BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Health
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Background Briefings 
Medical notes 
Education 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 

Wednesday, 2 August, 2000, 23:29 GMT 00:29 UK
City dwellers 'dying younger'
Cyclist
Traffic fumes are blamed for much pollution
People living in cities are dying younger because of air pollution, according to research.

Scientists at the Health Effects Institute in Massachusetts, US, analysed the findings of a number of previous studies into the effects of pollution on public health.


Everyone is agreed that we need to reduce air pollution

National Society for Clean Air
Their analysis backed up the original conclusions that people living in cities were more likely to die younger because of pollution.

Their study also highlighted that many medical problems could be attributed to some of the smallest air particles.

The first study the researchers looked at was carried out at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston in 1993. It compared death rates and pollution levels in six US cities.

It found that the death rates increased in almost direct proportion to the level of pollution.

Death rates and pollution

They suggested that people living in the most polluted city, Steubenville in Ohio,were at greater risk of dying young - by 26% - compared with residents of the cleanest city, which was Portage, Wisconsin.

A larger study, carried out by the American Cancer Society in 1995, tested these findings.

It followed 550,000 adults over seven years and their findings also indicated a strong link between death rates and pollution.

However, critics had accused the authors of both of these studies of failing to take other factors, such as poverty, into account.

As a result, the Health Effects Institute decided to re-analyse the studies' findings by testing for other possible causes.

They looked at factors such as education, ethnicity, income levels and the availability of health care as well as differences in other pollutants, temperature and humidity.

But the re-analysis confirmed the original findings.

Political fallout

"For the most part, the inclusion of these additional factors did not alter the association," said Daniel Krewski of the University of Ottawa.

The Harvard study had suggested that air particles with a diameter of less than 10 micrometeres were a threat to public health.

But this latest study has suggested that tiny particles with a diameter of less than 2.5 micrometres are more dangerous.

These particles can be made up of various elements, including fumes from cars and natural dust particles.

The UK government has committed itself to improving air quality and meeting specific targets by 2005.

But a spokesman for the National Society for Clean Air said much of the pollution was from car exhaust fumes. He said this was causing problems politically.

"Everyone is agreed that we need to reduce air pollution. The problem is that the main source of pollution is from road transport and we are seeing a battle between local and central government over who is responsible to reduce this pollution."

He suggested the real argument related to how pollution was going to be tackled and who is responsible for meeting the targets.

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
BBC RADIO NEWS
BBC ONE TV NEWS
WORLD NEWS SUMMARY
PROGRAMMES GUIDE
See also:

06 May 99 | Medical notes
Exhaust emissions
17 Mar 00 | Health
Modern man still virile
15 Jun 99 | Medical notes
Asthma
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Health stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Health stories