Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education

 You are in:  Talking Point
Front Page 
UK Politics 
Talking Point 
In Depth 

Commonwealth Games 2002

BBC Sport

BBC Weather

Tuesday, 5 March, 2002, 09:50 GMT
Should Australia's governor-general resign?
The Queen's representative in Australia, Governor-General Peter Hollingworth, is under increasing pressure to resign amid a row that threatens to overshadow the Queen's visit.

The Anglican church is to carry out an inquiry into allegations that Mr Hollingworth ignored sexual abuse in his church while he was archbishop of Brisbane more than a decade ago.

He has apologised for not doing more to help the victims, but has repeatedly refused to step down.

Prime Minister John Howard is standing by the governor-general, but there are increasing calls for Mr Hollingworth to fall on his sword before the Queen arrives in Australia.

Should the governor-general step down? Or should he hold tight, hoping the row will blow over?

This Talking Point was suggested by Natalie, Australia :

Should Peter Hollingworth (Governor-General of Australia) stand down in light of the investigation into allegations he covered up child abuse claims during his time as Anglican Archbishop of Brisbane?

If you have any suggestions for Talking Points, please click here.

This debate is now closed. Read your comments below.

Your reaction:

For once, the Queen should exercise the authority which she has, and take the matter into her own hands. She should sack this man without further ado. Give him the same short shrift, Your Majesty, that he gave the victims of the alleged sexual abuse which he refused to investigate.
David Hazel, UK

We are effectively condoning the actions of a lynch-mob.

Sam Bradley, Australia
After reading through the replies posted here, I must say I'm surprised and dismayed to see how many people are willing to climb aboard the media bandwagon and throw out their common sense. What we are seeing here is yet another example of blatant character assassination by the popular media, and an opposition party still sore after being dealt three straight election defeats. Dr Hollingworth has presented his side of the story in a fair and un-biased manner, admittedly he bungled with a statement to the effect that in one case a priest had been led on by a victim, but it was quite clearly because he misunderstood the question, not, as some people would have us believe, because he is "lacking in moral fibre"...

If we (the Australian people) allow Dr Hollingworth to be hounded down until he resigns or is removed, then we are effectively condoning the actions of a lynch-mob. I believe this story will end as so many others of this kind have: the story will lose its savour, the media will move onto newer and dirtier scandals, the majority of the public will forget all about this, and we will never, ever see an apology from the press, the opposition party, or the children's rights groups for all the damage they've sought to do to a good and honourable man.
Sam Bradley, Australia

This man is a disgrace to himself, his country, and most of all, to the victims and their families. He obviously has no sense of moral obligation and instead of seeking justice for those who deserve it, merely seeks to hide himself as much as possible behind the equally inept and morally ignorant John Howard. There is no doubt in my mind that he should be removed from office and held accountable for his actions (or lack of them).
Dave Wilby, England

I would like Dr Hollingsworth to explain (in writing) in full how he defines child sexual abuse and responsibility in terms of adult and child relationships.
Sara, Australia

The Queen must personally order his removal.

George McAllister, UK

If the Governor-General is unwilling to resign and John Howard stands by him whatever, then the Queen must personally order his removal. Although she has never exercised her full constitutional powers within Australia, it is now the time for a change!
George McAllister, UK

Unfortunately this matter goes beyond what he may or may not have done while in positions in the Church. His recent statements quite clearly show him to be out of touch with current attitudes towards child sexual abuse cases. How he even entertained the idea that a case involving a 14-year-old was "not sex abuse", let alone going on to imply that the girl led the priest on, shows how far off the mark he can be. Okay, we can see he does not understand how to handle media and is befuddled easily, but again, these are not acceptable traits in a Governor-General, who must be relied upon to have a steady hand in time of crises. The Governor-General must resign for the sake of Australia.
Robert Simons, Australia

With all the focus on the past inactivity of church leaders to deal with child abuse by clerics, let this controversy over Hollingsworth long continue. Perhaps it may lead to present church leaders rooting out those deviants NOW within their ranks and prevent us facing this dilemma in 20 years time again. But why meeting the Queen should enter in to it I really don't see. Considering that during her reign she has greeted many leaders and celebrities who later it transpired had skeletons in their cupboard, one more isn't going to make any difference!
Susan, USA

I have to agree with Chris B. and many others From England and others who say he should go. It is no excuse that you did not understand about child abuse 20-30 yrs ago. Every one understands sexual abuse against children, may it be 20-30 yrs ago. This is a feeble excuse. He should resign.
Margaret Salsbury, England

Tom Elders US. You don't have to be a socialist to be a republican. This system we have in Australia is all wrong. The PM appoints the GG, not on any grounds apart from a "Job for the Boys" There were a lot more people who could have done a better job and be in tune with the people. Its another reason why we need our very own head of state, and I am a Liberal (Conservative) voter and supporter
Malcolm Freeman, Australia

Dr. Hollingworth should do the honourable thing and stand down.

Steve, England
Dr. Hollingworth should do the honourable thing and stand down before Her Majesty reaches Australia. I hope he realises he must be causing the Queen quite an embarrassment during this, her Jubilee Year. Has the man no morals?
Steve, England

To all those to say we should forgive, it was a long time ago. The story on the BBC website is not quite correct when it says decades ago, we are talking 5 and 6 years ago. Hollingsworth was the only Church leader not to show up at a Government Summit on child abuse and is well know among Anglicans for his in-action on child sex abuse. He should not have made to the position to begin with......I suspect his days are numbered.
Matt, Australia

How can so many people assert so confidently that Dr Hollingworth has committed no crime? Have you never heard of Perversion of Justice? It is an offence in this country, and several others. Also, to have knowledge of criminal and abusive acts, but not to report them or act upon them, is to condone them. This is a crime in itself. Especially when such perpetrators are then promoted by someone who is aware of the allegations against them, but has not investigated them - how can this not be seen as a message of encouragement?
Natalie, Australia

Until someone comes forward with some real proof you should leave the poor guy alone

Adam, Australia
I believe that the governor general is innocent until guilty and until someone comes forward with some real proof you should leave the poor guy alone
Adam, Australia

This is quite a quandary. The Governor General has been accused of having shown a lack of judgement in a number of instances of alleged abuse. He has comprehensively answered some of these allegations; in others, he agrees that the decisions that he made were not the best. None the less, no one is accusing him of condoning child abuse, let alone perpetrating it. Some of the incidents (that a priest approached an adult man for sex, was refused and did not press the matter, for instance) could hardly be called abuse; others were certainly so. The point is not whether or not the Governor General is guilty of anything; it is whether the scandal (built on a mixture of truth, half-truths and, no doubt, lies) has gained enough momentum to have a life of its own. Sadly, it seems that it has. The man may have to go, if only to allow the position to be free from scandal - whatever the truth of the matter. And the position is supposed to be above politics.
Bernard Jones, Australia

Anyone who protects paedophiles has lost their moral authority. Australian law requires the mandatory reporting of paedophilic activities. And as for forgiveness, what right has DH to forgive paedophiles in the eyes of the law. Sure he can administer gods forgiveness if they are truly repentant, but that does not abrogate his responsibilities. Also he has repeatedly been accused of brushing aside the victims of abuse. Its one thing to ask for mercy for the criminals, but what of the victims? Hollingworth is guilty by his silence, his lies and his complicity in these crimes.
Dan Warna, Australia

How can one turn a blind eye to such despicable act! If he feels that what happened was wrong, he should resign to admit his mistake. You are involved in a crime if you try to cover one up, for no matter what reason.
Fahd Aman, Pakistan

Dr Hollingworth will probably be hounded to his resignation, which will be a tragedy for the public life of this country.

G. Watson, Australia
Dr Hollingworth will probably be hounded to his resignation, which will be a tragedy for the public life of this country. This is another example of the terrible disease of our times in which everything must be black or white. You are either for or against "terrorism", all asylum seekers are monstrous "illegals" , any taint with the words "child abuse" and you are damned. The chief damage to the Governor General's office is being done, not by Dr Hollingworth, but by the campaigners who want to force him out. Dr Hollingworth is the first G-G who has a vocation, and is not just from the professional classes or politics. When you deal with real people and real problems, through the changing mores of several decades it is inhuman to expect no mistakes or errors of judgement. I believe Dr Hollingwoth should be judged by his actions as G-G, but if we are to rake over his past, then we should judge his complete record, not damn him on isolated incidents, or single statements.
G Watson, Australia

No Peter Hollingworth should not resign. He has not done anything wrong. He has been accused, and judged by a media frenzy which is unaccountable for its actions. An enquiry will sort the mess out, in the meantime, leave the man alone. He is an honourable man, and if anyone out there can claim to be perfect, then stand up now. You will be the only one.
Christine Roberts, Australia

I believe he has compromised himself and has tainted the office of Governor-General.

Carol, Australia
Peter Hollingworth is not an ordinary man he was an Anglican Archbishop and as such is considered to be above reproach both ethically and morally. The law in Australia is clear you are duty bound to report cases of child abuse to the authorities. I understand the reason the Anglican Church did not wish to admit any child abuse occurred was purely on the advice of their insurance company. Loss of money is not an excuse and cannot be accepted as one. Peter Hollingworth played politics with the lives of the victims who sought justice from him. I believe he has compromised himself and has tainted the office of Governor-General. The Australian public have lost respect for him and expect him to gracefully resign.
carol, Australia

Hollingworth's stubborn refusal to resign reinforces the perception of a man desperate to cling onto an office which continues to afford him the pomp and ceremony he seems to savour. The simple fact is he is effectively a "dead man walking" - he can never enjoy the trust and confidence of the Australian people and his obduracy brings the office into disrepute. In public life, the office is far more important than the individual - but remember it is an office of a constitutional monarchy. Viva La Republic
Dianne Davis, Australia

The conservatives may say that the Labour Party is driving the current debate about Dr H's vice-regal position. It is driven by a public outraged that our Parliament is being undermined by virtue of a morally spineless leadership in both the Government and Executive. The Prime Minister is adhering to the falsity of the 'children overboard' issue and we have seen that our head of defence, Admiral Barrie has admitted his version of events on that same issue were incorrect. We are witnessing the pathetic side of Australian 'mateship'.
Shane, Australia

It was incredibly stupid of Dr Hollingworth to say in public anything that could be interpreted as blaming a victim of abuse. He has, as I understand it, apologised for this comment. His initial statement may, quite possibly, have been correct, but in the present climate this is irrelevant.
Andrew Criddle, United Kingdom

We look to politicians to be as free from corruption and sin as possible. We demand even higher standards from our religious leaders. Even more so when they are paid a very large amount of money to do very very little. Australia is fond enough of its history to maintain this archaic institution. But they should not have to deal with scandal in it. He should go. Point of Order by the Way the Queen can not 'sack' him . Constitutionally she can only sack him if a recommendation to that effect is made by the Prime Minister.
Steve Johnson, UK

A school principal who had behaved as he did as Archbishop would have been sacked.

Geoff, Australia
Many of the people overseas would not have seen the Australia Story interview. In this he clearly tried to shift the blame from his friend who was an adult Anglican priest to the 14 year old female victim. We saw and heard the words emerge from his own mouth. His cover-up explanations of this were extraordinarily inept and perhaps not accurate.
He must resign. A school principal who had behaved as he did as Archbishop would have been sacked. A teacher who behaved as did his priest friend would have been sacked and placed on a not to be employed list. A school principal who made the remarks made by the GG publicly would have been suspended the following day. An appalling situation. A very bad appointment. The GG must gallop off.
Geoff, Australia

Dr. Peter Hollingsworth should never have been appointed in the first place. PM John Howard knew full well about the convention of the separation of powers, between the church, politics and the judiciary, but chose to ignore it. He is history and he knows it, just as Peter Hollingsworth is also. Why? Because Howard has no intention of being a candidate at the next federal election and Hollingsworth knows full well his days as the GG are severely numbered. Welcome to the whole sordid world of politics and cover-ups by all so-called religious groups.
Len, Australia

