Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Talking Point
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
Forum 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 

Wednesday, 21 March, 2001, 12:16 GMT
Should elections be delayed?
Should elections be delayed?
The UK Prime Minister Tony Blair is coming under increasing pressure not to hold any elections in May because of the foot-and-mouth crisis.

Local elections are due to be held on 3 May and it has also been suggested as a possible general election date.

But the leaders of Devon and Cornwall county councils, say it would be wrong for the vote to go ahead while the countryside is a no-go area for many people and some farmers are effectively prisoners on their own lands.

Should elections take place during the foot-and-mouth crisis?

HAVE YOUR SAY

Click here to read later comments

The country is not a "no-go" area. Farmers are allowed off their farms subject to taking the appropriate precautions. The election of 1945 was not postponed despite the widespread destruction of the UK's infrastructure, rationing and the fact that we were still at war with Japan. Let's get the election over and done with and as quickly as possible. Then we can get on with far more important things.
Chris Klein, England


The postal vote is available and should be used

Aubrey Simcox, Devon, UK
The local elections should go ahead. Devon is not closed down! I have never in the last 10 years been visited by any Councillor or MP, they use literature and phone - as for the argument that many farmers are councillors, not one of our local councillors is either a farmer or connected with agriculture. The postal vote is available and should be used, indeed in some respects it may increase voter turnout. With regard to the general election, this issue should be handled somewhat differently, since it could appear somewhat insensitive if it is held and the disease is not under control, however since technically the Prime Minister has not yet named the day, this is something which would need to be considered nearer the time. Lets get the tourism industry promoted at home and abroad, most of Devon is open and in business, provided people are sensible and take heed of public notices which are clear and plentiful.
Aubrey Simcox, Devon, UK

The local elections must be postponed in the worst hit areas. I have just seen Margaret Beckett on TV giving a prime example of this Government's complete lack of knowledge or concern for the plight of the countryside. She seems to think that it is only the animals who are quarantined but in reality when a farm is in a restricted area then nobody can leave the farm and then return.
Stephen, England

It is clear that Blair intends to go ahead with the elections, without considering the best interests of the country. Tens of thousands of decomposing bodies of dead sheep cattle and pigs are left heaped in the fields for up to a week, allowing predators, crows and foxes, to carry and spread the infection - yet still the army are not called in, in force, to help with the massive task of disposal - why? Because this would involve calling a state of emergency, and no election could go ahead under such conditions. Surely it is time to treat the situation as the crisis that it is, and tackle the escalation before it is too late? The Government seems willing to allow farming in the UK to be destroyed forever, rather than take decisive action.
Juliet Auer, Worcs, UK


A government should be elected on a fixed day and serve for a fixed period

Tom Egan, UK
It is ludicrous that the date of elections should be decided on the whim of the Prime Minister. A government should be elected on a fixed day and serve for a fixed period such as the first Sunday in May for four years.
Tom Egan, UK

Tony Blair will hold the election this year come hell or high water, because we will be deeper in a recession next year and would take it out on the Government were he to hold the election then. It doesn't matter much anyway, because after the next election Gordon Brown will be Prime Minister and the farmers will be finished.
H Wood, UK expat

The Tories and their supporters are running scared hence their call to postpone elections. How is it that farmers can all meet up in village squares to attack the government and vow "all out war" and at the same time tell us that they can't pop to their local polling station - I think political games are afoot.
Steve, UK

With all this bad news floating about, Stock Market, foot-and-mouth, the Vaz affair, train crashes, hospital waiting lists, teacher unrest. Blair needs to get the election out of the way before the masses (Sun readers) realise what a liability he and his Government are!
Tony, UK

I get the impression Tony has finally decided to give up the fight. Look what he's done for us - foot-and-mouth, fuel blockades, "two" Mandelson messes, Pointless Prescott's "integrated transport policy", ripping off the pensioners, the air traffic control fiasco, a whole swathe of stealth taxes, selling off the Dome for peanuts, teacher shortages, nursing shortages - perhaps he's finally noticed that he seems to break everything he touches. Perhaps he's realised that maybe we've noticed too, so holding the election in May would be his way of getting out as fast as possible.

Whatever happens, I'll be interested to see how the spin-masters attempt to talk us into voting for him again, if they do it'll be time to open up a new category for the Guinness Book Of Records - "World's Most Persuadable Nation".

