Contact us

We want to hear your comments, opinions, thoughts and ideas on the programme or the website.

Click here to e-mail us

Let the HARDtalk team know what you think about our presenters; tell us what you thought about a particular guest, or let us know who you'd like to see on the programme. The comments published on this page reflect the balance of views we receive.

Please note that we regret we do not have the resources to provide transcripts of our programmes!

To make a formal complaint about HARDtalk or any other BBC programme or service, please visit the BBC's complaints website.

BBC Complaints website

Click here to read comments June - December 2007

Click here to read comments January - June 2008

---

So here I am in a military outpost with the boys - in the middle east tonight (New Years Day) and we actually get some satellite television time. You guys are interviewing some cricket player about his breakdown on the field, how tough it was for him to be on the road and leave his family behind, how hard it is to live in a flash hotel with full service everything, how stressfull his life was as a player making more money than one can spend in a life time. Wish we could have got the name of the player and the interviewer. Both were a couple of damned pussies.

Try leaving your family for a year or more, living in a tent when life is good - or sleeping on the ground, everyone wants to hurt you, you gat to talk to your family for 15 minutes every two to three weeks .. Next time leave them both at home - thought the guys here were going to wreck the telly watching these two.
Beebs, Middle East

Pls pass along these few comments to the interviewer I heard on or about Dec 25 chatting with Russian pianist Vladimir Ashkenazy .. As a former pianist I want to say that the interview was poignant and skillful. Drawing my attention to the smallness of Vlad's tiny paws explains much. Nervy and courageous doing Rach's 3rd was something even Josef Hoffman did not attempt (Josef had Steinway build a smaller keyboard, but even that did not solve his problems) Ol' Sergie had big paws and when he way dying was heard to say "bye-bye, dear friends...you've served me well." (in russian, of course!)
Don Newlands, Canada

Arround the conversation with Maestro Ashkenazy an essential matter was touched, as usual (not because of the programme), wrongly. In summary: only a very small amount of people have the capacity to enjoy real art or/and speculative thinking; this has nothing to do with economical situation; many people attending live performances, talking about classical music or art in general are fakes. Nietzsche talked about "ethical art" , mediocre, but for the majorities; and "real art" for a (genetic) "elite" .. I have abandoned the live performances and "music lovers groups" because of the above reasons. I have listened horrible snores in Bayreuther Festspiele and the Met. And heard incredible stupidities about musical works of art coming for high prized critics.
Juan Merello-Galasso, M.D., Chile

I have just watched a discussion between Stephen Sackur and Vladimir Ashkenazy and was very disappointed by one of Stephen's remarks. Apparently, he is under the impression that "working class" people have no access to or interest in, classical music. I would like to correct this image and assure the "upper classes" that we are more equal that they would like to admit. Or are "they" afraid of that? I expected better from Stephen. Disappointed.
David Raye, Canada

For the first time your interview brought tears, real tears to my eyes ! A warm and beloved genius and you brought the humanity of this ikon to life ! I bought every one of his CDs and treasure them. My mother was a classical pianist and I remember her playing Brahms and Beethoven for me on her Bechstein grand from my earliest years and generating my lifelong love of classical music. I only wish you had had an hour with him in Liverpool ! Thanks again for a wonderful interview ! Your own affection for Ashkenazy came came across loud and clear !
Kish Hahn, Waterloo, Canada

As a feminist professor in one of Europe's leading business schools, I had to respond to Stephen Sackur's provocative questioning of Marie O'Riordan. From my vantage point, the only feminist perspective on the show was that of Sackur's -- Marie O'Riordan's defence that magazines like Marie Clare celebrate women's economic power is ridiculous and at the same time dangerous. Sackur rightly argued that fashion sedation is a form of feminist betrayal. Each year in my classroom, I teach the next generation of female and male business leaders, and never once do I mention a handbag or party dress. It's hard to deny that magazines like Marie Clare have a place within our culture, but it's ridiculous to imply that this is a valuable celebration of female leadership and power. Women can do more than aspire to the catwalk. Well done, Stephen Sackur!
Dr. Gail Whiteman, Netherlands

I have just watched your Hardtalk interview this morning with Marie O'Riordan... a very interesting lady... harsh- shame on you the BBC! I would like to see the figures for female employee representation in management etc in the BBC company set up! One of your comments in this interview,'We struggle to get women to be interviewed on this show...' Well try having a female interviewer!!!! Maybe too empathetic for your liking???
Jenni Kitchiner, uk, bedfordshire

I watched the interview with Ojo Maduekwe, the Nigerian Foreign Minister. It was a shame that he could not answer the questions asked him in an honest and straight way. We have many problems in Nigeria and it is just unfortunate that the present government is not doing anything about it, all they know is how to divert public funds to their personal pockets.
Temple Ogbonna, Nigeria

I would like to say thank you to Stephen Sackur for his Hard Talk interviews. I particularly loved his interview of Studs Terkel and today I watched his interview of Leah Chishugi. Mr Sackur is always a gentleman and it's refreshing to see programmes prepared by BBC journalists who still manage to provide us with up to date information without browbeating their guests or using the time to draw attention to themselves.
Patricia Clark, Italy

Mister Steiner is apparently oblivious to what sank Kyoto, as he continues to bang the drum for wealth redistribution from the industrialized nations to the emerging markets. Any agreement that places the lion's share of finacial responsibility upon the industrialized nations of Europe, North America and the Pacific Rim while at the same time forcing the majority of caps and cuts on them is doomed. No nation is going to place itself at an economic disadvantage for the sake of some nebulous "global good." It's no mystery why many people, including many scientists, have concluded that global warming has far more to do with Socialism than science.
Peter Olson, USA

Martti Ahtisaari. Terrific interview! He ALMOST smiled as you shook hands! Hardtalk is the best of the best on BBC World News!
Kish Hahn, Waterloo, Canada

Hi, I'm so glad because i watched the interview with Fernando Henrique Cardoso by Stephen Sackur. There's no justice in Brazil. But Mr. Sackur makes justice for long-suffering brazilian people. Congratulations, Thank you very much! God bless BBC!
Diego Lós, Brazil

