Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBCi CATEGORIES   TV   RADIO   COMMUNICATE   WHERE I LIVE   INDEX    SEARCH 

BBC NEWS
 You are in:  Talking Point
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
Forum 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 


Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

SERVICES 
Tuesday, 19 March, 2002, 11:19 GMT
Mugabe victory: What should the world do?

Can Robert Mugabe's election victory be accepted as free and fair and should the international community recognise it? Talking Point discussed the implications.

Click below to watch or listen to the programme

  14k modems      56k modems

Our guest was Dr. Chris Alden, a lecturer in International relations in the London School of Economics.

Click here for more of your emails

This debate is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below.


Your reaction


I queued for seven hours to cast my vote

Anonymous, Zimbabwe
I queued for seven hours to cast my vote: short by Harare standards. Some of my friends queued into the third day. While I was queueing my parents were arrested along with 1400 others for transporting and feeding polling agents who were to observe the election for the opposition. The number of voters in the constituency is 5000. When the results were announced Mugabe had over 30,000! Those who support this government and condone the violence and the way in which the election was held will one day be answerable. The world has chased terrorists but let the youth be trained to beat old people at the Border Gezi training centres.

What kind of precedent is the world allowing to be set in this country? Why not use the West as an excuse forever? Accuse them of being racist when they attack one for what one is doing to his people? Accuse them of interfering when they send observers? Accuse them of colonial aspirations when they ask one to restore the rule of law? Do not be dictated to by despots; we are a new generation of Africans wanting liberation from the feudal ways of our grandparents.
Anonymous, Zimbabwe

Mugabe's interpretation of democracy has caused both blacks and whites loss of quality of life as well as bringing starvation and death to his people. He will be pleading for money to feed his starving people from the West and blaming the white farmers for not producing enough food to feed his people. Having wrecked their farms it is understandable that production is down. It is my opinion that no more money should be given to this despot, and that will cause his people to rebel and throw him out.
A. Lloyd, Storrington, Great Britain

The truth hurts. Some people believe they are the chosen race. When thousands of blacks die you don't want to talk. When a few whites die you want to make noise. When will you give others a choice or just a chance to do their own thing? We in Africa are tired of having masters. This white supremacy must end. Mugabe is very right. There is nothing the rest of the world should do. We Zimbabweans should decide for ourselves. We have just done that. You don't like it, but by the way who won in Florida, we still want to know?
Boston, Zimbabwean in the States


The recent election will only prolong Zimbabwe's suffering

Chris Castle, Perth, Australia
If African nations are to advance beyond developing world status, they need the assistance of foreign investment (not just handouts). Such investment is unlikely to occur where the rule of law is weak, arbitrary or subverted. The recent election will only prolong Zimbabwe's suffering. Regardless of their feelings for the opposition, foreign press or outside observers, other African nations should think carefully about endorsing such tainted elections and thereby attaching themselves to such unattractiveness.
Chris Castle, Perth, Australia

The world should leave Mugabe alone to go forward with his land reform policy. Britain can only do the right thing by providing the fund to compensate its subjects who unlawfully owns the land of Africans. Britain's divide and rule policy doesn't work anymore. All Africans are behind the land reform policy.
A, Ethiopia

The people of Zimbabwe voiced their opinions, most of them black Zimbabweans, as minority whites were mostly disenfranchised, their voice was clear but quelled by Mugabe and his cronies. It is not the whites who are going to die (they are not a threat). People forget what happened in 1980 when Mugabe was placed in power. He annihilated the opposition (ex-ZIPRA/Matabele) in a series of atrocities that left many thousands dead. I fear for the black Zimbabweans who stand against him in the name of democracy and pray for their well-being.
Stuart, London, UK

Britain and the Commonwealth should do more than merely "suspend" Zimbabwe from the Commonwealth. It should do the responsible thing which is to collectively remove Mugabe by military force. Then have the Commonwealth facilitate free and fair elections.
Michael, Minnesota, US

My heartfelt prayers go out to Zimbabwe, that there would be no more bloodshed and murder. It is clear the election was rigged, but I agree it is the height of hypocrisy for the EU and US to criticise Zimbabwe and ignore corruption in their "friendly" states. Maybe if the West stopped interfering, things would improve for Africa. Certainly if aid and trade were done justly and not just to benefit powerful interests things would improve. Perhaps.
Bob, Oxley, Australia


I do not believe that suspension of the country from the Commonwealth is the correct solution as this may lead to the ordinary people suffering

Emad Shaarawi, Egypt
I do not believe that suspension of the country from the Commonwealth is the correct solution as this may lead to the ordinary people suffering. The despotic behaviour must stop. I fear the West's concern might be in the whites' interests only and not the people of Zimbabwe's.
Emad Shaarawi, Egypt

Virtually all African elections are rigged, and the West (principally Britain and France) have historically been actively involved in this process. The protests only emerge when the outcome of the rigging fails to further the interests of the West at that point in time, hence the muted protests over the recent elections in Nigeria, Togo, Kenya, Ivory Coast, Uganda to name but a few.
Dr Femi Nzegwu UK

The Zimbabwe elections and the various differing opinions highlight a very simple issue. White people simply do not appear to understand that this was a normal African election. This is how it is supposed to be in Africa. One notes that the voices approving this flawed election are of those 'true' democrats who have either acquired, hold, or intend to retain power using similar brutal methods. What is the excitement all about?
Scott

Western liberals kept quiet about the massacres of the mutable, "one-party" democracy, et al. They are in part responsible for giving moral support to Mugabe for the last 20 years, and for the result of the election. What should the world do now? Cut all aid to Zimbabwe, and to the other African countries that endorsed the election. If this is a transparent display of "African values", then why should the US and Europe send aid money to keep despots like Mugabe in power? Frankly, I think Africa deserves much better, but it won't do anything to help itself as long as Western aid keeps on going to the people at the top, rather than the needy. There should also be a reconsidering of the values of the Commonwealth. If these are the values espoused by its members, then it has failed as an institution and should be scrapped as soon as possible.
Anonymous, Japan


As African countries have declared the recent Zimbabwe elections free and fair, that is full and final

Alfred, London, UK
As African countries have declared the recent Zimbabwe elections free and fair that is full and final on any argument. Any outside opinion to the contrary is irrelevant. President Mugabe has no need to share his government with a puppet. We all know that as long as the land issue remains, President Mugabe can never do anything right in the eyes of Prime Minister Tony Blair. But, unfortunately for Tony Blair today, the British people are not with him in his newly acquired hawkish and right wing tendency, especially in the way he mobilised the West against Zimbabwe and President Mugabe, just for land resettlement. This has made race relations irreconcilable. As a result, the Commonwealth should be disbanded. Moreover, the organisation has out lived its usefulness. The black and white countries can go to their respective continental organisations while they all meet at the United Nations.
Alfred, London, UK

Let farmers of Zimbabwe get their land back. Throughout white farmers still control the best land. What Mugabe is trying to do now should have been done 20 years ago. I think he wants to put his mark in history by carrying out such a drastic land reform that would be a model in many African countries. The election was not fair, but I challenge you to point a country in Africa where election was fair.
James, Sydney, Australia

I look back at the whole Zimbabwe elections as a rift that can tear a country at the bring of political unrest. It irks me to know that there was so much violence in Zimbabwe elections and the allegations that President Robert Mugabe's supporters had defranchised the opposite camp in areas that has high voting yields. Looking forward to the up-coming Sierra Leone elections, I scarcely foresee violence of such magnitude, save for those years when we were under the throes of war. It is high time we in Africa began practising decent politics. All I say now to the Zimbabwe populace is that the deed has been done and reacting violently will further escalate much trouble and the people at risk are not those in authority but the rank and files.
Andrew Benson Greene, Freetown/ Sierra Leone


Mugabe rigged himself to power last week

John Huruva, London UK
Mugabe rigged himself to power last week. He has no answers to the economic problems of the country. Corruption is still rampant. Innocent defenceless civilians are still being killed. Harphazard unplanned land-grab is on the increase. Surely there can only be one way for Zimbabwe and this the way to economic doom and social unrest? I would strongly urge the world not to recognise Mugabe's government and apply comprehensive sanctions in order to fast track Mugabe's exit. The argument about hurting the ordinary people does not hold water in that Mugabe has already inflicted much suffering to his people.
John Huruva, London UK

How should the world react? By helping the poor black peasants of that country get their stolen land back!
Alexander, USA

The world should do nothing. Mugabe is an old man with not many years to live. The best policy is patience and complete isolation of such regimes until such time as they aspire to and implement free and fair government and electoral practices. Unfortunately the logical consequence of such as policy will be withdrawal by EU and US governments of economic and political links with most African countries. That may be for the best, as then Africa will have the opportunity to develop in the way that suits it best. Perhaps it may be better to allow Africa to revert to the natural paradise that it was before contact with Europeans and Arab traders.
David, Sussex, UK


Now all are complaining. Now they do - when it's too late

Hans Georg Klee, Munich, Germany
Now all are complaining. Now they do - when it's too late. Why had none of those 'wise and concerned' politicians shout out and consider consequences two years ago when all the misery started in Zimbabwe? Let's start or maintain as much as possible relationships to Zimbabwean people on a civic society basis - politician's talk is for nothing.
Hans Georg Klee, Munich, Germany

Nelson Mandella advocated sanctions to end apartheid. Why not Zimbabwe?
Quentin Scott, Florida

The international community should deal only with the democratic countries in Africa i.e. Botswana, Senegal and Ghana. This will encourage the despots to change, too.
Ali Jjunju, Helsinki - Finland

Please, please do not keep saying anyone is trying to compare the running of elections of West and developed countries. THE ELECTIONS WERE NOT FREE and FAIR by Zimbabwean standards of elections that have gone on before! The framework and process was tilted in Mugabe's favour.
Shane Lunga, Portsmouth UK

This is not about "Africans", this is about Zimbabweans and what Zimbabweans want. The Zimbabwean people made their choice, but their choice was overridden. It is obvious to us who should be our leader - Morgan Tsvangirai. Is it obvious to the rest of the world that Mugabe has once again lied and cheated his way back into power? At the end of the day Zimbabweans will have the last say and the rest of the world can listen to them - so can Mr Mugabe!
Zimbabweans Forever, Zimbabwe

Enough is enough! What right do we have in the West  to criticise Africa that way ? Do we still believe that African are not humans ? Have we forgotten the last American election where many black citizens could not even reach the polling stations to cast their ballots ? Why is it that we cannot imagine African countries supervising our election ?
Gilb, Paris, France

This was an election African style....a black minority imposing its will over a black majority.
Charles Harlich, Hightstown US

Zimbabwe is part of the world community. If Zimbabwe cannot conduct free and fair elections as judged by the world community, it must be ready to be judged accordingly. African nations cannot continue to put their head in the sand while the rest of the world makes progress leaving Africa in the dust crying about racism and colonialism. It is pathetic. In order to play in the real world you must play by the rules. Mugabe should have done everything in his power to make these elections free and fair to ensure a genuine election term. From the way these elections were set up he has basically positioned himself for criticism.
Anonymous


Is Zimbabwe more important because it involves a white "British" minority that is 1% of the population holding onto more than 50% of agricultural land?

Maria Pons, Johannesburg, South Africa
Why are you such a bunch of hypocrites? Why has the so-called world kept silent about the fraudulent, rigged, and definitely not free elections in Congo Brazzaville, taking place at precisely the same time as the ones in Zimbabwe? Ah, of course M. Sassou Nguesso allows EU member France and the Americans free access to "his" oil fields off shore so please let us look the other way - yes? The EU and the USA have no moral high ground unless they apply the same standards to every country not following the rules! Oh I almost forgot Madagascar with two presidents...Where was/is the EU criticism? Is Zimbabwe more important because it involves a white "British" minority that is 1% of the population holding onto more than 50% of agricultural land? NO, I am neither black nor communist, BUT I am multilingual and do inform myself in several languages on a daily basis...
Maria Pons, Johannesburg, South Africa

I think EU, US and Britain are going very far with Zimbabwe issue. This clearly shows how badly-reared whites are towards a black person. There are countries which did worse in their election than Zimbabwe but we did not hear anything from EU, US or Britain. This shows that these people are biased and indeed they would want to colonise Africa. Please leave Africa alone to solve its problems.
G.M Chisanga, Kasungu- Malawi

Mugabe's "Freedom of Information and Right to Privacy Bill" is the ultimate oxymoron.
Maureen, USA


It is a shame that the world, especially the United Nations presently headed by an African, is unwilling to sanction Mugabe for the farce election held in Zimbabwe

Anonymous, Lagos Nigeria
It is a shame that the world, especially the United Nations, presently headed by an African, is unwilling to sanction Mugabe for the farce election held in Zimbabwe. It should not surprise the world that most African leaders are supporting this sham. This is due to the fact that most African leaders are corrupt demagogues who would like to misrule their people until God disposes the evil leaders like Sani Abacha of Nigeria. The stolen wealth of their nation lodges is in European and American banks and is the main reason why Europe and America are unwilling to sanction these corrupt head of kangaroo government. Nigeria is about to witness another election in May 2003 and already there is fear in the country that the election would be marred in violence and chaos. With such expectations it should not surprise the world that the current president Olusegun Obasanjo (who Nigerians are tired of) will definitely win the next election in 2003 after the vote-rigging experience of Zimbabwe. Obasanjo would also expect the other fraudulent African leaders to support him in his hour of need since the world did nothing to deter leaders like Mugabe. I am highly surprised that when it comes to countries in the Middle East, the Europeans and the Americans are too eager to step in as conflict negotiators. It should be noted that with the recent experience of Madagascar the next election conflict in Nigeria might be to late for the world to stop if Mugabe is allowed to continue his misrule. This time around oil prices would be shambles and foreign investors in Nigeria would be made lose billions of investments not to mention the disintegration of the country Nigeria. The greatest question of modern times is: does dictatorship and hijacking of government by African leaders constitute terrorism? If the answer is no, will the Europeans and Americans be willing to tolerate this leader? Or does terrorism only apply to their nationals and not the citizens of these African countries?
Anonymous, Lagos Nigeria

