Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Talking Point
Front Page 
UK Politics 
Talking Point 
In Depth 

Watch Laura and John Doyle discuss the book
"There is equality in our marriage."
 real 56k

Wednesday, 4 April, 2001, 12:00 GMT 13:00 UK
Should women "surrender"?
Should women surrender?
Women striving to be the equal of men is the root of all unhappiness and the disintegration of marriages, according to a controversial book.

In The Surrendered Wife, American author Laura Doyle, promotes the philosophy that women are happiest when they obey their husbands at all times.

She says that women should submit to sex whenever their husbands wish, and should not demand satisfaction for themselves. They should also forgive indiscretions away from home.

Doyle is part of a backlash against feminism that began in the early 1990s. But women are now working in record numbers and are more independent than ever.

Is this a realistic lifestyle choice for women? Would you consider changing your way of life for your man?

Laura Doyle joined us for a live forum on Thursday and answered a selection of you questions.
Click here for the transcript and video.

This debate is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below.

Your reaction

I personally don't think I could be attracted to a woman who had no ambition for herself. I'd much rather have a wife who was my equal than my slave.
James, Australia

I will not surrender my liberty to any man - or woman

Annette, UK
I earn my own living, I pay my own bills, I take responsibility for my own life. Whilst I share many things with many people, I will not surrender my liberty, or my financial or intellectual independence to any man (or woman).
Annette, UK

How boring it would be! Three quarters of my wife's conversation with her friends revolves around how wrong and silly all the husbands are, on a distressingly frequent basis. What would they have to talk about if they "submitted"? Of course, they could come half way by talking a little more about politics and discussing history, etc, while peppering their conversation a little bit less with juicy examples of what a jerk I am. Nahh, forget it... I'm happy with the way things are (although a bit more "submission" when I ask her to run down to the store to pick me up some more beer might be pleasant, but I'm willing to bet incredibly large amounts of money that it won't happen).
David Melchior, NY, USA

She is a disgrace to all that women have fought for

Suzanne McMillan, Japan
This woman openly insults and disregards the intelligence of women. Surely, marriage should be seen as an act of love where both parties maintain their individuality and respect each other's independence. Women following orders, which she basically recommends, demotes them to the role of a dog. She is a disgrace to all that women have fought for.
Suzanne McMillan, Japan (UK)

Making peace at home does not happen by ignoring conflict, but by resolving it. Ms Doyle is suggesting the former, I believe. She forgets that marriage is a partnership. And here's an idea for her: regarding sex, most men nowadays are willing to help their female partner enjoy it. This only makes sense if the men hope to "get any".
Mary, USA

I believe that women should obey and do what they are told. Get women out of the work force and back into the home - then maybe there will be less violence at the schools because there will be a parent at home to teach these little children right from wrong. Besides, there will be more jobs for us guys!
Tom, USA

I am told by my wife that neither men nor women really totally surrender themselves to their partners. And if she says so, who am I to argue?
Harry Knapp, Germany

How can we ever be sure that every man would be fair and just in his so-called superior role?

Agha Ata, USA
When man went out to gather fruit and hunt, and the woman stayed at home to look after her children, it was necessary for man to be strong and in command, and for woman to yield. But in the 21st century, a woman doesn't need a man for her or her children's safety - at least not in developed countries. Men are slowly becoming feminine and women are slowly becoming masculine. We should let evolution take its own course. One more thing: how can we ever be sure that every man would be fair and just in his so-called superior role, as Ms Laura Doyle suggests? We know man's history well. Look at Afghanistan and see what man can do when he is in absolute power. And I may also add that Ms Laura Doyle is still mentally living in the Stone Age. Wake up Laura!
Agha Ata, USA

If men want obedience, they should get a dog!
Jo, UK

I come from the "surrendered husband" school. I have discovered my life is so much easier if I simply waste my time going to fabric shops, agreeing with my wife's choice of curtain material and then paying for it. Also, I find that by accepting all blame and responsibility for anything that might go wrong whether it's around the home, while driving, at work or on the news, I avoid so many stressful arguments. In addition I find that by not bothering to have sex I don't get abused for being some weird sex-crazed deviant. "Surrendered wife"? - Ha! Makes a change.
John Moore, UK

Love will surmount all sorts of troubles

Jesmond Grech, Malta
The relationship between men and women should be based on love and respect. Love will surmount all sorts of troubles and difficulties.
Jesmond Grech, Malta

Here in Saudi Arabia, a significant proportion of the population believe that a woman's role is to serve a man. They claim it is an equal role to the man's, and claim that they have a better standard of living than women in the west who have to work. However, one rarely hears women in this country voicing that opinion. Most women here long for their freedom and the right to make their own choices independent of husbands, fathers and brothers. Men's domination of women is simply another form of abuse, and has no place in a modern civilised society.
David Warren, Saudi Arabia

I hope that "submissive" wives are not being confused with "housewives". My wife looks after our five children full time and gives them all the love and support they need. If anyone dare suggest that she is lazy or weak because she is at home, they will have a fight on their hands. I work for my family, not for myself, which sadly many selfish people seem to do these days - both male and female.
Myles, UK

The roles have switched. The men are the wives now and the women are the husbands. The women are going to work, managing the money, cooking the meals, raising the kids - I mean, we all have 2 full time jobs while the guys go to work and come home and sit on their fat asses all night. Then they want sex after all that.
Julie, USA

If a woman marries a man, surely that is an indication of mutual commitment to love and fidelity. It must be wrong, therefore, to talk as though a woman were 'imprisoned' by marriage - it's a voluntary thing. But, similarly, if a man really loves his wife, it should be his responsibility to see that she is reasonably happy, whatever that entails.
Edward Reeves, UK

Why is it necessary to play power and salary off against children and family?

Carl, England
I think what people have now is choice, and that can only be a good thing. In the modern world both men and women, on the whole, have more freedom on how they will live their lives. To judge a woman negatively for wanting to stay at home and raise children not only frowns on choice but on the importance of family. Why is it necessary to play power and salary off against children and family, anyway - isn't that what feminism was about? Did women fight for pay and power or did they fight for the freedom to choose? As a man, it seems to me that it's women who are their own worst enemies. If a woman announces that she is a housewife, it's usually the women who are bemused, not the men. Does anybody have the right to pass judgement on another person's life choices, and if they do, are they intimating that they themselves made all the right decisions while others made the wrong ones?
Carl, England

I'm sorry, but having been a victim of a sexual assault I can never agree with the 'philosophy' of total submission to a man. I am in a long-term relationship and planning to get married, and my husband-to-be finds the idea of submission to either partner offensive, in fact he finds the idea, as I do, of total submission to any other person offensive. I was brought up in a very open-minded Christian atmosphere, being the daughter of not only a Priest, but a female one. I was taught that Love is based on MUTUAL respect, trust and compassion. I find Ms Doyle's views archaic and dangerous. I thank God for my upbringing, most sincerely.
Catherine Oliver, UK

What is this woman's value system? Give up your humanity and you'll be happy? What exactly about that situation would make me happy? I would ask. And what sort of happiness would that be, anyway? One could also be perpetually happy by stuffing oneself with Prozac, for example, but would that be commendable? (I'm assuming here that Doyle would say 'no', but I might be wrong!) The stimuli provoked by direct exposure to life, to the immense possibilities of thought, of feelings, the struggle to learn, all those things make for a fuller life. I don't see how obeying your husband can be compatible with this.
Ana, UK

The issue is not that all women should stay home, but that most would prefer to

Jim, USA
In poll after poll, when women are asked would they rather work or stay home to raise their children, the vast majority say they would rather be at home. The problem with modern western culture is that the role of mother and homemaker has been denigrated. Most women, as is the case for most men, work at jobs that provide little personal satisfaction and not nearly enough money to justify having latchkey children. The issue is not that ALL women should stay home, but that most would prefer to, but they don't for reasons that do not make them any happier.
Jim, USA

Hasn't she heard about the Women's Movement? This kind of backward thinking is helping to set back women to a Victorian era. Bring back Hillary Clinton. All is forgiven!!
Tess Jack, England

Being married is being in a PARTNERSHIP. Both my husband and I are fiercely independent people with very separate interests. He cooks during the week (because he's home first); I cook special meals at the weekend. I do the decorating; he digs the garden. I would never tell him not to do something, because he would never knowingly do anything to upset me and it's the same the other way around. My husband works with an all female staff and I am in a male-dominated industry. So what! Our two children (girl 20 [away at college], boy 6) both pull their weight in the house and their sex is irrelevant. Any relationship is like a puzzle - the pieces have to fit together. Women will never be the same as men - why should they be? PS: We're a blissfully happy family and proud of it!!!
Sandie Caffelle, England

I think the correct word for it is slavery

Gill, UK
"Wives submit to your husbands", is often quoted as a biblical reason for this kind of philosophy, conveniently forgetting the line that goes immediately before it - "Submit, then, one to another. Wives submit to your husbands. Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the church and gave up his life for it." As a philosophy for living, the submissive wife may well work, but only when the husband is prepared to die for his wife and will do anything for her. Just a submissive wife? I think the correct word for that is slavery.
Gill, UK

Having watched the television programme last night and seen Mrs Doyle and heard what she and some of her "students" had to say I have to say she not only has a point, but seems to me genuinely concerned about helping couples have a happy marriage. Is this such a terrible thing? Also the first point she emphasised was that she deliberately chose the word surrender and NOT (as so many people here claim) the word submit as this would imply dominance which is not where she is coming from. The main objective seemed to me to be helping women to be themselves whilst allowing their husbands to do the same, in other words be happy and leave each other alone, sounds good to me.
Simon, UK

I come from a cultural background where Doyle would fit in perfectly. If she had to go through half of what my grandmothers went through I doubt she would have written such a book. I thank God that I live in a country where women have rights and so many more opportunities, how can a women be happy being man's slave?
Sami , Mexico/USA

So yet another American comes up with yet another gender-dividing, headline-grabbing view to sell something. If my mother had surrendered as Doyle (and my father) wanted her to, we'd have been destitute growing up when he took early retirement - and that was thirty years ago.
Kenneth Henry, London UK

No family is ever going to function properly if there is not equality and mutual respect

Christine, UK
There's absolutely nothing wrong with a woman wanting to stay home and bring up the kids. I think it's probably a good thing until the kids start school. But the operative word here is wanting. We are all human beings, in this country we live in a democracy and we can all think for ourselves.

The start of the feminist movement was the fact that women were seen as objects, to be treated as men saw fit. A lot of men were good, a lot more were terrible. We should all be given the choice to do what we want and live our lives the best way. That means that some fathers are better "mothers" than some mothers and some mothers are better for their children and husbands if they go out to work. No family is ever going to function properly if there is not equality and mutual respect. And just imagine the kind of brats that would be the result of a family culture where one parent has to be dominated by the other.
Christine, UK

I can see what Laura Doyle is trying to say - basically, life is easier if you just do what you're told. This doesn't just apply to women, but to ordinary people the world over. We are always being told by governments and heads of business to keep quiet, "don't rock the boat", don't go on strike, do as your told it's for your own good. Anyone who comes out with the sort of ideas Laura Doyle has, doesn't believe in personal freedom full stop. Doyle should remember that in the 18th Century women weren't even allowed to read lest they start having ideas, let alone write, so she should remember that if it wasn't for men and women fighting for equal rights, she wouldn't be writing her book in the first place. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you (i.e. using democracy to undermine it!)
Alex, UK

The "Doyle relationship" sounds like conscription i.e. something you hope you never have to do. I'm sorry, but I'm a hopeless romantic, I think people get married because they love one another i.e. it's a contract the "law" will never fully quantify. Dawn, having heard your side of the story ... I'd like to hear your husband's side.
IanC, UK

Writing such absurd things in a book is a great way to ensure high sales, as media organisations (such as the BBC) obviously think that their ratings will be improved by talking about it.
Greg Boon, UK

Even though the work may not be equally distributed, in general life now is better than my vision of the Doyle wife who is frustratedly silent, has unpaid bills, wears unsuitable clothing, and gives sex upon demand

Dawn, UK
I am a feminist and have been since the time the priest told me I couldn't be an altar girl. I believe fully in equal rights within the home and the workplace. Whilst I disagree strongly with Ms Doyle's opinions about overall submission, I can not help but feel that there is some reasoning behind a few of her comments. As a woman in a long term relationship I find that I take the responsibility for our money, holidays, arranging to see friends, paying the bills etc. Whilst my husband is grateful that these daily tasks are completed without his participation it would be nice for the responsibility to be shared. So I must admit I have corrupted the Doyle theory in the past and used in an 'agressive passiveness' in that I have refused to do much of the above and placed the responsibility of doing this week's banking etc in my husband's very capable hands. Even though the work may not be equally distributed, in general life now is better than my vision of the Doyle wife who is frustratedly silent, has unpaid bills, wears unsuitable clothing, and gives sex upon demand. Surely this is not the recipe for happiness?
Dawn, UK

The dynamic of the human partnership is extremely complex and one cannot state categorically that a set of rules would apply to all

Di Stewart, USA
What a hoot! Everyone getting steamed up about a book - kudos to the author for creating something that people might actually want to read and discuss. The dynamic of the human partnership is extremely complex and one cannot state categorically that a set of rules would apply to all. That said, if people want to spend the money to buy the book, more power to them. Sure I submit to my husband most of the time (in his dreams). The reality is, I submit when I jolly well feel like it. Now, that's equality.
Di Stewart, USA

Why not? People go for every other sad fad that comes along!
Paul B, UK

Making woman equal to man means removing her from her pedestal!
Helen Kirkham, Scotland

Only to their partners! No not really, to surrender implies you are in a battle and losing. From my experience women in Europe and the USA are starting to win and about time too. But, from over 25 years working in the Middle East I can't see a time in the near future that women will even get the chance to fight let alone surrender! What a boring existence to have a wife without a will of her own and rights to go with it - I support you all the way.
Ron Williams, England

This kind of thinking thankfully no longer dominates at least the Western world. But it certainly seems to sell a lot of books!

Fyler, UK
Nothing like playing Devil's Advocate, is there? Most of us seem to know that human relationships have out-evolved the domination and servitude of the "traditional" marriage. If an American woman, evidently "allowed" by her husband to trumpet the joys of servitude to the world, wants to do so, why stop her? The point is, this kind of thinking thankfully no longer dominates at least the Western world. But it certainly seems to sell a lot of books!
Fyler, UK

There is a flaw in Laura Doyle's premise - i.e. what if the husband or man is a cretin or crypto-fascist? Should the poor (and dumb) woman - she's gotta be if she hitched up with such a man - put up with this crock of horse manure?
Sonny Chod, UK

Steve from the US had a point: Ms. Doyle could well be on a money-making mission riding a trend. Maybe we shouldn't take her so seriously, more seriously than any other fad. Let's try to get used to idea that ideas can be sold as well as products and we don't have to buy all the fad products - or ideas!
Riikka, Finland

I think that a wife should 'surrender' to their husband but only if the husband is also prepared to 'surrender' to his wife. By this I mean that both the husband and the wife should put each other's well being and welfare before their own. This does not mean a wife being 'subservient' to a domineering, drunken and violent husband. It means two people, who genuinely love each other, putting each other before themselves. How can a relationship fail if it is run on these principles? How can it succeed if it isn't? The underlying problem, for relationships in our [so-called liberated and enlightened] society, is not the issue of whether women should 'surrender' to their husbands; it is that, in our culture of sexual freedom and one night stands, people end up being hitched to someone who doesn't truly love them.
Neville Harris, Great Britain

It is obvious from reading the postings here that no-one understands the concept of a D/s (Dominant / submissive) lifestyle. Surely any relationship that works for that couple is right for them. The idea of a D/s relationship is taking the author's ideas to their ultimate end, but what is wrong with that! There are many hundreds of thousands of people who lead this type of lifestyle very happily. Perhaps some of the people that are posting here should (a) be a little more tolerant of others and (b) find out about the D/s lifestyle before rubbishing it.
Ian, UK

Seeing Thai women suffering every day, beaten from their husbands, struggling to feed their families, never having time for themselves I believe it is a very decadent thinking to obey their ignorant, violent, silly uneducated husbands. This lady is not married, right? What is she doing if she is married to fulfil her husband? If you live in luxury, then it's very easy to play this game.
Doris Kraushaar, Thailand

Love does not dominate, it cares and encourages, goes the extra mile and never gives up hope

Joe, UK
From reading the comments, I'd say that most of the women who are striving to be equal to men are not truly happy - and are deluded if they think being equal to a man will cure it. Secondly the assumption of both men and women is that the man will dominate. Love does not dominate, it cares and encourages, goes the extra mile and never gives up hope. Seems to me as though both sexes need to have a think. Women need to consider why they want to 'wear the trousers', and whether or not that is compatible with what they want from a relationship, remembering that leading is sometimes lonely. And men need to learn how to love properly, to help their partners trust them so that they can flourish as women instead of just using them as a servant.
Joe, UK

I don't think women should be throwing in the towel to their partners as this will demoralise them, and also give the us, which are the male species of the human race, an excuse to put women down. We have never given women the chance they deserve, even though I do agree that a women is good at things that a man isn't and vice-versa. The remark where women should obey they husbands at all times should be considered not as a way of suppressing women, but a way in which both men and women listen to each other, and have a closer bond.
Atik, England