I enjoy your show HARDtalk and watch often. I am finding more and more that the commentator does not allow guests to answer anything. They are cut off before any answer can even be formed and the host seems to enjoy only hearing himself speak. I noticed this especially with the interviews of the Georgian Foreign Minister and US Republican strategist. I am not a big fan of either person but I wanted to hear them answer tough questions. Instead all I heard was your host's bravado and love of hearing himself speak. If I was in an interview with him he would know I would want to be allowed to at least finish a sentence. I feel that completely limits the conversational process and the results of this show.
Dylaan K, USA

Congrats to Stephen to bring out conflicting views from very obviously politically correct Carly Fiorina. Sarah Palin as a choice for the republican party does not spell doom for the party alone but I dare say, the entire democracy itself. Dark ages to age of reason to age of enlightenment to now age of ignorance? Palin, Zuma, what next?
Anu, HK

What i like about HARDtalk is Stephen represents the majority of people left out in World issues. When you look at the body language and answers of Stephen's opponent you will know the true leader of the people.
Mach Achiek, Australia

Excellent interview with the Georgian Foreign Minister this week where it would appear that Georgia had been economical with the truth regarding Abkhazia and South Ossetia. In view of this interview, are there any intentions to invite Sergei Ivanov back to HARDtalk for his response?
George Iain Best, Scotland

Hardtalk is really a very good programme because it is focusing on and discussing global problems and issues including politics and its effects on the people at grass roots level. Therefore, just like a court of law, it brings world leaders especially the polticians to justice and the verdict of this court is passed by people watching the programme. As a result of this, I'm a regular viewer of this programme. What attracts me more is that Stephen Sackur really knows how to corner his guests in order to let them air out the truth. Thanks
Serafino Musa ABDELKARIM Augustino, Sudan

This is the BEST program on earth. I salute to Stephen Sackur on this program and his excellent questions and outstanding analysis.
V Siva, Toronto, Canada

I was very dismayed today watching HardTalk with Mr Lakota. Mr Stephen Sackur was constantly interrupting and disregarding Mr Lakota. Instead of an engaging debate, Mr Sackur would ignore Mr Lakota's comments and ask the next question on his list. A good inquisitor should take into consideration the information presented to him at the moment and respond appropriately. I was impressed to see Mr Lakota remain calm and eloquent throughout most of the interview. During an interesting discussion of of South Africa's Politics Mr Lakota focused on policy, whlie Mr Sackur turned to mostly irrelevant personal comments ... A healthy democracy relies on healthy open debate focused on policy and options, with inclusion of all parties. I find BBC World News some of the best and least biased available to me, but I was very disappointed with the style of attack-debate today.
Tanya Roussy, Canada

I just watched Stephen Sackur's interview with Richard Lambert and I want to say that Sackur did an excellent job of pushing back against Lambert's ideological-based answers to ask some really deep and probing questions that I don't think Lambert really wanted to answer. I wish we had more of that kind of intellectual honesty as Sackur showed on this side of the Atlantic, especially with Obama choosing a team of economic advisers who scare me as being all to similiar in their economic worldview as Lambert.
Mike Feinstein, United States

Dear Stephen, I enjoy your programme very much but I think your interview with the shrewd intelligent Israeli prime minister has to change to a Middle East debate like Mr Sebastian's. I think you stand better on your mettle when you are on British ground. When you asked the prime minister about the occupied territories he didn't answer but quickly shot back at you saying "occupied by whom? for whom?". So be careful.
Dr Abusham Widatallah, Sudan

Stephen, thank you for bringing discussions about important issues in Hard Talk. I really enjoy watching the programmes. I was disappointed to hear CEO of Eden Project 'pontificating' about the need for corporations not to pursue profit maximisation. I wonder how much carbon footprint is added by attractions such as the Eden Project which are in the middle of nowhere and can be reached only by road. Collecting and displaying plants from all around the world and even the name 'Eden' are all examples of a particular worldview which is not necessarily very different in ethos from that of profitseeking corporations that the speaker was criticising .. The bottom line to debates about sustainable development is this: how serious we all in the developed world are to accept a reduction in the quality of our life - not maintain but a reduction. Can we do with fewer car journeys even if it means our children can attend fewer extra-curricular activities in the evenings and weekends? Are we willing to accept limited choices and adapt our tastes? While it is easy to blame corporations, they are simply magnifying the basis of rationality that each of us exercise as individuals.
P.B. Anand, UK

I am writing to HARDtalk team to express my interest in watching this program, and thank all of them for their effort and concerning the quality of it.
Adel Abudhir, Libya

Brilliant interview with Sir Hugh Orde. I strongly support that gentleman. Pollice should do everything in their power to make us safer. Everything what is not illegal. Why even talk with terrorists .. Police should work with politicians, and all other instruments of state to make world better place.
Luka, portugal

Hard talk is a programme which gives insights into linguistics, politics and psychology - a true masterpiece.
Anna Bak, Poland

Thank God for BBC. Stephen Sackur is awesome.
Richard Kerr, Canada

I have to say that I am impressed with how amusing and professional this program is. I would like to thank each and everyone behind this program, especially Stephen, a very neutral and excellent journalist, and most of all his courage when he had an interview with Dutch MP Geert Wilders.
Sal, Kuwait

That was the worst & ill prepared interview from the Russian energy minister. Arrogant and not informed. He clearly does not know what he is saying.
Tomas Kisa, England

I love listening Hard Talk, but today it was impossible to understand what Aitzaz Ahsan is saying as the interviewer didn't let him talk at all - interrupted him all the time or talked at the same time. If I understood it correctly, the name of the interviewer is Zeinab Badawi and I suggest she'd learn to listen more and talk less (learn it from Stephen Sackur).
Ruuta, EST

Brilliant interview with Dr. Fenwick, thanks for giving a great tribune to this inspiring and passionate scientist. We need to hear more leaders like Dr. Fenwick to raise our awarness of the real problems that are affecting the people of this planet. Caroline Charette, India

I have just watched your interview with Professor Alan Fenwick on the topic of Neglected Tropical Diseases. As an African who is very familiar with the environment described in your interview, I was very interested in the issues discussed. Unfortunately you do not publish transcripts of your interviews or do podcasts. Given the importance of the subjects discussed in your interviews, isn't it time you join the rest of your colleagues by participating fully in the BBC's digital revolution? Podcasting gives listeners the flexibility to consume your highly informative programs as and when they see fit. Please start podcasting. Donald Kallon , United Kingdom

Stephen Sackur is is a tremendous journalist; among the best. I congratulate the whole Hardtalk team on their relevant and unflinching approach to interviews. This show offers a breath of fresh air in a world dominated by suffocating namby pamby U.S. interviewers. Keep up the good work.
Stephen Magee, Canada

I would like to congratulate Stephen Sackur on his excellent program. I just love the way he conducts the interviews asking questions that we, the viewers, would like to ask.
Farid Jabrane, Brazil

I just saw my first hardtalk show ever and it was with the labor union leader, he was great! your host was a bit one sided though, what does that mean? Is the UK pulling for another radical republican president? Please, stay out of it!
L.Sullivan, USA

I would like to compliment you on the Hardtalk programme. In particular Stephen Sackur ,who is absolutely brilliant. Since moving to Trinidad from the UK ,I have been watching the BBC News channel religiously and have found it to be both informative and entertaining. Congratulations. PS Is Stephen Sackur really that well informed?
Chris Hasanally, Trinidad

Dear Mr. Sackur, Thank you for your Hard Talk with Richard Trumka. It is a superb debate and since the day I watched it I can not stop thinking about what Mr Trumka said: the economy is not like the weather,...They gave us the illusion of wealth,... and many other wonderfully put statements that I recall everyday. I'm becoming an addict of Hard Talk. Is this healthy?
Rafiki Ubaldo, Sweden

Your interview with Pakistan High commisioner to UK was engrossing and well researched. The Commissioner was unable to give a gratifying answer to your intelligent questions and showed the weakness of this government to handle the key issues inflicting Pakistan at the moment.
Suman Hammad, Pakistan

Hello, Although I find BBC to be generally great, Stephen Sackur just has to go, please!!! He is an unenlightened bully who has such a negative slant on things, he's quite painful to watch. Former Hard Talks were so much better... Have Mr. Sackur bully sportsmen or something. His interviews are useless and counter-productive. This is not "hard talk" but "stupid talk." Journalists should be constructive and not destructive in their endeavors, trying to find a solution to things, not fanning the flames... Thank you.
Susanne Walker, France

I am a 61 year old former Brit, and I have spent my life living in Barbados and most recently Cape Town. Stephen Sackur is the very best interviewer I have ever had the pleasure of watching.I try and watch every single Hardtalk, and I am never disappointed.He tells it like it is,he is extremely intelligent, and has some of his guests feeling very uncomfortable.Keep on going with your great in depth interviews Stephen.
fiona gardner, South Africa

I do not watch your HardTalk frequently for the very reason that the host is too aggressive and eager to appear tough. Trying to take advantage by interrupting and unnecessarily trying to appear as tough talker even when there is no need for it, but every attack by the host to Mr.Brzezinski turned out to be a boomerang, I liked that! and Thank you for bringing such people.
Syed Tanweer, Canada

I am constantly horrified by the pathetic interviewing skills of most journalists in the mainstream media. With your apparent crack team of researchers and the nimble, deft instincts of Stephen Sackur (who is, by far, my favourite interviewer out there these days) your program is constantly stimulating, informative and uplifting. Please keep up the splendid work.
Karen Pinchin, Canada

The best show on TV. Mr. Sackur should receive a knighthood many times over. How will you possibly write all these great interviews into book I ask Mr. Sackur? And when will see this great book and proffer from the wisdom you have gained? I had hoped in the latest Brzezinski interview that you would to put to him the question of how he proposes Obama is going to "reeducate" common Americans about engaging with the rest of the world when Obama countenances and indulges the same American mythology and myopia that I think got America into this mess in the first place.
Jason, Canada/US/Britain

Just a note to say that the interview with Gary Bauer was one of the most enjoyable shows that I have seen in a long time! Both Stephen and Gary Bauer articulated their views clearly without falling into the traditional rhetoric. Forceful, respectful, enlightening, well done guys!
Bill Arbo, Brazil

I think that HardTalk is one of the most significant, important, and potentially incredibly influential presentations on the old and new media. It is disappointing that it does not yet have a higher profile in the mainstream global media. Congratulations to all of you at the BBC and I only wish that your outstanding work could be at the forefront of global discourse. Steve Sackur is an incredibly intelligent, deeply researched, polite but firm, challenger - and the front face of a wonderful team: I just wish that your collective work could be more widely recognised. Thank you again for your wonderful professionalism and your service to humanity.
Chris Horn, Ireland

Today I watched the Hardtalk interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, and I was really impressed by the views expressed by Zbigniew Brzezinski regarding foreign policy. His opinions of what the next president of the US should do regarding foreign policy are in conjunction with what the most of the rest of the world expects. In the concluding stages of the interview he talked about the need of American people to understand the world. I felt pleasant that he said what he said because I have never heard any American leader, except for Obama talking the need for America to go along with the world with consensus and not alone using its military might. That is why it is no surprise why most of the world prefers Obama to McCain.
Vipul, India

The few times I watched HARDtalk, depending on who’s being interviewed – Z. Brzezinski in this case - I am left with the belief that Stephen should try getting himself elected – if he would like to influence anyone from his bully pulpit!
Mechel-Linus Selkin, Canada

I just watched Zbigniew Brzezinski's interview on Hardtalk. On one side, I was impressed by the old man's wits and insight and on the other horrified by what you (BBC) call a 'respected' journalist. Sackur was a TOTAL embarassment. He was ill prepared and asked irrelevent questions and wrongly insisted on what his guest politely called 'silly' questions. He was no match for the respected guest.
Sil, Canada

I want to congratulate you on the excellent interview you did with Brazilian film director Walter Salles. It was informative, entertaining, and motivating--I showed the interview for my English students here in Brazil and they were very happy to see a Brazilian speaking English in a real-life situation. Please, do more interviews with Brazilians.
Denis da Rocha Xavier, Brazil

My boyfriend and I listened to the Hardtalk interview with Dr Tom Pike yesterday on the BBC World Service while driving to his parents for lunch. I must say, we both became *extremely* annoyed with the interviewer's persistent attacks on Dr. Pike's work and its (in the interviewer's opinion) questionable value to society.