The Commonwealth should take a decisive action by expelling Mugabe and imposing full sanctions. If the president of South Africa does not agree for this, he should be given an ultimatum that his treatment of whites will be taken into consideration and all the willing nations of the Commonwealth should stop aid of their own accord to teach him a lesson.
Dr M Durvasula, Sydney, Australia

In 1980 the people of Zimbabwe were given what they asked for: one man, one vote. Unfortunately, this became one man, one vote, once. Mr Mugabe used intimidation in that election and has continued to use intimidation and "gerrymandering" ever since to the extent that no election in Zimbabwe has been free and fair. I don't believe that the Commonwealth can offer much as it was instrumental in Mr Mugabe gaining power and henceforth misusing it.
K, Brisbane, Australia


What should the Western world do? Get its own house in order

Ray, USA
The hypocrisy of Western imperialism is once again in evidence. I have no idea whether or not Mr. Mugabe's re-election was fraudulent since I don't live there and cannot truly rely on the Western press for the truth. One thing is very clear, however, and that is the one-sidedness of the West's advocacy of "fair elections". I live in the US where it is very clear to more than half of the electorate that the present president of the United States is a fraudulently "selected" president. African-Americans were denied the right to vote for various reasons and many votes of those who did vote were not counted. If the West is so concerned about fair elections why wasn't there such a hue and cry about this election as there is about Zimbabwe's? Did the EU and Britain ever consider placing "sanctions" on America, or is this kind of punishment meant only for weaker, dependent nations? Is it really a question of "might is right"? Is it really true that we have the best government that money can buy? Granted, the stench of rotting flesh is in Africa, but the corpse is in the West. What should the Western world do? Get its own house in order.
Ray, USA

All those who support ZanPF, and send messages to the effect that the rest of the world should ignore what is happening should be ashamed. Should the rest of the world keep quiet when people are being murdered, raped and muzzled just to keep one despot in power? What worries me most is that after a few months when all the fanfare has died down, it's us - the people of Zimbabwe who have to bear the brunt of Mugabe's failed policies and the collapsed economy. But obviously all those praise-singers will benefit from funds looted from the state coffers. I doubt very much that a normal sane person would support what is currently going on in our beloved country. I think the letters suggesting that we be left alone are from the members of the dreaded CIO, or people who directly benefit from what is going on. It hurts to think that a few months down the road, this will become stale news and the world will keep going about its business whilst we are suffering. How much more does it take before the world wakes up and starts doing something about this man before we all perish? It's about time the world acts rather than just talk and more talk. We are tired, we have prayed, but our prayers have not been answered. Its time to do something or else this monster has set bad precedent. Other brutal leaders might decide to take a leaf from Mugabe's book, in the belief that they will too get away with it.
Sam Tirivanhu, Harare, Zimbabwe

I don't know how the world should react to the turmoil in your former colony but I suspect that I know what you will do. Nothing. You will vacillate and debate and try to talk around the problem and take everyone's politically correct, white guilt point of view into consideration, then debate it all over again. Meanwhile people starve in the name of total consensus and multilateralism. It's pathetic that some would use even this topic in order to take pot shots at the US. You Brits need a new hobby.
WWL, USA


I am appalled by the South African government stance of support for Mugabe

John Gardner
I live in both South Africa and New Zealand and fought long and hard to disband apartheid with more than one arrest by police. I am appalled by the South African government stance of support for Mugabe. Is it not time to rethink sanctions against South Africa for directly supporting a dictatorship on its border and giving the lie to any vestige of democratic resolve for the region?
John Gardner

Congratulations Mr. Mugabe! In spite of Western interference and intimidation, especially Britain, Zimbabweans have spoken. Where were these so-called do-gooders when the whites, who are less than 1% and own more than 80% of the fertile land, ransacked, tortured, denigrated, and murdered the natives? Is the land rightfully theirs because they killed, bullied and forced the natives off their land? Why is there so much interest in Zimbabwe now? Is it because the British have developed a renewed interest in Africa? There are worse regimes than Zimbabwe throughout Africa. Is it because here whites are on the receiving end? How many people died in Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Liberia just to name a few? Where were these people who are so concerned about Zimbabwe? Where is the architect of this white land grab? Ian Smith is living peacefully amongst people that he dehumanised, maimed and killed! What is this patronising attitude? You set the priorities for Africans when it comes to dealing with whites in Africa, right? The Zimbabwean people have asserted their independence in the face of foreign threats and intimidation.
NJI Ntum, Chicago, US

Democracy is the government of the people from the people by the people. I believe the whole world should recognise Mugabe's victory as the people's choice. No matter how bad the minorities may classify him. If the populace (Zimbabweans) do not want him, he should have lost. If he won the election by bribery and corruption, then let the people who accepted his bribery and corruption bear the consequences of their action.
Daniel Ogo Nsofor, USA


I think the West should just give Mugabe a little try

Wycliffe Avutaga, Nairobi
I think the West should just give Mugabe a little try. All African leaders rig their way into offices and Mugabe is no different. He has been declared the winner and that is what it was. What should be done is he should be monitored for his action after the controversial election that just ended. If I were Mugabe I would include Mr Tsvangirai in the cabinet and test the international community. The issue of land should continue but with respect (they should half of the land to the whites).
Wycliffe Avutaga, Nairobi

A fascinating collection of opinions. As one of the dreaded white colonials (left in '99) I was not suprised by the result or the subsequent pathetically ineffective hand wringing which will go on for a couple of months and then the whole thing will be forgotten. Just like the 1000 South African farmers who have been murdered there since the ANC came to power, without an arrest being made. Too right Mbeki sees no problem with an election being not free or fair but legitimate!
Gordon ex-Zimbabwean, Auckland New Zealand

I wonder why UK didn't show this much concern in the recent elections in other African nations, which has been even less "free & fair"?
Anteneh, Ethiopia

The situation in Zimbabwe and its future is almost one to come down to political correctness. It can't be seen to the rest of the world of a Western government overthrowing an African government - slavery and the Klan etc. Therefore Zimbabwe's future is in the hands of the "black Hitler". The British Government will do nothing, or more likely the wrong thing - just like they are doing by trying to sell Gibraltar down the river to the Spanish. What's next, the Falklands? My personal opinion is that a more forceful measure should be adopted, but the UK politicians have no spine for it.
Mike Baker, UK


The land issue was a means to an end, and because the key-players were white Mugabe correctly guessed that white farmers would not receive much sympathy

Kevan Hyett, Gaborone Botswana
So wrong, Chris Hall and Mike of UK! It was never about land, but about power. The land issue was a means to an end, and because the key players were white, Mugabe correctly guessed that white farmers would not receive much sympathy. How does this follow? Mayhem was created in the rural areas, 500,000 farm workers driven from their homes, and their places taken by pro-Zanu-PF war veterans - and that is where all the ballot-stuffing and coercion - and the "winning votes" - took place. You can wash your hands of South Africa after this - SA is joining the basket cases - voluntarily!
Kevan Hyett, Gaborone Botswana

Admit Zimbabwe to the European union of course; Mugabe is quite a progressive fellow quite adept at politics. Surely Mugabe will be receptive to the Euro, unlike other backward countries.
JR Mackie, USA


Mugabe didn't "steal the election". Voting in Harare was actually up 12% from the 2000 figure

Anonymous
Mugabe didn't "steal the election." Sure, there were problems in Harare, but if you check the figures you will find that voting in Harare was actually up 12% from the 2000 figure. And even if all the remaining people in Harare had voted and voted pro-MDC Mugabe still would have won because he had such a large margin in the rest of the country. Right now, the ones who are talking about the numbers are the ZANU-PF and the Herald; if Mugabe had stolen the election the MDC and its backers at the BBC would be doing the talking about numbers. That any of you think that Mugabe did steal the election shows your naivete and the poor journalism of your news source.
Anonymous

The implications of his victory are more suffering for black and white Zimbabweans. The world should react to the election result by refusing to recognise it and cutting off diplomatic relations to Zimbabwe. It's an extreme measure, but Mugabe will not be deposed any other way. Sanctions are a joke - does any government seriously believe they will work?
Marcus, Bath, England

