|You are in: Talking Point|
Thursday, 31 January, 2002, 09:02 GMT
Are rail managers right to take a hard line on strike?
Managers are being drafted in to take the place of guards in an effort to alleviate the latest 48-hour strike.
South West Trains says it will run around a third of its services during the latest round of action by members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport Union.
South West Trains is expected to train further staff so they can help out during future strikes.
The move has prompted a fresh row between the company and the RMT, but SWT's managing director Andrew Haines denies reports that the firm is trying recruit more non-union staff.
Do you feel safe with managers acting as guards? Is this a welcome attempt to give passengers a service? Or is the company holding workers to ransom?
Your questions were put to Rufus Barnes, Director of the London Transport Users Committee, by BBC Correspondent Peter Gould. A video will follow shortly.
This debate is now closed. Read your comments below.
It's doubtful if these idiots from the "ivory towers" of the railways will make a difference but at least they may get an idea of the conditions the guards/conductors work under and may be they would go easy on the mindless discipline that was a contributory factor in one of these disputes. Should they make a mistake who will discipline them?
Any attempts to break these strikes, which amount to economic terrorism have my full support.
The Government should amend UK legislation to reduce union power and the right to strike.
Any rail company, including London Underground should be able to sack the strikers with impunity.
Industrial action of this sort should no longer be tolerated. They are an anachronism and a license to be avaricious and destructive.
We live in a democratic country, yet the workplace, where we spend most of our lives, is not. Until democracy extends to the control of capital and our workplaces we will see more strikes, as people seek to exercise control over their situation. More power to them.
This sounds like an extremely dodgy practise from a health & safety perspective. The managers have not been trained as guards, and therefore should not be used for this function.
It's strange how the public seem to regard the use of untrained managers to do guards' jobs as a great idea, but they would regard the use of untrained guards as unacceptable.
Let's just hope no accidents happen, because if they do, I have a feeling that the health and safety inspectorate will have a field day - I certainly would!
The whole point Simon Moore is that these people have been trained as guards. Otherwise they would not be allowed to be on the train!
Karl Peters, UK
I think it's about time someone took a stand against these unions. Nurses get paid a lot less than the guards and in my opinion do a better job of it, yet you don't see them striking all the time. This has got out of hand and it's time someone did something about it.
It's just plain silly for so many people to jump to the conclusion that these managers don't know what they are doing. I am sure that they do, being that they manage the people that usually perform this function, or in some cases, may have previously worked as guards. I don't mean to put the work of guards down, but come on folks, it isn't exactly rocket science. As for the union, they have every right to strike, which means withdrawing labour. The company also has every right to reduce the disruption caused by the strike. I believe that the playing field is a lot flatter than the terrible days of ASLEF and the 1970s.
I applaud the action taken by South West Trains management. Striking RMT workers would love to see a return to the bad old days when unions could hold the country to ransom. SWT have taken steps to see that this does not happen.
I have no sympathy for RMT strikers. Their rate of pay is much better than most public sector workers and they work a standard 35 hour week.
SWT should push ahead with it's training program and recruit non-union members where possible to fill the vacancies left by striking workers. By the next strikes, we won't miss the RMT wingers at all. They can stay on strike forever!
This is not the 1970s and this sort of persistent strike action and disruption is completely pointless. I support the managements efforts to put the passengers first and keep the trains running. They estimate that soon they will have trained sufficient management numbers to run 1000 trains day on SWT during strikes, this is good news. Strikes are a mechanism for disgruntled employees to make a point but this should not be to the detriment of tens of thousands of innocent commuters trying to get to their jobs on time.
South West trains are to be congratulated for their pragmatic approach to minimising the effects of yet another rail strike. I certainly don't feel less safe travelling with a management guard than with a union one - in fact, having commuted by rail for the last ten years, I've yet to actually see a guard perform any useful role whatsoever.
Three cheers for the managers. Nice to see them mucking in and getting their hands dirty for once. We have been held up on overground and tube trains for months on end. People are past caring about the complaints: kettles, uniforms or something as fundamentally important as safety. They have used us as strike material...and abused our goodwill for too long about lesser issues and in the meantime we are supposed to get to work and suffer excruciating problems doing so. Save striking for when you REALLY mean it, not for the whole time. It loses impact. So good for the managers, I am glad to see them doing something... anything. I personally fed up to the back teeth of the whole affair.
In an ideal world, trains would run on time, be fast, clean, efficient, safe, and offer excellent value for money. And rail workers would be well-paid, cheerful and never strike.
Suffice it to say that public morale is lower even than the unfortunate workers. If we could go on strike, I'm sure we would. And if we did, you bet your life something would be done in double quick time!
The government have yet to become involved. The last time we saw government involvement was at the mines and on the streets of Wapping, when the government basically declared war on its people. If the government are to become at all involved it should be in a way that redresses the balance. The rail companies are clearly morally bankrupt, and very nearly financially so... workers livelihoods and passenger lives have, are, and will continue to be literally sacrificed to the great god privatisation.
