Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education



Front Page

World

UK

UK Politics

Business

Sci/Tech

Health

Education

Sport

Entertainment

Talking Point

In Depth

On Air

Archive
Feedback
Low Graphics
Help

Tuesday, November 2, 1999 Published at 09:39 GMT


Sci/Tech

Facts and fossils

Did cynodont pairs bond for life?

First, they conquered the world. Then, with Jurassic Park, the cinema. Now, it is the turn of the television documentary. A ground-breaking, new television series about dinosaurs, made by the BBC, is currently thrilling 150 million people in 19 different countries.


Mixing fact with speculation: Tom Hagler reports
But Walking With Dinosaurs has also clearly irked some scientists who believe it reflects a worrying trend towards popularising science at the expense of the facts - a state of affairs which, they argue, could eventually undermine science in the eyes of the public.

The programmes use cutting-edge computer animation and animatronics to show how the creatures might have looked when they walked the Earth at least 65 million years ago.

The quality of many of the fossil specimens in world museums means we have a very good idea of how some of these creatures looked, but we actually have precious little information about how they behaved - no-one knows, for example, how male-female pairs would have conducted courtship and mating.


Watch the opening sequence of the first episode
And yet, in the great tradition of natural history television, this is precisely what we are presented with in Walking With Dinosaurs.

"The dinosaurs only exist as fossils," says series producer Tim Haines. "We know a great deal about them but we don't actually know enough to have them running around as we do in our programmes. We have to use informed speculation to fill in the gaps."

Greater realism

But the critics argue that Walking With Dinosaurs should have made a bigger effort to tell the audience where the facts finished and the speculation started.

"When you fill in the gaps you come down to individual judgements and they have shown things I wouldn't necessarily agree with," says Dr Paul Upchurch, a palaeontologist at Cambridge University.


[ image: The giant Ornithocheirus is shown calling to a mate]
The giant Ornithocheirus is shown calling to a mate
"One programme showed an animal guarding a territory and other animals were said to be bonding for life. I appreciate that this gives the natural history feel of the programme a greater realism but it is not something we can defend scientifically."

Dr Graham Farmelo from London's Science Museum concedes that it would have been tedious to qualify every statement with "we think that" or "we suspect that".

"On the other hand," he says, "there are very important distinctions to be made between things we are practically certain of and things which might possibly be true - and I think the series doesn't address these issues nearly seriously enough."

Black and white

The media as a whole is often accused of trivialising scientific debate by portraying complex issues in simplistic black and white terms. The pace of scientific development can sometimes seem bewildering and the facts can all too easily be lost in the requirement for instant opinions.

This makes it all the harder for society to take the important decisions about the application of new science, warns Dr Farmelo.


Tim Haines and Paul Upchurch discuss the science in Walking With Dinosaurs
"Science and technology are throwing up issues that impinge directly on people's lives. There are so many examples, such as how we feel about genetically-modified (GM) foods. It is important that scientists have a dialogue with the public to make sure that the debate is informed - because there is a lot of reflex opinion-forming that I think is very dangerous."

Science has thrown up an array of media stars in the last few years. These are men and women whose books regularly hit the top of the best seller lists and have a knack for making even the most difficult concepts seem accessible.

It is what science should be about, says one of the very best of them, Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics at University College London.

"It's often forgotten, for example, that when Darwin wrote the Origin of Species in 1859 he wrote it as a popular science book - it wasn't a technical book for biologists.

"The popularisation of any kind of knowledge is a very good thing and science in particular because it impinges so much on people's lives. Popularisation, in a narrow sense, is part of science because the whole point of doing science is to tell other people all about it."

[ image: The series uses computer animation and animatronics]
The series uses computer animation and animatronics





Advanced options | Search tips




Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage | ©


Sci/Tech Contents


Relevant Stories

20 Oct 99 | Entertainment
Ratings record for dino saga

02 Nov 99 | Sheffield 99
Walking like a dinosaur

09 Sep 99 | Sci/Tech
Darwin gets a makeover





Internet Links


Walking With Dinosaurs (BBC)

London's Science Museum

Sedgwick Museum of Geology, Cambridge


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.




In this section

World's smallest transistor

Scientists join forces to study Arctic ozone

Mathematicians crack big puzzle

From Business
The growing threat of internet fraud

Who watches the pilots?

From Health
Cold 'cure' comes one step closer