Morgan Tsvangirai should have won the election without doubt, but is he to blame for his loss? Yes and no. Yes because he didn't focus on the rural masses and he didn't apply common sense. Suppose he had gone and paid off or to politely put it, made an alliance with the other opposing candidates that received 6% of the votes, then he would have come eve with at least 50% OF THE VOTES splitting even with Mugabe. He would then have called for Mugabe 's resignation as he would have won the popular vote. He could then have called for a nationwide strike to force Mugabe into submission .All this was very possible. Getting Siwela on his side was the best he could have as it would have drawn all Ndebele votes. The international community must promote democracy and peace, i.e. don't condemn the elections so strongly as it makes the whole exercise of elections meaningless. Voting is still at its infancy in Africa, and we can only hope it improves. Having observers was in itself an improvement.
Zim1, Cleveland, Ohio


It is a travesty that once again Mugabe is the benefactor of international inaction

Hannah, London, UK
It is a travesty that once again Mugabe is the benefactor of international inaction. Governments need to stop talking about it and commit themselves properly by applying strong pressure in every way to the Zimbabwean government to redress the situation.
Hannah, London, UK

I am saddened as much by the polarised commentary on the elections in Zimbabwe as by the result. The people were denied a free and fair choice. Not by the irregularities in the actual poll, as significant as they were, but by their government. It found it necessary to deny them a free press, through the mechanics of government as well as through intimidation. It made others the authors of the country's deteriorating fortunes, despite an enviable record in creating a literate citizenry. If the politics of power and greed can so obviously prevent its citizens from benefiting from Zimbabwe's considerable resources, then how do the peoples of poorer African states maintain any hope for their future? This to me is the great tragedy of the election in Zimbabwe. Mr Mugabe has not just delivered a blow to the nation, but because of the promise of Zimbabwe post-liberation, he has delivered a blow to the continent. I can only hope that the citizens of Zimbabwe can overcome this tragic event and the government that caused it.
Gord Murray, Toronto, Canada

The Zimbabwe situation is not about land redistribution; it's about an old politician trying to cling to power. Mr Mugabe has used every means possible to manipulate the result. But the biggest shame for me is not about what's happened in Zimbabwe itself, it's the way that other African nations have failed to condemn Mr Mugabe and his tactics. It's a sad reflection on those African leaders. And yet both the Commonwealth and the United Nations have failed also.

The Commonwealth might as well be disbanded, for it has highlighted the fact that some of the member countries' leaders will quite openly make questionable comments without any condemnation. But the biggest fence- sitter is the United Nations. Neither Kofi Annan nor any of his entourage, have mentioned this situation. I would have expected some leadership and guidance from them. But once again the United Nations has proved itself to be a lame duck of an organisation. At the moment I am of the opinion that maybe the UK should consider using its economic muscle to influence the situation. No more support to any nation that does not support democratic principles and is seen to do so. I also think that maybe the UK should cease its payments to the United Nations until it stops sitting on the fence.
Peter, Sarajevo, Bosnia

One thing you have to say for Mugabe, he has managed to remove every trace of colonisation from Zimbabwe - that would be freedom of speech, good living conditions, future education (the cost of which is now astronomical), rule of law, trade with other countries, food on the shelves, jobs for those in town. I'd pretty much say he's succeeded - although I note he himself lives in the lap of luxury - how can those people writing in be blind enough not to see this discrepancy?

Shame on you for not supporting your brothers when they need you most - you fought for freedom and all you got was a tyrant. The biggest drive for 1980s black rule was the right to vote. Tell me, has Mugabe delivered even that promise? I think not. The world community needs to apply sanctions not only to Zimbabwe but to all those blind and irresponsible nations who are content to accept the mockery of a government now presiding over Zimbabwe. God bless Zimbabwe - may she and her people get the freedom and leadership they deserve.
Leigh, Bristol, UK

What do you mean by the term "free and fair"? What is your yardstick in this measurement, when are the elections free and fair? As for Mr Mugabe, I think the elections were free and fair, the only problem now is that before even they went in for elections (Zimbabweans) the West had a bias about him so the outcome did less in fact it was just adding insult to injury.
Kiyengo Nsubuga, Kampala Uganda


Rhodesia was a wonderful country, rich in so many ways

Heather, UK
Rhodesia was a wonderful country, rich in so many ways. Its population was educated, fed, healthy and working for a common future. Throughout the years of UDI the economy held firm, but in just 20 years we see an economic dust bowl. Hunger, sickness, destitution, brutality and corruption at a level extraordinary even for Africa. We should turn off the financial tap that has drip fed Mugabe and his thieves and made them into multi-millionaires whilst their people are left to rot. Perhaps Ms Short and her cronies should hold on to all those funds and ring-fence them for the support and resettlement of the people forced to leave their homeland of Zimbabwe by the wicked forces who rule there today.
Heather, UK

