| You are in: Sci/Tech | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
|
Sunday, 16 July, 2000, 09:10 GMT 10:10 UK
Go-ahead for new web names
![]() New domain names in the pipeline
The private corporation overseeing changes on the internet has approved the creation of the first new top-level domain names on the web since the 1980s.
The decision opens the way for a raft of additions to existing website suffixes like ".com" and ".org" to cope with the increasing demand for website addresses. But the pronouncement made at a conference in Japan has already come under fire for being too vague. Critics say the corporation should have been more decisive on the details of how the new names will be introduced. The addition of new names is aimed at boosting competition among companies that sell and register domains for website owners, and giving customers more names to choose from. It would also make it easier for internet users to search the web for specific topics. Travel agencies, for example, could use a ".travel" that would save tourists time in finding the companies. Limited 'dotsomethings' At the moment, there are only a limited number of suffixes on the internet such as ".com", ".gov", and ".net", in addition to special two-letter codes assigned to countries, such as ".uk" for the UK. The decision was passed unanimously by the 19-member board of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, (Icann). "It's beautiful. It's a major step," said Steinar Grotterod, of Active ISP, an internet service provider in Oslo, Norway, but added: "It's taken some time to come to this step." The decision has also been criticised by some for failing to set clear guidelines for the number of new names to be introduced and how they will be phased into use. Network chaos? Experts are worried that the proposed changes could result in widespread trademark infringements and confusion among internet users.
Some are worried that companies or individuals may try to register hundreds or thousands of choice names, such as "beautiful.shop," at bargain rates and then sell them for a hefty profit. "It's going to be a bloody mess," said Martin Burack, trustee of the Virginia-based Internet Society. "It'll be like scalping tickets for a hot show and this is the hottest show in town." Vague resolution The resolution passed by Icann calls for the introduction of new names in a measured and responsible manner. The group set a schedule for the phasing in of the names, with a target date of 31 December for wrapping agreements on the new domain names. But the resolution did not spell out how many new names would be approved or whether they would be specific, with certain names restricted for use by specified groups or individuals. There was also no statement on how trademark infringement could be avoided. Worries about the introduction of new domain suffixes have bogged down discussion of the move for five years and were a main theme running through the four-day conference in Yokohama.
|
See also:
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Sci/Tech stories now:
Links to more Sci/Tech stories are at the foot of the page.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Sci/Tech stories
|
|
|
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII | News Sources | Privacy |
|