|You are in: Talking Point|
Friday, 21 December, 2001, 21:09 GMT
Tanzania: Is the UK radar deal justified?
The UK has given the go-ahead for the sale of a controversial £28m air traffic control system to Tanzania.
The system has been at the centre of a bitter row over the government's commitment to tackling poverty in Africa.
Prime Minister Tony Blair reportedly gave his blessing to the deal, which safeguards 250 jobs on the Isle of Wight.
However, International Development Secretary Clare Short, who is meant to have a veto on deals which endanger "sustainable" development, was said to be fiercely opposed to it.
Is the government right to go ahead with this radar deal? Is it right to sell an expensive system to such a poor country?
This debate is now closed. Read your comments below.
We'll only regret it should we ever need to go to war with the customer later. That's life, politics and capitalism folks.
Hugh Kennedy, Germany
Ed Manning, UK
Realistically, the cash is better used on an asset which has the potential to improve regional air safety rather than sloshing away in the bank accounts of a handful of Tanzanian politicians.
I have advocated for sustainable development and poverty reduction since 1986, long before these became accepted as language of governments around the world as priorities for the 21st century. To put the issue in proper perspective: we are talking about less than 1% of total debt burden reduction package of £3 billion. This money will provide performance improvements on national security and the air industry of Tanzania, however poor it may be by international economic measures. Return on investment must be monitored so that previous unsustainable habits are minimised as well.
Dr Anthony O'Sullivan, UK
The Tanzanians didn't interfere when our government spent £800 million on a Dome instead of helping the people of this country. So we shouldn't interfere with what they do with their money either.
When the government has failed to deliver on transport, health, poverty and education, how could we expect them to deliver on their ethical foreign policy?
No, no and no! When is this absurd
policy of selling expensive weapons
to countries that are struggling
to provide basic living conditions
to their people going to end?
Tom from Oregon: Since when has an air traffic control system been a weapon?
With corruption widespread in African governments I would not be surprised if this deal went ahead. Everybody who deals with large projects in this part of the world knows that there is always corruption involved.
There's a lot of non-Tanzanians here who effectively want to enforce their own fiscal opinions upon that country. I wonder how many of those same people have previously protested about foreign interference in a nation's autonomy. Or is it okay to be an imperialist if you wear corduroy and read the liberal press?
Tanzania can buy the sophisticated radar system if it feels it needs it. But does it have the capacity to maintain such a sophisticated system? If not, then Tanzania will have to always turn to its British sellers to maintain it. It may not even have the financial means to call upon British experts. In the end it will result in Tanzania having to borrow from the same country that has been trying to reduce its indebtedness and dependency on foreign aid. Ultimately, the decision whether or not to break the country's cycle of indebtedness and dependency on foreign aid is Tanzania's. Its policy of self-reliance as espoused by its founding father, Nyerere, will remain impracticable as long as it does not learn to set its priorities right.
All these bleeding hearts should start minding their own business. If Tanzania wants to spend money on what could be considered a luxury that's their business.
Tanzania are buying a military grade air control system, yet they have an airforce of eight aircraft. What is the need of this system when they could easily cope with a civilian-style system? Also, what is the point of cancelling £100 million worth of debt whilst selling them a further £28 million of unnecessary equipment? One of the poorest nations in the world is about to get poorer and for no good reason, and the UK is to blame. What makes it worse - Blair refused to voice any disapproval in Prime Minister's Questions. This entire situation is frankly appalling.
Arun Thenabadu, Sri Lanka
Well, maybe it is to the long-term advantage of Tanzania - £40 million buys a lot of food, I admit, but if the radar is used to establish and support tourism and a local economy for the long term then that is a good investment that will repay itself very quickly. There is a saying - give a man a fish and he will feed his family, give a man a net...
Whose economy is more important, the Isle of Wight or Tanzania?
I live on the Island so I know whom my vote is with.
Nic, it's 250 jobs in a country with a social welfare system versus some minimum essentials for people who are poor beyond your understanding of the word.
Do we really need this? I don't know whom to believe here. Should I believe my own government or a foreign government trying to secure jobs for its citizens?
If rich countries buy things that they want and need from poor countries, what's wrong with poor countries buying things that they want and need from rich countries?
Of course the deal should go ahead. Surely investment in the infrastructure of a country is the best way to combat poverty. Or would the "anti-everything lobby" prefer to deny Tanzania the benefits of economic development that they take for granted?
Nick Bowman, UK
Is it heck madness Nick! Frankly, if they are willing to buy it, then we should be willing to sell it.
It's a capitalist society we live in - let's start acting like one instead of some namby-pamby liberal state.
Need anyone be reminded, Tanzania is an independent nation, and free to make her own decisions about what she chooses to buy or otherwise. As a Tanzanian citizen, I say this patronising attitude must stop. Surely we have a better sense of what's needed to guard against terrorism, poaching, smuggling and the like, better than certain quarters of the UK cabinet and media, who have never even set foot in Tanzania. Had they done so, I am sure they would have appreciated that the sheer size of the country, plus our unique set of circumstances, makes such equipment all the more suitable for the task at hand.
Victor - would you say this air-traffic control system was more important/valuable to your country than, say clean drinking water for 50% of the country's population?
Victor from Tanzania is right on the mark. If they don't buy the system from the UK, they'll buy it from the USA or China or Russia or Japan.
They've obviously decided they need it. Those who think that such countries are incapable of making informed decisions about matters such as this are guilty of the most insidious form of racism: i.e. hiding their sense of superiority under a veil of compassion.
Victor, as a Tanzanian citizen, I really don't see a need considering the fact that we don't even have a robust airline industry. The citizens of Tanzania need the money for essentials such as food. We cannot afford the luxury and it will be of little use.
Sure it's justified. It's the same justification that the fat cats of industry (e.g. the rail and water companies) have been using for the last decade or more of putting short-term profits for the few over long-term needs of the many.
20 Dec 01 | UK Politics
Tanzania deal cleared
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Other Talking Points:
Links to more Talking Point stories
|^^ Back to top
News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo
To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>>
© MMIII | News Sources | Privacy