Page last updated at 23:08 GMT, Tuesday, 13 May 2008 00:08 UK

Hospitals' care standards 'vary'

The Healthcare Commission's Anna Walker on the survey findings

Most patients staying overnight in hospital are happy with their care, but this masks problems in key areas and variations in standards, a survey says.

Nine in 10 inpatients in England said their care was good, very good or excellent, the Health Commission poll of almost 76,000 people showed.

But problems with the quality of food, information on treatment and the use of mixed-sex facilities were reported.

The government said it would look to drive up standards where necessary.

But campaigners said the results were worrying and demonstrated that the NHS was struggling to give patients the respect and dignity they deserved.

OVERALL APPROVAL RATINGS
Top:
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital NHS Trust, Oswestry: 92
Bottom:
Ealing Hospital, London: 65
On a scale of 0 (poor) to 100 (very good)

Overall, one in four patients said they shared a sleeping area with patients of the opposite sex when first admitted - but in some of the 165 trusts this rose to nearly half, while others had almost no sharing.

For non-emergency care, which is where the government has promised to eradicate the use of mixed-sex accommodation, one in 10 said they had shared a sleeping area.

On the quality of food, just over half described it as good, while 15% said it was poor.

A fifth of those needing help with eating also said they did not get it, but again there were big variations, with more than 40% reporting a lack of help in some trusts.

Patients also reported problems with the way they were kept informed about decisions relating to their care. One in five said they were not given enough information.

Bar chart showing percentages of patients who shared a sleeping area with patients of the opposite sex

The numbers saying their wards or rooms were very clean has also fallen slightly in the last five years to 53%, despite the focus on hospital infections such as MRSA.

However, overall attitudes to the care patients received were largely positive.

The numbers saying their care was excellent rose from 41% to 42% in the last year.

Overall, 92% said it was good, very good or excellent.

Worry

Healthcare Commission chief executive Anna Walker said the findings were "encouraging".

But she added: "Some hospitals are struggling to deliver on some of the basics of hospital care.

"There are striking variations in performance in key areas. Those performing poorly must learn form those who perform well."

Food

And Charlotte Potter, of Help the Aged, added: "Scores in some trusts were worryingly low when it came to being treated with dignity and respect or receiving help with eating - areas of care particularly important to older people."

Health Minister Ann Keen said: "This survey gives a real insight into what patients think about their care.

Conditions

"We will continue to listen to patients and work on those areas where improvements need to continue."

OVERALL, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CARE YOU RECEIVED?
Map showing locations of best and worst hospitals based on patient responses to Healthcare Commission question on quality of care received in hospital
Best
1 Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic, Oswestry - 92
2 Queen Victoria, East Grinstead - 91
3 Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool - 90
4 Christie, Manchester - 90
5 Royal Marsden, London - 90
6 Papworth, near Cambridge - 90
7 Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Wirral - 89
8 Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery - 89
9 Royal Brompton and Harefield, London - 88
10 Royal Orthopaedic, Birmingham - 87
Worst
1 Medway, Kent - 71
2 Mid Staffordshire General, Stafford - 71
3 North West London - 71
4 Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells - 71
5 West Hertfordshire - 70
6 North Middlesex University, London - 69
7 Barking, Havering and Redbridge, Essex - 68
8 Mayday Healthcare, Croydon - 67
9 Homerton University, London - 67
10 Ealing, London - 65
Numbers on map are for keying purposes and not necessarily ranking
Points calculated by converting each response into scores (from 0 to 100), applying "standardisation", and then averaging. The higher the score, the better a trust is performing.

Source: Healthcare Commission





SEE ALSO
NHS staff 'not happy with care'
13 Jun 06 |  Health

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific