BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: In Depth: Lockerbie Trial
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 

banner Tuesday, 30 January, 2001, 15:36 GMT
Fight goes on, say families
Lockerbie relatives
It has been a long wait for relatives of the victims
Relatives of the Lockerbie bombing victims have vowed to continue campaigning for justice whatever the outcome of the trial.

As the judges announced that they would deliver their judgements on the two Libyan accused on Wednesday, British relatives said they would once again press the UK Government to announce a full public inquiry into the bombing.

Some American relatives said they were determined to proceed with a civil action against Libya and that those who ordered the bombing should be exposed.

Trial details
The two accused are Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, 48, and Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, 44
Pan Am Flight 103 exploded over Lockerbie on 21 December 1988, killing all 259 people on board and another 11 on the ground
The two men deny murder. Charges of conspiracy to murder and a breach of the 1982 Aviation Security Act were dropped
The trial is taking place in a Scottish courtroom at Camp Zeist, in the Netherlands
The case is being heard by a panel of Scottish judges
There was surprise among some that the judges had not decided to extend the 12 days of deliberation when they convened at Camp Zeist on Tuesday, but others expressed relief that the lengthy trial was coming to an end.

The Reverend John Mosey, speaking on behalf of the British relatives, said: "I'm surprised the verdict is so soon but glad from a personal point of view.

"We've waited for a long time, we waited over eight years for a trial and have been out here at the trial for nearly a year."

Many of the British relatives have been willing to accept the decision of the judges but stressed that only through a public inquiry would the full facts be known.

However, that view has not been shared by some victims' relatives in the US, who have vowed to seek reparation from the Libyan Government.

Rev John Mosey
Rev Mosey: "An honest decision"
Rev Mosey, whose 19-year-old daughter Helga was killed, said: "My feeling is that we have three men (judges) who, from all we have been able to discover, are not politically motivated.

"They have shown themselves to be extremely shrewd and we believe they are going to come to an honest decision based on the evidence they have heard."

He said Wednesday would be an emotional day but stressed: "It will be a relief to finally know."

Whatever the decision, the British families said they wanted to highlight the failings of the intelligence services in allowing a terrorist to place a bomb on board the plane to come under the spotlight.

They are also determined to expose the "failings" of the aviation authorities in allowing a bomb to get through airport security measures and onto the plane.

'Badly let down'

Rev Mosey said: "We want to know why it was allowed to happen, when there was so much intelligence.

"We want to know why there were so many empty seats on the plane just before Christmas and why some people were warned not to get on the plane.

"The big question is why we have been so badly let down by governments and agencies employed to protect us."

Relatives of many of the Americans who died said they would be satisfied with nothing less than a guilty verdict.

Some of those at Camp Zeist voiced fears that the speed of the verdict could indicate an acquittal.


If they are found guilty we know they didn't do it by themselves

Peter Lowenstein
Peter Lowenstein, who lost his 21-year-old son Alexander in the 1988 disaster, said: "I have a very mixed reaction today. I am happy that the verdict is being issued quickly rather than being dragged out.

"But I feel concerned about the speed of the verdict and fear it could mean the verdict will be the one we don't want - not guilty.

"We believe they are guilty and if they are acquitted we will continue to believe that.

"There is no question in my mind that they are guilty. I don't think there is reasonable doubt."

Mr Lowenstein told reporters: "If they are found guilty we know they didn't do it by themselves - it goes right up to the top."

Bruce Smith
Bruce Smith: Planning a civil action
American Bruce Smith, a former Pan Am pilot, lost his English-born wife Ingrid, 31, as she flew to join him for Christmas in the United States.

He said: "I thought they would be ready to give their verdict. They have had eight months to consider this and to think about the evidence.

"They would have been developing an opinion as they went along."

Mr Smith said he expected a guilty verdict but said that is "only a small step towards what should be done."

"There is lots of evidence against the Libyan Government and the blame should lie with them."

Mr Smith insisted that the Libyans on trial were at the "bottom of the chain of command" which led to the deaths of 270 people.

He said Libya must still face a civil trial for the destruction of the airliner in a case filed seven years ago in the United States.

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
BBC RADIO NEWS
BBC ONE TV NEWS
WORLD NEWS SUMMARY
PROGRAMMES GUIDE
Lockerbie megapuff graphic

AUDIO VIDEO

Key stories

Features

The trial
See also:

24 Jan 01 | World
Q&A: The Lockerbie trial
19 Jan 01 | World
A truly exceptional trial
24 Jan 01 | World
The men in robes
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Lockerbie Trial stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Lockerbie Trial stories