| You are in: Talking Point | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, 9 January, 2001, 14:38 GMT
Is George W Bush ready for the White House?
![]() George W Bush has filled the key cabinet posts two weeks ahead of his inauguration as US president.
Mr Bush has selected the most ethnically diverse cabinet in US history. Some Democrat critics argue that it also is one of the most conservative. He has been meeting business leaders to outline his economic policies. He also spoke to key members of Congress in an attempt to pave the way for future cooperation. How has George W Bush handled the transition period so far? Is he ready for the White House? What do you think of his team? This debate is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below.
Your reaction
John Dawson, USA
George W. Bush selfishly put his own desire to be president ahead of the democratic rights of Florida voters to have their votes counted and ahead of the rights of all Americans to democratically elect a President. That can't be good for a country so proud of its democratic traditions.
Bush will do just fine. I think that he will bring The US closer to the centre of the political spectrum. People don't seem to understand that we are the United States of America and that we vote as states. Many tend to see the US as one entity, but in fact, politically, we are fifty states under a Federal Republic. Anyone that doesn't think that Bush won the election needs to read the US Constitution.
Mr Bush is far better prepared to be President of the United States than Bill Clinton ever was. He has carefully chosen a cabinet that is qualified, diverse and has been selected by merit of what they have accomplished rather than their ethnic background.
Of course he's not ready. We need a Philosopher-King, perhaps recruited from the faculty of a top European university.
Bush isn't dumb. He is just not intellectually curious about anything. Most past presidents have come into office with a lifelong interest in America's history and the world in general. Bush has neither, and our country and the world will suffer greatly for it. Better enjoy the environment, your civil rights, and the strong economy - the party's almost over.
Owen Courreges, Texas, USA
Praising Bush for putting together his Cabinet in such a short time is laughable. Does anyone think these jobs weren't promised LONG before
November 7th? Do you honestly think Colin Powell was surprised to be nominated? The true powers "behind the throne" had told Bush who he would be "choosing" when the time came. All he had to do was practice
pronouncing their names and remember which post was which!
Ready for the White House? You must be kidding! First of all, let us not forget that George Bush was appointed by a partisan Supreme Court, and not elected by the people. All one has to do is watch this poor soul try to navigate through a session with the press to determine that he is not competent to be President. Had he had a different father, we would not be having this discussion. Not only is his lack of experience and intelligence scary, it is also telling that he apparently has no desire to learn. But get ready for the environmental issues, women's rights, gay rights to all suffer; at the expense of what? Star wars revisited? Please! Your question is interesting in that it presupposes that George Bush is actually in charge.
This is a successful man at whatever he has done from Harvard business school to the oil business and governing Texas. He won 2400 of the USA's 3100 counties, you could walk on them from East to West, he has the bulk of middle America behind him not the chattering classes and the liberal elite maybe but who cares. He has shown great skill in forming a modern representative cabinet full of ability and will do what he does best -manage by consent and consensus.
Go for it Dubya!
Malani Lungu, Malawi
Bush has essentially assembled the kind of team that Dick Cheney and his Daddy's old cronies urged him too. The only twist is that they've managed to find some minority and female faces to make the bitter pill of their substantially conservative stances a little easier to swallow for all those Americans who are still angered over Al Gore having the election stolen from him.
The children can go home now. The
adults are back to run the Government.
What also worries me is his lack of foreign policy. Great, he has Condeleeza Rice and Colin Powell, both brilliant, but their fields of interest lie in the Cold War! Uiya Kipkorir, USA
Well, if he really does move on his plans for tax cuts and to revamp the pitiful condition of America's public schools, I'd say he's off to a flying start.
I am encouraged by many of the choices President Bush has made for his cabinet. They demonstrate his ability to lead a diverse and competent team. Honestly, who can say that General Powell and Senator Ashcroft do not represent diversity in political philosophy? In the personal dimension, I am especially proud of Arab-American and African-American contributions to the building of America (and the Republican Party). Bush is stretching past this sloganeering to find some of the most intelligent and capable candidates demonstrates his readiness to lead. Let's let him lead.
Bush may not be ready as a person, but as a leader, he will be ably supported by some very good staff members and so he will have the stability of his cabinet to make him ready, willing and able to lead the country. Where it goes from there is anyone's guess.
Most people who have commented seem to have pre-judged President Bush based on what others have said he is like, or what they feel that he will be like, rather than what he's actually done so far!
Are they ready to change their minds if he does a good job? Or are we just in for four years of bitching, whatever he does, because he isn't a liberal (and/or is religious)?
Ron Bentham, UK
The fact that G.W. Bush is not a great speaker in public creates a mistaken impression that he is dumb. Bill Clinton is a brilliant speaker at ease with large audiences, and what? What did he really accomplish in Somalia, Kosovo, Ireland, China, Iraq, Mid East? Did he save (read: reform) social security? Did he reverse dangerous decay of the U.S. armed forces? Did he reform health care system despite many promises? I find it quite ironic that a "dumb conservative" has created so quickly a cabinet so diversified and consisting of such competent people Clinton could only dream about. Dubya is a modest man, fully aware of his limitations. This will make him much better (and less dangerous) president than vain and arrogant Clinton.
Sure, he's filled the posts. What I can't understand is why he's getting applauded for filling them FAST. Since when has "do it fast" become more important than "do it RIGHT"?
As a business manager I recognise the excellent leadership style shown by George Bush. The bottom line is that Bush is smart enough to surround himself with excellent people - a sign of an outstanding leader. Liberal Democrats are frightened that Mr. Bush and his Administration will expose the lies of the Clinton Administration regarding social issues.
There is surely a distinction to be drawn (with Bush or with anyone else) between his competence and his political philosophy. To date George W Bush appears to have passed the "competence" test (quick, decisive, able to delegate, able to balance a ticket, confident enough to not be deflected by criticism of his penchant for trusted and experienced advisers). The sad bit is that the political route he seeks is not one that is good for the US or for the rest of the world.
He is showing much of the energy and determination of the great Franklin Roosevelt, but sadly, there's no "new deal" from Dubya.
Charles P, U.S.
It's a shame that many people are so easily led by the liberal-biased US news reports (mostly TV). George Bush has got no credit for significant education improvements in Texas while governor. Several key Texas Democrats have and are backing his ideas based on his performance while Governor. He has been disparaged by the US media to the point that everything he does or will try to do is labelled as radical or right-wing before he has even been inaugurated.
Just a note to Mikko Toivonen of Finland. Americans have not chosen Bush, five of our Supreme Court Justices did! Half a million more Americans voted for VP Gore and it seems increasingly clear as the media review uncounted ballots in Florida that Bush's razor-thin Electoral College margin is a fraud! Not since 1877 has a Presidency been so thoroughly compromised by the means of its installation!
No, George Bush is not ready to be President. Fortunately for him, he won't have to do much. Just make speeches, smile and wave for the cameras, and hope that the public doesn't notice who's REALLY running the country. I'm truly ashamed to be a US citizen.
The Bush Cabinet appointments show a man totally in hock to his backers. The overall cast of his team is conservative with a capital C. The most depressing aspect of his appointments and potentially the most problematical is the number of his advisors who are from his father's era and some are from the Ford administration. Their ideas and world-view were set in the Cold War era, the danger is their solutions will show no insight into the new world conditions. Bush has already shown himself to be deluded into thinking because America is the "sole remaining Super Power", he can do what he wants in the world. I would have thought that he would have learned from Vietnam, Lebanon and Somalia, that an ant can eat an elephant.
Being a "Brit" living in Texas, I have seen much of George Bush Jnr's work, some good, some bad. Like most politicians he is not perfect, but any man who can piece together a cabinet in such a short time, with such a wide ethnic spectrum demands respect - especially when the media has continually insisted that it could not be done. As far as I can see, the only real similarity that will exist between George Bush Jnr's government and that of his father is the name. Let's not be too hasty to judge him, everybody has to prove themselves, and it is wrong of us to judge a man who has not yet been able to do this.
GWB spoke about the economy on TV last night. He had trouble stringing a couple of words together let alone a whole coherent sentence. He will never be ready for the White House. The US is in for a difficult four years. I only hope he has the sense to listen to advisors rather than make a decision on his own. His father seemed fairly clued up, just goes to show that some things are not inherited.
Andy, UK
Mr. Bush has said several times he is "not afraid" to surround himself with skilled, experienced figures. Not afraid? He means afraid not to. This cabinet will be a saving counterbalance to Bush's woeful lack of knowledge and experience on national and international issues. And don't congratulate Bush for the smooth transition, praise Bush's experienced transition team leader, Dick Cheney.
Also, regarding the skin-deep diversity of Bush's cabinet, each member is a vigorous supporter of Bush's views regarding the specific office over which they each preside, making this cabinet one of the most uniformly conservative in history, even by US standards. This cabinet is no different than it would be had he actually won the vote and had a mandate.
Sandra Parmer, USA
Although his party's successful attempt to stop recounts was outrageous, I think Dubya should be given a chance. Everyone made fun of Reagan, but he stopped the Cold War. Just ask Gorbachev.
It doesn't matter what the skin colour of Bush's team is. What matters is their competency and their agenda. Bush seems wholly incompetent, and his agenda is unpleasant, to say the least. Repressive conservatism is repressive conservatism, whatever the ethnicity of its executors.
Bush is a mindless puppet of the establishment. Of course he's ready.
Cormac McGaughey, USA
President-elect Bush has demonstrated his executive ability by completing his cabinet nominations over two weeks before the end of a significantly shortened transition period. This is in strong contrast to President Clinton, who did not complete his cabinet nominations until something like 6 weeks AFTER his inauguration. W is ready with a strong, competent team behind him.
Get ready for more theatrics such as nods, winks, charming smiles and the glinting-eye-evasion of tough questions. I find it amusing that the only people in the US that don't think Bush is a buffoon usually are the same people that thought Reagan was a good president. Maybe we'll put 'em both on Mt. Rushmore.
Zulfiqar Ali, Pakistan/ USA
It may be ethnically diverse, but the common factor between them is that they are all George Bush Senior people. Do we really want a repeat of that era?
My only consolation in a (another) Bush presidency is that Congress is so evenly divided. I see the Democrats (and moderate Republicans) as a firewall against any far-right agenda. Democrats will take back the House and Senate in 2002 so we only have to hold the fort for two more years!
"Come the millennium, month 12,
In the home of greatest power,
The village idiot will come forth,
To be acclaimed the leader."
Nostradamus, 1555.
It doesn't take a genius to be President - look at Reagan. Equally if Americans want such a heartless government (which they actually don't, though that's another story) then it's their country. What bothers me is Star Wars - and here Dubya's blinked world view will affect the rest of us. Isn't it obvious this is just a wheeze to fuel the armaments industry? Hasn't it been proven those missiles can't hit anything anyway? And what if terrorists just choose to send their bomb by FedEx? No fancy satellite system is going to stop that!
He has done an excellent job, it is a pity the press will not admit this fact.
As an African American and a "minority". I am not jumping up and down. Condelezza Rice, Linda Chavez, Spence Abraham, are minorities that have done more harm to their own ethnic groups and to whites than helping them. Their colour and position is irrelevant. I detest school vouchers and so does a great percentage of the American public.
I admire Powell for reaching out to African Americans and other minorities to work in the state department. Something the others have not and will not do.
This is not about minority rights; but for the rights of the working class. Although the cabinet may be diverse. The Christian Coalition is waiting to pounce. Campaign Finance reform. Not if big business can help it.
Democrats are not perfect. It is the extreme views of the Republicans I detest the most.
George Bush is as ready to be President of the United States as he has been prepared to be by those who engineered his election. Ethnic and gender diversity is no substitute for political and ideological diversity. The Bush administration will represent a massive swing to the right.
Bush is more than ready. By his appointment of qualified individuals of both sexes and from such diverse ethnicity, he has essentially "shut up" the Democrats whose support for minorities and women was, and has been only pure rhetoric throughout Clinton's term. By such appointments, not only does Bush display his respect for people with merit, but also blows away the absurd Affirmative Action Act, which is demeaning in that it is essentially a hand out. I believe Bush's term will be most certainly enviable.
Bush is a free thinker and decision maker with a talent for placing the right people in the right job, not by special preference but rather qualification. A good leader doesn't have to have all the answers, but wisely surrounds himself with sound advisors. Former Clinton advisor Dick Morris, explains the reason for an apparent lack of intelligence is simply a difference in style. Bush thinks in terms of a big idea and lets others work the details while Clinton and Gore know details, but get confused with the big picture. That's why we have no coherent foreign, transportation, or energy policy today. If you're a liberal lefty, please keep thinking Bush is a dummy. It will help us conservatives in the long run when he succeeds.
GW Bush has introduced a time leap - backwards in time. His team is composed of people of past. With that selection there will be no future. Only reversal to dark ages. I feel sorry for the people of the world that the Americans have chosen us a president of the past.
|
See also:
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Other Talking Points:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more Talking Point stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|