[an error occurred while processing this directive]
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
Last Updated: Thursday, 8 March 2007, 16:57 GMT
Private equity tax rules examined
Birds Eye fish fingers
Private equity firm Permira bought Birds Eye for 1.1bn last year
The government is to review possible new curbs on the tax treatment of firms involved in private equity deals.

But the Treasury stopped short of a wholesale review of the way debt is treated within the tax system.

Private equity companies use clients' money and borrowed money to buy whole companies and try to turn them around.

Critics dismiss such firms as asset strippers, but Gordon Brown has praised their ability to create jobs quickly and contribute to the economy.

Private equity deals recently hit the headlines amid news that a group was about to target supermarket group Sainsbury's, while leveraged buyouts have been used to acquire big-name firms such as Birds Eye, Madame Tussauds and the AA.

Treasury minister Ed Balls announced government plans to review the private equity sector during a speech at the London School of Economics.

Shareholder debt

He said the review would look at the tax benefits of shareholder debt - a commonly used component of private equity deals - to ensure tax rules were working.

He added the review would look at fears that investors in private equity groups were getting unfair tax breaks on their "shareholder debt" by disguising equity as debt.

"Concerns have been raised with the Treasury that something further may in some cases be occurring - in particular, that 'shareholder debt' is replacing the equity element in highly-leveraged private equity funding arrangements.

"This shareholder debt is a form of equity that is treated as debt for tax purposes, giving these arrangements a tax advantage that is inconsistent with the principle that interest is a business expense."

'Unfair' move

But Mr Balls added that the Treasury had "no plans" to examine the tax-deductible status of interest, which critics had called for.

Such a move would have crippled private equity groups, as they borrow heavily to finance their deals.

Mr Balls argued that it would be unfair to make such a move as other companies also use this tax benefit, which is also an international practise.

"The question has been raised in recent weeks as to whether our tax system gives an unfair advantage to private equity over other forms of ownership - in particular, as a result of the tax-deductibility of interest," he said.

"There is, of course, nothing specific to private equity in the tax-deductibility of interest. Any kind of company can claim it."


SEE ALSO
Openness code for private equity
02 Mar 07 |  Business
Private equity boss defends role
23 Feb 07 |  Business
Private equity 'on crest of wave'
15 Feb 07 |  Business
CBI defends private equity firms
14 Feb 07 |  Business
Rival suitor 'eyeing Sainsbury's'
06 Feb 07 |  Business
Private equity deals 'hit record'
29 Jan 07 |  Business



FEATURES, VIEWS, ANALYSIS
Has China's housing bubble burst?
How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire
Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit

PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Americas Africa Europe Middle East South Asia Asia Pacific