![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Thursday, February 11, 1999 Published at 18:27 GMT ![]() ![]() World: Europe ![]() Outrage at 'jeans alibi' verdict ![]() MPs say they will protest until the ruling is overturned ![]() Women parliamentarians in Italy donned denim to work on Thursday to protest against an appeal court ruling that a woman wearing jeans could not claim to have been raped.
The protest came after the Supreme Court of Appeal in Rome overturned a rape conviction on Wednesday, saying the supposed victim must have agreed to sex because her jeans could not have been removed without her consent.
She vowed to continue the protest until the Constitutional Court overruled the decision. Horrified reaction The ruling drew horrified reaction from across the political spectrum.
"It's absurd. The Court of Appeal should be reminded of the existence of zippers," said Justice Ministry Undersecretary Maretta Scoca. A female Supreme Court judge, Simonetta Sotgiu, hit out at her colleagues. "The appeals court is in the hands of men, often elderly, with old-fashioned ideas. Every day I have to do battle to change the mentality," she said. The head of an anti-crime telephone hotline said the service had been overwhelmed with calls from women worried about the implications of the "mediaeval" ruling. "This decision is going to make it even harder for victims to take the step of pressing charges," said Giuliana dal Pozzo, president of the Telefono Rosa (Red Telephone) helpline. Conviction quashed The appeal to the Supreme Court - Italy's supreme judicial body - was brought by a driving instructor, Carmine Cristiano. He had been sentenced to 34 months' in jail for raping an 18-year-old pupil by a lower court in the southern town of Potenza. His defence had argued that the young woman - identified as Rosa - had consented to sex, a version of events which she strongly denied. The Supreme Court ruled that it was impossible to remove a pair of jeans "without the collaboration of the person wearing them", and that the young woman must therefore have consented to sex. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |