BBC Homepage World Service Education
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Entertainment
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Entertainment 
Showbiz 
Music 
Film 
Arts 
TV and Radio 
New Media 
Reviews 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 
Tuesday, 9 May, 2000, 11:59 GMT 12:59 UK
The music industry's MP3 headache

In the light of the controversy surrounding the Napster and MP3.com websites, The Money Programme's Michael Robinson reports on how major record companies are struggling to catch the internet music wave.

You'd never want to start from here.

An investigator working for the major record companies told me recently he estimated that there were up to one billion illegal downloads of copyrighted songs last year. He anticipates three times as many this year.

How many legal downloads of music from the major record labels were there? Hardly any. Because, until now, for the most part major labels have kept their music off the net.

They feared piracy. If they released their hit-tracks onto the net, they reckoned, the music would simply get copied on round the world. Fewer fans would buy CDs in the shops and the industry could grind to a halt.

A big mistake.

Unleashing the lawyers

What happened, of course, was that fans bought CDs, made copies in MP3 format (it's called "ripping" a CD, though "ripping off" might be more appropriate) and put the music up onto the net as MP3s anyway.


Internet cafe
Many fans are already used to free music on the internet

The major record companies' response to piracy wasn't to establish alternative legitimate sites where fans could pay for their music. Instead, they unleashed their lawyers.

They attacked the first portable MP3 player, the Diamond Rio, arguing it was a device which blatantly encouraged piracy.

"Wrong," said the judge. Since the Rio could also play legitimate MP3 tracks - offered free by up-and-coming bands looking for a wider audience - it couldn't be said to be a pirate device.

So the Rio was ruled legal and MP3 players are now widely available.

Napster - the arch-enemy

Industry lawyers have recently scored a win against the popular site MP3.com - and they are confident they will succeed in their case against their other present arch-enemy Napster (where a decision is said to be imminent).

But even if they prevail in such cases, other MP3 sites are sure to appear.


Limp Bizkit's singer Fred Durst
US band Limp Bizkit are holding a free tour backed by Napster

Finally, major labels have realised the only long-term hope of dealing with music piracy on the internet is to offer fans a legitimate, equally convenient alternative: official downloads from company sites which are paid for just as fans now pay for their music in the shops.

Starting so late, companies begin with a major disadvantage. Fans of music on the internet have already got used to the idea that music is free and will take a lot of persuading to start paying for it.

The job of persuasion is not going to be made easier by the way major record companies plan to go about offering their music.

For a start, it won't be in MP3 format. Instead, it will be delivered electronically wrapped in one of a variety of encrypted formats which paying customers will then unlock on their computers.

These formats are designed to restrict use, for example, to prevent the song being e-mailed or shared through MP3 sites. Or the use might be restricted to a specified number of plays or number of copies. These releases will certainly not be as convenient as present-day MP3s.

For a start, the music won't play on most existing portable MP3 players. Then the encryption formats aren't yet interchangeable.

For example, the encrypted songs being offered by Sony Music on its newly-launched American site will play on a new Walkman. But official downloads from other companies may not.

Encryption problems

Industry bodies hope to achieve what they call "interoperability" before long. But meanwhile, paying fans are sure to be frustrated.


PC user
The industry hopes to identify people illegally distributing music online

Worst of all for the majors, the whole encryption process may prove futile. There's a simple reason for that.

To get into our ears, the music, however encrypted, has to be decoded first. Once decoded, it can be re-recorded - from your hi-fi loudspeaker, for example. In practice, anyone who's minded to can make almost perfect unencrypted copies and post them up onto the net as MP3s.

The industry hopes it has an answer to that: a new way of electronically tagging their downloads so that, if one of their songs appears on the internet, the person who originally downloaded it can be identified and interrogated.

But for a business which relies so much on making its fans feel good, such big brother tactics may put off even the most loyal, paying fan.

Record companies would obviously prefer to persuade their fans rather than attempt to coerce them into buying their music.

What is clear is they are still yet to develop a credible relationship with fans over the internet using business models which make commercial sense to them and their customers.

They are now racing to get both in place but the history so far of shunning the internet rather than embracing it is going to make the job far harder to accomplish.

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
BBC RADIO NEWS
BBC ONE TV NEWS
WORLD NEWS SUMMARY
PROGRAMMES GUIDE
See also:

09 May 00 | Entertainment
Court blow for Napster
03 May 00 | Business
Stream Dreams
04 May 00 | Entertainment
Metallica's offline request
30 Apr 00 | Business
MP3.com to fight court ruling
29 Feb 00 | Brit Awards
Music online: The story so far
02 Mar 00 | Business
UK music 'must tackle internet'
Internet links:


The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Links to other Entertainment stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Entertainment stories