Europe South Asia Asia Pacific Americas Middle East Africa BBC Homepage World Service Education

Front Page



UK Politics







Talking Point

In Depth

On Air

Low Graphics

Saturday, February 13, 1999 Published at 10:58 GMT

Reward for the director who named names

By BBC News Online Entertainment Correspondent Tom Brook

[ image: Kazan: Honoured at the Berlin Film Festival]
Kazan: Honoured at the Berlin Film Festival
Last week's Oscars nominations did not cause too much of a stir. Yes, Jim Carrey was shut out of the best actor category and Shakespeare in Love got more nods than expected. But overall there seemed to be no great injustice. Or was there?

If you listen to Academy member Bernard Gordon, a former "blacklisted screenwriter", you will find a very different view. He is outraged that the Academy is paying tribute to one of America's foremost film-makers, 89-year-old Elia Kazan, by giving him an honorary Oscar on March 2. The decision was made unanimously by the board of the Academy early in January.

Kazan is an accomplished film-maker. He created such cinematic classics as A Streetcar named Desire (1951), On the Waterfront (1954) and East of Eden (1955). But his name will be forever linked with the dark days of the anti-Communist purges, or so-called "witch hunts" carried out by Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC).

[ image: Senator McCarthy: Led anti-Communist drive]
Senator McCarthy: Led anti-Communist drive
In April, 1952, Kazan co-operated with the Committee, admitting he had been a member of the Communist party and naming names. Among liberals in Hollywood it was seen as an act of total betrayal, adding to the hundreds of already "blacklisted" screenwriters and other professionals who were being thrown out of work.

Gordon, who says he lost studio screenwriting jobs at Universal and Warner Brothers because of the blacklist, has formed an ad hoc group, which may stage a picket outside the Academy Awards. He thinks Kazan, by collaborating with HUAC, was validating a political apparatus that in the 1950s not only destroyed careers but also suppressed dissent and created an atmosphere of fear.

The Academy does not have much sympathy with former "blacklisted" members of the Hollywood community like Gordon, who are opposed to Kazan's honorary Oscar. The president of the Academy, Robert Rehme, argues they are merely recognising Kazan's contribution as an artist, not his politics, and he sees it as time to forgive.

[ image: Bacall: Supports the award]
Bacall: Supports the award
Many celebrities, even those who were outraged by the McCarthy tactics at the time, have also now softened their views. Among them is Lauren Bacall who thinks Kazan deserves the Oscar. "He's a great director. He's made some incredible, unforgettable, everlasting films...and it's recognition for work after all."

But not everyone thinks you can compartmentalise Kazan's art and separate it from his political actions. There have been impassioned editorials in the past few days in American newspapers which point out that Kazan was, undeniably, a great cinematic artist. But he also made a lot of art impossible by naming names and collaborating with a "witch-hunt" that did not just destroy careers but prevented hundreds of potential scripts, performances and films from coming to fruition.

The compartmentalisation defense invoked by Kazan's supporters is extremely topical. President Clinton's loyal aides have invoked the same reasoning. They maintain that the president's behaviour in the Lewinsky affair has nothing to do with his abilities to govern as commander-in-chief.

Similarly, a debate is raging in Illinois over the state's decision to bar a fully qualified lawyer from practicing law because he is an outspoken white supremacist. His defenders say his racist views have nothing to do with his abilities as a lawyer.

Kazan's case is aided by the end of the Cold War. The release of Soviet archives has shown that McCarthy, although driven by anti-Communist paranoia, may have been right, because there were far more Soviet spies operating in America than many had believed.

This historical revisionism enables Kazan's act of "naming names" to be seen as a much less egregious act. In fact, the ailing film maker remains proud of what he did and has said that he would do it again.

Personally, the Academy's embrace of Elia Kazan leaves me uncomfortable. An honorary Oscar will put Kazan in the stratosphere occupied by such legends as Buster Keaton, Greta Garbo and Orson Welles. Yes, Kazan is a great filmmaker, but he has already won two Oscars for Gentleman's Agreement and On the Waterfront. Why single out a man for honour whose public actions added to the destructive climate of fear and suppression that stifled so much creative freedom in Hollywood?

Tom Brook writes this regular entertainment column exclusively for BBC News Online.

A well-known BBC entertainment correspondent, Tom has lived in New York and travelled extensively in the US for the past 20 years.

He has reported on cinema throughout his broadcasting career - interviewing most of the top Hollywood stars and directors and attending nearly all the Oscar ceremonies in the past 15 years while keeping up with new trends in mainstream and independent cinema.

Advanced options | Search tips

Back to top | BBC News Home | BBC Homepage | ©

Relevant Stories

09 Feb 99 | Entertainment
Brits go to Hollywood

09 Feb 99 | Entertainment
Going for a gong

09 Feb 99 | Entertainment
Full list of Oscar nominees

In this section

US TV's sweeps madness

Jewel rides into town

Omega breaks Hollywood code

Scorsese's still a winner

Showdown at the Fight Club

Holy Smoke: Winslet's back

Festival gripped by Dogme

Sam steals the show in Toronto

Rappers move into the movies

Mirren's unlikely comeback

US networks accused of racism

Brosnan bonds with McQueen role

Trailers become main attraction