Women are the female sex, right? Femininity is attractive, right? Brusque, aggressive, masculine "me first" women leave men cold whatever they pretend to the contrary. That's all that Laura Doyle is really pointing out. It is not that women should become like men but that men should become more like virtuous women. That is kind, humble, loyal, sensitive, thoughtful, compassionate, caring, generous and giving.
Simon Cameron, UK

If women are equal to men, what are men equal to? This statement alone shows that equality can never be achieved amongst the sexes, but society can falsely believe that it does.
Ade Talabi, UK

Has everyone who has derided this book actually read it?

Kim Harvey, UK
Has everyone who has derided this book actually read it? I think people are reacting against what they think it is about. I'm not saying I agree with what she says, I've only read the first chapter online, but I don't think it is all that controversial.
Kim Harvey, UK

We must remember that human beings are a diverse bunch. I believe there are naturally "submissive" people who may, very well, be happier in a relationship where someone else makes all the decisions but I don't see any evidence that a disproportionate number of them are women.
Malcolm McMahon, UK

It just goes to show that some people will engage in all kinds of moral and intellectual contortions, rather than grow up and be a responsible adult. If you submit completely to your husband, then nothing that goes wrong is your fault, is it?
C Griffith, USA

There will still be those lagging behind

B Maguire, UK
I'm sure that even in this day and age, after all that women have fought for, and got, and are now enjoying rights and freedoms that they've never had before, there will still be women who just want to play the little submissive housewife, sit at home all day and let some man support them in return for cooking their dinners and giving them anything they want in the bedroom. But this is not a loving relationship, this is just a business deal to provide each other with physical security to make the passage through this hard life easier on both parties.

I know there are still women like this, I know plenty of them. But I also know that these are the weak, lazy few. The vast majority of women today could never submit to that role - and thank God. I personally, and I think I speak for most men, would not want a woman like that, I could never respect her. The only men that want a woman like that, and unfortunately they still exist as well, are the weak, insecure men who see their wife as their property rather than an equal partner. The old traditional marriage is outmoded now, it is in its death-throes, humanity is evolving beyond that into more equal partnerships, but there will still be those lagging behind and living in the old world.
B Maguire, UK

The key to personal happiness lies deep within all of us. No one can write a book about finding it any more than they can tell you how the unlock vaults in the Bank of England. You can of course pray on people's insecurity and make a few quid in the process though. Nice work bird, now make us a bacon buttie!
Alex, UK

It just so happens (according to a well informed radio DJ) that Mrs Doyle is getting a divorce! I suppose she is only "surrendering" to the wishes of her beloved husband one LAST TIME!
LJ, Italy

Come on! My Mother and my Mother-in-law were both dominant. Give us males a chance, we die for you in wars and in the UK, you Ladies get the State Pension at 60 and we don't. Stop whinging please. BR> Bob Newcombe, England

I think this latest work reflects a strengthening of the conservative political and social movements in the US, especially in light of last November's elections. The author, like others, have tried this tack before and have quickly faded from the limelight.
Steve, USA

I believe most men want a partner, not an automaton. I'm not even going to contemplate how this would affect a woman's psychology, but men, do you enjoy being subservient to your boss?
Kevin Riant, USA

None of us are completely "free". We all have to serve someone or something to find fulfilment. We also like some decisions taken for us - otherwise we are lost in swathes of options, the strain becomes intolerable and we have no-one to blame but ourselves. Laura Doyle wants to serve her partner and leave the choosing to him. Good for her. But not necessarily good for everyone else.
Clive Mitchell, UK

Yawn. I think equality has been more than achieved. Lets stop with how things should be and get on with the complicated things in life - like paying the bills etc.
Suki, UK

I am going to buy this book for my wife, I will let you know in a few days whether or not she read it or made me eat it.
Ray, USA

My partner and I strongly disagree with the opinions stressed by Ms. Doyle. In fact in our household the roles have been reversed to a large extent whereby I have taken on the traditional 'woman's' role. My partner is the stronger element in our relationship and I would not consider myself the stereotypical male. I would challenge any opinion of male domination.
Martin Rolt, Ramsgate, Kent UK