It is of great concern that Peter Hollingworth appears, in his own TV appearances, to not understand the principles of child protection, the duty of care of church leaders, that in some Australian states mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse IS law and that as an Archbishop he ought to have been aware of his God given role of protecting the sheep from the wolves. Forgiveness follows confession, repentance accompanied by restitution (where possible) and a changed life. The principal of forgiveness does not override the obligation upon clergy to ensure that the church is a safe place.
Graham, Australia

He should resign before the Queen arrives. As the representative of a non-partisan constitutional monarch he has to be above politics. He isn't so he should go. If Howard doesn't recommend it the Queen should sack him anyway.
Luke Magee, UK

Dr H quite possibly is a decent human being despite his poor judgment over the issue of child abuse claims. He has also shown that he has the skills to carry out his duties as GG competently. However, and with disregard to how loud the media or some politicians squawked about his past, the simple fact is that the public, including politicians, do not like what they have learnt and no longer trust his judgment or character. For Mr H to lose this trust is to lose an integral part of carrying out the role of GG. Therefore, Mr H can no longer perform this role effectively and should stand down.
Emma, UK

Dr Hollingworth has only honourable intentions

James, Australia
Dr Hollingworth didn't act with contrived ill intent and has only honourable intentions with regard to carrying out his duties. His main flaw was, as Mr Howard suggested, misjudgement. Any dismissal by a prime minister would therefore be out of proportion.
James, Australia

Why can't people like him in his position ever just resign? It always ends up more embarrassing and vulgar in the end!
Milo Bray, UK

He should be suspended immediately and brought to trial

Chris B, England
If the stories of Hollingworth's past conduct can be substantiated he should be suspended immediately and brought to trial. This looks like yet another case of perverted behaviour by religious figures in positions of trust being ignored - and by inference condoned - by a person in a position of great responsibility. Hollingsworth's resignation should not even be an option: such people are a menace to society and need to be dealt with as harshly as the law allows.
Chris B, England

The teaching of Jesus Christ is to forgive. It seems that everyone these days has all but forgotten what Christ said. Shame on all of you.
Frederick Lam, Canada

Like anyone in public life, he should resign only if his position becomes untenable. At the moment I think he can do a bit more buck-passing before he reaches such a point.
Tom, Australia

On moral grounds the Queen should get involved

Stuart Torn, Russia
How can the Queen's advisors say that she should not become embroiled in the row? On moral grounds the Queen should want to get involved when members of the Anglican church, of which she is the boss, are sexually abusing the children of Australia - where she is also the boss.
Stuart Torn, Russia

The real issue behind this is that the Labour party in Australia are furious that they have lost three elections in a row and are lashing around for revenge. Howard appointed Hollingworth and so he is a convenient way to attack Howard. Howard knows this, which is why he is sticking behind Hollingworth.

There is also a large amount of hypocrisy here. In Queensland, two Labour party politicians were jailed for child abuse. In both cases, this was covered up for years by many of the very people who are calling for Hollingworth's resignation. The present Labour premier of Queensland even released one of these people early. This premier is also one of the loudest voices calling for Hollingworth's resignation.
Noel Smyth, Australia

Hollingworth should resign for the part he played in the cover up of child abuse along with the clerics who supported his view. The church has an obligation to look after their charges who have suffered, not the clerics who caused the suffering.
Dale Langford, Australia

It's just the rabid media trying to create the public attitude

Patrick Franklin, Australia
Hollingworth may have acted less vindictively than these new champions of the sexually abused, but he did what he believed was appropriate at the time. The media should report news not try to make it. Australia is not calling for the governor-general's resignation; it's just the rabid media trying to create the public attitude yet again.
Patrick Franklin, Australia

There must be accountability. If you do something wrong, you take the consequences, be you a leader of a church, a governor-general, or anyone in a community. This man must resign for he believes he is a moral man, and he has damaged our greatest treasure - our children.
Ex-pat, Egypt

An out-of-touch and foolish man who has no idea about the psychology of child abuse

