| You are in: In Depth: Tom Brook | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Saturday, 22 April, 2000, 07:52 GMT 08:52 UK
Hollywood's violent appetite
![]() Christian Bale plays the murderous American Psycho
By BBC News Online's Entertainment correspondent Tom Brook
Last year's Columbine High School massacre, which saw two teenagers kill 12 of their fellow students and a teacher on 20 April 1999, led to a rhetorical assault on Hollywood, unprecedented in recent times. Politicians, religious leaders, and parents pounced on the American entertainment industry and pronounced its violent films, TV shows and video games were largely to blame for the acts of the Colorado teen killers.
Miramax Films, nervous that they had a picture in the pipeline called Killing Mrs Tingle in which teens kidnapped their teacher, announced they were changing the title to Teaching Mrs Tingle. There was much soul-searching among production executives as the country witnessed one of the most intense debates over screen violence. Business as usual At the time the prospect of some form of censorship of violent pictures seemed a distinct possibility. But one year later it seems to be business as usual. American Psycho, a film based on one of the most violent novels of all time, has just been released, but its director found she faced a bigger battle over the sex scenes than she did over the violence.
The appetite for violent Hollywood entertainment appears unabated and the legacy of Columbine minimal. But the Columbine massacre did provoke a response from Washington and it was more than just words of condemnation. President Clinton ordered a Federal Trade Commission investigation, still ongoing, into how Hollywood markets violent and sexual material. Government controls Specifically, the government agency is trying to find out if the entertainment industry promotes adult oriented material to children. If there is evidence to implicate the film industry then it could open up the studios to expensive lawsuits. Also, in reaction to Columbine, the recent Republican Presidential candidate Senator John McCain introduced the Media Violence Labelling Bill.
Even though Washington has taken action the view now is that there seems little prospect of government controls over screen violence any time soon. Partly this is because the film industry can claim that it has a constitutional right, under the First Amendment, to be free of any government interference over its content. Also, the powerful underlying reality remains that America's violent entertainment sells, at home and abroad, and Washington has little desire to reduce the profitability of one of its biggest foreign money earners. Growing unease This means that all politicians can do is try to shame the Hollywood studios or individual directors if they create an inflammatory work directed at teens that seems capable of instigating a violent act.
The idea of a pathology at large in middle America has given recent films like American Beauty and Boy's Don't Cry, in which a woman masquerading as a man in Nebraska is murdered, a compelling urgency. Columbine proved that nasty things do happen in nice suburbs, not exactly an original idea, but it's a notion that now in the wake of Columbine has even greater currency in Hollywood.
|
See also:
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Links to other Tom Brook stories are at the foot of the page.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to more Tom Brook stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|