Al, Somerset, UK

The election should be cancelled and held when the foot-and-mouth epidemic is in decline. Everyone has the right to vote in this country, which is a point the government should remember.
Jean Preston, UK

Election! Is this what Blair is worried about? Does he have no idea of the severity of the foot-and-mouth crisis? He should forget any plans of the election until the crisis subdues. He is doing more damage to himself and his party by taking this ignorant standpoint.
Rhydian Mason, Wales

All previous Prime Ministers have been able to call an election when it best suited them. Why should the same thing be denied to Tony Blair? Do you really believe Margaret Thatcher would have changed her mind in the same circumstances? Anyway, I'd have thought that farmers would be desperate to vote in a bid to oust the Government they consider has caused all their problems, and the most effective way they can do this is by post. Or are they worried that Tony might win again.
Steve, UK

Of course Blair won't postpone the elections, the vast majority of the people restricted by foot-and-mouth wouldn't vote for him anyway and he knows it, so actually this goes very much in his favour. You can bet your life though that if Islington was cordoned off with his supporters unable to vote he'd postpone quickly enough.
Philip Mussell, Devon, England

The trauma of losing your herd of sheep or other livestock can equal that of losing a member of your family. You could equate it to having the factory you built up over years suddenly burn down. Then multiply this by several thousand and you'll see why farmers and many more in rural communities just don't want to think about elections. If the crisis continues, holding the elections in May will disenfranchise a whole sector of society.
Charles Tucker, UK

It is high time that the UK General Election date should be fixed at the end of the five-year period of the elected Government. This will be more democratic and not give unfair advantage to the ruling party.
A. Amatya, UK


Mr Blair is running scared

Darren Hazard, England
Keep the election on the third. The concern about all not getting a vote can be overcome like has been said already - phones can be used, mail and what about email? I feel Mr Blair is running scared as he knows after recent happenings in England, namely "The Fuel Crisis" he has no chance of winning again. And after the handling of this "Foot and Mouth" crisis, it's time for change.
Darren Hazard, England

Surely the correct time for something as important as any political election is not when the Country is in the grips of a crisis. No matter what the rest of the world think, we should postpone the elections - County and National - until we can all focus on them fully. Yes, we could all use postal ballots, but who knows whether they will get there or not? Let's learn from the American fiasco and have as few problems as possible at such an important time as electing the next P.M. new or old!
Sue Wright, England

I think the election should be postponed while Britain defeats the foot and mouth outbreak. We need to concentrate on eradicating foot and mouth before an election is allowed to proceed.
Emily,

Of course Tony Blair should be allowed to call the election when he sees fit. With modern voting methods i.e. postal voting you can vote without leaving the comfort of your own home.
D.Watson, UK

Reading the comments below, I have come to the conclusion that almost everyone who wants the election postponed is opposed to the present government and is cynically trying to use the foot-and-mouth tragedy as a political weapon. They want to put off the election to see if the Conservative Party's chances improve, and that is as undemocratic as allowing the prime minister of the day decide when to call the election, as now. The answer: fixed terms like almost everywhere else!
Paul, UK


Yes, the election should be postponed, as should the Census

Pam Hart, England
Yes, the election should be postponed, as should the Census, which would be even more likely to spread the disease. Stop introducing half measures. Either total restrictions are necessary or don't expect 1/2 measures to be taken seriously by everyone.
Pam Hart, England

I agree with Rupert Harden. Whilst I'm very much a city dweller - a friend of mine visited the countryside the other day and brought back news of gridlock, pungent smells and mild hysteria! Thankfully some of us urbanites recognise the contribution from all parts of our country.
Mark Hill, London

Chris said the farmers created this situation with foot and mouth. Sorry but from what I have read it came into the country in imported meat from an infected country. I feel the government has more control over this than the farmers do. The elections should be postponed until all have their right to vote. Tony Blair I feel wants to go to the country before all the truth comes out.
Dot, UK

Come on Mr Blair, I can see through your dirty little scheme, you want to cull all those poor defenceless animals so as you can go ahead with your election plans. I am a farmer, don't even consider sending the ministry in to cull my flock.
Enid Gwillim, Wales


We have no current politicians with the imagination, foresight, selflessness or courage to effect any real change

Simon, England
Good Grief and all this because we want to eat meat, unbelievable. As for the election I donīt think it matters a fig whether it is now, May, or 2010, we have no current politicians with the imagination, foresight, selflessness or courage to effect any real change anyway.
Simon, England

