BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Wednesday, 30 January 2008, 18:02 GMT
Israel probe finds war 'failure'
Judge Winograd at his press conference
Israel has waited for Winograd's findings since late in 2006
Israel's 2006 war against Hezbollah in Lebanon was a "large and serious" failure, according to an Israeli government-appointed inquiry.

Military and political leaders had no clear strategy, which meant Israel was "dragged" into an inconclusive ground operation in Lebanon, the report said.

PM Ehud Olmert has insisted he will not step down despite the findings.

However, public pressure could grow on partners in his governing coalition to pull out, analysts say.

Hostilities broke out in July 2006, when Hezbollah fighters captured two Israeli soldiers in a cross border raid that left three other soldiers dead.

Israelis react to report on 2006 war in Lebanon

In the conflict that followed, more than 1,000 Lebanese died, mostly civilians, along with 160 Israelis, mostly soldiers, but the captured soldiers have still not been freed.

Completion prevented

The report said Israel could have taken two courses - a quick, devastating blow against Hezbollah or a sustained ground operation - but failed to decide on either.

"The fact Israel went to war before it decided which option to select, and without an exit strategy... constituted serious failures, which affected the whole war," report chairman Eliyahu Winograd said.

"As a result, Israel did not stop after its early military achievements, and was dragged into a ground operation only after the political and diplomatic timetable prevented its effective completion," he added.

The report is highly critical of military commanders, especially in the ground forces.

Israel was dragged into a ground operation only after the political and diplomatic timetable prevented its effective completion
Winograd statement

"All in all, the IDF [Israeli army] failed, especially because of the conduct of the high command and the ground forces, to provide an effective military response to the challenge posed to it by the war in Lebanon," retired senior judge Mr Winograd said.

There has been considerable interest among Israelis about a last-minute ground offensive in the hours before a UN-brokered ceasefire, in which 33 Israeli soldiers were killed.

The report said the engagement did not improve Israel's position and there were "serious failings" in army command.

However, Mr Olmert acted in what was "the interest of the state of Israel", as it appeared at the time, when he authorised the offensive.


The report recommends "systematic and profound" changes in thinking in the political and military leaderships if Israel is to face up to future challenges.

Israeli troops leave Lebanon, 14 August 2006

Israel cannot survive without the belief that it has "the political and military leadership, military capabilities, and social robustness" to deter aggressors, the report says.

Mr Olmert's aides said the criticism in the report was not as harsh as they had been preparing for.

"The prime minister and the government take responsibility and will make repairs," his cabinet secretary, Oved Yehezkel, said.

In Beirut, a Hezbollah spokesman said the report vindicated everything the Shia Muslim militant and political organisation had said before.

"Israel failed completely in achieving its goals and the Israeli army suffered a military defeat at the hands of Hezbollah," Hussein Rahal said.

An Israeli war widow reflects on the conflict in Lebanon

Tough lessons for Israeli armour
15 Aug 06 |  Middle East
New phase in Mid-East power struggle
16 Aug 06 |  Middle East
Mid-East diary: A time of unease
18 Jul 07 |  Middle East
Israeli PM braced for war report
30 Jan 08 |  Middle East
Hardliners leave Israel coalition
16 Jan 08 |  Middle East
In pictures: Lebanon ceasefire
14 Aug 06 |  In Pictures

Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit


Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific