![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
You are in: Talking Point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Wednesday, 13 December, 2000, 16:02 GMT
Should Gore concede defeat?
![]()
The Democrat Al Gore is coming under pressure to admit defeat in the American presidential race after the Supreme Court ruled out further manual recounts in Florida.
Several senior Democrats have called for an end to the legal wrangling, saying it was now likely the Republican candidate, George W. Bush, would be the President. But others criticised the court's majority decision, and urged Mr Gore to fight on. He is expected to make a statement later today. Should Mr Gore continue his legal battle? Or should he throw in the towel and concede now? This debate is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below.
Your reaction
The votes were counted and recounted twice. What we have is failure of voters to follow basic instructions. The ballots in question do not clearly show a voter intent and were rejected by the machine, twice. Gore has lost. He needs to concede.
The USA has lost face with the world and I don't think Bush is the one to help them regain their ground, but the corruption goes too deep, strings are being pulled and Gore cannot win. The more he pushes the worse he looks, step down now and let Bush show the world how bad he really is. I just hope the USA can get through the deep division this has caused in some of its populace. The lesson to be learned for the world is if you want your guy in power, go out and vote, check and double check you're voting card and make sure it is valid.
Don Truitt, Panama City, Florida, USA
Although Gore, will probably concede - how can Bush govern with any form of legitimacy considering that less people voted for him? As for the Supreme Court judges - it is farcical that they rule along political lines. One big mess, with a pretty dirty outcome if you ask me.
It may seem like a sham to the rest of the world, but people in this country know our system has worked. Unlike some places, we didn't have tanks in the streets. We have allowed Al Gore to contest the election all the way to the Supreme Court and he has lost. We believe in the rule of law in this country and the Supreme Court is the highest judge of that law.
Mr. Gore, you have given an honourable fight but it is now time to concede. We must unite our divided country for tomorrow.
David Hammond, UK
It is now time for Gore to concede. To carry on any longer risks putting the world's last remaining super power into dangerous limbo. I am sure voters will have their revenge on Bush in 4 years time.
Al Gore does not have to concede. He has lost. Perhaps he should start behaving in a manner appropriate to the office of Vice President.
Gore should not concede. The US Supreme Court has dealt a blow to the voters in all the US by not allowing all votes to be counted.
Kenneth, England
Unfortunately Gore does have to concede now. America isn't bothered if they get the President most people voted for; they just want it over so they can carry on complaining about Federal government. Once again the only people who never lose out are the money grabbing lawyers.
Anders Dybwad, Norway
From outside the US, it looks very much that the votes of the American electorate do not count. The voting system is confusing and flawed. It would be wrong for an unelected candidate to take a position of such importance. The votes should be recounted. If Bush is so sure he has won fair and square, he should welcome the recount as an affirmation of his victory.
Gore should not give up, it is his constitutional right to stand for presidency and that right should not be hindered by those who stand to win in error.
Al Gore should carry on if he wants to. The judges that have now determined American politics ought to have taken the presidential role themselves. They are supposed to be 'above' politics, yet squeal towards political tendencies. I am getting the impression that some of the American public have seen this for the money- wasting legal farce that it has been. Better luck next time America!
James, UK
American democracy? Seems like a contradiction in terms. Elections should be decided by voters not machine malfunctions or judges.
|
![]() |
See also:
![]()
Other Talking Points:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Links to other Talking Point stories
|
![]() |
![]() |
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |