[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Monday, 8 September, 2003, 15:24 GMT 16:24 UK
Public panels concerned by GM
Anti-GM protesters
GM crops have attracted widespread opposition
Two "citizen's juries" have said the moratorium on the use of genetically modified crops in the UK should continue.

The juries, made up of 30 members of the public, said the possible health and environmental impact of GM crops were still such a concern that commercial planting should not yet go ahead.

Their feelings were published in the People's Report on GM Crops, compiled after the jurors spent six weeks hearing expert evidence.

The report was funded jointly by the Consumers' Association, Greenpeace, the Co-operative Group and Unilever.

The juries heard expert witnesses discussing the impact of GM crops on farming and the environment; food safety; potential health effects and the government's handling of the issue.

The implications of GM technology are not yet fully understood and have not been adequately shared with the public
Helen Colclough
Newcastle juror
At the moment, the biotechnology industry has agreed a voluntary moratorium on submitting applications to grow GM crops until the results of three-year farm-scale studies are unveiled - probably in October.

The juries called for the moratorium on commercial planting of GM crops to continue.

They also urged the government to carry on for the long term with testing GM crops in fields.

The two 15-person juries were held simultaneously in Newcastle upon Tyne and St Albans, Hertfordshire.

Helen Colclough, a juror from the Newcastle group, said: "We believe that the implications of GM technology are not yet fully understood and have not been adequately shared with the public.

"The jury felt because of this we could not justify an unqualified green light to GM crops being grown in the UK."

Food safety

Vinay Thoree, on the St Albans jury, said: "There is a general misconception that GM food will lead to human mutations.

"However, the attempts by manufacturers of GM technology to persuade us that the UK will lose out if we do not embrace GM is disingenuous.

How a plant is genetically modified

"Evidence shows that the GM crops currently on the market offer little benefit to consumers, the environment or the Third World.

"If the UK and developing countries really want to gain from GM then industry must develop products that will do more than line the pockets of the manufacturers who produce it."

As far as food was concerned, the jurors felt not enough was known about the potential health effects of GM food for them to be on sale.

None of the jurors had heard of the government's GM Nation debate before they participated in the juries, despite the process being launched several weeks beforehand, the report said.




SEE ALSO:
GM warning to trial farmers
25 Jul 03  |  Scotland
GM crop ban in beauty spot
23 Jul 03  |  Cumbria
GM scientists 'know too little' on wildlife
21 Jul 03  |  Science/Nature
GM science review answers few questions
19 Jul 03  |  Science/Nature
Public debate on GM crops begins
03 Jun 03  |  Science/Nature
GM crops 'need long-term monitoring'
27 May 03  |  Science/Nature


RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia
UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature | Technology | Health
Have Your Say | In Pictures | Week at a Glance | Country Profiles | In Depth | Programmes
Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific