Thursday, May 27, 1999 Published at 12:04 GMT 13:04 UK
Q & A: The Milosevic Indictment
What is the International Criminal Tribunal?
It is charged with bringing to justice people responsible for serious violations of international war or other crimes against humanity.
It was the first body set up to deal with war crimes since the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials following the Second World War.
So far, 84 suspects have been indicted and two found guilty of war crimes.
Six of the accused have since died while charges against another 18 were dropped. One man has been acquitted.
A further 25 suspects are in custody though critics say the trials timetable will slip because of the tribunal's shortage of resources.
What evidence does it need to bring President Milosevic to trial?
Firstly, it needs evidence that war crimes have been committed in the former Yugoslavia. This is being supplied by a variety of sources but principally from witness testimony.
Secondly, it would have to show a chain of command from the perpetrators to the president, proving beyond reasonable doubt that he directed the action.
What does this mean for Milosevic - Can he sign a peace deal?
Any international assets he has - including alleged secret bank accounts in Cyprus - will be frozen to further curtail his chances of escape. The money will also be used as part of restitution in the event of the president being tried and found guilty.
The indictment means that President Milosevic would be unlikely to travel abroad to sign any eventual agreement - unlike in 1995 when he flew to Dayton, Ohio, to sign the Bosnia peace deal.
How would he be arrested?
The tribunal relies on international forces such as Nato to arrest suspects.
In Bosnia, British and American troops in the S-FOR peacekeeping force have arrested some of the suspects and killed another in the attempt. But two key suspects, former former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, and General Ratko Mladic have not been arrested despite international protests.
Unless international troops enter Serbia there is little chance of the president being brought to trial - Nato would be unlikely to attempt a high-risk operation by elite forces such as the SAS to kidnap the president.
Why has this indictment come now?
Louise Arbour is known for her fierce independence and her determination to see results at the tribunal - and has stressed that "indictments must not be an end in themselves".
While the indictment may muddy the diplomatic waters, prosecutors would see it as the logical moral endgame of a conflict fought for moral reasons.
But won't this seriously wound diplomatic efforts?
Western leaders have threatened Balkan leaders with war crimes trials throughout the 1990s - but have been careful to avoid blaming President Milosevic directly, knowing that they have to deal with him at the conference table.
The indictment has already drawn stiff criticism from Moscow which has been working hard to broker a deal with Belgrade.
One reading of the indictment is that Nato is now saying it has had enough of President Milosevic and his circle and wants to bring maximum pressure against him in that the hope that he is removed from power - even though it may leave the Balkans in an even more uncertain situation.