Many women in countries all around the world have no choice in this area

Kate Lovegrove, UK
Kate Lovegrove, UK Doyle appears to be missing an important fact - she is living in a first world country which has made huge contributions to the cause of feminism and female equality in the workplace and at home. She at least has the option to surrender. I doubt whether those women who, largely due to impositions arising out of religious beliefs, or simply fear of violence from their partner, 'surrender' their rights as equal partners in a human relationship on a daily basis. Many women in countries all around the world have no choice in this area. Perhaps she should take the silver spoon out of her complacent American mouth and look to the causes of women who would like to even have the option to surrender. But I am hugely encouraged by the numbers of men who have submitted opinions on this, saying how ridiculous they find her suggestions...
Kate Lovegrove, UK

I think what is great about feminism is that women finally realised that they were individuals and that their life doesn't necessarily have to revolve around men, whether single or married. I think the view that women should submit to men, would totally go against my grain - if it suits some, fine - better them than me
Kim, England

Women should not surrender, any more than men should have to put up with nagging wives. I thought it was all about team work and mutual respect.
Phil W, UK

This woman is very intelligent! She has everyone in a tizzy about a book that doesn't tell us anything that we haven't all heard before and will probably sell more copies of her book than any feminist book will this year!
Donna Lennon, Northern Ireland

If my wife would obey me at all times be sure I would leave her very soon to look for a more interesting character creating and living her own life!
Wolfgang Scherreiks, Germany

This suggestion is outrageous! How far back into the past does she want us to go? These absurd principles date back to the days when women didn't even have the right to vote and think for themselves, basic human rights which I presume even she must support. To use American vernacular, she should "get real!"
Jake Foster, England

A family needs one final decision-maker

Sue Alexander, Indonesia
It's not so much about submitting to one's husband as submitting one's ego to produce a loving and harmonious family. In cultures across the world, where everyone's trying to win as individuals, marriages suffer. In the same way as a good business needs one person responsible for final decisions, a family needs one final decision-maker. The other family members provide input and inspiration and must be respected for their skills, talents and contributions but, at the end of the day, they should allow the decision-maker the last word. If the husband is sensible, the wife who submits need lose no self-respect, as her wishes and desires are always incorporated into any decision. If the husband cannot respect his wife, the marriage will not work anyway, however non-submissive the wife is.
Sue Alexander, Indonesia

Every couple is different to every other. To proscribe roles for people regardless of personality type is ignorant and pointless. The book has absolutely nothing to say to people who wouldn't already be following what it recommends.
Jon Anderson, UK

This book and the comments of Paul Taylor, UK and John Carter, UK are based on a false premise. The false premise is that until the 60s or 70s women were completely servile and did not work outside the home. Many feminists also seem to have this point of view. Read the history books. Read about all the great women who have lived. Women have fought in wars. Women have ruled countries.

The truth is that women have been contributing economically to their families for thousands of years. Women have more often than not been the authority in the household (the elderly matriarch is still common in many so-called male dominated cultures). Women have had to be self sufficient and make the decisions when husbands died, went to war, travelled long distances on business, worked long hours often seven days a week. The human race would not have survived so long if half of the world's population was so weak and dependent.

All Ms Doyle is doing is trying to go back to a time that never existed except in physically abusive, impoverished households. And remember, the countries where women are the most submissive and obedient are the poorest countries in the world.
Joan Fiver, USA

I would love to be with a strong man who could provide me with a comfortable lifestyle, be trusted to pay the bills and make all the major decisions but unfortunately I have never found one. However when I am in a relationship I have found that the more I do to keep my partner happy, the less he respects me.
Gill, UK

What planet is this "woman" living on. Has she no self-respect at all! Submitting to sex whenever your husband wants it? Ok, each to their own yeah, but surely if you are in a relationship it's to do with respect for each others wants, needs and desires and wanting to make "each other" feel good, not yielding to your partner's every whim. She is entitled to her opinion. She obviously feels the women are incapable of doing a job just as well as a man, and that our place is in the kitchen or the bedroom. We are looking for respect and something to give us a self-esteem boost, because so many women have been conditioned into thinking that we can't do this, we can't do that. We should stay in the kitchen where we belong. Times are changing. Role with it.
Claire, USA (originaly Scotland)

Compromise is a great thing, unfortunately in a marriage it is not what seems to be the same as the description in the dictionary! When a wife wants to do something the men can only watch, but when a men wants to do something the wife has to give the final decision. That is what feminism in this age has really become. Control! Women are getting their revenge for all the years that they were second class. This is not right because the men that are living today are the ones that have given you the rights that you deserve!
Aleksandar, Canada

