Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Sci/Tech
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Sport 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 
Monday, 10 January, 2000, 05:35 GMT
Soil problems prompt farming ban call

fields Soils in parts of Britain are too fragile for continued arable farming


By Alex Kirby, News Online Environment Correspondent and presenter of Costing the Earth

A prominent UK agricultural scientist says some soils are now too fragile to grow arable crops.

His comments come as concern grows over the impoverishment of soil in many parts of the UK.

The scientist, Professor David Poulson, is the head of soil research at the Institute of Arable Crop Research in Hertfordshire. He was speaking to BBC Radio Four's programme Costing the Earth.

Professor Poulson told the programme there were specific problems of soil health associated with intensive agriculture. Under continuous arable farming, he said, the organic matter in the soil tended to decline, and this changed its physical properties, making it more susceptible to erosion.

Areas at particular risk include the North and South Downs in southern England, parts of the West Midlands, and the Welsh borders.

tractor Intensive agriculture can impoverish the soil
"I think perhaps in the worst areas probably the only sensible alternative is not to do arable farming. In the long run, we have to look at taking areas that are prone to severe physical damage out of, certainly, arable production."

Professor Poulson is also concerned at the accumulation in soil of heavy metals like zinc, cadmium and copper, from the dumping of commercial and industrial wastes, notably sewage sludge.

"We know that quite low levels of these metals can have negative effects on soil microbes, and on nitrogen-fixing bacteria. The metals stay in the soil for many, many years, and only very tiny amounts get washed out or taken up by plants.

"We need to be concerned about those. But 90% or more of the metals remain in the soil, virtually for ever.

"The concentrations will build up, and at some stage in the future they could have a bad effect on the microbes. We certainly need to worry about those."


wheatfield Soil problems could soon imperil food supplies
Another scientist, Dick Thompson, of the Soil Survey and Land Research Centre at Silsoe in Bedfordshire, told the programme that some farming soils were beginning to lose their productivity.

"They are simply organo-mineral mixes of sand and silt and clay, and seem to have no life in them. They are now producing very much lower yields than other soils.

"They contain very little organic matter. If you take the living component out of soil, it's a bit like switching the lights off in a factory. Everything comes to a grinding halt."

Dick Thompson is also concerned at the small amount being spent on monitoring what is happening to the soil - less than a million pounds a year, compared with several tens of millions on monitoring air and water quality.

"At the moment, we live in ignorance. We don't actually know where we are in terms of soil quality."

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
BBC RADIO NEWS
BBC ONE TV NEWS
WORLD NEWS SUMMARY
PROGRAMMES GUIDE

See also:
29 Dec 99 |  Sci/Tech
Microbe tucks into toxic waste
29 Aug 99 |  Sci/Tech
US dustbowl fears return

Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Links to other Sci/Tech stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Sci/Tech stories