In a special edition from the Hay Festival, Newsnight Review discussed The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon.
(Edited highlights of the panel's review taken from the teletext subtitles that are generated live for Newsnight Review.)
GERMAINE GREER:
I thought the book was wonderful. It's not
because I think my mother has probably got
Asperger's, and somebody finally told me how
she thinks. I have spent 65 years trying to
figure it out! Someone comes along and tells
me that my mother's world makes perfect
sense. His world makes sense. It's just not
the same world as the world of other people.
That means that, when he comes up against
other people, they seem insane, and he seems
sane. Their behaviour is outrageous, cruel,
stupid, vulgar, because this child is so
intelligent, so focused, so orderly. He is
involved, like any subject people, in this
attempt to make himself understood to other
people. It's all on his side. Everybody
deceives him, takes liberties with him,
touches him when he can't bear to be touched.
The curious thing is that it kind of
intercepted with the James Frey book, because
you realise that there is actually a lot more
autism about than you might think, and we all
have autistic traits. We could all recognise
some of his little obsessional behaviours. We
also know he is a person who is extremely
vulnerable, and at the same time extremely
dangerous. It's a book for children. It's a
book for adults. It's a book for me, who
spent 65 years with someone I couldn't
understand. I think it's a staggering
achievement, and it's beautifully,
effortlessly, clearly, limpidly written. It
doesn't strain after any effect.
RACHEL HOLMES:
It is suspenseful. Christopher is obsessed
with Conan Doyle, so his interest in Sherlock
Holmes is one of his obsessions. One of the
things that makes it very interesting is that
he believes that his detective knowledge is
going to help him in a forensic scientific
way, solve the mysteries around him of who
put the pitch fork in the dog and the
disappearance of his mother, and various
other mysteries. He believes that it is that
application that will reveal it. In the end,
of course, it isn't just like in Conan
Doyle's Sherlock Holmes. It's not the science
and forensics that solve the problems but the
way they become emotional traps and the way
you get the confessions. But at the same
time, I like this book, and Christopher
is a very engaging character. But, for me,
because he is typical. He is alienated.
Teenagers don't like being touched. They are
obsessive. Yes, he is different, but I also
think that one needs to be careful that, just
because he is good at maths and he is logical
and he is accurate about grammar, that
somehow this makes him an unusual...
KIRSTY WARK:
Hari, it's a great book where he is trying to
make sense of things. He says, "I am in a
special needs school, but everyone has
special needs." There was a lot of humour,
but not in a patronising way?
HARI KUNZRU:
That's the achievement of the book, that it
presents the world from the point of view of
this character. You are shown the world
through his eyes and you learn a lot. That's
a marvellous aspect of it. I am slightly less
certain whether it's totally successful. He
feels constructed to me, at times. There is a
necessary simplicity about his language, and
he is interested in facts. He is interested
in greater clarity of statement. But at
times, this seems to kind of dissipate the
character into a kind of formalism which
seems to be more to do with the writer's
research about Asperger's syndrome.
BILL BUFORD:
I loved the book. It was one of the cleverest
books I have read in a long time. Sure, there
is a deceit. He is the genius spaz. On one
level, he is completely arrested, and on the
other level he is completely brilliant. It was working on two levels. He attacks
metaphor. He describes metaphor as a way of
describing something in terms which it isn't,
so metaphor is basically a lie. It's raining
cats and dogs, or you laughed your socks off.
You are the apple of my eye. He wants to know
where is the apple in the eye? That approach
is in many ways a metaphor for the book. Here
is someone saying why can't someone be
honest. At the heart of the book is betrayal.
His mother leaves his father. His father
betrays him. He is simply saying, "Why can't
you love me? Why can't you be straight?" I
just thought it was terrific.
KIRSTY WARK:
This book is published in two editions, one
for adults, one for kids. Nothing different
except for the dust jacket. The rise of the
cross-over book. Do you think it works as
well for adults as it does for children?
GERMAINE GREER:
I only read books written for adults. I see
children playing with toys. They are decoy
objects and they are boring and stupid and
ugly, so I always wanted what the grown-ups
had. I think they are really being just a bit
nervous. I could handle the children's cover
and the children could probably handle my
cover. The dog changes a bit.
KIRSTY WARK:
There is no editing, no swearing, no
difference, just the dust jacket?
GERMAINE GREER:
That's one of the things I like about this
book so much. The adults appear so self-
indulgent and so violent and crazy, and they
are mad. You see the psychopathology of
everyday life suddenly thrown up on this
screen with this grave child examining it. We
are all a bit in that position. We are all a
bit autistic in that way. Partly because we
are all writers probably. We spend a lot of
time not being with other people. To me,
there was a continuity here and there was a
kind of hope.