BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Sci/Tech
Front Page 
UK Politics 
Talking Point 
In Depth 

BBC News Online's Dr. David Whitehouse
"Like its Hollywood counterpart, the tick was fossilised in amber"
 real 28k

Wednesday, 2 May, 2001, 12:04 GMT 13:04 UK
Tick could have had dino diet
Steve Passoa/USDA
Carios jerseyi: The oldest blood-sucking tick yet discovered
By BBC News Online science editor Dr David Whitehouse

A 90-million-year-old tick, fossilised in amber, and which could have fed on the blood of dinosaurs, has stirred up suggestions that it might contain the DNA of the fearsome creatures.

Would ticks feed on dinosaurs if dinosaurs were still around today? You bet

Prof Hans Klompen
But the scientists in charge of the parasite say they do not intend to turn the film Jurassic Park into reality, as they maintain the chances of finding any readable DNA are slim.

Instead, they want to preserve the specimen as it shows unique features not seen in modern day ticks.

The tick is the oldest known fossil of the order Parasitiformes. Its discovery increases the order's age by 50 million years, says Hans Klompen, professor of entomology at Ohio State University, where the parasite is being studied.

Dinosaur blood

Carios jerseyi, as it is technically known, is an Argasid, or soft tick. The fossil is estimated to be between 90 and 94 million years old.

If C. jerseyi really is that old, it could have fed off the blood of dinosaurs. "Ticks will feed on anything that has blood," Klompen says.

"Would ticks feed on dinosaurs if dinosaurs were still around today? You bet," he adds. "Nearly all soft ticks will feed on a wide range of hosts. If it has blood, a soft tick will go for it."

But the ancient tick's precise feeding habits will remain a mystery, since scientists want to preserve the unique specimen and not break it up.

Fed on birds

Although Carios jerseyi lived during the height of the dinosaur era, the upper Cretaceous period, Klompen is pessimistic that any DNA from dinosaurs could be extracted.

"You won't reconstruct a dinosaur from the blood of a blood-feeding arthropod," he said. The tick was discovered several years ago in a large rock excavated from an amber outcrop in central New Jersey, US. It measures 0.520 mm by 0.445 mm (0.02 by 0.01 inches).

Scientists are puzzled by its three dozen or so tiny bristle-like hairs aligned in two rows on its back.

"It was very surprising," Klompen says: "Soft ticks normally have far fewer hairs over their entire body. But this tick is much closer to what I anticipate as the evolutionary starting point of all ticks."

"Most of the hairs on the body of a mite or a tick are probably contact receptors," he adds.

Feather clue

"If something gets too close, the tick notices it's there. Other Argasidae have hairs, but they're typically much longer and arranged chaotically."

Rather than feasting on dinosaurs, Klompen says, it is more likely that C. jerseyi fed on sea-faring birds.

The specimen shows similarities to a group of ticks known for feasting on birds. And a small feather (7.5 mm, or 0.3 inches) from an unidentified bird was also found preserved in the same outcrop of amber.

"Finding this feather suggests that the tick might have travelled to North America on a seabird," Klompen said.

C. jerseyi is described in the current issue of the journal Annals of the Entomological Society of America.

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
See also:

18 May 00 | Sci/Tech
Dino fever grips Chicago
22 Jun 00 | Sci/Tech
Earliest feathers fan controversy
23 Feb 01 | Sci/Tech
Dinosaur bites back
25 Apr 01 | Sci/Tech
Dinosaur was covered in feathers
Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Sci/Tech stories are at the foot of the page.

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Sci/Tech stories