BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Health
Front Page 
UK Politics 
Background Briefings 
Medical notes 
Talking Point 
In Depth 

The BBC's health correspondent Karen Allen
"For years consultants have complained targets distort clinical priorities"
 real 56k

The BBC's Navdip Dhariwal
reports from a hospital in Essex and speaks to Gordon McClellan of the Hospital Consultants Association
 real 56k

UK Health minister John Hutton
"We've made it very clear to the NHS that they must treat urgent patients first"
 real 56k

David Davis MP, Public Accounts Committee
"The whole method of trying to control waiting times is flawed"
 real 28k

Thursday, 26 July, 2001, 12:16 GMT 13:16 UK
Ministers blamed for NHS failings
The whole wait - from GP to operating table - is not measured
Wait from GP to operating table is not fully measured
Doctors leaders say ministers are to blame for the failure of the NHS always to treat those patients most in need first.

A report by the National Audit Office found that patients with serious illnesses have had their operations delayed in favour of less urgent cases so that hospitals can meet government waiting lists.

These official statistics do not accurately reflect how long people have to wait for hospital treatment in England, the report says.

Routine reverse vasectomies were performed ahead of bladder tumour surgery because the vasectomy patients were nearing the 18-month maximum wait, in one example given by the report.

We have a situation that is costing patients' lives

Evan Harris, Lib Dem health spokesman
More than half of consultants surveyed in the report said they had been forced to treat less urgent cases at the expense of more seriously-ill patients in a bid to meet targets on reducing hospital queues.

Twenty per cent said they frequently treated patients in a different order to their clinical need to meet targets.

Dr Ian Bogle, chairman of the British Medical Association, said his members had long warned of the problems that waiting list targets were causing.

He said: "Understandably the government has tried to do something about the time patients wait for treatment, but wrongly they have focused on the actual size of the list, rather than looking at the time people wait and the condition they have got."

System flawed

Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Evan Harris, Liberal Democrat spokesman on health said the NAO report showed the pressure on doctors to meet waiting lists was so strong that patients' lives are being put at risk.

Highest numbers waiting over 13 weeks for inpatient treatment (per 1,000 people)
North Cheshire - 29
East Kent - 27
Isle of Wight - 27
South Lancashire - 27
St Helen's and Knowsley - 26
He condemned the current system as having no redeeming features.

And he said cardiac surgeons had told him that urgent cases, that needed to be done in four to six weeks, could take four to six months because the top priority is patients, who though more stable, are waiting 18 months.

"We have a situation that is costing patients' lives."

"I don't think doctors can ethically co-operate with such a system now." he said.

Minsiters have said that in future they will focus on waiting times, rather than waiting lists.

Health minister John Hutton defended the government's record on pushing waiting lists down.

But he added: "I'm not going to justify anyone waiting longer than they need for treatment, and if that's happened its a matter of serious regret and we'll take action to put it right."

Shadow health secretary Dr Liam Fox earlier said: "All around the country doctors have been angered by the way clinical need has been overtaken by political expediency."


The NAO also says there are wide variations in how long patients wait around the country.

Highest numbers waiting over 13 weeks for outpatient treatment (per 1,000 people)
North Staffordshire - 14.2
Wirral - 12.6
Redbridge & Waltham Forest - 11.6
Liverpool - 11.5
Enfield and Haringey - 11.4
It said the way waiting list figures are compiled is riddled with inaccuracies and discrepancies and that hospitals do not even collect data in a comparable way.

The NAO is calling on the government to reform and standardise the system for collecting statistics, so patients get a truer picture.

Its report is an embarrassment for the government, which last year set targets of a maximum three-month outpatient appointment wait and a maximum inpatient wait of six months, to be met by 2005.

The report also criticises the way the NHS has concentrated on the wait to see a consultant for the first time and the wait for an operation, while ignoring "waits" for tests and further consultations.

Individual need

Waits around the country ranged from Dorset, where less than one per cent of patients on the inpatient waiting list waited longer than six months, to West Sussex where 37% did.

Martin Pfleger, deputy auditor general, said: "From the patient's point of view, they want to know how long it's going to take from first being aware they have a problem to being treated for it."

Mike Stone, director of the Patients Association, told BBC News Online: "We're meant to live in a country with a national health service. Whether you live in Newcastle or Truro, you should be receiving the same service."

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console

Waiting game
Are waiting lists bad for your health?
See also:

26 Jul 01 | Health
'Bunions put ahead of hip ops'
26 Jul 01 | UK Politics
Ministers savaged over waiting lists
Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to more Health stories are at the foot of the page.

E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Health stories