No, we should'nt return to those bad old days. What does concern me though is that men no longer know how to be a man. Constantly having to question whether what we do and what we feel is politically correct etc. Marriage should be an equal partnership and bond. Feminism - I don't know, at the end of the day women can get what they want if they really want it!
Paul, Australia

It is mutual compassion, respect and integrity that we really need to develop

Amy Kellam, U.K
Doyle's argument is disingenuous. Yes, it may be about time that society fully recognised that the "sexual revolution" has not been a complete success, but the solution is surely not to retreat back to a polarised definition of gender that institutionalises inequality and is a storehouse for social conflict. Rather, we should be moving forward towards a greater humanitarianism that looks beyond the current status quo, in which it is quite acceptable to divulge your sexual proclivities to complete strangers, and share your bodily fluids with casual acquaintances, but yet, it still remains taboo to relate with compassion and integrity. It is indeed a strange liberation in which the so-called freedoms of post-modern sexual identities simply serve as other masks behind which we hide our hearts. As so many other people here have already said, it is mutual compassion, respect and integrity that we really need to develop.
Amy Kellam, U.K

Maybe Mrs. Doyle should stop writing books, get back to cooking dinner, and spare us this garbage!
Ted, USA

Women used to stay at home and devote their lives to building a good secure home base from which to launch good, strong, mentally healthy and secure children. I think that women have thrown away their "true" power by going out to work. You don't have to be at the front line to make a difference in the war. As for being his sex slave, I suggest Laura Doyle most likely has a sexual fantasy she is living out!
Liza, Australia

In circumstances where the husband is respecting and honouring the wife, she should be survile and obey

Paul Taylor, UK
Since feminism, women feel that they don't need the male aspect in bringing children up and keeping a family. How wrong they are. In circumstances where the husband is respecting and honouring the wife, she should be survile and obey. If the man is obviously in the wrong then the wife needs to take action. This is how we are designed.
Paul Taylor, UK

If a black author wrote a book suggesting that race-relations would be improved by all African Americans enlisting themselves as slaves, that book would never be published by a major publisher. This book should be regarded in the same manner.
Marc Brammer, USA

Psychologically this philosophy makes good sense. The whole act of sexual intercourse in many cases involves the woman surrendering to the man. Its nature, and when we go against it we're unhappy. It's not politically correct, but stop and think, men are stronger, women are weaker, whatever they say they'd rather be with a man who they can surrender to. It's psychological fact.
John Carter, UK

Surely marriage and relationships should be about give and take

Deborah, UK
Surely marriage and relationships should be about give and take. For instance, if one partner is best at handling the money aspect of the relationship, it makes most sense for them to deal with paying bills and dealing with investments etc, rather than expecting the man to do it, because "it's a man's job". Likewise, if the man is better at cooking, I'd be out of the kitchen like a shot!
Deborah, UK

As far as I can see, feminism gave women the opportunity to choose. If Laura Doyle wants to be a voluntary sex-slave, that's her choice. I hope she is happy. Personally, I could never do that, and I don't think my partner would want me to either. If it weren't for feminism, I would not have so much freedom to do all the things I want.
Lizz, UK

Where's the fun in argument if I win all the time. If I want to marry a mannequin, I'll go to Macy's.
Thomas Byrne, USA

I believe in women's equality but women surrendering to men is perhaps the weirdest idea I have heard from the western world

Men and women, both have to work together to protect the family structure. If one takes on an extra burden than strain will develop in the relationship. Unfortunately, over the last few decades women have taken over extra "outside" work and still kept on the "home" work (primary responsibility of family care). The husband or wife should not be subservient to the other, they should understand each others needs (be they physical or emotional) and divide the responsibility fairly.
Umer Farouq, USA

To be fair, Ms. Doyle may well find the key to her personal happiness through supplication to her partners demand

Todd, Canada
To be fair, Ms. Doyle may well find the key to her personal happiness through supplication to her partners demand, but for her to suggest that this may be the case for the world at large is presumptuous. The Woman's Rights Movement was started BECAUSE women at large were unhappy with the existing household role arrangement. I sense from many of the women who support a return to the previous arrangements a feeling of nostalgia, a feeling that the bad relationships and problems in their lives would never have happened if they had submitted themselves to a man's will.
Todd, Canada