The West is full of double standards. Did you hear George Bush state yesterday that he would not recognise a flawed election? He would rather recognise that military dictator in Pakistan. What a cheek. The West is highly misinformed by its journalists who are in the business of manufacturing news. The result is that the West believed its propaganda that they thought that their preferred candidate would win. As usual Mugabe has outmanoeuvred his opponents and exposed how hypocritical they are. Mugabe won because of the land issue. The majority of the people in Zimbabwe are in the rural areas and the issue of land is close to their hearts and souls. My 80-year-old grandmother in Zimbabwe does not care about democracy but what she wants is her own piece of land to farm. Mugabe has provided that and a lot of people in the rural areas did not vote otherwise. The way forward is for the West to leave Zimbabwe alone and let Zimbabweans decide their own destiny.
Tidza Zichy, Leicester

People are forgetting that the biggest issue is land. The election result is a go-ahead for the ZANU PF to finish the unfinished business of redistribution of land. Most of Zimbabweans don't own land and there are comments in this forum about shortages of milk and bread. It is a pity how easy people can be brainwashed by neo-colonialists propaganda.
Ahmed Mussa, Stockholm, Sweden

Most despicable thing I have ever heard, insensitive and cruel. However coming from a government which believes that HIV does not cause AIDS and therefore unborn babies should not be protected from it (and is prepared to go to court about it), should one be surprised? We should not expect anything different from President Thabo Mbeki who is almost certainly going to say the same as his deputy and tell "white supremacists to shut up".
Chitatu, Zimbabwe

As soon as Mugabe puts his foot on international soil he needs to be arrested and trailed at The Hague like Milosevic.
Andreas Weiler, UK

This result is an international outrage. People are denied votes and polls are closed. Lives are threatened if anyone speaks out against the government. The people of Zimbabwe were denied the opportunity of free and fair elections. Mr. Mugabe is a dictator in the same vain as Milosevic. Mr. Mugabe should be removed from power and an international peace keeping force should be sent until free and fair elections can take place.
Isabel Turner, Orlando, Florida US

Maybe the whole world should just shut up just as they did when Mugabe slaughtered 20,000 Ndebeles in the 1980s.
Bhekizwe Joseph Dlodlo


I don't think that sanctions will help. Mugabe is already letting his people starve and die

B. Bates, London
I was in Zimbabwe last September. I was there for four weeks. I tried to speak to as many people as I could about the political situation, and almost everyone I spoke to mistrusted the motives of Mugabe. Our regular taxi driver read both the state newspaper and the independent Zimbabwe newspaper (literacy is very high in Zimbabwe - one of Mugabe's positive achievements). He deeply mistrusted Mugabe's government and said he had witnessed intimidation of villages by Mugabe's henchmen - his extended family also had witnesses intimidation as well. The guide who took us round Victoria Falls was reluctant to speak about the situation, but eventually spoke about his village being ransacked by Mugabe's men because the area did not support Mugabe. I think hat he also mentioned people being killed as well. He himself was hoping to occupy a farm and had requested to do so. A black policewoman I spoke to desperately asked me if I could help her to live and work in the UK. What is disturbing is that the people cannot afford cooking oil, which is part of their staple diet. Starvation in the next few months is a very real possibility for the Zimbabwean people. AIDS is also one in four. I don't think that sanctions will help. Mugabe is already letting his people starve and die. They are only political pawns.
B Bates, London

Mugabe should remain if the people of Zimbabwe say so. EU and America should mind their own countries and allow us to run our continent.
Ikeagu, Lagos Nigeria

Yes, the election was free and fair in Zimbabwe and I take this opportunity to congratulate Mr Mugabe. I also urge the West to change their mind for thinking that elections are fair if opposition parties win! The case of Zimbabwe is interesting for two reasons:
1. The West disqualified the election before it took place so how can they accept it now and if they opposition saw early misconduct why they joined it?
2. Why Zimbabwe? There were elections in Madagascar and Congo Brazzaville, but these are not commented on!
Congratulation Mr Mugabe for fighting and winning the battle against the giants>
Geoffrey Kabakaki, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

We in Sri Lanka had to put up with the South Asian version of Mugabe during our general election held in December 2001. President Chandrika Kumaranatunga tried every dirty trick in the book - using her presidential security to harass voters, stuff ballot boxes etc. Yet the people of Sri Lanka were able to overcome this female Mugabe. It is only a matter of time before Zimbabweans will be able to achieve what we have achieved in Sri Lanka.
Anonymous


If only George Orwell was alive today to see his novels in action in Zimbabwe

PS, London, UK
If only George Orwell was alive today to see his novels in action in Zimbabwe. I don't know which would be more appropriate - "Animal Farm" or "1984". Mugabe is so lacking in credibility in every way that he is just plain laughable. If only Zimbabwe could have had a leader of the calibre of Nelson Mandela.
PS, London, UK

So what? Probably a greater percentage of his country voted for him than voted for Bush!
Alastair, England

An election has been, is and will always be an election. Diamonds, indeed, FOREVER? People wanted one that's already available and they of course till now have it. But not to have it till it's GONE.
Harry Momoh, Nairobi, Kenya

The issue of Zimbabwe's elections has highlighted serious discrepancies in the UK's policy on Africa. Why is Robert Mugabe any worse than Levy Mwanawasa, who was recently elected president of Zambia in elections described by the EU as "seriously flawed"? Why is Mugabe's campaign against white farmers more worthy of moral outrage than his involvement in the genocidal civil war in the Democratic Republic of Congo? Why aren't Kenya and Uganda expelled from the Commonwealth for failing to live up to the democratic norms touted by the UK government? The Blair government's lack of a consistent stance on African development and democracy has undermined the UK's credibility in the continent and in the Commonwealth as a whole. This duplicity is simply fuelling the rhetoric of African leaders who accuse the UK of acting arbitrarily as an imperialist power. I would argue that as a result, Blair has become a pariah dictators can rally around.
Daniel Brett, Cambridge, England

I cannot believe that the South African Government chose to endorse this "election win". I pity the people of southern Africa as if this the quality of the leaders one can only imagine the results of their future decisions. Is democracy going to be able to grow in this beautiful land - Jacob Zuma answered and nailed the final blow in its coffin!
James, Caribbean


Democracy can never take root in Africa if leaders want to hold on to power forever

Nana Gyan, Accra Ghana
It is a shame the way sometimes some African leaders betray the continent. South Africa is held in a very high esteem by many Africans. Mr. Zuma's comments are therefore not only sad but also highly disappointing. Democracy can never take root in Africa if leaders want to hold on to power forever. We want a better leadership from South Africa in order that Mandela's fight, imprisonment and suffering would not be in vain.
Nana Gyan, Accra Ghana

Well, well, I have digested a lot of comments. I am really impressed by those who support Mugabe for I am one of them. It is time for the West to learn that a new Africa is rising; we need our own freedom with as little interference as possible. Give us a chance to deal with our own problems, I am quite sure Mugabe will at some point leave his position as president (since no-one lives forever) but surely we DO NOT NEED the westerners to tell us how to live. When will it stop, learn to separate issues here, if you personally hate Mugabe, it is unfortunate but the people of his country have spoken and since you are Champions of democracy yourselves you should for sure keep away for the sake of other people's rights (those who have voted). And anyway, it is very ironic that Western Governments have the audacity to see a tiny stick in Mugabe's eye without realising big "trees" in their own. Nobody is a saint when it comes to these things and for sure westerners cannot play god telling and policing other world nations on ways of dealing with their own problems.
Juma, Perth, Australia

If Mugabe was so sure his people would vote for him, why did he not allow international observers into the country? Clearly because he knew that if he did he would not be the president of Zimbabwe today! However, I ask Juma, Perth, who declares support for Mugabe, why is she living in Australia? I suppose because there she doesn't have to line up in a queue kilometres long to get fuel, she can go to a supermarket unlike her fellow countrymen who waste a day in line for fuel, another for oil, another for sugar, meal and even milk.
Nicole, Athens, Greece

Ojulu Ocala, you ask how long the British can dictate to their former colonies? For as long as we continue to believe in freedom, democracy and the right to self-determination. FOREVER, I HOPE!
Tracy White, Turin, Italy


Key stories

The vote

SLIDESHOW

TALKING POINT

AUDIO VIDEO
 VOTE RESULTS
Zimbabwe: Should the vote be recognised?

Yes
 13.56% 

No
 86.44% 

23223 Votes Cast

Results are indicative and may not reflect public opinion

See also:

12 Mar 02 | Media reports
Press fears for Zimbabwe's future
11 Mar 02 | Africa
In pictures: Zimbabwe votes
12 Mar 02 | Africa
Zimbabwe election in quotes
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Talking Point stories