[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Saturday, 18 February 2006, 14:22 GMT
Challenge bank charges, says lawyer
By Paul Lewis
BBC Radio 4's Money Box

People at cash machines
Bank charges have been attracting increasing criticism

Bank customers across Britain are being encouraged to challenge penalty charges after claims they are unlawful.

A Scottish law centre supported by Citizens Advice in Scotland has drawn up a letter which challenges the right of banks to charge 30 for going overdrawn without permission or missing a credit card payment date.

Lawyers claim charges at that level break the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, which say consumers must not be charged "a disproportionately high sum".

Mike Dailly, Principal Solicitor at the Govan Law Centre told BBC Radio 4's Money Box programme that charges of 30 certainly breached that rule.

"The law says if someone breaches their contract, for example you go over your overdraft without permission, the bank's only entitled to recover its actual loss," he said.

In most cases the banks are paying up. Some people are getting all their money back
Mike Dailly, solicitor
"If you get an automated letter from your bank for going over your limit, that costs about 50p. So why should someone get a 36 letter for that transaction?".

His views were echoed by a Money Box listener from Yorkshire.

"The bank put its charges right at the end of the month just before I got paid," he said.

"I didn't have the funds to meet it and so two of my payments bounced and I was charged 36 for each one - that's 72.

"I am a computer programmer. I know what's involved and I think the charges are far in excess of what it costs the banks."

"You get overdrawn 3 and you're charged 36. It's absolutely ridiculous."

Human intervention

Ian Mullen, British Bankers' Association
We know students today are in financial difficulty
Ian Mullen, BBA
But Ian Mullen, Chief Executive of the British Banker's Association (BBA), told the programme that banks were not charging customers more than the actual cost.

"No we're not. The banking systems are geared to an automatic process, so when a cheque or a charge sends an account overdrawn or over an agreed limit this involves manual intervention: to extract the item from the day's work, to research the customer's recent credit profile, and then a managerial decision as to whether to return the unpaid item."

He confirmed that "in the majority of cases" a human intervened in imposing a default charge.

However, Mike Dailly claims customers who have used his letter - which cites case law in Scotland and England as well as the regulations that apply throughout the UK - are getting their charges refunded.

"In most cases the banks are paying up. Some people are getting all their money back," he said.

"For example, I had an e-mail from one saying: 'I used your letter and got 900 back'. Some are getting a percentage of the charges back. What we're finding is the banks are very reluctant to see this come before a senior court."

But Ian Mullen claimed that many of these successes were students who the banks recognised had problems: "We're dealing with students, and banks are very keen to see that students are serviced optimally. We know students today are in financial difficulty."

BBC Radio 4's Money Box was broadcast on Saturday, 18 February, 2006, at 1204 GMT.

The programme will be repeated on Sunday, 19 February, 2006, at 2102 GMT.

Money Box



Download or subscribe to this programme's podcast

Podcast Help

Late credit card fees 'too high'
26 Jul 05 |  Business
UK banks' 3bn overdraft 'sting'
02 Sep 04 |  Business
Have Your Say: Bank charges
18 Feb 06 |  Moneybox

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific