![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sunday, February 21, 1999 Published at 18:13 GMT World: Europe Kosovo: US makes case for force ![]() The US fears the conflict in Kosovo will spread to Nato countries The United States has been trying to bolster its case for the use of force in Kosovo in the face of direct opposition from Russia and China and uncertain backing at home.
The Russian Foreign Minister, Igor Ivanov, reiterated Moscow's opposition to strikes on Saturday. "Military actions will not resolve the Kosovo conflict," he said.
The joint chairmen - UK Foreign Secretary Robin Cook and his French counterpart Hubert Vedrine - believed progress had been made and the US reluctantly supported the extension, despite pessimism about the prospects of a satisfactory outcome. A White House official said: "We felt we were in a position we couldn't say no [to the extension in the talks]. Under the circumstances both sides felt that more time was required. We felt it appropriate to allow this to continue." US stands firm
Serbian President Milan Milutinovic indicated that Serbia would allow foreign troops once a political agreement is signed. "We expect nothing less than a complete interim agreement including Belgrade's acceptance of a Nato-led force," said US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. A senior US official said Washington did not expect the Serbs to agree to a complete peace deal including a Nato-led force in Kosovo. Creeping conflict The US fears that the conflict in Kosovo could spill into neighbouring countries, including Nato members Greece and Turkey. "The conflict in Kosovo has no national boundaries," Under-Secretary of State Thomas Pickering testified to Congress earlier this month. Washington fears that a flood of Kosovar refugees could threaten stability in Nato member states, and that attacks on Kosovar Albanians could spread to neighbouring Albania, and then on to the largely Albanian population of Macedonia. With such a scenario on the borders of three Nato countries, the US is keen to head off a conflict that could become difficult to contain. Hard sell at home
Some in the US House of Representatives oppose the troop deployment without the consent of Congress. Congress has the constitutional responsibility of declaring war, and Republican Representative Tom Campbell of California described the proposed deployment as illegal without the formal participation of Congress. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||