best. However, I am not at all comfortable with Kerry's constant polling of our "allies" to make our security decisions. Bush is the front runner when it comes to security.
Andy, Orlando, Fl
If Bush performs the same way in the next two debates as he has done in the first debate then his next four years will be spent on his ranch!
Graham Kehoe, Nanaimo, Canada
If we vote Bush back in, the world will loose all faith in America, and I'll loose some too. Anyone who couldn't see Kerry crushing his opponent (with his own father's words even) is blind or just has blind faith.
Greg Ortega, Chico, Ca
John Kerry wiped the floor with Bush clearly proving he is the better man for the job. There will be a terror alert in the US within a day or so and I will be shocked if Bush has the courage to show up to another debate with Kerry.
Daniel J Isbister, Massachusetts, USA
We watched that discussion very carefully. We appreciate Mr John Kerry, for his outstanding and peaceful presentation of what he stands for. We expect brave decisions from the people of USA, like choosing Mr Kerry as the president. A man with good vision and thoughtful action.
Dhanyalekshmi, Kerala, India
Bush won the debate on content- that is what matters most. Kerry referenced facts incorrectly. Bush was stronger in the beginning of the debate, but lost some of his steam later. His visit with hurricane victims that morning may have made him tired during the debates. Bush did not knockout Kerry, but he demonstrated that he is as smart as Kerry. Overall, Bush was the winner.
Kate Coveski, Boston, MA
|
Bush has reduced himself to a "single issue" candidate.
|
Bush has reduced himself to a "single issue" candidate. All he can do is blather on about 9/11, "freedom" and "democracy" - these latter two are something that Americans have lost under him and that Iraqis will not see for many decades. I am not religious, but God help us all if Bush wins the election.
AC, UK
I recorded the debate and have just finished watching it. Right from the get-go, Kerry was confident, decisive, and consistent. Bush was anything but. Bush slumped, shrugged, and smirked. Kerry wiped the floor with him, and remained nice about it for the whole 90 minutes. My estimation of John Kerry this morning is miles higher than it was yesterday. This will have a big impact on the election.
Mike Mitchell, High Wycombe, UK
What a refreshing change it was to see the two candidates present their positions (this was no debate) in real-time without the scrutiny and spin of the talking heads and pundits. Both men articulate their views, I think, with clarity. If only the whole campaign had been like this then I feel the American public could make an informed decision based on the facts and issues rather than the smears of both sides
Dave Storey, Guildford, UK
Kerry blew it when he admitted that he would not defend America against Terrorist without Global Approval. We will not wait for approval from nations such as France & Germany that make illegal deals with despots such as Saddam. Our National Sovereignty is still in our hands and we will not vote for a man that came home & told horrific lies about his fellow troops to advance his political career and is now willing to endanger our troops in Iraq to win the Presidency. Bush is a man of principal and he alone understands American values. We will not give in to the Terrorists, ever!
T Buchanan, Nashville, TN USA
The Americans have a choice to make here. If they want to remain at war then Bush is the right candidate and if they want to mend their relationship with the rest of the world then Kerry is the best choice. I agree with Kerry that the wrong approach was used to disarm Saddam. Imagine children perishing in Iraq and you feel Bush is doing the right The only way we can win a war on terror is by choosing the best approach to fighting it. Africa is behind Kerry.
Resai, Zimbabwe
I watched the debate on BBC 24. By the end, I was still had not heard any consistent message from Kerry except "I am not Bush". I can't vote in the US, but I wouldn't vote for a jellyfish!
BF, London, UK
Senator Kerry out-performed Bush in every respect in this debate. In the last 4 years, we have forgotten what it is like to have a truly presidential man running the country. Tonight, we were reminded. Senator Kerry is informed on every aspect of every issue and has proven that he is dedicated to and capable of making our country safer at home and more respected in the world. He is articulate, clear, consistent, confident and sincere, all in sharp contrast to Mr. Bush. Congratulations, Senator Kerry, we're behind you 100%.
Gabrielle, Northridge, CA, USA
Pres. Bush was clearly "staying on message" and seemed lost when the questions did not quite fit what he was prepared for. On the other hand, Sen. Kerry demonstrated his ability to think on his feet, as well as his critical understanding of the challenges that face America and the world. Although I did not agree with everything he said, I strongly believe that he would be a much better president than "W."
Nathan K. Moses , San Diego, US
Bush sounded just like he usually does, and he said the same sorts of things as he normally does. Kerry sounded much less wordy than he normally does, and many of his positions have changed over the last few weeks. I can hardly wait to see who Kerry is going to be during the NEXT debate!
Jeffrey Hall, Norwalk, Connecticut USA
Unfortunately for the Democrats, Senator Kerry came across as too assured, knowledgeable, confident of his facts, intelligent and decisive. Based on the last four years, these are clearly not traits we Americans desire in our Presidents.
Mike, American Ex-pat and Voter
I watched the debate keenly and my views are changed about Kerry. He was more clear about foreign policies than Mr. Bush. He wants Americans to be safe but also wants them to regain their lost respect. Mr. Bush wants American to be safe only. Bush is not very clear about his enemy but Kerry is. At times, Bush looked annoyed but Kerry was relaxed. I don't know who did better, but certainly Kerry did more what was expected from him. God Bless both of them.
Mudassir Hussein, Pakistan Having just watched the first debate, we are completely impressed with John Kerry's performance. His message was clear and he presented a comprehensive plan for fighting terrorism, and completing the mission in Iraq. President Bush appeared more uncertain and defensive than usual. His message was weak and repetitive. He must have said "this is hard work" at least ten times, while failing to address the significant failures of his policies on Iraq and terror.
Frank Campbell, Bel Air, CA USA
The question about Putin, wisely asked, seemed more like a trap for Bush. As in Russia, the president is using the war against terror to fight off his political rival. This is dangerously undemocratic, since it treats the election process as a threat to presidential policy objectives. Tonight Kerry was the clear winner. He came across as forthright, very clear about his policies (the "flip flop" label is now history); and an excellent candidate whose standing in the polls will now drastically improve.
Simon Dixon, Bozeman, Montana, USA
|
Bush did a magnificent job exposing Kerry's wavering and varying opinions
|
To all those in this debate who thought Kerry won... which debate were you watching? Bush did a magnificent job exposing Kerry's wavering and varying opinions from Iraq to the Patriot Act. The sad thing is the likes of us in this country have grown used to politicians of little substance, so the likes of Bush, determined, steadfast and honest causes many of us here to feel un-comfortable.
Ed H, UK
I thought that Kerry wiped the floor with Bush on the issues that matter. Bush's main charge - that Kerry flip-flops - just doesn't hold water. Common sense tells you that politicians change their positions all the time, and Bush has done his fair share. What matters isn't how much you change, but whether your positions are the right ones, or getting better.
Ryan Bodanyi, Providence, RI, USA
Kerry went to VN war, he came back home and said "I made a mistake". Kerry voted for the Iraq war, he now said "I made a mistake". I hope he will not say "I made a mistake" after he becomes the president of the U.S.A.
Samuel Caos, Fountain Valley, CA USA
It depends how victory is being judged. I would say it was a draw. Existing supporters of either man will have remained unmoved by both displays. The intention of the debate was to appeal to the undecided voter and I don't think it will have made much impact in that regard. Bush didn't offer Kerry a gift by being rambling and inept or short on detail, as some might have expected. Those who are undecided have maintained that status despite both party conventions and the events in Iraq. I think the debate on domestic issues will have a greater impact on the undecided voter and that Kerry has a distinct advantage. With the foreign policy debate, he always has the fact that he voted in support of the war hanging over his head.
Tony, England
With President Bush habitually lampooned as an "idiot" and Senator Kerry hailed as a great debater, expectations becomes a huge factor in determining the victor. George Bush didn't drop the ball and John Kerry didn't strike any telling blows. Bush wins on the basis of lower expectations.
Simon Hamilton, Belfast, Northern Ireland
Kerry mopped up the floor with Bush, then squeezed the water out of him and hung him out to dry.
Pamela Gross, Santa Barbara, California, USA
Bush was on the ropes, big time. He took some nasty punches and all he could do was block and shield. Bloodied after a few rounds he shrank into a shell, citing "wrong war, wrong place, wrong time" over and over. Kerry flunked it once for me, missing out some of the countries out in Iraq helping the "peace effort" (Poland, for example), but not bad enough to lose many points. In the end Kerry won hands down. Sadly, Bush will still win the election!
Kevin, London, UK
If being articulate could be a key element for being elected president, Bush could never have been a president. Thank god that people out there, look for traits other than articulacy. For sure, the potential to lead often emerges under the pressure of difficult situations. Bush may be dumb but he is an honest person. If I had the chance to vote in the USA I would vote for Bush again and again and again even he lost on his war on terror. People should also remember than even just causes can be lost.
Herbert Kathewera, Malawi
John Kerry might not be an outstanding candidate, but this debate proved that he indeed will be a much better president, and that is what it is all about. To hear George Bush say that he knows how the world works is very, very frightening. What kind of world is he talking about? Good on John Kerry, his world looks more like the real world!
Jan Nicolaas Kind, Brasilia, Brazil
George Bush actually managed to make John Kerry look relaxed and not only by the belief-based rigidity of his positions. Kerry was the clear winner if intellectual clarity is relevant to the US electorate.
Allan Scott, London, England
I thought that Kerry won the debate hands down. He was confident, poised and seemed very sure of himself and his position. Bush seemed not to be on top of his brief. At times he took long, awkward pauses that almost made your heart stop. If you had just landed from Mars and were asked who was President, most people would have said Kerry. In that respect, even without a knockout punch, Kerry leaves the debate with his position enhanced.
Gerard Kelly, London
Bush won the debate and, if there's any justice in the world, should win the election because he talks about the facts and the realities that he has had to handle for the last three and a half years. Kerry is a fantasist. He sounded like a presidential candidate from a Hollywood movie - all platitudes and unrealistic promises. How can he build a broader coalition in Iraq, as he claims, when he insults the existing allies as "a coalition of the bribed" and ignores their sacrifices? And does he really think France and Germany will rush to send troops to Iraq just because there is a Democrat in the Whitehouse? They hate the US - Republicans and Democrats alike. The US election won't change that.
John , UK
With far superior rhetoric and background knowledge, Kerry easily out-classed the repetitive, unconvincing Bush. I am still, however, in need of some convincing as to the right of either to rule the most powerful nation in the world.
Joshua Blanchard, Brighton, UK
I only managed to catch the last 40 minutes of the debate but there is no doubt that Kerry won this hands-down. For every questioned asked, Bush seemed to take his time looking down at his notes to find a position written down by his aides; and if he didn't find it, he'd return to his resolve and values speech. America, please open thy eyes!!!
Sola Akinloye, London, UK
I hope that the people of the USA re-elect George Bush. His stance on defeating terror deserves support. Kerry's four point plan for Iraq is nothing more than a surrender document.
Joe Mooney, Wymondham UK
Kerry talked and presented well. However, he had no substance. Saying "I can do it better" over and over again is not the answer to how he will be a better president. His record in the senate for twenty years shows it: He accomplished nothing. If he accomplished nothing in twenty years, what can he expect to accomplish in four?
Jimmie, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
Clearly Bush got schooled by Kerry, but why would any voter be excited that Kerry is finally making a presentable case? His polished performance is only window dressing for 20 years of lacklustre performance in the Senate and a campaign with no message. The debate win will give Kerry a bump in the polls, but it is too little too late. The damage has been done. Bush will recover in time for the next debate. Though Bush did a poor job of countering Kerry's charges in Miami, his team will certainly sift through Kerry's words and highlight all of the flaws underlying the smooth veneer we saw on TV.