Several farmers were among those last autumn who would have been more than happy to bring a democratically elected government down, and were clearly guilty of sedition. Now they may have a chance to change the government by the proper means - they don't want it. Also - those people calling for the use of the army - are they the same people who threw up their hands in horror when it was suggested the army might have been used to move fuel last year? Arrogant hypocrisy or what?!
HH, UK

Perhaps we could postpone all elections until there's a party that has policies that are worth voting for.
Andrew Dowle, UK

The County Council elections should go ahead, and hopefully the General Election too. No one's been restricted from getting to work, and even if some farmers don't want to leave their land, they can apply for a postal vote - there's been no disruption to the post despite the outbreak. I imagine the Tories are desperate to have the date postponed - the polls show they're going to go the same way as the sheep and cattle come May 3rd.
Steve, UK


This is the 21st century and there are alternative ways of voting

Anne Wilkes, UK
The UK is much more than farmers, actually 95% more. The rest of us can't be expected to always dance to the tune of the landed minorities. This is the 21st century and there are alternative ways of voting. Mr Blair should go on with the election when he sees fit, foot and mouth or no foot and mouth.
Anne Wilkes, UK

If Pamela Armstrong think it's OK to discount 2% of the electorate because they're farmers, would it be OK to discount 5-6% of the electorate on the grounds that they're ethnic minorities? Would that be just as democratic?
Henry Case, UK

The Countryside Alliance have postponed their protest march, foxhunts have been cancelled, Cheltenham postponed, Rugby matches called off, holidays cancelled and visits to the countryside stopped. Yet it seems that Tony is above all this and even if everyone else has to make sacrifices the Government can go ahead with the election whenever it likes, despite the fact that it doesn't have to be held for another 12 months.
Tim, UK

There is no way that the elections. should be held until all the foot-and-mouth difficulties are over. All Blair thinks about is himself - he has no interest in the UK at all. The British people should see through the New Labour and vote Tory at the next election say in a year's time.
J Evans, UK

The British Parliament is a funny animal that refuses electronic voting in case MPs defy the whips in the lobbies and vote against their party. Similarly, canvassers are certain that they can persuade people on the door step to change party allegiance. I think neither case works, and I don't see any reason to delay the vote.
Pascal Jacquemain, UK (French)

Why is Tony Blair so determined to go ahead with the election? Is there something on the horizon that only he knows about?
Ted, UK

Am I alone is thinking there is a sinister link between the sudden decision to slaughter millions of healthy animals and the Government's desperation to hold an election on May 3rd. Of course the elections should be delayed. If even one person is unable to vote because of the restrictions in place, then that should be enough.
Mark, UK


To go ahead with the election will sink their standing to an all-time low

Peter Kidds, UK
These are exceptional times and Tony Blair and his government should recognise the fact. Many thousands of country folk are suffering great hardship and to go ahead with elections whilst this crisis is continuing is a kick in the stomach to them all. Politicians are held in low enough esteem as it is; to go ahead with the election will sink their standing to an all-time low.
Peter Kidds, UK

There is no law that states a General Election should take place on the 3rd of May. Tony Blair should stop being so arrogant and wait until the foot-and-mouth disease has gone. After the next General Election, a law should be passed that the Government must stay for a fixed term, say 4 years. This would put a stop to all this spinning and whispering about when an election will be called. I would also like to see a box on the ballot paper for "none of the listed candidates".
Shaun Forrest, Great Britain

It would be ridiculous to postpone the election after May, the country needs to be able to say what it thinks about the current Government, a small minority of farmers and people in rural areas should not be allowed to dictate to the rest of the nation. The foot-and-mouth crisis has been precipitated by their greed and intensive farming practices for too long, it's about time they began to realise that they are responsible for their own mistakes and stop bleating about having life hard. The rural vote hardly matters anyway does it, we live in a country which is in majority urban - lets have an election and in May.
Richard Lofthouse, UK

I work in the tourist industry, with the main business being activity holidays does Mr Blair assume I even have time to think about the election with all the cancellations and re-organising of holidays that we have to do, all my wasted advertising bills come at the end of this month but none of the expected final payments for the holidays. Nice to see dear Tony with plenty time to visit Walsend Shipyard to congratulate them on there new order for an oil rig but still no time to visit the people who are on a "downer". Philip, Northumberland.
Philip, England

