BBC NEWS Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific
BBCi NEWS   SPORT   WEATHER   WORLD SERVICE   A-Z INDEX     

BBC News World Edition
 You are in: Health  
News Front Page
Africa
Americas
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Middle East
South Asia
UK
Business
Entertainment
Science/Nature
Technology
Health
Medical notes
-------------
Talking Point
-------------
Country Profiles
In Depth
-------------
Programmes
-------------
BBC Sport
BBC Weather
SERVICES
-------------
EDITIONS
Thursday, 20 June, 2002, 12:08 GMT 13:08 UK
'No hesitation' on asbestos ruling
Brian Fox, Tommy's brother, and his wife Judith
The relatives of Tommy Fox heard the Lords ruling
The Law Lords say it would have been "offensive" to deny compensation in a landmark case brought by asbestos victims.


Any other outcome would be deeply offensive to instinctive notions of what justice requires and fairness demands

Lord Nicholls
The ruling, made last month, could pave the way for thousands of claims by people who have developed asbestos-related diseases as a result of exposure during their work.

Five law lords, headed by Lord Bingham, overturned a Court of Appeal ruling which had denied compensation to victims because they could not prove which of several employers was responsible for their illness.

It has been estimated that insurance companies are likely to have to pay out up to £8bn to victims in coming years as a result of the decision.

The reasons behind the decision are set out in a 111-page written judgment published on Thursday.

No hesitation

One of the law lords, Lord Nicholls, said he had "no hesitation" in allowing the appeals.

He said: "Any other outcome would be deeply offensive to instinctive notions of what justice requires and fairness demands."

"A former employee's inability to identify which particular period of wrongful exposure brought about the onset of his disease ought not, in all justice, to preclude recovery of compensation.

"So long as it was not insignificant, each employer's wrongful exposure of its employee to asbestos dust and, hence, to the risk of contracting mesothelioma, should be regarded by the law as a sufficient degree of causal connection."

Lord Bingham said the case hung on six points being satisfied.

Click here to read his judgment.

In this case he was convinced that they were.

The Law Lords were examining test cases brought by a man who has mesothelioma - a form of respiratory cancer caused by exposure to asbestos - and two widows whose husbands died of the disease.

The three who brought the cases were:

  • Eddy Matthews, 54, from Tunbridge Wells in Kent, who was actually awarded £155,000 compensation for his mesothelioma in July last year - but then left devastated when the Appeal Court took the money away.
  • Judith Fairchild, from Leeds, whose husband Eric, a former concil worker, died from mesothelioma in 1996, aged 60.
  • Doreen Fox, from Liverpool, whose husband Thomas also died from the disease
See also:

16 May 02 | Health
16 May 02 | Health
07 May 02 | Health
07 May 02 | A-B
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Health stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Health stories

© BBC ^^ Back to top

News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East |
South Asia | UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature |
Technology | Health | Talking Point | Country Profiles | In Depth |
Programmes