How incredibly ignorant and stupid can you get?! If you cancelled every scientific research program which in the eyes of the public did not help with a particular issue (say climate change), then it would only take one decade until we had eradicated any scientific progress at all .. Furthermore, the exploration of Mars is a vital goal for humanity! How can we call ourselves a developed, open-minded and adult species if we refuse to explore beyond the fence of our own backyard? And even if there are immediate problems that need solving in this little backyard, it would be FOOLISH to force every single person to blinker their curiosity to searching for a solution towards this one problem only .. Next time you interview such an eminent scientist, it is NOT up to you, dear interviewer, to question the value of their life's work. Show some respect.
Carina Uehr, Australia

Congratulations to Stephen Sackur on Hard Talk to challenge what I regard as madness - trying to find out, if we humans could live on Mars one day! I was waiting for a real challenge: Don't you think the billions of Dollars spent on space exploration would be better spent on providing fresh water for all here on earth first?

But perhaps even atheistic scientists believe what the bible predicted long ago - this present earth will not last forever. So let's all relocate to Mars! God has a better place in mind, Mr. Pike, trust me!
Dieter Fischer, Australia

No cries no shrieks of pure journalistic angst. In this age of tabloid news catering to over half of the world audience, Stephen Sackur really has managed to put on a 25 min show that matters to the saner audience. This is the difference between a genuine professional approach & mere gonzo-journalism.
Amjad Hakro, Pakistan

Last evening I watched Hardtalk with Trevor Manuel. As ever Stephen Sackur was polite corteous but firm. The South African Finance Minister was however evasive, condescending & it seemed to me derisory. Not one question was answered. I understand that politicions like to put their own slant on things but he was down right rude to Mr Sackur. As the programme progressed I found myself becoming more angry with the man for he made a mockery of what could have been an informative interview. He seemed intent on insulting Mr Sackur at every opportunity by stating that any points raised were incorrect or "I don't know where you got that from" .. God help the South African people if this man is a true representative of the politicians who have the task of governing South Africa.
Patricia Hoare, UK

Excellent interview with Oliver Kamm and Nouriel Roubini!! For the first time in weeks, someone (Roubini here) gave a lucid account of the extent of the economic crisis, the fallout, and constructive suggestions on how it can be put right. Un fortunately he has a sombre attitude, and his attitude spells "doom". Congress would have dome well to take his advice; specially where he speaks of separating the bad apples from the good apples. Thank you Stephen Sackur and BBC. That was satisfying.
Rotna Das, India

Excellent questions on interview with Alexei Pushkov. Was most impressed with the frankness exchanged and by the answers given. Never watched Hardtalk before...will watch daily!
Y KERR, scotland

Hard Talk is the one programme I will not miss if I can help it. It opens a window on the world and helps me understand issues. My friends have been told not to phone at 8 pm when Hard Talk is on! And Stephen Sackur is superb -- such breadth. Better than even Tim Sebastian.
Suguna Ramanathan, India

I really appreciate this program. Stephen is a very nice journalist. I loved when he had as a guest President Lula and Gilberto Gil. I would like to watch a program with Barack Obama and Hugo Chavez, that would be very interesting .. As I wake up very early to go work, I never leave my home without watching news on the BBC. Congratulations, it is an amazing TV channel.
Ester Silva, Brazil

By far the best reporting interview I have ever witnessed. The direction and clarity of the entire piece was so simple to follow that a person sitting in a mud hut in the middle of nowhere could draw from this all the presenter wished to convey and I wish with my whole being that more reporting was conducted in such a manner. Just imagine if we were to interview heads of state before they take office in this manner. Well I feel Hardtalk is the best program to come out of the BBC in its entire history. My second choice is Democracy Now. Thank you ever so much for your time and dedication to reporting.
claris drouet, US

This program is an example of what an interview should be; you are the voice of all of us who cannot get to talk to these persons. Great job guys, and don't ever back down; get that answer, we are watching and listening.
Andre Leonard, Barbados

Stephen, Interesting that the Western press can sit down with Mr. Shalit and call his son by his first name, Gilad, but that we have never seen an interview to my knowledge with a member of the Palestinian family from Beit Hanoun in which they are called by their first names, even though Israel has completely ignored an calls for an open inquiry and denied any responsibility to financially pay compensation.

A key moment of your interview tonight was when you tried to make the point that the Palestinians had been suffering long before Gilad Shalit's suffering began. For Mr. Shalit, it's "not about that". There is no sense of cause and effect for Israeli dispossession of Palestinians, and the occupation which began in 1967. Perhaps Mr. Shalit should have a long chat with Jeff Halper on the occupation, or Ilan Pappe on 1948. Or, perhaps YOU should. On Hardtalk. These Israelis and the rest of the world are so insulated from the true reality in Palestine. And the press certainly doesn't do much to bring the issue into the full light of day.
Carl Zaisser

Yesterday's interview on Iran (23/9/08) was masterful. The questions Stephen kept throwing out were questions I had been wanting to ask for ages. Please keep up the momentum.
Jeff Hambleton, Thailand

I am extremely angry with your consistent opposition to the NSG exception granted to India. You must know that nuclear energy, and concomitant zero greenhouse emissions, is good for India as well as the world. Also, a giant country like India needs a minimum nuclear deterrent, particularly with China and Pakistan as neighbors. But, what I really want to add is that the country least deserving of nuclear weapons is your Great Britain. Britain has become irrelevant to world affairs. Your foreign, economic and defense policy is completely mortgaged to USA. Yet, so many Brits continue to have an imperial hangover - believing that they still count in world affairs.
Nandu Madhekar, India

Stephen, I've watched your interview with Mr. Saakashvili, president of Georgia, and have to say that the world has learned a lot about president Saakashvili. In the interview president of Georgia mentioned his 78% approval in Georgia and his alignment with President Bush. What President of Georgia didn't mention is that President Bush had a 90% approval in the US and now that approval is at 28%. The Georgians are patriotic and proud people and the rating is reflective of that but once the true issues and people's hardships come to forefront Mr. Saakashvili's ratings and popularity will reflect that of his mentor G.W. Bush. Ouch!!!
Goran, Canada

I believe the way you conduct your interviews with so many personalities from around the world on such broad topics across the board is very unique. However allow me to comment about the interview you had with Georgian President. I believe it was so soft that it felt more like a soft ball game or similar to a badminton match. This Gentleman (Georgian President) believes he can use the international media to cover his actions. His decisions have the possibility to send the world back decades. I am not Russian, but I want the truth and yes I ‘can handle the truth!’
Theo Moussageas, Australia

Fantastic interview Stephen!! Great job you did, asking all the right questions and standing your ground fearlessly! Wow what a breath of fresh air!! What a joy to watch! Kinda sad though if that's the best they can do for a prime minister! I could feel him squirm and squirm he should! .. man you had me talking back to the TV .. haven't done that in years!! Cheers! Keep up the good work Stephen! Hardtalk rocks!!
Kazz, Canada

I'm sure you would have been justified if you had gone for a good shot of Scotch whiskey after your interview of the motor-mouth US asset President of Georgia. You did a great job, calling up your best thrust-and-parry skills and showing him up for what he is. I pity the Georgian people having such a 'leader'. How about having Kevin Phillips on his book, "Bad Money" on the show to discuss the financial melt-down?
Diana Jewell, Canada

Hi Stephen. Your style of presenting the HardTalk show is very engrossing. Your intelligent questions & queries are great. I hardly miss any of your shows. Your last one with Mr. Monks (european labour confedaration) was very informative.
Amit Agarwala, India

Your program is great. It is the most hard-hitting of all news shows. Your guest today, Mr Glassman, is twisting words .. trying to condone a failed USA policy around the world. The war on terror is as good as the war on drugs. What lies, and Americans keep falling for all of them. How naive they are. The rest of the world has eyes more open. Thank you.
Edwin Franel, Argentina

Dear Mr. Sackur, Having just watched your HardTalk interview with U.S. Under Secretary of State James Glassman, you touched on a long term, fundamental contradiction in U.S. foreign policy, but unfortunately failed to "drive the nail home". Namely, that the United States seeks to promote democracy, inherently politically unstable, while seeking and reaping the profits of political stability (dictatorships) at the same time. America cannot "have its cake and eat it too". Before Mr. Glassman preaches to others the virtues of democracy, perhaps he should first convince himself and his own country, stop supporting dictatorships, and punishing people for election results not in America's interest. The fact is America is afraid of democracy, for the simple reason most people will not vote in America's interest, rather in their own.
Steven Trop, Germany

Stephen, I am your enthusiastic fan! I love hardtalk so much that wouldn't miss one. I think it's the best talk show in the world. I live in Canada now but already begin to worry and wonder if this programme can be watched in Beijing too (because I will go back China next June)? Please keep on doing! you are making the world more meaningful and beautiful! Thank your fantastic team!
Bing Qiao, Canada

I will be a bit of a maverick here, reading the other comments. I have watched a few programmes when traveling in Europe (Bishop Greg Venables interview for instance), and find this programme to be anything but "hard talk". The Bill Browder interview is the case in point: not "hard-hitting" without evidence of "detailed research and in-depth investigations". Not addressing the difficult questions, it betrays the naivete of the interviewer. I don't think he "gets behind the stories" and for the life of me can't see why Stephen Sackur is billed as "one of the BBC's most respected journalists" He tends to latch on to some trivial and/or irrelevant point and assign importance to it: "you knew that you were swimming in 'shark infested waters'! What is the point here? That prior knowledge of the danger implies consent to Russian government abuse? .. I find the programme shallow, half baked and....well cowardly. It fails to live up to its title!
George Andrews, Canada

I believe Hardtalk is a very informative show with complete details for all viewers, and this serves as a mouthpiece in analysing global socio- economic and socio-political issues.
David Abebrese, Virginia, USA

BBC Hardtalk = Stephen Sackur = Awesome. When he is indisposed, pls cancel the program - others just don't have the bite!
Anu, HK

The answer to the question is not to debate the Niger Delta. Your team should go like you have done in some places, then reflect on what you see. If you are not touched then you are not human. Human lifes is better than money.
Felix Obums, Belgium

I'm a regular viewer of Mr Sackur and Hard Talk. Thorough preparedness; probing unbiased and intelligent questions; and guests who are in a position to know. It's rare to see such quality journalism that invariably gets to the heart of the matter. Similar CNN programs are at best tabloid by comparison. Thank you to Mr. Sackur and his team.
John Holwell, Canada

Stephen Sackur is a true professional and so very polished and knowledgeable in the way he conducts his interviews. So enjoyed the Ingrid Betancourt interview during which Stephen actually briefly displayed his emotion. This is proof of the man he really is but which, by the nature of the programme, you seldom get to see. In my opinion, he is the very best man for the interviews he conducts and can be extremely probing when this is needed, which lives up to the "Hard Talk" interviewing requirement and reputation. Well done Stephen!
Christine Coelho, Trinidad & Tobago, West Indies.

HARDtalk is amazing and fascinating. The most valuable thing in the programme is honesty - really questioning about hard things nobody wants to talk about.
Sergej Rassadin, Lithuania

I have watched Hardtalk on and off for years (depending if I was awake or not). I thought it should be on at a reasonable time. Thanks to iplayer I can catch up on it easily now! Hardtalk is fantastic, and the range of high profile guests and the quality of the questions posed to them, makes it so interesting to watch.
Ted, UK

I just saw an interview of a Russian Foreign Ministry official today about Georgia. The whole interview, all the questions directed at the Russian Official were biased. It was as though he was being interviewed by Dick Cheney.
Gilles Hudicourt, Canada

This Stephen who 'interviewed' our courageous, intelligent and sympathic Geert Wilders - has the opposite qualities of what I just mentioned! In my opinion is this unsympathetic, prejudiced and of course leftist thinking a shame for the BBC, which was 40 years ago SO MUCH better. I hope you will renew your staff of journalist with men of this age. We are living in 2008! Geert Wilders will win many voters. The cowards of 'political correctness' of old politics will be shocked! And, the Island will follow to see the Koran as a dangerous, fascist book indeed: England wake up.... always behind as you are, but slowly but surely you MUST choose! I love Muslims, I hate what they think (Koran).
Bert Boland, U.K.

I am writing regarding the Hardtalk interview with Geert Wilders. Firstly I would like to complement the journalist who was able to interview such a ridiculous and racist man. His views on Islam were horrific, least to say. I would like to clear a misunderstanding: Islam is not an ideology but a religion. An ideology is a particular type of political thought. Feminism is an ideology as is fascism and anarchism. It is completely false to say that Islam is an ideology. It's a religion just like Judaism and Christianity. Geert pointed out several times in the interview that he doesn't hate the people, meaning Muslims, but just hates the Islam "ideology". Well, isn't that controversial because by saying he hates this "ideology" he is also saying that he hates the people who follow this "ideology. If not hate, he is definitely criticizing and condemning Muslims. Well I have news for you: Islam has the second largest population in the world. 1.5 billion People follow Islam. If Islam was such a violent and militant religion why would it hold the second largest population in the world? If Islam was so violent why would 1.5 billion follow it? I am sure that even you can't say that all these people have been brainwashed. You are deeply mistaken Mr.Wilders. There was proof in front of you to show that Islam is a peaceful religion. When your film was released didn't the imam stop Muslims reacting in an irrational way? If the same sort of film was released about Judaism or Christianity I don't think you would have faced such peaceful opposition .. I believe that Mr.Wilders have taken advantage of the vulnerable position that Islam hold in the world today and using it to turn others against the religion as well as provoking, yes provoking, Muslims to take action.
Norina Arif, England

Just saw Stephen Sackur's interview with Geert Wilders which I thought was very disappointing. I felt that Mr Sackur fell into the easy role of putting up a controversial interviewee and then covering his back (Sackur's) by just labelling him a racist, a xenophobe and a loser. The interview could have been so much more interesting. Wilders represents a fascinating dilemma for tolerant politically correct European society, and provokes many questions: Should we automatically respect all faiths? Should we label Islam a religion of peace? Do we believe it is? Does the fact that the majority of Muslims are good people mean their religion is a force for good too? Why does Wilders require extreme security? Sackur seemed to go out of his way to just brand him a nutter which I thought was simplistic and unfair.
Mike Smith, UK

I am completely shocked with regard to your interrogation of Geert Wilders. We need more politicians with his courage, instead of the "cowardly" attitude towards the dangers we all face, especially in the UK, in Europe. Face up to reality!
Anonymous, EU

I just viewed Steve Sackur's interview with Geert Wilders, and a time ago i saw also interview with Ayaan Hirsi Ali. I don't agree with the argument what they say. Every human person has the right to live to say etc how they want to. Stephen Sackur had very good questions and Geert Wilders is abusing Koran for nothing. He doesn't know that Muslims are very peaceful only what they want is to live like a muslim. Everybody has their own choice and that is democratic, if Geert doesn't know what that means! My teachers were also Christian and Jewish and they also didnt agree with Geert Wilders. Anyway I like Stephen very much and hopefully you will continue your job.....lovely show keep it up!!
Bano, Holland

Western media gives a completely distorted picture over the terrible disaster that happened in South Ossetia, blackening Russia as much as possible, and whitewashing the American puppet's actions. Your reports are biased and provocative. Your recent interview with Mr. Ivanov was not much different in this respect. I am ashamed to listen to your journalists twisting information to support American politicians. Instead of giving the world the truth, and showing it to your own politicians you continue to twist and manipulate. How can you be respected after this? It is really enough of lies! I hope Mr. Ivanov's tired smile will stay in your eyes, Stephen! He was extremely patient with you given all the above.
Olga Bramley, UK

I am a Hardtalk addict and a long standing fan of Stephen's. I have watched many many enjoyable interviews - most of them much better than your predecessors I might add. However I have to say Stephen that recently I think you have been asking over the top questions of your guests by attempting to put words in their mouth. The Russian deputy prime minister was a good example today. The "are you in fact saying saying that the Russian government etc etc ?" type of question is an attempt to put words into the mouth of the guest. Please don't patronise your audience by attempting to get a sensational simple statement. I know you are trying to get a clear statement for us (your audience) but it is not justified to put words in their mouths. We know when politicians try to avoid the question - they are very good at it - but we don't need you to put words in their mouths either! Because,in the end, they will be your words, not theirs. Stephen, you have done a great job on Hardtalk but maybe you need a break!
Don Nixon, Brunei Darussalam

Stephen, Excellent interview with Sergei Ivanov! Keep up the good work!
Stephen Mepham, Scotland

I have been watching Stephen Sackur's interview with Russias deputy prime minister Mr. Ivanov, and unfortunately Stephen was not prepared for this interview properly, because as Ivanov says that Abkhazians and South Ossetians decided on referendum to be independent country. Stephen Sackur said nothing about Georgian refugees from those parts of Georgia. For example 55% of Abkhazian population are ethnically Georgians and they were forced by Russian army and Abkhazian rebels to leave their homes during 1990s.
irakli, Georgia

I appreciate that Hardtalk is precisely that, but I did feel that the programme with Michael O'Leary of Easyjet was a tad too aggressive. Stephen Sackur interrupted frequently and just read out random quotes from newspapers which O'Leary was supposed to respond to immediately even though they were often taken out of context. I think it best to stick to facts to be discussed rather than one irate customer (of which I'm sure every airline has more than one on its books!) Regards Jill Chisholm
Jill Chisholm, England

Stephen Sackur's Hardtalk with David Bakradze was the best 30 minutes of Russia-Georgia conflict coverage in the whole western media so far. Presenter (once again) posed the only relevant questions to the georgian MP, the ones that every decent journalist should ask in this moment. My compliments go to the whole BBC coverage on the conflict (I don't know how you do it, but you do it all the time), but this interview was like a cherry on the cake. I'm not thanking the Hardtalk presenter and his team because of the exposure of Georgian propaganda, but beacuse I am fully confident that he would pose the equally unpleasant questions about the excessive use of force and real interests that are behind it, to the Russian officials. So there. Thank you Stephen Sackur, you have never EVER let me down.
Boris Upelj, Slovenia

Thank you so much for your objective interview with the Georgian House Leader. It really gave me a re-assurance that your program is not biased. I hope leaders will learn a lesson to think of possible consequences of their personal selfish ambitions and scores to settle. Great Job !!!
Roseline Adegbamigbe, Canada

Hi, Just watched the show with the Italian Foreign minister, great interview. Mr Frattini obviously hasn't watched Hardtalk before because if he had he would reealise that Stephen is tough on everyone he interviews hence the name "Hardtalk".
Joe Herlihy, Ireland

Watching one hardtalk episode is equivalent to watching a hundred news broadcasts. Sriram, India

I continue to watch and enjoy your program for its quality of content, your interesting guests and the well-prepared Stephen Sackur. Hardtalk is a benchmark of excellence. Charles McGrory, Scotland & Canada

I just watched the episode featuring an interview with Kenyan Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta. Finally Steven Sackur meets his match, Uhuru consistently corrected on his supposed facts on the Kenyan political and economic situation, for example, Steven Sacker claimed that the Kenyan Government was not internationally recognised - Uhuru quickly corrected him, informing his that the members on the Kenyan Government were in fact in the UK on the invitation of Her Majesty The Queen. Bravo! It is definitely about time this happened. News channels such as the BBC should NOT allow themselves to project inaccuracies. More interviews with Uhuru Kenyatta please. Mike Jones, UK

Regarding Steven Sackur's interview of Kenya's Deputy Prime Minister, Uhuru Kenyatta, I marvelled that Steven managed to maintain his composer and patience in the face of such unadulterated tripe! Black Africa, as represented by Uhuru Kenyatta, just doesn't have a clue and until it embraces a moral code and develops an understanding of the meaning of decency, nincumpoops like Uhuru Kenyatta will see merit in facilitating a man guilty of genocide, murder, mahem, and economic ruin remaining power in Zimbabwe, even if in a dimished role in a coalition. Anything goes and any port in a storm for Mr Kenyatta and those of kindred spirit - which happens to be most of Africa's utterly useless leaders. Worst of all Kenyatta really sees nothing wrong in it. Let him "welcome" and "applaud" such a travesty to his heart's content, with such pitiful excuses for leaders Africa is destined to remain a backwater and a beggar continent. I can only imagine the contempt a great man like Alexandr Soltzhenitsyn would have felt if listening to Kenyatta's pathetic dose of mediocrity. Rob Porter, Canada

I just want to tell you that HARDTALK is great. I'm listening yours programme every day. In Poland we don't have such programme, where is so many interesting topic. Great thanks for all HARDTALK team. It's a nice way to learn English. Thanks. Paul Pawelec, Poland

TO: Stephen Sackur. I always listen to your HardTalk interviews when I can. At this moment -- I follow your program in Switzerland. What a problem you have -- when interviewing such characters as that Hamas character today. Such interviews truly reveal the actual problem between the Israelis and the Palestinians. I wish others would look at Hard talk to see the very thinking of these characters you interview so carefully. Hard Talk is time very well invested. Keep up your excellent work!
David Kersten, US

Just saw the Hardtalk today featuring Lawrence Hunt. He was excellent in his talk and showed ample confidence in facing Stephen. Please pass my best wishes to Lawrence Hunt for his future ventures. Good luck to this man.
Jaz Hanspal, UK

Hard Talk brings a wealth of knowledge to me since 2005 because I am international relations student. It infuriates me and gives me basic insights into my study perspective. Keep up the good works of concrete journalism. Who says Larry King is the best? Stephen Sackur is an icon that should be reckoned with.
k J , lithuania

Stephen, I rarely miss your show. For me this is the best in BBC and the only programme I watch regularly. Your recent interviews focused on Global Warming and CO2 footprints etc and your questions sometimes are based on opinions presented as facts. I am not a global warming skeptic. However I believe you should give more opportunitis to the skeptics too express their view. I love to see how they respond to your views and vice versa. Hope you and your producer think of bringing the 'qualified' skeptics to the scene and have some great arguments. Wish your programme the very best.
Wimal, Japan

I am writing in support of Hard Talk. I find it compelling, as it sets out to challenge the very people that have power, or relevant authority. This is a clear case of Hardtalk bringing accountability to the general public. That said, I do however, smell a rat in the airing time slot that it is given? It is not inconceivable, more obvious that the BBC has great reluctance to popularise such a powerfull programme, it therefore designates its airing slot to 05.30 AM. I say a big thank you to all the team at Hardtalk, and to Stephen Sackur for his interviewing skills. May long you last.
John Miles, UK

I happened upon the treasure interview on Hardtalk with Ingrid Betancourt. I have been deeply moved, encouraged and inspired by her words and person which resonated truth and hope. As I have been prompted to try to find the interview again, I read Stephen's article about the background work in getting the interview. I would like to thank Stephen for his integrity, constraint and compassion.It is encouraging to know that there exists some integrity in the media.
Anthea Tonkin, Australia

Well done to Dan Gillerman. a pity that Stephen seemed to pale by Gillerman's calm and intelligent brilliance and appeared so boorish and out of his depth; Sackur usually fares better.
Sara Leviten, Israel

Stephen Sackur is always enjoyable watching because of his very forthright questions. I just watched him interview Dan Gillermann, Israeli Ambassador to UN,and I thought that though he did ask the tough questions, he left one important one out. I expected him to ask of Gillermann whether Israel has nuclear weapon. Surely if Israel is objecting to Iran and others of possessing nuclear weapon, then Israel itself should say clearly that it does not have any and that it will allow for UN inspection to prove that? In the end Stephen lacked the courage to ask that question - just like 99% of the journalists thus far.
Adam Abdool, Australia

Just found this Hardtalk feedback section. I've watched this programme for years and always thought it should be on BBC1 or BBC2 at a watchable time for everyone. It might slow the dumbing down a bit. It should definitely be an hour long for the more interesting guests,as you can often see how many points are rushed through in an interview because of lack of time. Oh,and Stephen Sackur has really stepped into Tim Sebastian's shoes well. Keep it up!
Al Barvey, United Kingdom

We really enjoyed your interview with Ingrid Betancourt. Is there any chance of a re-broadcast? Once again thanks for a very moving interview, and well done to Stephen Sackur
Joseph Felicity

I really like Steven Sackur as an interviewer. He is a very well prepared and generally a very tough interviewer too. I watched both Larry King's (CNN) and Steven Sackur's interviews with Ingrid Betancourt. Mr. Sackur's was so so much better, warm, sensitive, inquisitive yet respectful, that it deserves high praise. Well done, Mr. Sackur!
Beatriz Westphalen, Brazil

I want to thank the BBC crew who made the moving Hardtalk interview with Ingrid Betancourt happen.
Farhad Refahi, Canada

I don't know how Steve got through the interview with Ingrid Betancourt without breaking down in tears, a remarkable (and very attractive!) woman and a very moving interview
Adrian, UK

I'd like to interview Stephen. I think he owes the audience an opportunity to see him under the spotlight!
Ochieng' Okeyo, South Africa

Re. Interview with Bishop Greg Venables. I wonder if you are aware that only 7% of Britons actually belong to a church?? I watched with horror as the bishop attempted to justify discrimination against women and homosexuals .. Full marks to Mr Sackur for his dogged interviewing style, how refreshing to watch the interviewee wriggle in discomfort, and regularly attempt NOT to answer the questions. As a secular person the interview only confirmed what I already believe, that the churches of today are irrelevant. Perhaps an interview with a popular committed secularist would attract more secular viewers, who are after all now the majority in Britain??
jhill, England

Dear Stephen Sackur, I have all my adult life on a daily basis listened to the BBC World Service or in recent years watched BBC World. As a Danish citizen I have in no material way contributed to the BBC. Nevertheless, I feel proud and moved, as when I visit the cemeteries at Flanders Fields where after all no Danes are buried, to be part of a civilization which for all its shortcomings ranks supreme in fighting for and bringing to the attention of the world the standards of human decency, embedded in us all. I have this morning seen your touching interview with Ingrid Betancourt. You must be so proud that this remarkable woman has chosen to share her inner thoughts on her ordeal with you in this interview, and you must also on behalf of the organization of which you are a distinguished member be proud of what she had to say about what the BBC had meant for her during her years of captivity. I write to you this morning to use this opportunity to show my respect for the BBC, which I consider one of the finest products of our western civilization, and in particular to provide a sign of respect and gratitude to those of your colleagues who has given their lives in the defense of the values which the BBC stands for.
Sincerely yours, Knud Jørgen Munk

Thank you for the moving interview of Ingrid Betancourt. It is amazing to me to hear her talk in Spanish, French and English and to describe with so much discretion such terrible experiences and Hardtalk is so sensitive to her situation. The world wants to see Colombia at peace, our Basque Country and the world at peace. Let's hope for some advance in the right direction.
Kate Bromley, Spain

I watched Zeinab Badawi take Nick Broomfield down .. a rather relentless display of antagonism that backfired. His stalwart behavior was remarkable under the circumstances. She railed at him so much that one couldn’t help but sympathize with him....not at all what she intended!
Stuart Munro, Canada

I watched much of the Nick Broomfield interview by Zeinab Badawi and was disturbed by her accusation that Broomfield didn't treat the 3 factors objectively or with equal consideration, the 3 factors being the Marines, the Iraqi bomber and the families murdered by the Marines. Was the interviewer serious or just trying to wind Broomfield up?

How could any rational human being with a basic understanding of morals, possibly judge them on an equal basis? It would be like judging the murderer on the same basis as the victim. In a wartime scenario, it is the equivalent of judging the French Resistance on the same plane as the Nazi occupiers! Is that what Ms Badawi would have done?

Really, get a rational person, aggressive if that is the aim of Hardtalk, but at least someone who understands the morals of the issue at hand.
Alan Young, Canada

One of the best programs on the BBC where you actualy get to see peoples colours nailed to the mast. I don't agree with some of the posts in thinking that Stephen Sackur is bullying his guests. He is merely asking the 'questions' that people want to hear instead of the normal run of the mill banal questions. Yes, he may have been put down a wee bit by a couple of guests ie; Mr Gerry Adams or Mr Tony Benn, but he always respects his guests with a handshake at the end of the programe, that's good journalism in my book.
John MacKenzie, Trinidad

Tony Benn is a man who expresses my sentiments exactly from his heart. I agree with his views about freedom, security, and his definition of Terrorists/Terrorism 100%. Eliminating the threat of attacks from terrorists does not lie with the police telling politicians which way they should go. The solution to this problem lies in writing effective laws that the police must implement to eliminate the threat of terrorists invading and threatening our security. It is the law and not the police that must prevail and be in control to insure and secure our freedom from those who wish us harm. Hats off to Tony Benn at age 83. Where have all the right thinking men like him gone?
Joan Commissiong nee Salfarlie, USA

Stephen Sackur finally met his match with Tony Benn. Good going Tony -- we need your perspective in the US.
James Moyer, Philippines

I was most impressed by the way Harold Ford stood up to the pummeling he got from Stephen Sackur. Please think twice in future before setting attack dog Sackur loose. The approach is appropriate and valuable in the case of many known or alleged perpetrators of the ills of the world. It can be dangerous in the case of someone who has clearly demonstrated the vision, integrity, intelligence and flexibility needed to set things right. While Sackur asked the right questions, he did so in a way that seemed calculated to sow or fertilize doubts about Obama. In my view, from a global perspective, Hard Talk did not do the world a service.
Alison Massa, Jamaica

Stephen, I really feel sorry for Mr. Harold Ford Jr. He comes across as either very honest man or totally naive one. Even if Mr. Obama wins and becomes the next President of the so called democratic USA his presidency is going to be a hell .. America is most probably facing terrible disaster politically and otherwise. I wish Mr. Obama lots of luck and a safe life.
Mr. Jovo Grubor, Canada

Fascinating interview with partisan journalist Arianna Huffington despite her comments to the contrary. Ironically, the mainstream media she derides, that is, the mainstream American media, is very much guilty of the same subjective journalism. Objectivity seems the pipe dream of journalists whose works eventually fall between pot and kettle.
C Lee, Canada

Just finished watching Arianna Huffington and Stephen Sackur. How impressive is Ms Huffington? I thought she was terrific. Left Sackur for dead. She was focused and intelligent and clear thinking. Whilst Sackur tried to blind her with convoluted logic, she flattened him. Well done Arianna. I haven't seen the Huffington Post before, but now will definitely have a look. It was a great program and good to see the BBC interviewing smart, cluey, now people. Beats some of the drab interviews of late. PS: sorry to say, but Stephen could take a few lessons from Arianna on debating.
Jane, Italy

This was my first time watching Hardtalk and I felt so riled up that I had to go and respond. I honestly cannot believe Senator Barbara Boxer's excuses. She constantly avoided questions and justified herself by saying that "you don't understand our country." In good old fashioned American arrogance, she seems to assume that the only people who can understand American politics are Americans...which explains a lot...Thank you for pushing her on this point and i enjoyed it thoroughly, although gah I wish someone would tell her to stop making excuses. But I presume an American senator is guaranteed to avoid questions and make excuses.
Jazzy B., Canada

I love Hardtalk because this is strong caffeine to my life. The questions and discussion were fast with complete details... no sound bites... lovely.
Saravanan Kannan, New York, USA

I just viewed the tail-end of Steve Sackur's interview with John Sauven. I am pleased to see guests on BBC like Mr Sauven....he brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to pressing environmental issues but Steve your constant interruptions I found infuriating. John Sauven has much to say...there is a time and place for challenges. This was not one of them. I wanted to hear what he had to say.
Anne Schibli, Canada