BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Sci/Tech
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 

Tuesday, 31 July, 2001, 15:44 GMT 16:44 UK
Ancient human DNA claim
<I>Paranthropus robustus</I>, a hominid line that became extinct about one million years ago
Paranthropus robustus, a hominid line that became extinct about one million years ago
By BBC News Online's Helen Briggs

One of our oldest ancestors crouches in a cave under African skies clutching a stone tool. The hominid, an early member of the human family, nicks itself and a drop of blood oozes on to the rock. Nearly two million years later, scientists detect microscopic traces of blood on the tool and extract the DNA. They say it is the oldest human genetic material ever found.


We strongly suspect that the DNA that we have is that of a hominid, but we still want to conduct more research to verify our claim

Tom Loy, University of Queensland
This is the claim that is dividing the archaeological community. Two researchers say they have extracted the DNA of a 1.8-million-year-old hominid from stone tools excavated at the Sterkfontein Caves near Johannesburg.

"The DNA we have found is something between a chimpanzee and a human, which suggests a hominid," Bonnie Williamson of Wits University, South Africa, told a Johannesburg newspaper this week.

"We strongly suspect that the DNA that we have is that of a hominid, but we still want to conduct more research to verify our claim," added co-researcher Tom Loy of the University of Queensland, Australia.

'Highly improbable'

The scientists believe that the DNA is that of either Homo habilis, thought to be a direct human ancestor, or Paranthropus robustus, a flat-faced hominid. If confirmed, it would be the oldest DNA yet extracted. But the news has been greeted with scepticism by some experts.

Sterkfontein Caves
One of the richest sites of early hominid fossils in Africa
Upright-walking creatures roamed the landscape at the site over three million years ago
In 1936, the first adult skull of Australopithecus africanus (2.6-3-million-year-old human-like creature) was discovered
Subsequent finds include stone tools and many hominid skulls and bones
"It seems very unlikely," Chris Stringer of London's Natural History Museum told BBC News Online. "It would be astonishing if such material could survive under these conditions for two million years."

It is a view shared by Alan Cooper of the Ancient Biomolecules Centre at Oxford University, UK. The likelihood that DNA could survive the heat of Africa for more than 10,000 years was, he said, "highly improbable, in fact almost impossible".

"Sadly, it is part of continuing claims of ancient human DNA finds lacking experimental and intellectual rigor," said Dr Cooper.

Contamination concerns

The issue at stake is the technical difficulty of piecing together stretches of old DNA that have decayed over the passage of time. Some researchers believe that it is chemically impossible to isolate DNA that is older than 100,000 years. The possibility of contamination from extraneous sources of DNA during the handling of specimens has raised further concerns.

Critics point out that even a sneeze, a speck of dust containing skin or hair, or a drop of sweat, could leave traces of human DNA on a sample.

Ancient DNA controversies
DNA extracted from an 80-million-year-old dinosaur bone turned out to be that of a mammal
Australian scientists announced in January that they had extracted a tiny amount of DNA from the country's most ancient human skeleton, the 60,000-year-old Mungo Man - some scientists have cast doubts
The Wits/Queensland researchers say they have taken rigorous precautions to minimise contamination. Ken Dusza, a graduate student in Professor Loy's laboratory, says methods have advanced so much in recent years that it is quite feasible that hominid DNA could survive for more than a million years.

"We have improved our techniques beyond what initially gave ancient DNA analysis a bad name," he told BBC News Online.

"Now, it's a very well-developed and almost foolproof science in that we know when we have contamination and we take great precautions to ensure that we don't get contamination."

The Queensland researchers say they plan to publish the findings in a leading scientific journal soon.

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
BBC RADIO NEWS
BBC ONE TV NEWS
WORLD NEWS SUMMARY
PROGRAMMES GUIDE
See also:

09 Jan 01 | Sci/Tech
Fossil challenge to Africa theory
07 Feb 01 | Sci/Tech
Extinct bird in 'ground breaker'
19 Apr 00 | Sci/Tech
Europe's seven female founders
30 Oct 00 | Sci/Tech
Genetic 'Adam never met Eve'
26 Apr 00 | Sci/Tech
Near complete ape-man skull found
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Sci/Tech stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Sci/Tech stories