Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education

Front Page



UK Politics







Talking Point
On Air
Low Graphics

Monday, July 20, 1998 Published at 11:32 GMT 12:32 UK


Don't light up yet

Passive smoking claims were not based on sound evidence, said US court

An American ruling which calls into question evidence of the harmful effects of passive smoking is unlikely to have much immediate impact on cigarette bans, according to experts.

Judge William Osteen of the US District Court in North Carolina ruled on Friday that a 1993 report by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) made procedural and scientific errors when it declared that passive smoking could cause up to 3,000 lung cancer deaths a year.

The ruling was part of a case brought by tobacco companies who are seeking to get the report declared invalid.

Little immediate effect

But anti-smoking campaigners and the tobacco industry have told the Wall Street Jouranal that the ruling will have little immediate impact on the various US laws banning smoking at work, in restaurants and other enclosed places.

This is because the EPA does not regulate indoor smoking, because local government rather than federal government have imposed many of the smoking bans and because the EPA report is not the only study advocating the dangers of passive smoking.

However, it is one of the most influential. At least one tobacco firm, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co, told the Journal it was considering taking legal action against smoking bans.

Government lawyers are expected to appeal against the ruling.

White House campaign

[ image: President Clinton: documents showing industry attempts to hook teenagers should go online]
President Clinton: documents showing industry attempts to hook teenagers should go online
As part of the White House campaign against smoking President Clinton called on Friday for documents claiming to show how tobacco companies have tried to hook teenagers on cigarettes to be posted on the internet.

The White House is also considering plans to sue the tobacco industry for the healthcare costs of caring for people who have become ill because of smoking.

The plans are likely to come into play if the US government does not vote for broad anti-smoking legislation.

Advanced options | Search tips

Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage | ©

Health Contents

Background Briefings
Medical notes
Relevant Stories

16 Jul 98 | Health
Total smoking ban

24 Jun 98 | Health
Genetic link to smoking addiction

24 Jun 98 | Health
Tobacco industry faces smoking gun challenge

11 Jun 98 | Latest News
Anti-smoking campaign targets children

09 Jun 98 | Latest News
Smokers 'should get help on NHS'

05 Jun 98 | Latest News
Depressed men at greater risk of heart disease

Internet Links

Tobacco links

US Environmental Protection Agency

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

In this section

Disability in depth

Spotlight: Bristol inquiry

Antibiotics: A fading wonder

Mental health: An overview

Alternative medicine: A growth industry

The meningitis files

Long-term care: A special report

Aids up close

From cradle to grave

NHS reforms: A guide

NHS Performance 1999

From Special Report
NHS in crisis: Special report

British Medical Association conference '99

Royal College of Nursing conference '99