Of course the elections should be cancelled. The Prime Minister's seeming determination to hold a May election makes one wonder what he knows that we don't. What disasters are going to happen to the economy if he waits any longer?
Neil Mathieson, England

There is a wide chasm between the local elections and the general election. Local elections, with local candidates discussing local issues should possibly be postponed so that those affected can participate. The general election is not needed for another year anyway, but if it were, in this age of express media, telecommunication and electronic means there is no reason why it couldn't go ahead with the wide-spread use of postal voting. So let's kill all speculation about a General Election which is unnecessary for 12 months, and postpone the locals until such time as everyone is able to participate.
D. R. Attwell, UK

I think its sad that a three quarters of our country have no idea what is happening in the other quarter. Before passing judgement on farmers, people should know what they're talking about.l
Rupert Harden, Cumbria

If Blair had any inkling of what is right, he would not call an election. But since he has no such inkling, let him go to the country and face its wrath for treating the rural communities with such ill-disguised contempt.
David I. Jones, United Kingdom

Of course the elections should go ahead. Panic and hysteria may be the Opposition way, but, sad as foot-and-mouth is - it is in an industry that represents less than 1% of GDP. Delaying elections for industrial reasons would set us off on a slippery slope that could end in anti-democratic chaos.
Vernon Moyse, England

The trouble with postal ballots is that once you drop your envelope into the post box, you have no way of knowing whether your vote ever gets there - or what might happen to it along the way. I'd rather consign my ballot paper to a locked box under supervision than to a postal sorting office.
Henry Case, UK


Did the farmers have sympathy for the miners, dockers and steelworkers?

Paula Black, UK
The foot-and-mouth crisis has just come to show us that the real political power in this country is still in the hands of the landowners. Whilst a few farmers face problems, the whole country has to suffer. Did the farmers have sympathy for the miners, dockers and steelworkers when their businesses collapsed due to competition from overseas? Well no.
Paula Black, UK

Why hold up the election until the epidemic is over? The voting public should be able to select a government which has a good head for crisis, which the country is experiencing a lot at present.
Leon Shearer, England

There is no reason why elections cannot be held whenever the PM sees fit. In the 21st century there are plenty of ways for politicians to get their views heard. Those who claim Blair has another year to go should remember that very few UK PMs take the full 5 years unless they think they are going to lose - look at Major! Thatcher called elections when she thought she had the best chance to win, and she did!
Iain D. Monaghan, UK

I feel that to hold an election now would be to disenfranchise large tracts of the rural community. Canvassers would spend more time stood in tubs of disinfectant than they would spreading their propaganda. I feel that Tony should hold off until later in the year and give the Tories a chance to get their act together. I pray for the farmers.
Dave Jones, UK

Perhaps Pamela Armstrong could explain how 98% of Britain's population would be disenfranchised if the elections were postponed. It appears, though, that she is more than happy for 2% to be disenfranchised if the elections were to go ahead. She calls those 2% right-wingers!!
Vivienne, England

Holding a general election on May 3 would be a political decision, informed by opinion polls, spin merchants, focus groups, etc. The more negative opinion encountered, the less likely there is to be a general election. However, this (and most other comments) misses the point that the LOCAL Elections are NOT optional. The council members up for election have reached the end of their (fixed) terms. To delay is possible but requires (I believe) an Act of Parliament.
Gareth Walters, UK


The UK is now a laughing stock to the rest of Europe

Paul Joyce, UK
The UK is now a laughing stock to the rest of Europe. The Government has clearly not got its finger on the pulse of this country or the people that live in it, the recent FMD epidemic has shown that. I think Tony could be shooting himself in the foot if he doesn't give things a chance to calm down. Emotions will be running high for a long time yet and it could all go badly wrong for him in the elections. Tony, wake up and smell the country, it's going down the pan.
Paul Joyce, UK

Not only should a general election be delayed, but the UK 2001 Census due on 29 April should be as well. The census website states - " A census form will be delivered by hand to every household to complete and return." Surely personal delivery by hand will increase the risk of F&M transmission up every farm track there is?
Ian Holyhead, UK

The election must go ahead in May 2001 or next year.If foot-and-mouth disease can be spread by air, why do the politicians not keep quiet and use lime pits to destroy the infected animals?
Anne S, England

The UK has a severe crisis on its hands. The Government should concentrate on solving this rather than on a general election. It is unfair to the thousands of people involved in the farming and food industry as well as the country inns and zoos etc who face an uncertain future to have to worry about who will be their next MP. Tony Blair should state now what his intentions are.
Andy Millington, Germany

Tony Blair's arrogance is shining through. Keep up this act and hopefully he will be one of the new unemployed in the future.
David Salisbury-Higgs, England

As a Brit working abroad my memory of the tedium of watching and listening to all the flimflam of every previous election leads me to recommend no more elections until the next millennium!!
David Coe, Netherlands (ex-pat)


The Government have manipulated the news agenda to suit a May election

Richard, England
I live in an area of Worcestershire affected by foot-and-mouth. It would be the height of irresponsibility to hold a general election under these circumstances. Roads are closed and affected families are virtually imprisoned in their homes. If Blair persists in going to the country it will demonstrate a self-serving agenda of self-interest. The Government have manipulated the news agenda to suit a May election. Well if they can't have it in May, then that is just tough Tony!
Richard, England

In these days of technology it's amazing that we still have to go to a public property to put a cross on a bit of paper and put it in a tin box. Why not use postal voting, e-mail voting, internet voting?
Dave, UK

If you want these "clowns" out of office Graham, the last thing you'll want is an election soon. And you'll also need a credible opposition led by somebody who doesn't actually look like a clown. Poor you, you've got a long wait!
Steve, UK


The census is due to take place a week before the elections

Mike Holmes, Sandwich, UK
Don't forget the census is due to take place a week before the elections - now surely that can and should be postponed. There may be some benefit in maintaining the democratic timetabling but surely not statistic gathering.
Mike Holmes, Sandwich, UK

I think the election should be postponed. I work on a farm in a small village called Capel. Our business is crippled and if there is a change in government there will not be a focused effort on resolving the problem. We have suffered enough with the BSE.
Adam Pollard, Redhill, UK

The rural lobby seems to believe its demands (sometimes genuine, sometimes otherwise) should be automatically fulfilled by government. As a (lifelong) "townie" I am sick of hearing rural people wanting it both ways: wanting to keep non-locals out and then wanting these same non-locals to subsidise the "country" way of living (involving less traffic, pollution, crime). I am no fan of New Labour but am glad it does not cave in to every selfish demand of the very vocal and visible rural lobby.
Arun, UK

Contrary to Downing Street's assertions, the issue here is not merely logistical. A general election is not a giant opinion poll. It is (or should be) a dynamic process through which parties resolve a battle of ideas on national and local stages. At best holding such a contest in the midst of this crisis would be in poor taste. At worst it would undermine the validity of the next government's mandate.
Peter Rushton, UK


It would be very bad public relations for Labour and Good Ole' Tony

Andrew, Ohio, USA
The Tories are far more popular in the farming country currently in the grip of the Foot-and-mouth. It would be very bad public relations for Labour and Good Ole' Tony to rush through an election amidst this time of turmoil in the UK.
Andrew, Ohio, USA

I'm sure in this day and age we can manage a postal vote. Delays are what Blair wants. The quicker we do something about the lack of action and promises which came with the Labour government the better!
Gina Tucker, UK

This is the 21st century for Gods sake. There are postal votes and canvassing can be done by phone. Odd is it not that those seeking a postponed election are invariably right-wingers and their press out-riders. Farmers amount to less than 2% of Britain's population. Why should the rest of us be disenfranchised because those affected could not have been bothered to take out insurance because foot and mouth was considered to be a thing of the past.
Pamela Armstrong, UK

The election should go ahead. If the foot and mouth crisis were happening in 12 months time, it wouldn't be possible for there to be a delay in the election. You cannot stop elections simply because the country is in a difficult situation. Nothing - not even war - should allow our hard-fought democratic right to vote to be withheld.
Mark Dawson, UK


Things could get worse still for the Labour Government, especially as the Foot and Mouth crisis continues to escalate

Grahame Warby, United Kingdom
Whilst Blair may be under some pressure at the moment to postpone the elections, it would probably make more sense to call the election now. Afterall, things could get worse still for the Labour Government, especially as the Foot and Mouth crisis continues to escalate, and more and more UK farmers are facing certain turmoil. Even if they do postpone, this disease is going to stick in the minds of many (not just agricultural sorts) for a while; and of course, this is not the only disaster for the Labour government to have to contend with. So, why not call it now? Go on Tony.
Grahame Warby, United Kingdom