Debby O'Brien, Australia
The governor-general should sack John Howard first. He is a far greater threat to children, as he locks small children up in detention centres for many years and splits up families of refugees, deporting wives without husbands and not allowing children into Australia when their parents are here. The governor-general is an out-of-touch and foolish man who has no idea about the psychology of child abuse. John Howard is plain dangerous.
Debby O'Brien, Australia

Before he goes, Australia should consider who should replace him. How many people are there with whiter-than-white histories who are in the running ?
Tony, UK

He has been open and honest about his mistakes

Philip Hobday, UK
Dr Hollingworth was acting during a period when most public institutions had little idea how to handle these problems, and he has been open and honest about his mistakes to the official enquiries and to the public. To blame the bishop is to judge events years ago based on knowledge and understanding which has come to light thereafter. That is retrospective condemnation and wholly unfair. Yet another attack on a good and honest man in public life who made mistakes and has had the courage to admit and apologise.
Philip Hobday, UK

No decent person can turn a blind eye to abuse - whether it is yesterday or 1990 or earlier. The establishment appears reluctant to backdate judgement on earlier times - this is mainly due to them protecting themselves against us. Will politicians and leaders use the same argument as to why they failed to protect today's victims?
Martina, UK

He has absolutely no morals

Peter Biggs, Australia
Hollingworth has committed no crime under Australian law but has shown that when it comes to child abuse, he has absolutely no morals. He first covered up allegations in his diocese; then promoted a priest to head of a school, although he knew this priest had had child abuse allegations levelled against him. He then tries to justify it all by suggesting that if a 14-year-old girl led a man (a priest in fact) on, then that is really the child's fault. Is this the sort of person you would want representing you?
Peter Biggs, Australia

If Howard hasn't got the guts or moral fibre to sack Hollingworth then the Queen should do it for the sake of her church, of which Hollingworth is an archbishop and the Australian people her loyal subjects!
B Wilson, Australia

This is a ploy by republicans and socialist media

Tom Elder, US (Australian)
This is a ploy by republicans and socialist media with the monarch's visit imminent. He is a fine man and has committed no crime. I back our prime minister, and when polls are released, he will be shown to have massive public support.
Tom Elder, US (Australian)

Hollingworth should resign. No one questions that he is a decent individual but like so many in his former position as a senior church person, has completely misconceived the revulsion people feel about these issues. It is clear a cover up was intended albeit quite some time ago. It is a pity Hollingworth has now been so publicly humiliated. It is a greater pity such offensive past conduct was not dealt with properly or at all. The sooner the governor-general goes the better.
Brian Quilty, Australia.

While I have some sympathy with Hollingworth in that he hasn't committed any crime and at worst has exhibited poor judgement, the simple fact now is that he can no longer function effectively as governor-general. You can't have a situation where community groups no longer accept a governor-general as a patron, rightly or wrongly. Howard is right not to sack him, there is no offence, but unfortunately for the good of the office, Hollingworth should resign.
Bruce, Australia

Hollingworth has no choice but to go

Neil Travis, Australia
Hollingworth has no choice but to go. He believes the advice of lawyers and insurers ("Do not admit fault") over and above the advice of his own Christian God. Hollingworth, by not reporting known child abusers to the police, is aiding and abetting the crime, not to mention withholding information about a known crime, is as guilty as the perpetrator. Hollingworth is now being requested not to turn up at official engagements, therefore diminishing his ability to carry out the role of Governor General of Australia. Australia cannot afford to have a man of Hollingworth's questionable character as its first citizen.
Neil Travis, Australia

The issue here is this - does he have the public confidence? Quite clearly he does not. In his position as GG he has shown himself to be either insensitive to the issues of sexual abuse of children or incredibly naive. This is now damaging the position of GG and his former actions (or inactions) have also damaged the credibility of church. He has to go - and the PM and his government (who have shown a similar lack of understanding and compassion towards victims) should follow him close behind.
Greg, Australia

Dr Hollingworth has brought serious damage to the most powerful office in the land and seems to be incriminating himself further with attempts to exonerate and defend himself against allegations of apathetic behaviour involving a most sensitive issue. It's not good enough for the prime minister, himself a man of shallow moral conscience, to state that Dr Hollingworth be judged on his performance as the incumbent of the governor-general ship and his past "errors of judgement" not be taken into account.

Dr Hollingworth as a venerated man in a position of trust and leadership failed to fulfil his prime responsibility of duty of care towards vulnerable children in the care of his institution. He has already lost the support of the opposition Labour party and of all of the State and territory Premiers. In the interests of the victims, Australia and out of respect for the visiting Queen, he must resign now. Thank you
Wahid Ezaty, Australia

The media are persecuting an honourable man

Kate, Australia (now Germany)
It's a bit hard to pass judgement when I'm so far away, however Hollingworth took the post of governor-general with the support of most Australian politicians. The fact that this has only now come to the fore puts doubt in my mind that Hollingworth was actually in the wrong in this situation. He did not commit the abuse himself, and, the cases brought up so far, did not know about them until fairly recently. I agree that the media are persecuting an honourable man in this circumstance, on the other hand, the Australian public have a right to know what's happening under their own roofs and we're certainly not going to be told anything by anybody except the media.
Kate, Australia (now Germany)

If - and I repeat the "if" here as nothing has been proved - he did cover up instances of sexual abuse, and there is evidence to back it, he should not only resign but he should be prosecuted for perverting the course of justice.
John, Italy

It's time for us to have a Head of State elected by the people.

Simon Rumble, Australian in UK
The position of governor-general is the most powerful in the country's political system. As such, the person appointed must be beyond reproach. Hollingworth has shown he's not up to the job and cannot be relied upon to make the right decision in a time of crisis. He has to go. And after he goes, it's time for us to have a head of state elected by the people, not appointed by the current government.
Simon Rumble, UK (Australian nationality)

He is a sensitive and caring person. He looks at the aftermath with sympathy; and realises that compassion and understanding far outweigh the ranting witch-hunters. He does not subscribe to a media beating brought on by a minority of commentators; who are themselves a mentally ill group, not yet pigeon-holed in our current society.
Kendrew, Australia

Who benefits from Hollingworth's continued employment? Not the Queen and certainly not Mr Howard, despite his protestations.
TJ Cassidy, US

This is a trial by media - and it is essentially Australia's business. His decision of 10 years ago may have been a mistake, but we can only suggest that with all the brilliance and wisdom of hindsight. He otherwise seems to be a good man . I see no reason to pillory the guy without clear evidence that he was deliberately and maliciously acting against the public interest. I fear that this is another case of the media trying to bring down anyone who associates him or herself with the establishment. If one is allowed to excel one is allowed to err.
Mark M Newdick, US/UK

It should up to the Queen alone to decide

Simon Cameron, UK
If he has apologised then, as much as he is to be commended for this courageous confession, apparently he's guilty as charged. However, unless this makes him guilty of a crime under the laws of the land, he is quite within his rights not to resign under public pressure. I think in this case, it should up to the Queen alone to decide on the issue, and recommend his resignation if need be. It is she, after all, who officially appointed him.
Simon Cameron, UK

He has demonstrated a 1950s attitude to child sexual abuse

Maggie, Australia
Yes Simon Cameron, the Queen does appoint the governor-general but it is on the recommendation of the prime minister of the day. There was great concern at the appointment of Dr. Hollingworth because of the possible conflict between his loyalty to the church and loyalty to the state. The major outcry at present is that he has demonstrated a 50s attitude to child sexual abuse in that he essentially blamed a 14-year-old girl who was sexually abused by a 30-year-old priest. In other words, he blames the victim, an attitude which died out two decades ago. The damage he is doing to the position of governor-general is such that he should resign.
Maggie, Australia

Should Australia's governor-general resign?



1013 Votes Cast

Results are indicative and may not reflect public opinion

See also:

21 Feb 02 | Asia-Pacific
Howard stands by governor-general
20 Feb 02 | Asia-Pacific
Calls grow for governor to quit
18 Feb 02 | Asia-Pacific
Hollingworth rejects new abuse allegations
20 Dec 01 | Asia-Pacific
Sex scandal dogs Governor-General

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Talking Point stories