Friday, January 15, 1999 Published at 21:41 GMT
Prosecution sets sights on Clinton
Winter chills in and outside the Capitol
Republican Congressmen have called for President Clinton to testify in person at his impeachment trial in the Senate.
As the prosecutors completed their opening arguments they intensified their efforts to persuade US senators to allow the summoning of witnesses, like Monica Lewinsky, whose affair with the president led to his impeachment.
"The president engaged in a scheme starting in December 1997 to conceal from the court in the Jones case his true relationship with Monica Lewinsky and to cover up his acts of concealment, which he had to know by that time were serious crimes."
But it was Rep Bob Barr of Georgia who summed up the House case after a lengthy recounting of how Mr Clinton allegedly tried to get Ms Lewinsky a job.
"What are you as jurors entitled to conclude from all of this as a matter of law and fact?" he said. "Mission accomplished. Obstruction accomplished."
Democratic Sen Tom Harkin stunned his colleagues by interrupting Rep Barr's presentation by objecting to being called a juror. He said he did not want to go down in history as a juror in a trial that had no right to take place.
Chief Justice William Rehnquist sustained the motion, agreeing the Senate "is not simply a jury but a court."
Boredom burdens prosecution
Despite the historic nature of the trial, prosecutors face an uphill battle.
A new ABC News poll showed that only 33 percent believed Mr Clinton should be removed from office if he lied about the affair under oath, compared to 55 percent who held that position shortly after the scandal first broke one year ago.
President Clinton, meanwhile, was in New York as the proceedings began. In classic Clinton style, he tried to make it "business as usual" by unveiling an economic initiative for inner cities.
"I don't think we're there yet," he added with a laugh.
Witnesses still divisive
"If you have any significant doubts about Monica Lewinsky's credibility or her testimony, you should bring her in here and let us examine her face to face so you can judge her credibility for yourself," Rep McCollum said.
The issue of witnesses has polarised the Senate. Democrats have argued the mountain of evidence passed on from the House should serve as the official record.
'Above the law'
Mr Clinton is charged with committing perjury and obstructing justice over his affair with former White House aide Monica Lewinsky.
After the conclusion of Friday's evidence, Republican Sen Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania said the prosecutors had presented a compelling case.
"Unless the White House can rebut some of these arguments, the senators are going to have a hard time voting against removal from office."
Mr Specter added that he would like the president to come to the Senate floor and explain himself. But he said he believed that was "zero chance" the president would do so.
The 13 House managers have 24 hours to present opening arguments against the president. White House lawyers are expected to begin their opening statements on Tuesday, 19 January.