Is this the next generation of Stepford wives rearing it's head? What an insult to suggest that men would be happy in this situation. Although there are no doubt bullying or insecure individuals male and female who would like their partners to be their slaves rather than an equal partner, ignoring differences in needs, aspirations and expectations in a relationship is not the way to treat the person whose life they have chosen to share with you.
Mel, Wales

I'm glad my wife doesn't follow this philosophy - there are occasions when she's right and I'm wrong! Besides which, she has her own goals which are just as valid as mine - the point of marriage is a union based on sharing, not domineering.
Dave Tankard, UK

So Laura Doyle thinks women are second class citizens, well Mrs Doyle I think you've been brainwashed, wake up and smell the coffee, and as for your books burn them!!
Sha, UK

I want a partner, not a subject

Jason Ward, UK
I want a partner, not a subject! Whilst I like to be bloke, and for my girl to be a girl, I don't want a supplicant!
Jason Ward, UK

This Mormon-sounding philosophy is completely silly and totally unworkable in practice. It does sound good in theory, but then I would never be with anyone who would be so weak-willed to bow down to a philosophy like this.
Jeff Scholey, UK

What a load of rubbish! Women are equal to men and should not pander to their wishes. Only through compromise and respect can a relationship survive healthily. I would never give up my freedom for a man. If a man wanted me to, then I would know I was with the wrong man.
Naomi, UK

I think this "wife surrendering" is a lot of rubbish! It is certainly not realistic. Women have the right to be independent!
Ben Lindsay, Belgium

The truth of all human relationships is moderation, consideration and compassion

Of course this is nonsense, just as much as the more extreme feminist dogma. The truth of all human relationships is moderation, consideration and compassion.

Even if it were true that women were happier submitting to men (and I strongly doubt it) is such happiness worth the price? The happiness that comes from letting another person rule your life and take all decisions on your behalf is no more than lazy complacency. A poor relationship might be 'saved' by one side surrendering to the other, but it can not be transformed into a good and healthy relationship unless points of conflict are addressed and resolved.
Ricky Wright, UK

Speaking as a husband-to-be, I find the suggestion repellent.
Peter Ellis, UK

I have never heard such a load of absolute rubbish! No woman in her right mind is going to be brow-beaten in this way. A woman has a mind of her own, she makes her own choices, and should not be forced into anything by any man.
Claire, UK

Having an automaton instead of a partner will appeal to very few men other than religious bigots and abusers

Julian Hayward, UK
What utter tosh. I'm sure there aren't many divorces amongst couples who practice such misogynistic lifestyles; on the other hand, having an automaton instead of a partner will appeal to very few men other than religious bigots and abusers. The Doyles are not looking back to a traditional family set-up, they are looking forward to a level of repression never before seen.
Julian Hayward, UK

The problem with equality is that the apparent confusion between the terms "equal" and "identical". The basic fact is that men and women are different, and trying to pretend otherwise is lunacy. The "traditional" family model worked just fine for hundreds of years, and now we've decided to tinker with it in the name of "liberation". The term "housewife" is largely regarded as derogatory, despite the fact that some women prefer this lifestyle. I'm not sure I would go as far as "surrender" in my description of the ideal, but it's time we grasped the concept that people have different contributions to make, and the fact that they are different does not automatically mean one is more worthy than the other.
Karl Peters, UK

There will undoubtedly be a swathe of respondents up in arms over this heresy. Surely the most important thing, though, is the happiness of the person concerned. If some women prefer such an arrangement, then so be it, and never mind the meddling wannabe-dictators who complain!
Rob Harris, UK

What man would want to be with a submissive woman in this day and age? What woman would want to live that way? I cannot even imagine how Doyle managed to conjure up this theory.
Stephanie, UK

We should embrace diversity rather than pit one gender against the other

Bradley Cotier, England
This particular talking point is obviously aimed at sparking a nonsensical 'battle of the sexes' discussion (argument). We should embrace diversity rather than pit one gender against the other, which only serves to put pressure on the individual. Perhaps if the media were a little less concerned with the endless supply of drivel that accompanies this debate and which bulks out their publications, it wouldn't seem such an important issue.
Bradley Cotier, England

Americans will write any sort of old tripe to make a buck. What a load of rubbish this is - it insults the intelligence of all people - men and women alike.
Janet, UK

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
See also:

27 Mar 01 | Arts
Taming the shrew, US-style
Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Talking Point stories