This transcript has been typed at speed, and therefore may contain
mistakes. Newsnight accepts no responsibility for these. However, we will be happy to correct serious errors.
Anti-Semitic manuscript put up for auction 5/6/01
LIZ MACKEAN:
Bold and non-conformist, the tomb
befits the man who's buried inside.
The Victorian explorer Sir Richard
Burton courted controversy in life.
It now shadows him in death. A
linguist and anthropologist,
he translated the Karma Sutra and
his talents took him all over the
world in a life of exploration and
adventure. Sir Richard's travels
took him to Damascus. Based on his
experiences there, he wrote a book
that was so sensitive, it was never
shown to the public - until tomorrow
when it goes under the hammer. It's
being sold by an organisation that,
for the best part of 100 years, kept it
under lock and key. Details of the
manuscript are found in the
Christie's catalogue for the sale.
Written in Sir Richard's hand,
it deals with the arrest of 13 Jews
accused of the ritual murder of
a priest in 1840. As Sir Richard
knew, they were all acquitted. But
the story was considered so
inflammatory, and the manuscript
so damaging to his reputation,
that it was never published.
Instead, it was acquired by the
Board of Deputies, the organisation
that represents Jews in Britain. Jo
Wagerman, its president, has
decided to sell. But after hanging
on to the work so protectively,
why is it now being sold?
JO WAGERMAN:
Its contents are ridiculous and
unpleasant but they're no longer
relevant to the modern world.
Nobody could believe the ravings of
a disappointed 19th century
explorer. They don't represent any
threat that they might have done in
the 19th century.
MACKEAN:
When it goes under the hammer,
the manuscript is expected
to fetch up to £200,000 - money the
Board of Deputies admits it needs
to move to new offices. The Jewish
community is divided about the
wisdom of selling such
a work on the open market, with
no controls over who buys it.
LORD JANNER:
I think it's a grave error. The Board
of Deputies is the representative
body of the British Jewish
community and for it to put up to
auction a cruel, vicious medieval
lie, what was described as
anti-Semitic racism, is unworthy
and wrong.
MACKEAN:
The evidence of history
certainly justifies the alarm bells.
The Jewish Museum in north London
celebrates Judaism's culture and
traditions. The accusation of
ritualised killing has been made
against Jews since medieval times
and often used to justify
persecution. That's why Sir
Richard's manuscript was so
troublesome 100 years ago, and why
it remains so today.
DR ANNE KERSHEN:
We have, if you like, ignorant
anti-Semitism. Kids during the
Second World War would look for
horns in evacuees. Once they came
into contact with Jews, they understood,
and lost the fear and a degree of anti-Semitism.
But there's intelligent anti-Semitism -
people who understand the situation very
well and use all the tools they can.
Both those who are ignorant and
those who are intelligent use
cartoons, language and stereotyping
as a weapon to demolish and
eliminate minority groups.
MACKEAN:
This website promotes books that support
its view that humanity is not equal.
Sir Richard is one of its heroes
and the sale of his manuscript is
eagerly anticipated. There's even
a link to the Christie's website.
So why is the Board of Deputies so
convinced the manuscript, once sold,
won't be abused?
JO WAGERMAN:
If I weren't doing
this, do you think this Nazi group
would be stuck for information? If
I weren't selling this manuscript,
do you think these American
neo-Nazis would go silent all of a
sudden and their website would
suddenly be blank because they
couldn't find any libel to put
there? They make it up as they go
along. They change from a medieval
horror to a 19th century horror
because that's what people eaten up
with race hatred do.
MACKEAN:
Sir Richard's widow, who's buried
alongside him, left instructions for the
manuscript to be burned. In the
intervening years, it's been seen
by just a handful of academics. The
sale should guarantee a much wider
readership. Its author, who claimed
that the issues deserved a careful
perusal, would no doubt be pleased.