Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Sci/Tech
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 


The BBC's Rory Cellan-Jones
"Messages went too far"
 real 28k

Dr Laurence Godfrey
"The law has been very clear"
 real 28k

Thursday, 30 March, 2000, 18:08 GMT
Demon settles net libel case
Computer user
The case will have implications for all ISPs
A UK internet service provider has settled a libel case in a move which could have wide-ranging implications for online publishers.

Laurence Godfrey will be paid 15,000 plus legal costs - which could top 200,000 - by Demon Internet after allegedly defamatory postings about him appeared in newsgroups.

Demon had previously said the case would affect the entire ethos of free speech on the internet.

Dr Godfrey alleged that the company failed to remove defamatory material from a newsgroup it hosted, in the first case of its kind to go before the English courts.

He said after the case: "I am happy with the settlement.

"I don't think there is a right, in fact I'm quite sure there's no right, to libel other people on the internet, to concoct fabricated allegations and try to destroy people's reputations."



Dr Godfrey outside the court
Dr Godfrey said his argument had been vindicated and he now hoped ISPs would act responsibly if anyone else found themselves in a similar situation.

Although such discussion forums are often full of robust, forthright and even offensive opinions posted by individuals, the case hinged on whether Demon could be treated as publisher of the material.

The case will affect other ISPs - all of which host newsgroups - who fear they could become liable for offensive material which millions of their users might write.

If the ISPs become more cautious over what material they allow to be published - by screening submissions or suspending websites - they could inflame the debate over freedom of expression or damage internet-based businesses.

Reasonable care

Under English law ISPs are not held to have been the publishers of defamatory material providing they satisfy two criteria.

They must prove they took reasonable care to ensure such material was not published, and once alerted to a problem, took steps to resolve it.

Dr Godfrey's action against Demon related to a message posted in 1997 on soc.culture.thai, purportedly coming from him and containing damaging allegations of a personal nature.

He said he asked Demon to remove the message but the ISP refused. The message was copied to its servers around the world and many others containing newsgroup messages.

In a statement, Thus, Demon Internet's parent company, said: "Concluding this matter in a reasonable way is in the best interests of the company and its customers.

"Thus remains convinced that the law has not kept pace with the development of the internet and will work with our colleagues in the industry to lobby for modernisation of the law.

"Thus will press the government for recognition that ISPs should not be liable for the millions of items carried on the internet every day."

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
BBC RADIO NEWS
BBC ONE TV NEWS
WORLD NEWS SUMMARY
PROGRAMMES GUIDE

Talking PointTALKING POINT
Internet libel
Should there be free speech on the web?
See also:

30 Mar 00 | UK
Net libel claims warning
30 Mar 00 | Americas
US regulators fight internet fraud
06 Mar 00 | Business
Battle for the internet
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to other Sci/Tech stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Sci/Tech stories