![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, September 16, 1999 Published at 17:51 GMT 18:51 UK
Blair's anti-hunt conversion ![]() Tony Blair: Why now? By Political Correspondent Nick Assinder When Tony Blair suddenly declared that he was going to ban fox hunting, it wasn't just the anti-hunt lobby which was caught on the hop.
Just a year before, he had killed off a move to ban hunting by backbencher Michael Foster by refusing to give it parliamentary time. Mr Foster's bill won a first Commons reading with a whopping majority of 260, but Mr Blair ensured it got no further.
And ministers signalled that there was no way the government was about to produce its own legislation on the matter. Most MPs dismissed all the explanations and believed the decision had far more to do with the massive opposition the proposal had sparked amongst the powerful countryside lobby, which marched on London in protest and which took the government by surprise. Change of heart Now, Mr Blair has decided he wants to ban the sport and MPs are wondering what has happened in the last few months to change his mind. Most believe the answer is simple - he lost a couple of elections and is desperately searching for populist policies to "re-engage" with core Labour voters. The local council and European election losses proved a severe blow to Mr Blair and he is eager to get back onto the offensive and win back disillusioned Labour voters. A ban on fox hunting is seen as highly popular and can be justified because it was in the Labour election manifesto. And the prime minister clearly believes the countryside lobby does not command widespread support, particularly amongst the traditional Labour voters who have recently been deserting the party in dismay at its concentration on the middle classes.
The countryside lobby is again up in arms at the proposal, claiming thousands of jobs will be put at risk and a way of life will be destroyed. Supporters insist that the government has misjudged the issue by believing it is targeting a group of privileged "upper toffs" when, in reality, hunting is enjoyed by people from all classes. Mass demonstrations They are planning mass demonstrations of the kind which so rattled the government when the original bill was being debated. Mr Blair may think his principled stand will win him support and that voters will be delighted to see him standing up to the vested interests in the countryside lobby.
And Mr Blair's recent behaviour has only added to the impression held by some MPs that he is pushing the policy for political advantage rather than out of a strongly held principle. His attendance at the infamous Palio race in Tuscany, where horses are injured and killed, has raised a new question mark over his motives. And recent surveys suggest that the sport is not a major issue with ordinary Labour voters who are far more concerned about the NHS and education. It may turn out that Mr Blair has sparked a huge controversy but reaped very little political advantage. To return to Fox Hunting: Fighting for the Fox, click here
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||