As one Westminster wag put it, Tony Lloyd is not even a household name in
his own household. He is one of life's natural Ministers of State. He is
a decent, hard-working, largely unremarkable minister. Or rather he was.
Unremarkable, that is.
Thanks to the assorted forces of Sandline, Sierra
Leone, President Kabbah, Foreign Office civil servants, various rebels
and mercenaries, the Conservatives, Robin Cook, Tony Blair, and the
British media -- Mr Lloyd is much more famous than he ever dreamed he
might be. And all for the wrong reasons.
Mr Lloyd is the minister in charge of African matters. It is his
responsibility to know whether British companies are illegally sending
arms to foreign countries. It is also his responsibility to know whether
any such companies are under official investigation for alleged breaches
of United Nations embargos. Discharging those responsibilities depends on
one crucial factor, namely the co-operation of officials. Without that,
the minister is hopelessly adrift.
The Foreign Office is rightly proud of its reputation as a
breeding-ground for high-quality officials. Its ministers are always kept
informed of relevant details, they say. Keeping ministers informed, in
turn, depends on one crucial factor, namely the willingness of ministers
to read their papers. In full. Mr Cook, the Foreign Secretary, rather
foolishly boasted in a recent television programme that it is quite
possible to be a successful Foreign Secretary "without finishing the
paperwork", or some such phrase. It plainly is not possible.
Mr Lloyd, his junior, has suffered from the other problem. He was not
given sufficient information on which to base a judgement. He addressed
MPs while ignorant of the fact that Customs and Excise were investigating
the activities of Sandline. He says he was never told of the
investigation. Sir John Kerr, the top civil servant at the Foreign
Office, initially contradicted this and said that Mr Lloyd had, in fact,
been briefed. Sir John, widely described as having a Rolls-Royce brain,
then had to execute an ugly U-turn and admit that his memory had let him
down.
This was the week's most farcical event in Whitehall terms. For Sir John
to admit that Mr Lloyd had not, in fact, been fully briefed before his
appearance in the Commons was stunning. It was a clear signal that
officials had let ministers down, and a useful explanation as to why Mr
Blair and Mr Cook have been much more cocky in recent days about the
whole affair.
For the ultimate verdict on what went on, we will still have to wait for
the Customs investigation to take its course, and the Foreign Office
investigation after that. But it now seems clear that ministers
themselves will not be fingered.
Right there in the firing line are the civil servants themselves.
Ministers have a vested interest in making sure they are not brutally
attacked, but the criticism (if there is any) will be very public indeed.
Relations between civil servants at the Foreign Office and Mr Cook's team
are, I am told, not particularly good. This episode will not have helped
matters, and there's no sign of any immediate improvement.
Mr Blair, meanwhile, insists that Mr Cook is an "excellent" Foreign
Secretary, in whom he has "full confidence". In Westminster terms, the
need for these frequent assurances of "support" is normally a less than
encouraging sign.