| You are in: World: South Asia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Friday, 19 January, 2001, 09:45 GMT
New UN sanctions on Taleban
![]() UN staff leave Kabul as the deadline approaches
By Kate Clark in Kabul
The UN Security Council has imposed fresh sanctions against the Taleban in Afghanistan after they failed to hand over Osama Bin Laden. Mr Bin Laden, a Saudi dissident and millionaire, is wanted by the United States for the bombing of two American embassies in which over 200 people were killed.
In 1999, when sanctions were first imposed on the Taleban, there were angry demonstrations against the UN, but the streets of Kabul are calm this time. A Taleban official was defiant in the face of the new sanctions. "We will never expel him [Mr Bin Laden] by force, but he can leave if he wishes," Information Minister Qudratullah Jamal said. Fear and confusion The Taleban took a decision not to organise protests against the new sanctions, but they have run a highly successful publicity campaign from the mosques and state-run media, condemning the measures as cruel and ruthless and a conspiracy against the Afghan people and against Islam itself.
The result has been widespread fear and confusion. Most Afghans seem to think the UN is imposing an economic blockade, or even stopping its aid programme. Many fear that prices will rise and food will be in short supply. 'Targeted' sanctions But the drafters of the resolution say they designed the sanctions to target the Taleban only.
For the first time in a sanctions resolution, there will be mandatory monitoring of the humanitarian impact. A statement released by the US embassy in Pakistan defended the sanctions. "The sanctions are political and not economic. They do not prohibit private sector trade and commerce, including the importation of food and medicines," the statement said. Controversial measures Nevertheless, these are highly controversial measures. They have drawn public criticism from the aid community and from many within the UN, including Secretary-General Kofi Annan. They fear that any economic impact, however indirect, could be a severe blow to Afghans, struggling to survive in a war-ruined country and suffering from the worst drought in living memory. There is also widespread concern that the arms embargo that affects only the Taleban amounts to the UN taking sides in the long-running Afghan civil war.
|
See also:
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top South Asia stories now:
Links to more South Asia stories are at the foot of the page.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more South Asia stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|