[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Wednesday, 8 August 2007, 09:21 GMT 10:21 UK
Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'
Twenty pound note
A High Court case could change the way banks do business
Bank customers do not want monthly account fees even if it spells the end of penalty charges, a survey suggests.

The High Court is due to decide in a test case whether the level of penalty charges made by banks is lawful.

If the banks lose, some fear they may try to recoup money with monthly fees or by charging for each transaction.

A YouGov survey of 2,116 people for website Moneysupermarket.com suggested just 8% wanted a regular fee with 1% wanting a charge for each transaction.

At the moment, people can be charged as much as 35 for going overdrawn without authorisation or for having a direct debit refused.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is investigating the current penalty charges system.

Pay-per-transaction

Some experts suggest that the money from these charges essentially subsidises the accounts of people who did not incur them.

We have already seen some providers abandon the concept of free banking by steadily introducing a bevy of charges on their less profitable customers
Kevin Mountford
moneysupermarket.com

Kevin Mountford, head of current accounts at moneysupermarket.com, said free banking was possible "largely because of the number of people who are hit with fees and charges".

If this was outlawed, a pay-per-transaction system - as used in many other countries - could be introduced in the UK.

"We could well see the system prevalent in Western Europe, North America and Australia, where there are a certain number of free transactions and then you pay for any additional ones," Mr Mountford said.

"We have already seen some providers abandon the concept of free banking by steadily introducing a bevy of charges on their less profitable customers."

The introduction of such transaction charges could lead to a change in the spending habits of people used to making cash withdrawals or multiple card transactions, he added.

Court action

There has been a growing consumer campaign against bank charges.

Tens of thousands of bank customers have threatened to take their current account provider to court for the return of bank charges.

They have argued that the charges are excessive and breach consumer law.

To date the banks have avoided taking on consumers head-on in court.

Instead, banks have preferred to pay-up or have simply not turned-up to court hearings.

Therefore, the OFT, with the agreement of the banks, has decided to take a test case over the scale and legality of their charges to court.

If the OFT wins it could lead to hundreds of millions of pounds in bank charges being returned to customers.

However, if the banks win it will effectively bring the issue to a close and enshrine their right to levy charges on people who go into unauthorised overdraft.

VOTE RESULTS
How should banks cover the cost of their services?
With penalty charges
 56.15% 
With monthly account fees
 12.34% 
By transaction charges
 10.09% 
With an alternative charge
 21.42% 
7642 Votes Cast
Results are indicative and may not reflect public opinion


RELATED INTERNET LINKS
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites



FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific