Wednesday, October 28, 1998 Published at 20:00 GMT
Bristol inquiry to examine doctors' closed shop system
Supporters of the Bristol surgeons march on the inquiry
The closed shop system by which doctors regulate their own profession will be investigated by the public inquiry into the Bristol heart babies.
This could lead to a huge shake-up in the medical profession.
The self-regulation system has come in for much criticism following a hearing by doctors' regulatory body, the General Medical Council, into the Bristol case.
It has resulted in a number of reports by doctors' organisations, suggesting ways to improve self-regulation.
Professor Kennedy was speaking at the preliminary hearing into the heart operations inquiry which was attended by both supporters and opponents of the two heart surgeons at its centre.
About 100 members of the Bristol Surgeons' Support Group and parents of the children who died or were injured following heart operations at the Bristol Royal Infirmary (BRI) packed out the hearing at Bristol's Council House.
They heard Professor Kennedy say that it would be open, independent, sensitive and informal and would look at every relevant medical record covering the period.
"We were not set up to engage in a trial fixing blame. Our focus is much, much broader than that. It is to inquire into what happened and what can be learnt," he said.
Professor Kennedy also warned that some of the evidence that the inquiry would consider would for some be "almost too painful to contemplate."
Members of the Bristol Heart Children's Action Group, the main parents' group, sollicitors and the United Bristol Healthcare Trust told the hearing they wanted to give evidence.
The trust was worried about confidentiality.
The preliminary hearing was held on Tuesday. The full inquiry is expected to begin early next year.
The case, which has caused a cultural earthquake among doctors, should last about 18 months.
The public inquiry will consider a wide range of cases, including allegations of brain damage and 140 cases of children who died after operations.
It was called after public protest at the outcome of the GMC hearing.
The hearing found three doctors - surgeons Mr James Wisheart and Mr Janardan Dhasmana and manager Dr John Roylance - guilty of serious professional misconduct.
Mr Wisheart and Dr Roylance were banned from practising while Mr Dhasmana was prevented from operating on children for three years. He has since lost his job at the BRI.
Earlier on Tuesday, about 100 supporters of Mr Wisheart and Mr Dhasmana marched through the streets of Bristol.
Donald Boots of the supporters' group said the 500 members of the group included some parents who lost children in operations.
Some of the marchers carried placards saying "Heart surgeons save lives, not kill 'em" and "Thanks for saving mum's life".
Mr Boots said: "We think it totally wrong that Mr Wisheart was struck off and we are very concerned that Mr Dhasmana does not have a job. I would have no qualms about him operating on me. He is an excellent surgeon."
Some parents of children who have survived heart operations say they believe there has been a witchhunt against the surgeons.
One mother said: "It is not down to the surgeons who are very special people who have saved thousands of lives."
But she added that it was not just the surgeons who were at fault.
"There has been an institutional failure," she said.
She welcomed the inquiry and the fact that it was looking at both the problems at the BRI and at the NHS as a whole.
"It could happen all over again if it is not sorted out," she said.
"They have gone through a hell of a lot and they need everybody's support and help now."
The BHCAG is angry that the GMC hearing only looked into the deaths of 29 children and four cases of alleged brain damage.
Its nine-month hearing - thought to have cost between £1m and £2m - examined 53 operations by Mr Wisheart, 59, and Mr Dhasmana, 58, between 1988 and 1995.