![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Friday, November 28, 1997 Published at 15:09 GMT Talking Point Are women's magazine's bad for you ? Your reaction <% ballot="34363" ' Check nothing is broken broken = 0 if ballot = "" then broken = 1 end if set vt = Server.Createobject("mps.Vote") openresult = vt.Open("Vote", "sa", "") ' Created object? if IsObject(vt) = TRUE then ' Opened db? if openresult = True AND broken = 0 then ballotresult = vt.SetBallotName(ballot) ' read the vote votetotal=(vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "yes")+vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "no")) if votetotal <> 0 then ' there are votes in the database numberyes = vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "yes") numberno = vt.GetVoteCount(ballot, "no") percentyes = Int((numberyes/votetotal)*100) percentno = 100 - percentyes ' fix graph so funny graph heights dont appear 'if percentyes = 0 then ' percentyes = 1 'end if 'if percentno = 0 then ' percentno = 1 'end if else ' summut went wrong frig it numberyes = 0 numberno = 0 percentyes = 50 percentno = 50 end if end if end if %> Votes so far:
Of course women's magazines are destructive to individuals. Women start to
believe some of the garbage printed about male sexual performance, etc and
expect supermen. If that is what women really need then men over 20 are
superfluous.
The women's magazines here in
Canada - mostly Canadian publications,
and some American, are mostly
just as described by the Social Affairs Unit.
They seem to rehash the same tired
subjects over and over. I don't know who they're catering
to, but I suppose when they keep publishing the same drivel all the
time, that's an indication someone is purchasing them.
I don't buy them ! That's what the web is for - entertainment.
Without my regular readings of women's magazines, I just wouldn't have any idea
about what women REALLY want. In that sense, I feel they are deserving of
their place on my coffee table.
Get a life, of course they are not. Penthouse is much more damaging than magazines like Woman's Weekly which provide positive reinforcement not sterotypes which the average woman cannot live up to.
I can't see how women's magazines could be bad for you, but I must admit I
find endless articles on sex and how to keep your man of little interest and wish
a newer style could be adopted in a new women's magazine.
Perhaps along the lines of some of the recent men's magazines.
I used to read women's mags when I was a teenager..to help figure things out. I don't think 'real' women read them because they are boring, repetitive, and if you read them for more than a year nothing new turns up.
As far as the sex thing goes.....at least we don't spreadeagle men all over these mags and objectify them...we'd rather look at ourselves, or get on with real life!!!
My impression of women's magazines is that many are just another example of
how we are all made to feel inferior, and ultimately resentful of our own
lives The constant bombardment of images displaying beautiful men and women and 'the lifestyles of the rich and famous' articles breed disatisfaction amongst many of the rest of us. This cannot be a healthy phenomenon and can lead only to the avid reading of more magazines to live this life vicariously, followed by
the frenzied buying of lottery tickets!
The majority of women's magazines appear to me to be actively encouraging the
old age premise that a woman's first and most important priority is to attract
and ensnare a man. Articles that embrace wider social and political issues are
rare.
Women's magazines often have really useful health tips and advice not carried
by mainstream media. Plus lots of time management suggestions for working
mothers. As for the sex - that's used to sell all mags, teens as well as
mens. Mostly it's tongue in cheek and I doubt most women spend any real time on
those sections. Celebrity gossip is always popular and people who say they
aren't interested in it are usually pretending.
Well, I think they play a main role in society in spreading thinking,
especially in the women's world. Besides, Men do gain a lot of benefits from reading them, don't you think so ? So, I strongly believe that women's magazines are good, not just for me, but for all the community.
My girlfriend finished with me after reading a copy of 'More'.
I like to read women's magazines because
then I can understand women better.
Now I have a better relationship with my
girlfriend and we talk more often about
what she fancies to do in the bedroom.
Hopefully more people will do this.
I don't tend to read them
but my comment is:
"What about the new men's magazines?"
These seem to be of the same genre
but aimed at men.
How can all women's magazines be lumped together like this? If you peruse the
wide selection of magazines on offer you will find a range of editorial
styles, reflecting the different age and social groups being targeted.
I also abhor the insinuation that these are the only magazines that women
read. I enjoy reading Marie Claire or New Woman for some escapism and a female
perspective on a range of issues. When I want more 'serious' reading matter,
the Economist , Business Week, or any number of other publications are
available.
The majority of womens magazines are not aimed at what women want, but at what the editors perceive women as wanting. Hence, a variety of useless information on where to buy your sprouts this Christmas. If there are going to be womens' magazines they should be far more interested in reality.
Have tabloid newspapers
been subject to the same
sort of research? They
are read by millions of
people every day and
claim to be news orientated,
something that the
so-called 'dumb' magazines
do not, and yet contain
relatively more sex and
trivia than women's magazines.
It is interesting to note
that this research was led
by a man pronouncing on women's
magazines; maybe he would
like to do similar research
on tabloid newspapers,
although given the circumstances
I think we could predict
the results.
Without being "bad", women's magazines perpetuate the idea that women have to
be slim, attractive and sexy -- without being intelligent. I do not read
these kinds of magazines - my time is too precious. I prefer to surf the Net.
If we are going to attack women's magazines on this score what about 'Loaded',
or 'FHM' with its 'position of the month'??
Most magazines, especially Cosmopolitan, make you feel totally inadequate
because you don't (like all other "normal and successful" women) balance a
great job, two lovely children, a perfect husband, a lover, a great figure and
other more intellectual interests.
No, there're not bad for you as long as people don't take them too seriously.
This goes for a large percentage of the British press too! As long as there's
market for the kind of thing they sell, I don't think we have a
right to complain. If women were unhappy with them, they would not buy them.
Women's Mags aren't bad, they teach us a lot about ourself in all kinds of ways :
physically, mentally and sexually.
They also tell us how to please both ourselves and our partner in all manners.
There are male magazines which do the same.
So why be sexist by just complaining about Women's Mags and not the Men's ?
If you've read one women's magazine, you've read them all. Articles such as
"7 ways to have an orgasm", "Pink is the colour for 1998", and "What to do with
ground beef" does not offer much. Or to qualify that statement, maybe you can
get a minute amount of real information on mostly trivial subjects, but it
isn't worth your time. Want something interesting and edifying -- read a
scientific magazine geared to mass readership.
I find these kind of "social" commentators rather pathetic -
who is paying for a study like this? Living here in Geneva,
I am restricted to what English language publications I can purchase
and indeed, I am guilty of buying what I call my "comics" but surely,
a magazine like Marie-Clare which at least discusses taboo subjects
and features articles of an interesting/intelligent nature could hardly
describe its readers as "sex-obsessed" and the like. I wonder if this
survey done on men's magazines would reach the same conclusion? How
about including "Loaded" or the like! Really, why don't these people just get a life!
The articles in women's magazines are hardly bad for the reader but it is
extremely frustrating when
the writers give such serious advice on comparatively trivial subjects. I wish
they would take a more
tongue-in-cheek approach, the readers would appreciate the respect given for
their intelligence.
The emphasis is now to cheapen themselves
to make themselves more accessible to men
- fine, they are falling for the old male game.
The clothes they are encouraged to wear
from a young age. All for male gratification.
Most magazines should be called THICK BIRD.
Women's magazines vary a great deal. Vanity Fair is an exception to most of
the negative generalisations. The articles are intelligent; only the adverts
are dumb.
Women's magazines do have a negative impact on us. Sure they have the
occasional article of interest, but over all, you rarely see them promote
older women ~ what does Kate Moss have that Isabella Rossellini doesn't ? - Youth, sad but true, women are terrified of ageing and the great "hope" industries
(cosmetics, fashion, magazines) know this. I'm 30 and don't buy them anymore
because I get bored - depth, character and intelligence define women but the
magazines remind us to escape and dream of beautiful clothes where one may
find oneself. I love clothes, but I respect myself more.
If some-one reads Shakespeare for example, someone is transported to the
heights, read a womens magazine and notice the difference
If you've been reading the wrong kind of literature for too long, then you
can't even appreciate the quality of good writing, which free the human spirit
Womans magazine, demean the human spirit, is it any wonder woman hood
In general (and manhood) has fallen to its great depths.
As a parent, I certainly want my daughter to have a wider range of interests
than the women who populate women's magazines.
As a teacher, I find that young women are damaged by the stereotypes portrayed
in these magazines. They are left feeling inferior and unable to measure up
to the standards women's magazines present. They are not thin enough, sexy
enough, confident enough, and they certainly don't have the right "man" yet.
I rather like Cosmo but I surpose that there's always the danger that
someone, somewhere will end up actually believing that they reflect reality. In general the score would be: entertainment value 9, reality content, nil.
To disregard a large sector of the magazine market as being 'vacuous' seems a
little naive Many of them compare favourably to other publications, most
notably the British tabloids. Are they any more 'sex-obsessed' than these? A
number of them have also gained considerable honours for their coverage of
major news events.
'Trivial, lazy, intellectually incurious'. It seems to describe many popular
British publications, not least women's magazines. And since they have no
political motivation I think we should take a long hard look at exactly what
poses the greater danger.
I enjoy reading women's magazines.. but I'm a bloke. Certain of them seem
intelligent and if a publication proclaims that it's about careers, sex and
clothes, how can you complain when it writes about them???
I never read them because they're full of adverts. But having said that I would read someone else's just because they're good for a laugh. Of course the magazine's aren't bad for you, but you have to be stupid to believe what they say.
When I was 13 I read "Seventeen", when I was 17, I read "Glamour & Mademoiselle I came to my senses before I ever started reading "Cosmopolitan".
Women's magazines do absolutely nothing to help women, young or old,
prepare for and work through life's challenges. They are vacuous, insipid,
and yes, "DUMB" in all caps. They perpetuate the idea that women live for and are made for sex alone, and physical beauty (by which they mean
size two and flawless skin). Is the only measure of a woman's worth?
If cigarettes are a waste of money and destroy the lungs, women's magazines
are the equivalent for the brain.
The true meaning of such magazines is lost today. All that fills
modern women's magazines is often not pertaining to the topic and irrelevant.
People may still use it, for the sake of passing time, without any intention
to draw or learn any serious lessons from the book!!
These magazines aren't necessarily 'good' for you because they proliferate
images of make-up women who are self-involved, vain, unusually beautiful, etc.
These are the things that women with little sense of self aspire to because
they see these women as the ones who get what they want financially and
sexually. On the other hand if your sense of self is so poorly developed that you can't see how superficial it all is then it is easy to blame trashy shallow magazines
but the real detriment is living in a society that responds to fads, trends and a pretty face not the magazine itself. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||