One final point... go to France, Germany, even Spain....all with centrist parties (no extremism there) , and transport is key. It's got nothing to do with who is in power as to whether the trains run on time. All parties in this country should make a commitment to long term spending on infrastructure.
I suffer daily at the hands of the RMT staff who are on strike, and look forward to the elimination of this organisation and its members from this service provider.
When they are "at work", the train service is not much better than that provided today.
It is about time that the RMT hierarchy woke up and smelt the coffee. The days of getting paid based on other workers worth are long gone. Can the industry afford the level of pay rise demanded, and still keep all the staff employed should be the question being asked. My pay isn't going up this year, but I have a job, and hopefully will have it this time next year. If I demanded an above-inflation pay rise, I may get it, but would I keep my job??
Given that huge numbers of people commute using South West Trains, this rail network forms a vital part of our commercial infrastructure. It should therefore be kept running use any means available - and should not be compromised by the recent resurgence of belligerent unions. The fact that the rail managers have the courage and sense of responsibility to step into the gap and keep the system running might serve as a useful humiliation to the government, which has apparently failed to grasp the fact that our semi-derelict railways are important to this nation's financial survival.
A final point is that why should workers who have to put up with the conditions on the railways and tube be satisfied with scraps from the masters table when the directors take massive pay rises and bonus/share options each year?
I don't think the operating companies deserve our sympathy, but I'm with them on this one. In my experience, guards are generally unfriendly and unhelpful, and have no conception of customer relations. They also earn a lot as it is (drivers earn an incredible amount). I have been studying and practising law for 8 years, and one day I hope to earn as much as they do!
I don't know how the company is "holding workers to ransom" - it is the workers choice to strike and the managers job to provide a service, sounds like it is the workers holding the company to ransom and that the managers have actually decided to do something about it. I am sure that once the workers realise they can be replaced they will get back to work - so that train users can actually get to work!
Ben Drake, York, UK
Well done managers for trying.
If I was in charge I would start sacking the striking workers.
I would recommend that every business, shop or service effected stops serving the striking RMT members and see how they like it.
If someone is qualified to be a guard then there is no problem. Just because you label them as "manager" doesn't mean they are not fit for the job. The RMT may moan about it but if these people pass the same qualification as RMT guards have then good luck to them.
I use mainline and underground trains to commute to work, and I'm sick and tired of being held to ransom by these train workers. Would these people strike if they served food in a restaurant? No, because customers would quickly go elsewhere and they'd be out of a job. Because they work on an essential service, they go on strike whenever they feel like, to grab as much money as possible from the management.
I applaud the train managers for being pro-active and keeping the services running. If these services don't run, I can't get to work and I lose money. Are the striking railwaymen going to subsidise me on the days they strike? I don't think so.
And by the way, before I'm accused of being a fat-cat city worker with a huge annual bonus and pay-rise, I work in a library in Central London, and I earn about £19,000 a year, and I didn't get a pay rise at all this year.
Clearly the company is trying to buy goodwill from its travellers. It won't work. Everybody knows the management know nothing about running a railway which is one of the reasons for its poor service. Trying to substitute the people who are supposedly trained for the job with managers who haven't a clue isn't going to improve public perception of safety.
Dominic Hill, UK
One of the problems facing the industry appears to be the lack of experienced and qualified personnel with in it. The train companies have downsized and rationalised their work force to a level which is dangerously affecting performance. As the SRA seems unwilling to take effective action, perhaps it is time the unions took a stand. Many of the delays on the network are blamed on the demise of rail track, but Railtrack do not cause trains to be cancelled due to driver shortages.
For the strikers to whine about safety or how many days of an 8-week course the replacements have had is a smokescreen - how safe were the railways anyway before workers started holding passengers to ransom? The first LU and rail strikes were over safety. Then pay and conditions. Now it's about whatever the hell they want this week. Now if only Transport for London would do the same for the tube...
I agree that the companies concerned should take a hard line with the railway unions - however the government should also provide the necessary environment to stop these strikes from affecting the travelling public. The problem is that as the Labour party receives its funds from the unions they cannot take the necessary steps to enforce the public's right to not be affected by strikers.
This is a bold and courageous bid on the part of the management to help the paying customer out, and hopefully it will prove to be one in the eye for these bone idle guards. Let's be honest, a guards' job is not rocket science is it? You need very few qualifications and have virtually no responsibility. If they want to be paid what train drivers get, let them retrain as Drivers and take some responsibility. If all they want to do is punch holes in tickets, make unintelligible announcements over the tannoy, and blow a whistle after they have sullenly slammed some doors shut, we should continue to pay them accordingly.
28 Jan 02 | England
Rail managers cover for strike staff
27 Jan 02 | England
Rail bosses to become guards
25 Jan 02 | UK
Commuters endure more rail misery
31 Jan 02 | UK
Second day of rail gloom
24 Jan 02 | England
Guards aim for striking impact
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Other Talking Points:
Links to more Talking Point stories
|^^ Back to top
News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo
To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>>
© MMIII | News Sources | Privacy