BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Languages
Last Updated: Sunday, 16 October 2005, 23:39 GMT 00:39 UK
Aziz 'won't speak against Saddam'
Tariq Aziz at a tribunal hearing
The paper said Tariq Aziz could live quietly in exile
A lawyer for Tariq Aziz has denied a British newspaper report that the former Iraqi deputy prime minister will testify against Saddam Hussein.

The lawyer, Badie Izzat Aref, said Mr Aziz would not give evidence against the former leader, whose trial is set to begin on Wednesday.

Separately, Human Rights Watch has warned the proceedings might not meet international standards.

Saddam Hussein's trial will be taking place in an undisclosed location.

The Sunday Telegraph said in return for his testimony, the main charges against Mr Aziz would be dropped and he would be allowed to live quietly and work on his autobiography.

Mr Aziz has so far not been charged with any specific crimes. He has been held at a secret location since his surrender in April 2003.

'Completely false'

A US official told the paper: "Things are very delicate and a plea bargain is never sealed until the witness takes the stand and delivers his side of the deal."

Saddam Hussein
Saddam Hussein's much-delayed trial begins on Wednesday
His lawyer, Mr Aref, said of the Telegraph report: "It's completely false, I have always said that Tariq Aziz never had any intention of testifying against Saddam."

He added: "What I told the British newspaper is that during a questioning session, Tariq Aziz was asked about who in Iraq took sovereign decisions like declaring war, suppressing a revolt or a civil mutiny.

"Tariq Aziz's answer was that sovereign and political decisions were in the hands of Saddam and he had nothing to do with them."

'Occupiers' trial'

Human Rights Watch on Sunday voiced concern over the possibility that the trial might not be fair.

It fears the death penalty might be applied, and highlights the defence's claim that it has not had enough time to prepare its case.

It is also worried about the possibility of political interference and the fact that the burden of proof does not have to be beyond reasonable doubt.

Saddam Hussein is entitled to a fair trial. This won't be a fair trial because it has been created to fit the offence
Abdul Haq al-Ani, defence lawyer

Five judges will open the proceedings against Saddam Hussein and seven associates accused of killing more than 100 civilians in the Shia Muslim village of Dujail in 1982.

It is not clear what other charges will be filed.

The start of the trial has been delayed several times, amid criticism of the tribunal's legitimacy and fears for the security of its judges.

Speaking on the BBC's Sunday AM programme, lawyer Abdul Haq al-Ani, who says he is authorised to speak on behalf of Saddam Hussein's defence team, said he had no evidence that any of the deposed leader's former colleagues would testify against him.

He said the trial had no jurisdiction as it had been set up by an occupying power which was not entitled to change the legal system of an occupied country.

"Saddam Hussein is entitled to a fair trial. This won't be a fair trial because it has been created to fit the offence," he said.


RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific