| You are in: Talking Point | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Monday, 15 October, 2001, 10:57 GMT 11:57 UK
Northern Ireland Assembly in crisis: What can be done?
The Northern Ireland Assembly is on the verge of collapse after Ulster Unionist Party leader David Trimble announced that the party would boycott meetings of the executive and withdraw its ministers from the assembly.
Sinn Fein President Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness met with the UK Prime Minister Tony Blair at Downing Street on Tuesday morning in an attempt to resolve the crisis over decommissioning. The meeting was arranged at Sinn Fein's request following Monday's failed attempt by the UUP and the Democratic Unionist Party to exclude the party from the power-sharing executive. What do you think can be done to resolve the current deadlock in Northern Ireland? Does the assembly have a central role to play in the future of the province? Is there a sense of deja-vu about this situation? This debate is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below.
Your reaction
Frank O'Brien, England
Frank O'Brien from England has protrayed the British government as some sort of invading force. Whatever you might like to believe, the people of Northern Ireland are not living under an evil regime. The easy way to sort this out would be to stop voting for terrorist/politicians and choose decent law-abiding members of the community to voice their opinions. With the politicians they've got, they don't really have much chance of sorting out all the problems.
No concessions offered by the nationalist community will ever be sufficient to persuade dyed-in-the-wool unionists to enter into government with them. In the long run, Westminster will have to bite the bullet and realise that the only way forward is to rule Northern Ireland under a system of joint sovereignty with Dublin. Under such a system London can act as guarantor on the part of the Northern Ireland community that identifies with Britain while Dublin can do the same for that part of the community that regards itself as Irish.
So yet again we are seeing the unionists being shamed by the nationalists in their inability to overcome prejudice. But both sides need to grow up and learn to live together and respect their differences without violence.
Does your definition of a normal "democracy" include parties being allowed to retain tons of weapons in case they're needed to murder, or threaten to murder, their political opponents in the future?
The assembly may collapse but it will be reinstated. The I.R.A will decommission their weapons. It's alway's been just a matter of time and pressure. The truth is that we are on the road to peace and there is no turning back. The I.R.A and Sein Finn know that the armed struggle has had it's day - even more so in the light of the tragic events of September 11th. We are in the end game . Once peace has truly settled and established itself then we can get down to the real business of working through the religious intolerance and the sectarian hatred that so corrupts and pollutes our society.
Glen Cruddas, England
It's too bad that the many and varied world crises in the wake of imperialism can't learn from each other. Even as Afghanistan is bombed by the vengeful Bush administration, they express support for an eventual Palestinian state. Sinn Fein can no more be held responsible for IRA decommissioning than Arafat can be for Hamas or Islamic Jihad.
Just who are these people saying that the IRA possessing weapons is no big deal, as long as they are not used? Nowhere else in the civilised world would a political party serving in government be allowed to have links with a known terrorist organisation that has it's own cache of weapons and personal army.
Mike, UK - that's exactly
what the ANC did!
Other countries have a similar problem, Mike. In Spain, ETA is still active and yet it has strong links with the Basque separatist party that usually does pretty well in the regional elections.
Peter, London, England Peter in London claims the SF leadership has used its influence on decommissioning. Considering the alleged overlap between the leaderships of the IRA and SF, surely if the SF leaders actually wanted decommissioning, the IRA terrorists would do it tomorrow.
All illegal guns from both communities should be handed in immediately to the police for destruction - under the cover of a one month amnesty if necessary. The retention of weapons by either side has nothing to do with freedom-fighing or community protection. It is blackmail of the democratic process and unacceptable.
Steve Richmond, UK
This should not be a state of crisis and I don't think Gerry Adams is particularly helpful or cooperative. After, what, three years of changes in Northern Ireland, the only things that have not changed are IRA weapons. I thought that over the last few months they might have moved. And what about this 'war against terrorism'? The IRA are, or were, terrorists (not freedom fighters), and all everyone is asking for is that they disband their weapons. Then the parliament can resume. Is that too much to ask?
Crisis, what crisis? Surely when the current military strikes in the Middle East have subsided then the US and GB will immediately turn their hand to NI, won't they? Both have clearly indicated that they will eradicate terrorism wherever it may reside. Or will Bush and Blair be seen to be hypocritical? Surely not!
It is ironic that Mr Trimble is making such a noise about IRA decommissioning at a time when Loyalist violence has been reaching new and alarming heights. If General De Chastelain was happy with the IRA proposals a few short weeks ago, why have we suddenly fallen back to the current impasse? If the guns remain largely silent then the Executive members on all sides have a duty to their electorate to continue striving for peace and working together. There really is no other solution.
To solve the Northern Ireland problem Colombia should form a coalition (perhaps with Iraq) and launch an anti-terrorist campaign against the IRA and the countries that support them, the Irish Republic and the USA. Come on Bush and Blair, lets not be hypocrites, if this action is good enough against the Taleban then it is applicable to the IRA and UDF as well. Ask the politicians that one and watch them run for cover.
The Good Friday Agreement specifically
commits all parties
to work for "total
disarmament". No ifs, no ands, no buts.
And no special deal for
the IRA.
Pete, Ireland
It's time for this Labour Government to allow some of the principles it apparently has in the international forum to trickle into practice on home soil. By that I mean that its time to take a stance against those who refuse to denounce terrorist activities and not continue with the current strategy of appeasement.
|
Other Talking Points:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more Talking Point stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|