Henry, Slippery Rock, PA USA
Immediate post-debate polls suggest that up to a third of Americans thought Bush won the debate... Did we receive a different broadcast in the UK? Watching it live, I was embarrassed for Bush. It seemed like he had only committed three phrases to memory, and like a stubborn, angry child, stuck to them when the going got tough. This should be one of the easiest decisions Americans will ever have to make.
JC, London, UK
The support for Kerry's performance is more a reflection of the informed and educated readers that visit this website. Sadly the reality is that 90% of Americans live in a goldfish bowl and are unaware of the contempt that the rest of the world hold them in due to the actions of Dubya and his buddies. I really hope Kerry gets elected so he can attempt to restore the damage done by the current administration to the USA's reputation.
Fraser Perrie, London, UK
I think Kerry raised his credibility with solid facts, confidence, and even by admitting his mistake of "how he talks about war in Iraq". Kerry definitely had more concrete plans than Bush. But in all, I would watch the remaining debates to make a call on my presidential choice.
Nyomka, Japan
The question is how the debate played to the tiny number of actual voters who are truly undecided. Bush supporters will forgive his bumbling. Kerry supporters will think through "nuances" that seem to be contradictions at first blush. No polls, pundits, or politicians can reliably discern what the rest will do, and that is the only question. The numbers are too small, yet they will turn the election.
Matt Jones, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA
John Kerry was the more Presidential of the two. Kerry has a definite plan for the war in Iraq, for the war on terrorism, and for improved foreign policy. Bush would give us more of the same, which has destroyed U.S.A. credibility around the world.
Naomi Durant, Lindsborg, KS, USA
I didn't watch the debates. I guess because my vote was sealed prior to the debates when one decided to help and console the hurricane victims (President Bush) while the other went out for a manicure (Kerry).
Tammy Bailey, Madison, OH USA
Anyone who watched the debate and thinks the Bush-Kerry debate was a draw or that Kerry didn't win hands-down probably still believes there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, that Saddam Hussein had a part in 9/11, and that Santa Claus really does exist. Kerry was by far the winner. Coherent, clear, convincing, next to Bush's boring repetition of cliché, after cliché, after cliché.
Aaron Ernst, Portland, Oregon, USA
John Kerry exposed a fundamental difference between him and George Bush: He will adapt to the realities of the situation while Bush will not alter policy in the face of shifting situations.
Michael McKnight, Durham, USA
I have to admit that Bush has learnt a lot in these years, but it is not enough, he still does not look very bright. Unfortunately this election will affect the entire world not just USA, so please vote for Kerry, let America have a proper President.
Antonio, Lucca, Italy
Kerry was outstanding on this debate. He showed that he is ready to be the next commander in chief. He did a great job. I don't think I need to comment on Bush. His arguments were weak as always.
Bardhi, Utah
|
Kerry clearly outlined his foreign policies, which may win back some of the swing voters
|
Kerry was the more presidential in this debate. GW showed more of his nervousness and his usual strength, his charm did not come through adequately. In terms of ideas Kerry clearly outlined his foreign policies, which may win back some of the swing voters.
TM Hoogland, Houston, TX (Dutch)
Mr Bush was certainly right in his statement that he has shown the world he can make decisions and lead. But it still does not appear to have occurred to him that real leadership means making the right decisions and being answerable to the consequences from making the wrong ones. Unfortunately and yet again this debate just confirms how far out of step US politics is with the rest of the world.
Mansel, Oxford UK
President Bush is an ill informed embarrassment to so many of us here. Senator Kerry is clear and articulate and has an intelligence about the world which is needed badly. What some call inconsistency I respect as the ability to use new information in a sound way. Dear God, please help us elect this man!
Suzanne Drennan, Madison, WI USA
However hard John Kerry tried, he couldn't get George Bush to say the word 'Nuclear'....
Ahmed, Denver, CO
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~57~RS~)
One-Minute World News
News services
E-mail this to a friend
Printable version