The politicians (on both sides) seems to be more concerned that the election will be turned into a referendum on their handling the Foot and Mouth outbreak. If elections have been held during the darkest days of war, then surely they can be held during an animal disease outbreak.
Tom Byrne, USA


Elections should be put on hold during this crisis

Natalie, UK
No way - elections should be put on hold during this crisis. As well as the affected farmers having an unfair disadvantage in having the access to vote, there is the issue of the Government having enough to deal with at this time without the hassles of elections. It would be chaotic for perhaps a new Government to come into this mess midway through.
Natalie, UK

No - this isn't just about postal voting, it's about the right of people to take part in elections. County council elections often have a wide range of candidates - many of whom live in their areas, which are now restricted. If the elections went ahead on May 3rd, many people who have a right to take part would be banned from doing so, or if they took part banned from campaigning. It's not democratic to hold an election while potential participants are being held under what amounts to house arrest!
Jackie, UK

Holding the election during this national disaster will be the final act of this arrogant Government. Tony Blair may feel now is a good time to go to the polls, whilst we who live in the countryside are otherwise engaged. However he is sorely mistaken. If he wants the vote now, then go on Blair! We will still get you out as you have not only underestimated foot-and-mouth disease, you have underestimated the contempt felt by so many in this country towards yourself and your corrupt Government.
Andrew, England

Of course the elections shouldn't be delayed. If the farmers can't get out to vote that's their problem. They created this situation in the first place.
Chris, UK

I do not understand why people are calling for local elections to be postponed when the polling station is situated very close to where they live. I live in a rural area, where the local school is used as a polling station. I travel 10 times further to work than I would do to vote! If there are no restrictions in place limiting the movements of people, who after all have to work and go out to buy food supplies etc, then I see no value in stopping them voting in what is, after all, their local area.
A. Rogers, UK


As it is, the rural community are not exactly Labour's biggest fans

Mike Burns, Scotland, UK
Here's some food for thought. At the moment we have a foot-and-mouth crisis which limits the movements of the rural community. As it is, the rural community are not exactly Labour's biggest fans and are hardly likely to vote for them in an election. So what better opportunity for Tony to call an election when the people who would vote against him can't physically do so or at least will not have full access to the system if door to door visits etc are not allowed! It's not that outrageous an idea is it?
Mike Burns, Scotland, UK

Lets hurry up and get these clowns out of government.
Graham, England

There are many "townies" out there who don't realise just how serious foot-and-mouth is. People must respect the farming community and all those connected to the industry during these times. To have elections would be foolish. I'm not a farmer, but I live in the countryside. It's not a case of going overboard, it's just that now is simply not the right time. Oh, and to those out there not adhering to requests to keep off farmland and forestry sights, KEEP OUT!!!!! The signs are there for a reason!
Richard Hardiman,

If the current emergency measures are affecting the ability to vote, then elections should not take place. This is a democracy after all!
Mark B, UK

Oh dear, poor Tony may have to postpone the election. An inconvenience to him, but absolutely nothing compared to the tragedy which is taking place on farms around the country.
Pete Morgan-Lucas, Wiltshire, UK


Have the election every 5 years

Michael J. Turberville, London, UK
NO. We should move away from the flexible date of elections determined on the whim and fancy of the PM to one of a set date, time, and term. Have the election every 5 years and let the cards fall where they fall and we have to live with the outcome. It might even make the electorate more responsible in voting and less susceptible to the panderings of the tabloids.
Michael J. Turberville, London, UK

I think the election should continue, if only to get the irritating political mudslinging out of the way for a few more years. Anyway, this might be an opportunity to improve the voting system. The UK is not quite up to e-voting yet, but postal votes can be delivered and collected amidst this crisis. And to be honest, if everyone in the country has a postal vote, rather than traipsing to the community hall once every few years, more people might vote.
Colin, Netherlands

I do not believe that the election should be delayed. The affected areas are, I understand, still receiving deliveries of mail. Therefore it should be perfectly possible for the electorate to make its views known via postal ballots - and let us not forget that it is hearing the voice of the electorate that is important.
Matthew Salter, UK

Blair does not need to call an election for another 12 months. It would be disgraceful to rush the country into a premature election at this time of high crisis
Aidan Langley, UK

Click here to read later comments

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
BBC RADIO NEWS
BBC ONE TV NEWS
WORLD NEWS SUMMARY
PROGRAMMES GUIDE
See also:

14 Mar 01 | UK
Call to hold off elections
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


Links to more Talking Point stories