The Head of the United Nations organisation charged with stopping the proliferation of nuclear weapons had an upbeat message about Iran: progress was being made.
Mohamed El Baradei has to report on the state of world nuclear security. Since his last report, there've been astonishing revelations from the man behind Pakistan's attempts to build a nuclear device.
Our Diplomatic Editor, Mark Urban, went to see Mr El Baradei to talk about his concerns.
MARK URBAN:
For the past two months there have
been weekly revelations about the
Pakistan connection in nuclear
proliferation. AQ Khan and other
scientists have been interrogated
about a series of discoveries which
demonstrates the biggest leakage of
nuclear know-how for decades. From
his base in Pakistan, Dr Khan
directed a shipping operation in the
Emirates. They sent centrifuge parts
capable of enriching uranium to
weapons grade to Iran. Last month,
the IAEA discovered a more advanced
centrifuge plant, showing traces of
uranium, one that the Iranians had
not previously owned up to. Khan's
operations also sold Libya centrifuge
technology, as well as atomic bomb
designs and almost two tons of
uranium. Investigations have shown
that the Libyan and Iranian plant was
made in Malaysia to Khan's
specifications. Investigators are now
looking for evidence of shipment to
other countries. There are already
indications that North Korea was
receiving assistance too, leaving a
host of unanswered questions. This
issue has provoked an unprecedented
challenge for the world's nuclear
policemen, the IAEA. Next week, their
board will meet to consider how they
should respond to the latest
discoveries in Iran and Pakistan. You
have talked about discrepancies and
unanswered questions in the case of
Iran. What do you want them to do
now?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI
DIRECTOR GENERAL, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY:
Frankly, I want them to give me every
bits and pieces of their nuclear
programme, including all of the R and
D they have done in the past, all
their activities. I need to have a
comprehensive, complete, accurate
picture. We have got a lot, I must
say. Iran has been co-operating post
last October, since they decided to
come clean, according to their
statement. But, I was a bit disturbed
by the fact that some R and D
activities have not been declared to
us as part of their declaration. I'm
emphasising to them that to build
confidence, you need to be proactive.
You need to give me prompt, detailed
information of all what you have
done.
MARK URBAN:
When you make discoveries, like these
unwelcome discoveries you made there,
does that in your mind, cast doubt
about whether they are talking to you
in good faith?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
It, of course, raises the question,
is there anything else they haven't
discovered? That is not helpful
neither to them or to us. Then we
start the process all over again. I
told them that, I trust, I hope that
this was the last time that something
would come trickling down again, from
their past activities. Large or
small, it is important they declare
everything to build the confidence.
MARK URBAN:
The Pakistanis have had a big
investigation, looking at their
scientists and what they may or may
not have been doing. Have they been
passing the results to you?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
The Pakistanis have been co-operating
well, I should say. They have been
briefing us on the result of their
investigations. We still need lots
more information from the Pakistanis.
As you know, there is this question
of contamination of imports in Iran.
I would like to know whether the
contamination of equipment is a
result of enrichment in Pakistan or a
result of enrichment in Iran. That is
a crucial question. That raises the
question is there any undeclared
activities in Iran? What we have
discovered is not that the whole lot
is coming from Pakistan. AQ Khan, as
we have learnt, has been the chairman
of the board if you like. But he has
been delegating. Lots of
manufacturing, lots of equipment
procurement in different parts of the
world. Not necessarily that
everything that has come to Iran has
been manufactured in Pakistan, but
probably has been co-ordinated.
MARK URBAN:
What do you make of this? A couple
years ago, would you have conceived
that proliferation activities on this
scale would have been going on?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
I would not have conceived that. I
think it's coming as a total shock to
pretty much everyone. We have heard
there is some underground efforts to
procure equipment, to elicit drafting
some nuclear material from the former
Soviet Union, but it is beyond
anyone's imagination, at least beyond
mine, that such a sophisticated,
complex network of black market in
nuclear equipment, in nuclear
facilities, even bomb design, has
been going on underground.
MARK URBAN:
Is there anyone else we don't know
about? There is North Korea, Libya,
Iran. We hear he offered assistance
to Iraq, but was refused in the '90s.
Is there any other country that they
were dealing with?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
This is the million dollar question
and it's a very important question in
fact because we worry, I worry
whether any other countries have got
the equipment, have got the
knowledge, the design. That is really
a major part of our focus right now,
trying to work with the Libyans, with
the Pakistanis, the Iranians, to see
whether anything else, any similar
equipment has trickled to any other
country.
MARK URBAN:
What is the answer to the million
dollar question in your mind at this
particular point?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
It is still an open question. We know
that AQ Khan has not just been
working for money. There is an
ideology involved. We need to
understand the motivations, we need
to understand and try again to put
some pieces and put some pieces of
puzzle together, to see whether any
country have gotten that. We have
been sending the message around. If
any of you have any of this equipment
or knowledge, it's better to declare
it to us at this point.
MARK URBAN:
How difficult does it make your job
that some of these people involved
with the Pakistan connection, could
just say they were involved in a
legitimate business, supplying
precision engineering or electronics?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
It is an absolutely major loophole in
the system of export control that
many of these people can say exactly
that this is a legitimate business.
We are doing precision engineering.
We are manufacturing part of
centrifuges. There is nothing illegal
about it. But I think that is one of
the lessons we learned. We need
national laws to criminalise any
effort by any individuals or
companies that aim to illicitly
traffic in equipment or material that
could lead to nuclear weapon
proliferation.
MARK URBAN:
Do you think that Libya had a nuclear
weapons programme. Would you
characterise it in that way?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
I think Libya was in the preparatory
stage of developing a capability that
would move it to acquire a nuclear
weapon. It was a matter of time as I
have always said. It was not there
yet. Most of the know-how was still
in boxes. There was still lots of
work to be done. Given the capability
they acquired from outside, I think
it was a matter of time before they
could have acquired a nuclear bomb.
North Korea however is a different
ball game because North Korea has
been quite advanced in fact in the
past even before any assistance from
Mr Khan. They had a processing plant,
they had, they have the capability to
produce plutonium, if they haven't
done it already. They have been
operating without any international
oversight for a couple of years now.
I have always said that North Korea
is my number one, non-proliferation
concern.
MARK URBAN:
Do you think the invasion of Iraq
empowered your work in Iran or Libya?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
I think it empowered my work in some
sense. It showed an inspection was
working in Iraq, that we managed to
disarm Iraq through an inspection. It
empowered my work by telling people
you should give me more time to
complete my job. You need to be
patient. These things take time. In
that sense, it also empowered my work
because people are taking
verification very seriously, they
know that this could make the
difference between war and peace.
MARK URBAN:
So to some extent, they have been
intimidated, those regimes or not do you think?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
I think maybe a positive message that
came out of Iraq, that the
international community will not
tolerate proliferation of weapons of
mass destruction and in that sense it
helps me of course with my work.
MARK URBAN:
Does make to difference to you if you
are being bugged as well?
MOHAMED EL BARADEI:
I think I work on the assumption that
I am being bugged. It doesn't make
you feel good because it is an
invasion of privacy. It also sends a
cynical message frankly that some
people are more equal than others.
Some can bug you and get an advantage
over others. If we really need
multinational work to proceed
effectively, you need have to have a
level playing field.
MARK URBAN:
Dr Baradei, thank you very much.
This transcript was produced from the teletext subtitles that are generated live for Newsnight. It has been checked against the programme as broadcast, however Newsnight can accept no responsibility for any factual inaccuracies. We will be happy to correct serious errors.