Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education



Front Page

World

UK

UK Politics

Business

Sci/Tech

Health

Education

Sport

Entertainment

Talking Point

In Depth

On Air

Archive
Feedback
Low Graphics
Help

Tuesday, November 2, 1999 Published at 12:26 GMT


Health

Guidelines proposed over internet health services

Firms have been criticised for misleading health information

Guidelines to protect consumers from unreliable health advice and information on the internet are being drawn up by American medical firms.

Two separate initiatives - by drkoop.com and Medscape Inc - aim to regulate advertising, content, sponsorship and privacy, following public concern over the accuracy of information available on web sites and how they use personal data collected from consumers.

Medical ethicists, patient advocates and others complain that much of the information available on the 15,000 or more medical web sites is misleading and potentially harmful.

They argue that internet health companies do not distinguish unbiased medical content from adverts or promotional material.

The US push for regulation follows several lawsuits against web sites for allegedly criminal conduct.

In October, Illinois sued four online pharmacies and affiliated doctors, saying they had violated several state licensing and medical practice laws, placing consumers' health at risk.

Financial ties

Illinois was the third US state - after Kansas and Missouri - to file a suit against internet prescription sites.

The American Medical Association has developed guidelines for health web sites with the US Food and Drug Administration, which were adopted by the Association of Medical Publishers.

UK medical bodies have called for similar initiatives to protect patients.

Dr Simon Fradd, Chairman of the British Medical Association's Doctor-Patient Partnership said the best solution would be to promote a handful of validated web sites.

"The proliferation of web sites means that regulation would be difficult, so I'd like to see bodies such as the National Institute for Clinical Excellence providing reliable information."

Roger Goss, director of Patient Concern, warned that that regulation could lead to censorship.

"My view is that it is up to patients to access as much information as they want and then check its validity with their GP."





Advanced options | Search tips




Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage |


Health Contents

Background Briefings
Medical notes
Internet Links


American Medical Association

British Medical Association


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.




In this section

Disability in depth

Spotlight: Bristol inquiry

Antibiotics: A fading wonder

Mental health: An overview

Alternative medicine: A growth industry

The meningitis files

Long-term care: A special report

Aids up close

From cradle to grave

NHS reforms: A guide

NHS Performance 1999

From Special Report
NHS in crisis: Special report

British Medical Association conference '99

Royal College of Nursing conference '99